So no, it was Russian under-development, rapid industrialization using militarization of the economy, the failure to grasp that while states can concentrate capital to form industries they must immediately be managerially privatized or they turn parasitic. That is a law of econ.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4
Theme: Productivity
-
So no, it was Russian under-development, rapid industrialization using militariz
-
There is no evidence of that. And I am certain I now the economics of it better
There is no evidence of that. And I am certain I now the economics of it better than you do. The quality declined rapidly generation by generation as people learned ‘to do the minimum’. Only the military could function and did. Hence your instincts of militarization of economics.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-21 19:16:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285654799032213505
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285654239365214210
-
There is no evidence of that. And I am certain I now the economics of it better
There is no evidence of that. And I am certain I now the economics of it better than you do. The quality declined rapidly generation by generation as people learned ‘to do the minimum’. Only the military could function and did. Hence your instincts of militarization of economics.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
Russia had about the same # people, more resources, but Russian people are low t
Russia had about the same # people, more resources, but Russian people are low trust, lazy, production quality was trash, and (STILL) can’t form large organizations because of low trust. (same as Muslims). Russians used cheap(forced) labor, US/CN used credit. Incentives mattered.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-21 19:11:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285653540682321920
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285652681542053890
-
Russia had about the same # people, more resources, but Russian people are low t
Russia had about the same # people, more resources, but Russian people are low trust, lazy, production quality was trash, and (STILL) can’t form large organizations because of low trust. (same as Muslims). Russians used cheap(forced) labor, US/CN used credit. Incentives mattered.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
Yes, you disagree, you haven’t learned from the failures of the past (china has:
Yes, you disagree, you haven’t learned from the failures of the past (china has: nationalsm+state capitalism+to catch up). And so have we (nationalism + state capitalism to stay ahead). Russia is poor so it can’t take either path and will have to return to forced labor. Simple.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-21 18:52:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285648830076276736
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285648189467525120
-
Yes, you disagree, you haven’t learned from the failures of the past (china has:
Yes, you disagree, you haven’t learned from the failures of the past (china has: nationalsm+state capitalism+to catch up). And so have we (nationalism + state capitalism to stay ahead). Russia is poor so it can’t take either path and will have to return to forced labor. Simple.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
So what are we doing to debate then? Adaptive innovative, mixed economies, versu
So what are we doing to debate then? Adaptive innovative, mixed economies, versus a repetition of the soviet and Russian failures of the past? is this a debate over prices and incentives again? What is there to debate other than another promise ‘this time will be different’?
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-21 18:49:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285648108991512581
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285647263914696705
-
So what are we doing to debate then? Adaptive innovative, mixed economies, versu
So what are we doing to debate then? Adaptive innovative, mixed economies, versus a repetition of the soviet and Russian failures of the past? is this a debate over prices and incentives again? What is there to debate other than another promise ‘this time will be different’?
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
German advtg is the banking and auto industry, it’s net exports to the rest of E
German advtg is the banking and auto industry, it’s net exports to the rest of Europe that will shortly end bc of Impossible benefits vs Demographic collapse and aging. France has the only military in Europe and still seeks rule. Poland won’t take charge. Russia must expand. END.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-19 19:57:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284940520406618112
Reply addressees: @bierlingm @MBJolnas @mpigliucci
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284937646486310912