Theme: Productivity

  • (I find if I don’t use social media i’m more productive but my prose is more sel

    (I find if I don’t use social media i’m more productive but my prose is more self directed)


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 18:39:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358123064077152257

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @ThruTheHayes @Airmanareiks

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358121930734338048

  • The Negative Value of Non STEM+EL Degrees

    Because 1) humanities grads must learn on the job, the skills that are taught in STEM fields- and eventually do 2) must ‘unlearn’ what they were taught was false – and eventually do 3) and the net difference is that non-STEM education cost was a LOSS, and STEM students earned it. There is never, ever a comparison between a conversation with a physicist, engineer, or economist that is vapid as someone in the humanities. It is however, more pleasant going through life in secular theology of the humanities, just as more blissful in supernatural theology. Very few people (relatively) get stem degrees. The disturbing reality is that despite the vast number of people put thru higher education the number of top talent, the marginal difference in theory, and innovations hasn’t increased since 63. Lower return on ed vs reproduction. So what’s ‘wrong’? The measure of any discipline is (a) reproducibility of research (b) survivability of claims and skills in time (c) demonstrated evidence of resulting productivity (d) improvement or decline in competency per person (e) non- substitutability by apprenticeship. So? How many disciplines dont fail? Better yet, what if Universities and professors had to warranty students for occupational fitness upon award of degree or return the educational funds to students? What would happen is that we would drop back to 10-12% of population. All of this is common knowledge in economics. All we have done is dumb down high school degrees, eliminate cheap vocational(manual) and junior(clerical-medical) training, in exchange for impoverishing parents in old age, delaying homeownership, and gutting reproduction. Gutting reproduction while causing declining productivity generates demand for immigration to pay for medical and retirement costs of people who were deprived of children and consequential consumption, causing a continuous reduction in the competitiveness of the economy. And that’s BEFORE we talk about the fact that colleges are teaching a secular religion of false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe: marxism-postmodernism-pc/woke – that is marching through the institutions of cultural production and maintenance. Why? to feed higher ed. And if you were skilled in physics, economics, cognitive science, and not yourself indoctrinated into the social construction of false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe you would know this. But your keep perpetuating these lies like a priesthood justifying faith.
  • The Negative Value of Non STEM+EL Degrees

    Because 1) humanities grads must learn on the job, the skills that are taught in STEM fields- and eventually do 2) must ‘unlearn’ what they were taught was false – and eventually do 3) and the net difference is that non-STEM education cost was a LOSS, and STEM students earned it. There is never, ever a comparison between a conversation with a physicist, engineer, or economist that is vapid as someone in the humanities. It is however, more pleasant going through life in secular theology of the humanities, just as more blissful in supernatural theology. Very few people (relatively) get stem degrees. The disturbing reality is that despite the vast number of people put thru higher education the number of top talent, the marginal difference in theory, and innovations hasn’t increased since 63. Lower return on ed vs reproduction. So what’s ‘wrong’? The measure of any discipline is (a) reproducibility of research (b) survivability of claims and skills in time (c) demonstrated evidence of resulting productivity (d) improvement or decline in competency per person (e) non- substitutability by apprenticeship. So? How many disciplines dont fail? Better yet, what if Universities and professors had to warranty students for occupational fitness upon award of degree or return the educational funds to students? What would happen is that we would drop back to 10-12% of population. All of this is common knowledge in economics. All we have done is dumb down high school degrees, eliminate cheap vocational(manual) and junior(clerical-medical) training, in exchange for impoverishing parents in old age, delaying homeownership, and gutting reproduction. Gutting reproduction while causing declining productivity generates demand for immigration to pay for medical and retirement costs of people who were deprived of children and consequential consumption, causing a continuous reduction in the competitiveness of the economy. And that’s BEFORE we talk about the fact that colleges are teaching a secular religion of false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe: marxism-postmodernism-pc/woke – that is marching through the institutions of cultural production and maintenance. Why? to feed higher ed. And if you were skilled in physics, economics, cognitive science, and not yourself indoctrinated into the social construction of false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe you would know this. But your keep perpetuating these lies like a priesthood justifying faith.
  • My company did ‘white papers’ for certain high profile tech companies when it wa

    My company did ‘white papers’ for certain high profile tech companies when it was impolitic to produce them internally.
    The most interesting being the utility of indian tech labor (ack).


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 16:51:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358095904197197829

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @ThruTheHayes @Airmanareiks

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358082628608536578

  • UNIVERSITIES DON’T TEACH. THEY SORT BY WORK CAPACITY, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, AND IQ.

    UNIVERSITIES DON’T TEACH. THEY SORT BY WORK CAPACITY, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, AND IQ.

    You pay 150k in debt, four years of earning, four years of life, one or two fewer children, delayed homeownership, on what’s nothing more than a class, personality, and IQ test. That’s all it is. There is no evidence you learn anything in university unless it’s math, comp-sci, or engineering, that can’t be taught part-time in two years or less. The rest is ‘recreation’ or ‘indoctrination’.

    Now, you will find that ceo’s tend to the 130 iq range for deterministic reasons (I have an undergrad in art history and founded a dozen companies). And demand for ceo talent varies dramatically by sector. Some are political (GM), some technical, some engineering, some finance.

    The difference is that they have 130 plus IQ’s, and have high conscientiousness, and can work harder than most people can imagine it’s possible to work, have extraordinary endurance, high pain tolerance – especially psychological. It’s equivalent to being a professional athlete.

    So your argument is well-intentioned but false: one’s chances of becoming a fortune X ceo have nothing at all to do with education. Just as almost everything in life has to do with one’s social and economic market value: determined by fitness, manners, conscientiousness, & IQ.

    If you study for example Harvard, Yale, Georgetown, and Stanford JD courses it’s postmodern drivel. It’s intellectually embarrassing. If you study at a state school or just read the literature, and apprentice (in the past) you’d do better.

    Universities don’t teach. They Sort. That’s all they do.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 16:49:08 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105685329373852063

  • The difference is that they have 130 plus IQ’s, and have high conscientiousness,

    The difference is that they have 130 plus IQ’s, and have high conscientiousness, and can work harder than most people can imagine it’s possible to work, have extraordinary endurance, high pain tolerance – especially psychological. It’s equivalent to being a professional athlete.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 16:37:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358092510078275587

    Reply addressees: @SarahGrynpas @AlanLevinovitz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358092033018245121


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @SarahGrynpas @AlanLevinovitz Now, you will find that ceo’s tend to the 130 iq range for deterministic reasons (I have an undergrad in art history and founded a dozen companies). And demand for ceo talent varies dramatically by sector. Some are political (GM), some technical, some engineering, some finance.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1358092033018245121

  • Now, you will find that ceo’s tend to the 130 iq range for deterministic reasons

    Now, you will find that ceo’s tend to the 130 iq range for deterministic reasons (I have an undergrad in art history and founded a dozen companies). And demand for ceo talent varies dramatically by sector. Some are political (GM), some technical, some engineering, some finance.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 16:35:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358092033018245121

    Reply addressees: @SarahGrynpas @AlanLevinovitz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358091391331692547


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @SarahGrynpas @AlanLevinovitz And yes I’m probably the leading thinker in legal, economic, and economic reform because I understand very thoroughly the difference between politeness and fraud.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1358091391331692547

  • Because 1) humanities grads must learn on the job, the skills that are taught in

    Because 1) humanities grads must learn on the job, the skills that are taught in STEM fields- and eventually do 2) must ‘unlearn’ what they were taught was false – and eventually do 3) and the net difference is that non-STEM education cost was a LOSS, and STEM students earned it.

    There is never, ever a comparison between a conversation with a physicist, engineer, or economist that is vapid as someone in the humanities. It is however, more pleasant going through life in secular theology of the humanities, just as more blissful in supernatural theology.

    Very few people (relatively) get stem degrees. The disturbing reality is that despite the vast number of people put thru higher education the number of top talent, the marginal difference in theory, and innovations hasn’t increased since 63. Lower return on ed vs reproduction. So what’s ‘wrong’?

    The measure of any discipline is (a) reproducibility of research (b) survivability of claims and skills in time (c) demonstrated evidence of resulting productivity (d) improvement or decline in competency per person (e) non- substitutability by apprenticeship.

    So? How many disciplines dont fail? Better yet, what if Universities and professors had to warranty students for occupational fitness upon award of degree or return the educational funds to students? What would happen is that we would drop back to 10-12% of population.

    All of this is common knowledge in economics. All we have done is dumb down high school degrees, eliminate cheap vocational(manual) and junior(clerical-medical) training, in exchange for impoverishing parents in old age, delaying homeownership, and gutting reproduction.

    Gutting reproduction while causing declining productivity generates demand for immigration to pay for medical and retirement costs of people who were deprived of children and consequential consumption, causing a continuous reduction in the competitiveness of the economy.

    And that’s BEFORE we talk about the fact that colleges are teaching a secular religion of false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe: marxism-postmodernism-pc/woke – that is marching through the institutions of cultural production and maintenance. Why? to feed higher ed.

    And if you were skilled in physics, economics, cognitive science, and not yourself indoctrinated into the social construction of false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe you would know this. But your keep perpetuating these lies like a priesthood justifying faith.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 16:15:58 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105685198973302635

  • Gutting reproduction while causing declining productivity generates demand for i

    Gutting reproduction while causing declining productivity generates demand for immigration to pay for medical and retirement costs of people who were deprived of children and consequential consumption, causing a continuous reduction in the competitiveness of the economy.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 16:06:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358084637214400512

    Reply addressees: @SarahGrynpas @ChrisJKennedy @AlanLevinovitz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358084336990507010


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @SarahGrynpas @ChrisJKennedy @AlanLevinovitz All of this is common knowledge in the economics. All we have done is dumb down high school degrees, eliminate cheap vocational(manual) and junior(clerical-medical) training, in echange for impoverishing parents in old age, delaying home ownership, and gutting reproduction.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1358084336990507010

  • All of this is common knowledge in the economics. All we have done is dumb down

    All of this is common knowledge in the economics. All we have done is dumb down high school degrees, eliminate cheap vocational(manual) and junior(clerical-medical) training, in echange for impoverishing parents in old age, delaying home ownership, and gutting reproduction.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 16:05:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358084336990507010

    Reply addressees: @SarahGrynpas @ChrisJKennedy @AlanLevinovitz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358083797976289286


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @SarahGrynpas @ChrisJKennedy @AlanLevinovitz So? How many disciplines dont fail? Better yet, what if Universities and professors had to warranty students for occupational fitness upon award of degree or return the educational funds to students? What would happen is that we would drop back to 10-12% of population.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1358083797976289286