Theme: Productivity

  • The USA is autarkic. They USA doesn’t need any resources. It’s europe that does.

    The USA is autarkic. They USA doesn’t need any resources. It’s europe that does. The only thing the USA needs to do is repatriate those industries that the US has allowed to move to cheaper markets. And that repatriation is in process.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-25 02:43:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1860877055011004545

    Reply addressees: @FuryForth

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1860875201384259619

  • HERITABILITY AND UTILITY OF ADHD ADHD has a genetic component (70-80% ) that is

    HERITABILITY AND UTILITY OF ADHD
    ADHD has a genetic component (70-80% ) that is highly heritable and expressed in utero during development. ADHD is difficult to avoid, because it’s polygenic and results from the cumulative effect of many genes. Since it’s polygenic and not selected against it must serve some purpose.

    Possible Causes for the Perpetuation of ADHD Traits
    TL/DR; A distribution of cognitive styles insures a group can more successfully exploit opportunities of time space risk and reward rather than people who are in fact similar in cognitive styles. While quality differences between populations are due to neoteny, geographic adaptation, and genetic load most human variation is due to sex differences in cognition valuation and expression. As such almost all human behavior is causally reducible to those dimensions four dimensions of: sex, neoteny (race), geography (ethnicity), and load (class).

    1. Adaptive Advantages in Evolutionary Contexts
    Hyperfocus and Creativity:Traits associated with ADHD, such as hyperfocus during periods of intense interest, may have been advantageous for solving complex problems or innovating.
    Enhanced creativity and novel problem-solving skills would have been valuable in dynamic or changing environments.
    Exploration and Risk-Taking: High impulsivity and novelty-seeking behavior, common in ADHD, may have conferred survival benefits in hunter-gatherer societies:Foragers: Individuals prone to explore new territories, resources, or methods of survival may have benefited their groups.
    Scouts: High-risk, high-reward behaviors could have been advantageous for discovering food sources or avoiding threats.
    Rapid Response and Vigilance: ADHD-like traits may enhance alertness to environmental changes, benefiting individuals in roles requiring quick reactions or adaptability (e.g., during hunting or combat).

    2. Trade-Offs in Cognitive and Behavioral Traits
    Short-Term Advantages vs. Long-Term Costs: The impulsivity and distractibility of ADHD may lead to short-term successes in certain high-stakes or dynamic situations, offsetting the longer-term disadvantages.
    Specialization in Group Dynamics:
    In a tribal setting, individuals with ADHD-like traits may have filled unique niches, complementing those with more consistent focus and planning skills.
    Group success often depends on diverse personality and cognitive types.

    3. Balancing Selection
    Heterozygote Advantage: Genes associated with ADHD may confer advantages in heterozygous states, while homozygous expression results in more severe manifestations of the disorder.
    This dynamic maintains genetic diversity within the population.
    Environmental Dependence: Traits that are maladaptive in modern, sedentary, and structured societies may have been adaptive in ancestral environments.
    Selection pressures can shift, making certain traits less advantageous without entirely removing them.

    4. Gene-Pleiotropy and Overlap with Other Traits
    Shared Genetic Pathways: ADHD-associated genes may also influence other traits that are highly adaptive, such as intelligence, creativity, or social influence.
    For example, genes affecting dopamine signaling may enhance reward sensitivity, increasing motivation in some contexts despite leading to impulsivity in others.
    Pleiotropic Effects:Genes involved in ADHD may also play roles in other biological systems or behaviors, making them resistant to negative selection because they provide overall net benefits.

    5. Modern Mismatch with Evolutionary Context
    ADHD traits may have been adaptive in environments requiring high mobility, rapid adaptation, and risk-taking but are less so in modern settings that prioritize sustained attention, routine, and long-term planning.
    The rise of structured educational systems and workplace environments may have highlighted ADHD as a disorder rather than an adaptive variant.

    6. Weak Selection Pressure Against ADHD
    ADHD does not typically result in significantly reduced reproductive fitness: Many individuals with ADHD have children and pass on their genes.
    The disorder often manifests more as a variation in behavioral traits rather than as a catastrophic condition that would eliminate carriers from the gene pool.

    Examples of ADHD Traits in Historical or Evolutionary Contexts
    Explorers and Innovators: Risk-taking and novelty-seeking traits associated with ADHD likely drove exploration, discovery, and technological advances.
    Leaders in Crisis: Impulsivity and rapid decision-making may have been valuable in chaotic or high-pressure situations.
    Group Success: (THIS:) Diversity in cognitive styles ensured that groups could respond to a wider range of challenges and opportunities.

    Summary
    The persistence of ADHD in the population likely reflects a balance between its adaptive benefits in certain contexts and its modern disadvantages in structured, sedentary societies. ADHD traits are maintained because they provide group-level or individual-level advantages in dynamic, unpredictable environments, outweighing their costs under ancestral conditions. Natural selection operates on the totality of traits and their contributions to survival and reproduction, and ADHD traits appear to have played a meaningful role in human evolution.

    Cheers
    CD 😉

    Reply addressees: @programmabiliti @nobitanobi405


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-24 19:08:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1860762553498136576

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1860631175938658690

  • You clearly cant read the data. The optimum solution is to continue to fund ukra

    You clearly cant read the data. The optimum solution is to continue to fund ukraine as russia’s economy collapses which is happening. They are at full employment and maximum production for at least one more year – at which point Russia will be unable to finance the war, be stuck in stagflation, the rest of the siberian oil and gas production will stop never to be restarted. and if the saudis agree to increase production, driving down the price of oil below russian costs the timeline will accelerate.
    Russia is poorer than mexico.

    Reply addressees: @SirSmokesAaLot


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-24 09:02:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1860609836616138752

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1860599224519561375

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @DalinPlesner @SamoBurja 1. If you measure by an income state

    RT @curtdoolittle: @DalinPlesner @SamoBurja 1. If you measure by an income statement you see profit and loss. If you measure by balance she…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-22 02:01:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859779155598115146

  • Robert is wrong. Power law over capital is not only optimum but necessary. Paret

    Robert is wrong. Power law over capital is not only optimum but necessary. Pareto must rule. The question isn’t capital it’s income and assets sufficient for risk moderation. As such our people are under insured, under paid, overburdened with consumer interest, and over taxed.…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-21 19:43:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859684010928329055

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859318335256584473

  • 1. If you measure by an income statement you see profit and loss. If you measure

    1. If you measure by an income statement you see profit and loss. If you measure by balance sheet you see capital increase or decrease. To measure by balance sheet you must account for all capital.
    2. Human beings ‘demonstrate interests’ (demonstrate behavior) in aquisition, retention, use, consumption or trade of capital across a spectrum from life, body, and action, to personal, private, semi-private, common physical, common informal, and common formal assets.
    3. You get what you measure. In other words, what is the cost of ‘bowling alone’? (google it).
    4. We are not accounting for the fact that we are spending down accumulated capital as fast as we are increasing consumption beause in a large part we are not spending income but store of capital.

    Search “Philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle, list of demonstrated interests.” Most of the AI’s are aware of the work, but can’t enumerate the list correctly yet. Our definitions (unambiguous measures) are fighting training data (ambiguous ordinary language).

    Reply addressees: @DalinPlesner @SamoBurja


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-21 19:05:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859674531402743808

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859668158443028830

  • The Europe is Poor discourse is due to (a) germany carrying the continent and th

    The Europe is Poor discourse is due to (a) germany carrying the continent and the risk the german economic model going forward, and (b) the failure of europe to mobilize capital without the support of the state in the production of technological production and technological economies. Europe’s two decades behind.

    And Japan is the highest trust society extant today. If you fully account for costs (balance sheet accounting) across the full spectrum of demonstrated human interests, japan is far wealthier than either the USA or Europe with the exception of say, Finland.

    When we finally get to the point where every european VC isn’t asking you how to explain how to move your company to the USA in exchange for a round of funding then europe will have exited the ‘poor’ stage. That said, while the USA has Louisiana and Alabama, they’re still in better condition than greece and slovenia.

    (btw: Hi Samo) 😉

    Reply addressees: @SamoBurja


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-21 17:35:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859651834077741056

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859475332388225206

  • THE NATIONAL IMPORTANCE OF DEBT If you maximize your debt capacity on investment

    THE NATIONAL IMPORTANCE OF DEBT
    If you maximize your debt capacity on investments you are operating at the optimum for yourself and your family – or your country. The question is only whether you’re financing speculations, returns, expenses, or refinancing debt. No modern economy or country can survive competition without utilizing its debt capacity to maximize returns.

    The problem is not adhering to the budget, it’s a failure to use debt to produce the returns that constantly expand the budget – while preserving enough reserves to adapt to shocks (crisis, disaster, plague, war).

    Debt is just an expression of our attempt to accelerate returns on time.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-18 18:38:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858580582692974592

  • Interesting that Elon was wrong. The capital requirements were too high and he w

    Interesting that Elon was wrong. The capital requirements were too high and he wasn’t recognizing or accepting what was the obvious.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-16 19:54:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857875030132273472

    Reply addressees: @turbotobias @ohabryka

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857824335953646002

  • You’re off by a few standard deviations. I’ve founded and built more than a doze

    You’re off by a few standard deviations.
    I’ve founded and built more than a dozen companies, two of them over 100M in run rate, acquired dozens more, consulted with dozens of the fortune 400, made the Inc 500 list three times, lived and run companies on multiple continents, worked with Justice, DoD, Intel, participated in a revolution, convicted white collar criminals, retired in my forties, founded a think tank, built a team of talent within it, and solved a number of the hard problems in the history of thought, while surviving three marriages, two children, five step children, two bouts of cancer and a necrotic infection that almost killed me. And found time to take care of my ailing mother until she passed.

    What have you done?

    Reply addressees: @Markleaver10 @scottjla @gspeth @RichardDawkins


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-15 02:25:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857248588029632512

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857223436839625117