Theme: Productivity

  • Yes it would. That said, only separaration between the dysgenic and hyperconsump

    Yes it would. That said, only separaration between the dysgenic and hyperconsumptive cognitively female (left) and the eugenic hyper capitalizing cognitively male (right) appears possible and necessary because there’s no longer need for compromise. It’s time for national divorce.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-24 21:16:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452383547336138759

    Reply addressees: @entoliberal @DorianGray321 @GoyKeane

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452382954370572289

  • This isn’t true. It’s the economic productivity that inserts women without child

    This isn’t true. It’s the economic productivity that inserts women without children into the economy, voting pool, and political structure. Every culture I can find goes through it.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-24 19:15:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452353109305479169

    Reply addressees: @LucioMM1 @KoenigJojo @2020Blackstone

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452352886428651534

  • That’s the thing. Mother nature can’t do her job. The market is the evolutionary

    That’s the thing. Mother nature can’t do her job. The market is the evolutionary substitute for mother nature. If you can’t survive in your market then evolution (mother nature) has done her job.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-24 18:26:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452340663857688587

    Reply addressees: @archon_killer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452339336473686020

  • Japan has 60% of our population but an equal number of smart people. China has f

    Japan has 60% of our population but an equal number of smart people. China has five times our number. The ‘smart fraction provides 100% of competitive advantage. Because that’s what ‘smart’ means: rapid adaptation with limited information and rehearsal.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-24 18:25:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452340361779687426

    Reply addressees: @Substr8Monopoly @StruanCurtis

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452339620449030150

  • The Restoration of Marriage as A Business Venture

    THE RESTORATION OF MARRIAGE AS A BUSINESS VENTURE (The end of the luxury good of romantic marriage.)

    1. The historical reason for pairing off. (Hunter-Gatherer)

    2. The historical reason for Marriage (agrarianism and property)

    3. The Invention of Romanic Love (The Plague). Romantic Love as we understand it was INVENTED and not that long ago. Marriage is a business proposition. If it isn’t it’s pointless to produce a corporation (which is what marriage consists of) instead of simply engaging in a market exchange until the opportunity’s exhausted.

    4. The invention of Chivalry ( trade restoration, viking age, pre-state formation, )

    5. The Invention of Female-On-A-Pedestal (Industrial Revolution)

    6. Evolution of marriage relations and the value of the sexes and an Illustration of why the separation of church, law, and state are so important

    7.  The pre and postware capture of the church by the Jewish invasion of the academy, converting it from Christian cooperation to Jewish conflict and undermining

    8. So we are stuck with the future where debt, economy, geostrategy, political systems, … and without a reformation that cannot be produced by an authority like the church, but must include the science, law, economics, AND moral narrative that makes us survive. Marriage is the first corporation, developed under agrarianism, which began the possibility of the accumulation of capital or what we call complex ‘property’, and the resulting far more complex common property that was then possible – the institutions of cultural production of cooperation destpie sex, class, age, family, clan, tribe and national differences. And that’s what relationships consist of: opportunities for reciprocal exchange, by the only condition in life where you can exchange putting another’s interests ahead of yours, because they are polar opposites. Exhaust opportunity, resource, or charge. It’s just physics. Sorry. This is a little closer to the voice I’m developing now that we’ve ended the century of romantic love. I think that’s the direction I want to work on, because that’s where I sense we are headed. The romantic dream American dream enlightenment dream all end together. Yep.   We have a lot of relationship mythology to unlearn – and most of it was developed during the victorian era, but not practiced until later, just like the chivalric nonsense wasn’t practiced until far later. These are class mythos sold to uplifted lower classes.

  • The Restoration of Marriage as A Business Venture

    THE RESTORATION OF MARRIAGE AS A BUSINESS VENTURE (The end of the luxury good of romantic marriage.)

    1. The historical reason for pairing off. (Hunter-Gatherer)

    2. The historical reason for Marriage (agrarianism and property)

    3. The Invention of Romanic Love (The Plague). Romantic Love as we understand it was INVENTED and not that long ago. Marriage is a business proposition. If it isn’t it’s pointless to produce a corporation (which is what marriage consists of) instead of simply engaging in a market exchange until the opportunity’s exhausted.

    4. The invention of Chivalry ( trade restoration, viking age, pre-state formation, )

    5. The Invention of Female-On-A-Pedestal (Industrial Revolution)

    6. Evolution of marriage relations and the value of the sexes and an Illustration of why the separation of church, law, and state are so important

    7.  The pre and postware capture of the church by the Jewish invasion of the academy, converting it from Christian cooperation to Jewish conflict and undermining

    8. So we are stuck with the future where debt, economy, geostrategy, political systems, … and without a reformation that cannot be produced by an authority like the church, but must include the science, law, economics, AND moral narrative that makes us survive. Marriage is the first corporation, developed under agrarianism, which began the possibility of the accumulation of capital or what we call complex ‘property’, and the resulting far more complex common property that was then possible – the institutions of cultural production of cooperation destpie sex, class, age, family, clan, tribe and national differences. And that’s what relationships consist of: opportunities for reciprocal exchange, by the only condition in life where you can exchange putting another’s interests ahead of yours, because they are polar opposites. Exhaust opportunity, resource, or charge. It’s just physics. Sorry. This is a little closer to the voice I’m developing now that we’ve ended the century of romantic love. I think that’s the direction I want to work on, because that’s where I sense we are headed. The romantic dream American dream enlightenment dream all end together. Yep.   We have a lot of relationship mythology to unlearn – and most of it was developed during the victorian era, but not practiced until later, just like the chivalric nonsense wasn’t practiced until far later. These are class mythos sold to uplifted lower classes.

  • THE RESTORATION OF MARRIAGE AS A BUSINESS VENTURE (The end of the luxury good of

    THE RESTORATION OF MARRIAGE AS A BUSINESS VENTURE
    (The end of the luxury good of romantic marriage.)

    Romantic Love as we understand it was INVENTED and not that long ago. Marriage is a business proposition. If it isn’t it’s pointless to produce a corporation (which is what marriage consists of) instead of simply engaging in a market exchange until the opportunity’s exhausted.

    And that’s what relationships consist of: opportunities for reciprocal exchange, by the only condition in life where you can exchange putting another’s interests ahead of yours, because they are polar opposites.
    Exhaust opportunity, resource, or charge.

    It’s just physics. Sorry.

    This is a little closer to the voice I’m developing now that we’ve ended the century of romantic love. I think that’s the direction I want to work on, because that’s where I sense we are headed. The romantic dream American dream enlightenment dream all end together. Yep.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-20 14:28:44 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107134328822050828

  • @Lil_Aspiring_Rapper This is normal destructive behavior that results in any sta

    @Lil_Aspiring_Rapper This is normal destructive behavior that results in any state or empire that expands credit such that returns on men’s productivity is reducded.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-19 08:59:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107127372856417354

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: @curtdoolittle I always framed it as cooperation of the divisi

    RT @ThruTheHayes: @curtdoolittle I always framed it as cooperation of the division of labor aiming to improve those returns through time. Y…


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-18 21:10:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1450207764777783302

  • I can agree that the intemporal preservation of multi-generational families in t

    I can agree that the intemporal preservation of multi-generational families in territorial proximity in homogeneous polities produces the optimum capital returns under the broadest array of circumstances.

    I just don’t know about how incentives can be altered back to it. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1450184965480669189