Ego the fallacy of pretense of the neutrality of belief.
You don’t consider that the purpose of defending belief is exclusively to commit crimes. And like all criminals you think these crimes are justified.
I do law, not philosophy, ideology, or theology.
I deal with crimes.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-07 15:47:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358442241254191105
Reply addressees: @FL1420
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358437928557502467
THE LEFT ARE KLEPTOCRATS AND HUCKSTERS
When dealing with the left whether extremists like antifa and blm, or liberals, or democratic party members, you must undrestand they are hucksers, that are seeking to accumulate a mass of sentimental wins to undermine your civilization – not consistency or rational argument.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-03 15:31:52 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105668038672702963
the evolutionary argument is this is why we still have cheaters, and we still have scam artists, and scoundrels. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-02 18:19:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1356668575952629760
Reply addressees: @LukeWeinhagen @bryanbrey
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1356667000794345476
That’s what exists and how it performs.
My argument is that group strategies vary from highly correspondent, productive, inovative, and adaptive to non correspondent, parasitc, destructive, and devolutionary.
So are you talking about feels or reelz? or what?
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-02 16:29:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1356640818665259010
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1356640341143785472
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Imperius__13 Body: Sense > Model > Perception > Auto Association > Auto-Prediction > Valuation > Recursion:
Langauge:Continuous recursive disambiguation:
Promise: Speech: Existential > Declarative > Imperative > Agree/Not:
Evidence: Actions: Invariant .> True-False .> Success-Fail > Agree/Not
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1356640341143785472
The Technique of “GSRRM” includes: … (L)ying by Plausible Deniability By: … (E)vading the Truth By: … (E)quating Truth to (F)ace, (A)pproval, or (C)onsent By: … (D)isapproving … … (D)enying … … … (S)ilence And By Escalating To: … (S)haming, … … (M)oralizing, … … … (P)sychologizing, … … … … (R)idiculing … … … … … (O)utraging, And By Escalating To: … (R)allying … … (G)ossiping … … … (U)ndermining, … … … … (P)ropagandizing And By Escalating To: … (S)houting Down … … (S)ilencing … … … (C)ancelling … … … … (D)eplatforming (interference in communication and colaboration) And By Escalating to: … (R)eputation destruction (interference in reputation) … … (D)oxxing (interference in safety and anonymity) … … … (J)ob Doxxing (interference in employement) … … … … (B)usiness Doxxing (interference in the conduct of a business) And By Escalating to: … (C)ourt Abuse (using cost of litigation to silence, obtain false confession, or to harm) … … (J)udicial Abuse (using select cases to exploit vunlerabilities in the law) … … … (C)onstitutional Abuse (using advocacy of incrementally harmful legislation to exploit vulnerabilities in the construction of the constitution, under cover of moral pretense) And By Escalating to: … (M)ore…
In western history under our ancient laws, men were prohibited from reputation destruction by direct violence between men under the law of the Duel.
In western history Female Conflict (social violence by GSRRM) was largely illegal or punishable under laws against “scolds” –women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace.
During the democratic and Marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony).
Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM.
GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience.
The Technique of “GSRRM” includes: … (L)ying by Plausible Deniability By: … (E)vading the Truth By: … (E)quating Truth to (F)ace, (A)pproval, or (C)onsent By: … (D)isapproving … … (D)enying … … … (S)ilence And By Escalating To: … (S)haming, … … (M)oralizing, … … … (P)sychologizing, … … … … (R)idiculing … … … … … (O)utraging, And By Escalating To: … (R)allying … … (G)ossiping … … … (U)ndermining, … … … … (P)ropagandizing And By Escalating To: … (S)houting Down … … (S)ilencing … … … (C)ancelling … … … … (D)eplatforming (interference in communication and colaboration) And By Escalating to: … (R)eputation destruction (interference in reputation) … … (D)oxxing (interference in safety and anonymity) … … … (J)ob Doxxing (interference in employement) … … … … (B)usiness Doxxing (interference in the conduct of a business) And By Escalating to: … (C)ourt Abuse (using cost of litigation to silence, obtain false confession, or to harm) … … (J)udicial Abuse (using select cases to exploit vunlerabilities in the law) … … … (C)onstitutional Abuse (using advocacy of incrementally harmful legislation to exploit vulnerabilities in the construction of the constitution, under cover of moral pretense) And By Escalating to: … (M)ore…
In western history under our ancient laws, men were prohibited from reputation destruction by direct violence between men under the law of the Duel.
In western history Female Conflict (social violence by GSRRM) was largely illegal or punishable under laws against “scolds” –women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace.
During the democratic and Marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony).
Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM.
GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience.
The BLM, ANTIFA PC/Woke, Anti-Whiteness, White Replacement, White Genocide Tribe doesn’t are about moral duplicity, ethical duplicity, argumentative duplicity, political duplicity. Their entire strategy is predicated on the irrelevance of truth and morality – its just for POWER.
The BLM, ANTIFA PC/Woke, Anti-Whiteness, White Replacement, White Genocide Tribe doesn’t are about moral duplicity, ethical duplicity, argumentative duplicity, political duplicity. Their entire strategy is predicated on the irrelevance of truth and morality – its just for POWER.
8. … is simply female social super-predation industrialized by mass communication, where the costs of their political ‘accommodation’ of the enemies of civilization are born by men and men alone.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 13:10:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355503659610759168
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355503658365038593
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
7. This demand for attention, the pretense of non-aggression, virtue signaling (value signaling), and escalating demand for attention by virtue-signaling into virtue signal spirals, that turns into intolerance, aggression and undermining …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1355503658365038593
7. This demand for attention, the pretense of non-aggression, virtue signaling (value signaling), and escalating demand for attention by virtue-signaling into virtue signal spirals, that turns into intolerance, aggression and undermining …
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 13:10:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355503658365038593
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355503656989241354
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
6. They created a market of escalating demands for attention, and escalating demand for attention by virtue signaling of non-aggression,thereby producing virtue signal spirals that convert from non-aggression and tolerance to aggression and intolerance.(Just as Popper predicted.)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1355503656989241354