RT @_HistoryNerd: For over 300 years, Barbary pirates enslaved 1 million Europeans and Americans.
They raided ships, burned villages, and…
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-31 05:57:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873971725832249388
Theme: Predation
-
“Actual cooperation doesn’t need to be enforced.” What evidence do you have for
“Actual cooperation doesn’t need to be enforced.”
What evidence do you have for that. History states the opposite. Human acquisition is only limited by cost(effort) and risk(cost). Why would we cooperate at all if not for the returns vs the costs of conflict?
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-27 00:23:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872438120748286236
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872434880467837404
-
“enforced cooperation ceases to be cooperation” is it? If the strong suppress th
“enforced cooperation ceases to be cooperation”
is it? If the strong suppress the predation and parasitism of the weak, producing reciprocity, then what about that reciprocity is no longer reciprocal? Instead alternatives are no longer reciprocal. Cooperation enforces the recirocal by via negativa preventing the irreciprocal. As such recprocity still exists and may only exist within the constructino of the conditions for it by suppression of irreciprocity.Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-27 00:02:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872432719092994048
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872430514474197413
-
So for example, what is the point of going to war with an opponent neighbor? Eit
So for example, what is the point of going to war with an opponent neighbor? Either to restore cooperation which minimizes costs, or to produce boycott (being left alone) despite the maintenance costs. Cooperation is the lowest cost stable equilibrium becuase it is the only cost that produces continuous returns. The qeustion is only in accounting for trade offs. If it’s a negative sum then it’s not valuable. If it’s a positive sum then it is. In both cases it is possible to move in any direction that is a capital benefit.
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-26 23:42:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872427697261154304
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872425777926750509
-
It’s odd that you would ask that question. “As a general rule of decidability, o
It’s odd that you would ask that question. “As a general rule of decidability, over time, cooperation will defeat boycott and predation given the surpluses that advance evolutionary computation.”
That I know of this statement survives all testing.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-26 23:36:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872426350944108629
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872425777926750509
-
I start from selfish and merely state that cooperation is one of three choices.
I start from selfish and merely state that cooperation is one of three choices. Predation, cooperation, boycott. I only refer to cooperation to produce evolutionary computation as a means of decidability. As I have stated before in response to your objection we should address all three choices and state the value if each. The missing concept I think as we discussed this morning is capital and full accounting.
You don’t want me to test your reasoning by testing your incentives. So if I don’t I must limit my response to the search for decidability by the identification of limits. Cooperation cannot be defeated. Only its terms given present and future capital.
I keep wondering if I have failed with this group because when I shifted from libertarian philosophy using popperian analytic philosophy’s methodology to science operationalism and behavioral science I think I left behind a lot of people who are not seeing the Closure the system provides. So again I have failed because I haven’t explained the difference. Even in the book I assumed too much. So that’s three things in three days I realize are obvious to me and not to others.
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-26 22:29:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872409500701073409
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872351529472041342
-
We purge, and have puged throughout history, criminals from all aspects of life.
We purge, and have puged throughout history, criminals from all aspects of life. Given that all leftism is just conspiracy to commit crimes, why should we not suppress your criminality the way we suppress all other criminality? You cannot express a single left ambition that is…
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-23 18:03:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1871255291901448382
Reply addressees: @CasualLavaring
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1871193298309960018
-
PREDATORS I think in predatory terms. military, strategic, political, financial,
PREDATORS
I think in predatory terms. military, strategic, political, financial, economic, and commercial. I have earned a somewhat ruthless business reputation and a combative legal one. I understand the enemy. The difference is that I work for our people by defending against… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1870273111188521049
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-21 01:16:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1870277045600805368
-
“The fact is you can be the protection racket or you will be subject to a protec
—“The fact is you can be the protection racket or you will be subject to a protection racket.”— Martin Stepan @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-20 23:59:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1870257730512191761
-
WHy do minority non-utiopian anglos NOT resist the economic mission by the suppr
WHy do minority non-utiopian anglos NOT resist the economic mission by the suppression of parasitism and predation, and NOT resist all the ideological nonsense that rides upon it. In other words why are you blaming others for your own failures?
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-15 20:29:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868393051577880616
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @ArcologyTech
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868391126874341501