RT @LukeWeinhagen: You can not escape nature’s laws.
“Why don’t I kill you and take all of your resources?” is the persistent question nat…
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-29 02:09:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652132953588219904
Sure. One can self determine by raiding, r*aping, looting, and pillaging just fine. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-22 21:05:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1649882026412064771
Reply addressees: @StevePender
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1649881035134365697
Quite the opposite.
SHORT LIST OF FEMALE MEANS OF ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR, EVADING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMMONS WHILE HIDING BEHIND MORAL PRETENSE
CAUSE: Evasion of responsibility for the common but demand for control of the commons, externalizing consequential responsibility to males.
Industrialize the sale and distribution of false promises by the tactics of by means of:
Denial
1. Dismissal of the Evidence, History, Argument, Incentives, Norm, or Tradition
2. Evading providing a competitive, equally criticizable and testable alternative.
3. Equating Desirability-Undesirability and Approval-Disapproval or Denial with Truth and Falsehood
4. Face-Before-Truth rather than European truth-before-face, or threat to the dominance or competence hierarchy.
4. NAXALT – “Not All X Are Like That” – Denying a general rule describing a distribution is false because there are some cases at the tails.
Undermining by Ad Hominem (GSRRM)
Consisting of:
1. Poisoning the Well (Polluting the Informational Commons)
2. GSRRM:
… denial
… disapproval,
… outraging
… ridicule,
… shaming,
… moralizing,
… psychologizing,
… rallying,
… gossiping,
… reputation destruction
… and Social Construction
Creating Plausible Deniability
1. Hiding Behind Moral Pretense
2. Hiding behind Voluntary Choice
3. Hiding behind Sympathy for Hyper consumption (experiences)
4. Hiding Behind (Selective) Evasion of Responsibility
5. Heaping Undue Criticism (Persecution) and Undue Praise (personalizing)
Fraud by: Claiming Oppression by individuals as a proxy for laws of nature, or conversely claiming false promise of possibility of evading the laws of nature:
1. False Promise of Freedom from Formal Laws (logic, truth) by the use of social construction of repetitive feedback of information counter to formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.
2. False Promise of Freedom from Physical Laws (scarcity, false promise of endless growth). by the false promise of endless growth, an end to scarcity, and an end to human competition by demonstrated acquisition.
3. False Promise of Freedom Natural Laws (of self-interest, rational choice, amorality, reciprocity, competitive organization), by the false promise of an end to kin selection, koinophillia, ethnocentrism, sex, class, subrace, and racial differences, and the sexual, social, economic, and political value of organization by ethnocentrism given the class, subrace, and subrace differences in sexual, social, economic, and political value to one another, given the substantial evolutionary difference between the races and subraces.
4. False Promise of Freedom from Evolutionary Laws ( ending natural, and market selection, accumulating mutation and regulation, the impossibility of isolation, inescapable regression, accumulated genetic load, dysgenia, and the red queen of resources, competitors, biological, climatological, geological, solar, and galactic risks. ).
Using “Storytelling” by:
1. Faith Healing, delaying into hazard. Faith Healing consists of providing temporary psychological relief while allowing the cause to persist, grow, and evolve.
2. False Story Telling, baiting you into empathy, loading, framing, obscurantism, suggestion, suspension of disbelief and overloading.
3. False Promise, baiting into hazard. Baiting into hazard consists of making false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe. arguing them with sophistry to idealism, magic to pseudoscience, or occult to theology.
4. False Criticism, undermining into hazard.
5. Duplicitous, Double Standard, Irreciprocal, and Poly Logical Ethics, like their polylogical unequal laws,
Escalating from the least burdensome to the most burdensome tactic:
1. Faith healing at every opportunity (lie and deny)
2. Selling false promise if they can (fraud)
3. Evading or silencing at every necessity (shaming, moralizing, psychologizing)
4. Undermining if they have opportunity to (sedition)
5. Attack if they can get away with it (de-platforming, conspiracy)
6. Hiding behind plausible deniability of freedom of choice (non-coercion)
he opposite.
Reply addressees: @WomanPissedoff
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-17 20:13:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648057143289958421
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648045661147877415
Quite the opposite.
SHORT LIST OF FEMALE MEANS OF ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR, EVADING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMMONS WHILE HIDING BEHIND MORAL PRETENSE
CAUSE: Evasion of responsibility for the common but demand for control of the commons, externalizing consequential responsibility to males.
Industrialize the sale and distribution of false promises by the tactics of by means of:
Denial
1. Dismissal of the Evidence, History, Argument, Incentives, Norm, or Tradition
2. Evading providing a competitive, equally criticizable and testable alternative.
3. Equating Desirability-Undesirability and Approval-Disapproval or Denial with Truth and Falsehood
4. Face-Before-Truth rather than European truth-before-face, or threat to the dominance or competence hierarchy.
4. NAXALT – “Not All X Are Like That” – Denying a general rule describing a distribution is false because there are some cases at the tails.
Undermining by Ad Hominem (GSRRM)
Consisting of:
1. Poisoning the Well (Polluting the Informational Commons)
2. GSRRM:
… denial
… disapproval,
… outraging
… ridicule,
… shaming,
… moralizing,
… psychologizing,
… rallying,
… gossiping,
… reputation destruction
… and Social Construction
Creating Plausible Deniability
1. Hiding Behind Moral Pretense
2. Hiding behind Voluntary Choice
3. Hiding behind Sympathy for Hyper consumption (experiences)
4. Hiding Behind (Selective) Evasion of Responsibility
5. Heaping Undue Criticism (Persecution) and Undue Praise (personalizing)
Fraud by: Claiming Oppression by individuals as a proxy for laws of nature, or conversely claiming false promise of possibility of evading the laws of nature:
1. False Promise of Freedom from Formal Laws (logic, truth) by the use of social construction of repetitive feedback of information counter to formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.
2. False Promise of Freedom from Physical Laws (scarcity, false promise of endless growth). by the false promise of endless growth, an end to scarcity, and an end to human competition by demonstrated acquisition.
3. False Promise of Freedom Natural Laws (of self-interest, rational choice, amorality, reciprocity, competitive organization), by the false promise of an end to kin selection, koinophillia, ethnocentrism, sex, class, subrace, and racial differences, and the sexual, social, economic, and political value of organization by ethnocentrism given the class, subrace, and subrace differences in sexual, social, economic, and political value to one another, given the substantial evolutionary difference between the races and subraces.
4. False Promise of Freedom from Evolutionary Laws ( ending natural, and market selection, accumulating mutation and regulation, the impossibility of isolation, inescapable regression, accumulated genetic load, dysgenia, and the red queen of resources, competitors, biological, climatological, geological, solar, and galactic risks. ).
Using “Storytelling” by:
1. Faith Healing, delaying into hazard. Faith Healing consists of providing temporary psychological relief while allowing the cause to persist, grow, and evolve.
2. False Story Telling, baiting you into empathy, loading, framing, obscurantism, suggestion, suspension of disbelief and overloading.
3. False Promise, baiting into hazard. Baiting into hazard consists of making false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe. arguing them with sophistry to idealism, magic to pseudoscience, or occult to theology.
4. False Criticism, undermining into hazard.
5. Duplicitous, Double Standard, Irreciprocal, and Poly Logical Ethics, like their polylogical unequal laws,
Escalating from the least burdensome to the most burdensome tactic:
1. Faith healing at every opportunity (lie and deny)
2. Selling false promise if they can (fraud)
3. Evading or silencing at every necessity (shaming, moralizing, psychologizing)
4. Undermining if they have opportunity to (sedition)
5. Attack if they can get away with it (de-platforming, conspiracy)
6. Hiding behind plausible deniability of freedom of choice (non-coercion)
he opposite.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-17 20:13:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648057143784886280
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648045661147877415
If Trump wanted mob violence 10M men would overthrow the government in three days. And he knows it. He wants to build a legacy of ending the postwar predation on America for others’ benefits and restore the priority of the american worker. And to do that by cleaning house in the postwar deep state that perpetuates that condition. Yet we were subject to an entire year of mob violence by the left, leftist-supported criminals, antifa, and BLM. And most of the clinton-obama conspiracy against him was the greatest intimidation of a president in history. Trump BUYS silence. ANd despite a decade of trying the worst thing they can accuse him of is not paying taxes on such a payment.
Reply addressees: @Maltizm @AttyTMD @lawofruby
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-17 04:39:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647822142187220993
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647762285622853633
If Trump wanted mob violence 10M men would overthrow the government in three days. And he knows it. He wants to build a legacy of ending the postwar predation on America for others’ benefits and restore the priority of the american worker. And to do that by cleaning house in the postwar deep state that perpetuates that condition. Yet we were subject to an entire year of mob violence by the left, leftist-supported criminals, antifa, and BLM. And most of the clinton-obama conspiracy against him was the greatest intimidation of a president in history. Trump BUYS silence. ANd despite a decade of trying the worst thing they can accuse him of is not paying taxes on such a payment.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-17 04:39:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647822142271045634
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647762285622853633
(No criminal gives up his crimes voluntarily. You will not give up yours voluntarily either. For the same reason. )
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-16 16:01:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647631218387697664
Reply addressees: @hockeygirl_CA @Angelia_143 @terrilbruce @GregAbbott_TX
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647630631696842754
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
You mean duplicating the actions of the founders in their common law suit against the state for the redress of grievances by their Petition To The King? ;). The method that is expressly permitted in and justified under the common law and exemplified in the Declaration of Independence? ;). And that we recommend returning cultural independence to the states and restoring the federal government to its original role in defense, trade, and the resolution of differences, thereby allowing us to create of establish different cultures as we see fit, as was the tradition of the european people throughout our history?
Yes I would suggest our people understand the european group evolutionary strategy, its embodiment in the traditional then common then concurrent law, as discovered by the long history of the natural law research program, with the British invention of modernity and the modern state, and the codification of it all in Blackstone, and the american federalist papers, the declaration, the constitution, the bill of rights, and (less accurately to satisfy the communists in items ?24+) in the declaration of human rights?
Yes I would like our people to understand the concept of natural law (the science of cooperation) natural rights (the science of minimum necessary rights and obligations to bring about natural law), the meaning of text as a weight and measure at the time of recording, the transactional process of law that like monetary accounting forces full accounting and due process, the reason for the independence of the judiciary and the legislature, and the meaning of commonality in law, and concurrency in voting and legislation, all of which are specifically designed to prevent tyranny of authority and tyranny of majority, requiring concurrency of consent of the citizens for any and all legislation passed.
Now I’ll venture you don’t know this or why it’s so, and why you’re probably in no position to opine on our system of law and government, and because of it why our education is destroying the civilization from within just as the ‘intentional march thru the institutions of cultural production’ stated they would do, by taking advantage of the fact that educators are from the bottoms of their graduating classes, and largely women, and as such are vulnerable to suggestion and groupthink.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1647630631696842754
RT @curtdoolittle: @TruthQuest11 We think in terms of control, but they think in terms of undermining. It’s hard for us to step into their…
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-12 16:09:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646183667776012290
RT @curtdoolittle: @gmarkul @GamerInvestin @naval Among those of us who have studied the method of undermining host peoples, using the new…
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-12 16:08:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646183520904126469
I want to see how the audience addresse #1 before answering. As for #2, the purpose of all religions since the first good-evil religion is to prevent non-aggression against insiders and llmit to encourage aggression against outsiders. The means by which religions ‘addict’ members is the production of mindfulness – which is a necessity. Both together, plus all the taboos and demands produce self regulation. It’s common for all people to assume that their culturall indoctrination produces a human normal (natural) set of intutions, but this is absolutely false. We have unequal needs for mindfulness but the majority need SOME form. For men it was originally the initiatic brotherhood of warriors. Religion provided women and other men a substitute.
Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-10 19:19:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645506881857757184
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645462048023904262