Centralization is achieved by suppression of local parasitism and rents, and levying taxation instead, that is used for that suppression. This drastically reduces transaction costs and associated risks, which in turn produces volume and velocity. The problem of taxation arises when it is not used for the purpose of suppressing local parasitism and rents and instead simply centralizes parasitism and rents.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 16:05:00 UTC
Returns on cooperation regardless of ability still are higher than non-cooperation UNLESS offset by parasitism and predation.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 23:42:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020453890511331328
Reply addressees: @georgiegirl1828
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020409865829797888
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020409865829797888
(pastoralism/diasporia/parasitism vs territorialism/production) The difference between my anglo sovereigntarianism and ashkenazi libertarianism(libertinism) is that the militia and the judiciary rule under the natural law of reciprocity, property in toto, universal standing, and universal application – with a monarchy as a judge of last resort (headman). And that one constructs the market for the construction of commons (government) in whatever way is necessary for competitive persistence(survival, and flourishing) of the polity (militia). This means monarchy, republic, direct democracy, as conditions (war, growth, windfalls) warrant. This organization both adapts to all circumstances and suppresses all parasitism of all forms – providing competitive survivability; whereas ashkenazi libertarianism (libertinism) does not suppress parasitism. It licenses it. And ensures the competitive death or conquest of the polity. There is a reason the ashkenazi civilization is diasporic and dependent: inability to produce high trust territorial commons due to the high costs of opportunities, costs, duty and sacrifice required.
(pastoralism/diasporia/parasitism vs territorialism/production) The difference between my anglo sovereigntarianism and ashkenazi libertarianism(libertinism) is that the militia and the judiciary rule under the natural law of reciprocity, property in toto, universal standing, and universal application – with a monarchy as a judge of last resort (headman). And that one constructs the market for the construction of commons (government) in whatever way is necessary for competitive persistence(survival, and flourishing) of the polity (militia). This means monarchy, republic, direct democracy, as conditions (war, growth, windfalls) warrant. This organization both adapts to all circumstances and suppresses all parasitism of all forms – providing competitive survivability; whereas ashkenazi libertarianism (libertinism) does not suppress parasitism. It licenses it. And ensures the competitive death or conquest of the polity. There is a reason the ashkenazi civilization is diasporic and dependent: inability to produce high trust territorial commons due to the high costs of opportunities, costs, duty and sacrifice required.
The Clintons are lower middle class social climbers that conspire with the enemy to advance the cosmopolitan, socialist, anti-aristocratic (anti-western) group strategy of truth, duty, reciprocity, and judicial rule by natural law, for signals and profit. Natural Aristocracy (intergenerational martial and economic nobility) need not play such games.
The Clintons are lower middle class social climbers that conspire with the enemy to advance the cosmopolitan, socialist, anti-aristocratic (anti-western) group strategy of truth, duty, reciprocity, and judicial rule by natural law, for signals and profit. Natural Aristocracy (intergenerational martial and economic nobility) need not play such games.
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
THE CLINTONS AS JULIUS AND ETHEL ROSENBERG AT SCALE:
The Clintons are lower middle class social climbers that conspire with the enemy to advance the cosmopolitan, socialist, anti-aristocratic (anti-western) group strategy of truth, duty, reciprocity, and judicial rule by natural law, for signals and profit. Natural Aristocracy (intergenerational martial and economic nobility) need not play such games.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 12:07:22 UTC
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
LIBERTARIANISM VS SOVEREIGNTARIANISM
(pastoralism/diasporia/parasitism vs territorialism/production)
The difference between my anglo sovereigntarianism and ashkenazi libertarianism(libertinism) is that the militia and the judiciary rule under the natural law of reciprocity, property in toto, universal standing, and universal application – with a monarchy as a judge of last resort (headman). And that one constructs the market for the construction of commons (government) in whatever way is necessary for competitive persistence(survival, and flourishing) of the polity (militia). This means monarchy, republic, direct democracy, as conditions (war, growth, windfalls) warrant. This organization both adapts to all circumstances and suppresses all parasitism of all forms – providing competitive survivability; whereas ashkenazi libertarianism (libertinism) does not suppress parasitism. It licenses it. And ensures the competitive death or conquest of the polity. There is a reason the ashkenazi civilization is diasporic and dependent: inability to produce high trust territorial commons due to the high costs of opportunities, costs, duty and sacrifice required.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 12:04:30 UTC
THE CLINTONS AS JULIUS AND ETHEL ROSENBERG AT SCALE:
The Clintons are lower middle class social climbers that conspire with the enemy to advance the cosmopolitan, socialist, anti-aristocratic (anti-western) group strategy of truth, duty, reciprocity, and judicial rule by natural law, for signals and profit. Natural Aristocracy (intergenerational martial and economic nobility) need not play such games.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 08:07:00 UTC
“The Democratic Majority Fallacy” |CAUSALITY| .01% -> 1% -> 20% -> EVERYONE ELSE. That is that historically it only takes 1-2% and no more than 3% of a (male) population to cause revolutionary destructive harm, just as it takes only 1-2% to create revolutionary productive good. The success of either end of the spectrum depends upon the state of development of the people, their degree of heterogeneity, the consequential degree of disparity, the consequential degree of competition, and the percentage of the populace that will practice alternative norms. Norms create a market for cooperation. Markets for production AFTER the market for norms (cooperation), and markets for commons after production, and markets for polities after commons. So no. It matters more if 1% of immigrants are hostile than it does if 1% of citizens are fully domesticated. Don’t let democratic reasoning fool you. The Pareto rule and the power laws ALWAYS rule – FROM EVERY DIRECTION. .5% of a hostile populace is enough. Abrahamism, particularly militant, fundamentalist, irreciprocal, equalitarian, anti-reason abrahamism, is the equivalent of a single cancer cell. It spreads rapidly and kills everything it touches from the inside out. Judaism was bad, christianity, worse, and islam the very worst. Islam(Judaism, Christianity) = Monopoly. Paganism = Markets. IT’S NOT COMPLICATED: MARKETS IN EVERYTHING TO EVOLVE, OR DEVOLUTION AND REGRESSION.