Curt Doolittle

Theme: Predation

  • Men are physical super-predators, and Women are social super-predators. Hierarch

    Men are physical super-predators, and Women are social super-predators. Hierarchies in both.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-23 16:13:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1153699684394967040

  • Boys who view learn that the polity as hostile to their mothers – no matter how

    —Boys who view learn that the polity as hostile to their mothers – no matter how ‘crazy’ – will always and everywhere exercise their predatory instincts physically and politically, either effeminately or masculinely.—

    (Worth repeating)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-13 18:33:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1150111088484200448

  • Men are super predators of the physical and political. Women are super predators

    —Men are super predators of the physical and political.
    Women are super predators of psychological and sociological.
    Together we tend to mediate the differences between the types of predation we specialize in.—

    (worth repeating)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-13 18:33:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1150110950554570752

  • NO MORE FREE RIDES ON OUR ANCESTORS. Rule and Rule Best. Or be Ruled by the Wors

    NO MORE FREE RIDES ON OUR ANCESTORS.

    Rule and Rule Best.
    Or be Ruled by the Worst.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 17:44:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102429719608909859

  • NO MORE FREE RIDES ON OUR ANCESTORS. Rule and Rule Best. Or be Ruled by the Wors

    NO MORE FREE RIDES ON OUR ANCESTORS.

    Rule and Rule Best.
    Or be Ruled by the Worst.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 17:44:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1149736363287339008

  • Jun 29, 2019, 8:02 AM I had an insight yesterday that’s bothering me, and it’s b

    Jun 29, 2019, 8:02 AM
    I had an insight yesterday that’s bothering me, and it’s bothering me because it’s true.

    the amoral and immoral have an advantage over the moral if we let them.

    The needs for sun tzu’s, aristotle’s machiavelli’s, doolittle’s and martial epistemology, to counter the habituation of morality – while at the same time, the return on the value of the habituation of morality.

    Taleb’s (false) argument about IQ, because he’s talking about amorality and opportunism (semitism), not intelligence and capital accumulation (europeanism).

    The reason the jews have benefitted from polyethicalism (amoralism), so consistently even independent of ashkenazi distributions – vs the problem the english equivalent (“Anglicans, Tories” – the genetic superiority of the british ‘middle'[upper middle]) class at home and in the empire (opportunity diaspora).

    The value of understanding Propertarianism, which, says that we must build that moral civ by due diligence in prosecuting the immoral. The value of P in understanding that much of what appears Amoral is Immoral.

    In other words our strength is our weakness if the “commercial state” (what we have today) or the commercial sector, or the ‘religious’ sector, expand beyond national means into consumption of the accumulated capital in all its forms, including those opportunities that may not be seized amorally.

    In other words, there is an error in our demarcation between moral amoral and immoral commercial, political, religious activity.

    P fixes this implicitly but I don’t TALK about it to provide clarity explicitly.
    Edit

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:59:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426238079433292

  • YOU DON’T PERSUADE PARASITES —“You don’t persuade parasites – you implement la

    YOU DON’T PERSUADE PARASITES

    —“You don’t persuade parasites – you implement law that disincentivizes their behaviour. Persuasion is for moral posturing and marketing – law is for molding human behaviour.”—Bill Joslin

    Three sentences. All quotable. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:53:48 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426216262854360

  • (…continued) Why? “The desire for equality under poverty, monopoly under the h

    (…continued)

    Why? “The desire for equality under poverty, monopoly under the herd, authority over markets, and feminine dysgenia over masculine eugenia.:
    “The Mindless Equalitarian Dysgenic Herd.”

    There is and can never be equality. The demand for equality is to devolve mankind to one’s own lowest level – as an animal. The demand of aristocracy is to evolve mankind into one’s own level – transcend the animal into reason. THe anglo enlightenment experiment has been one of attempting to raise man into an ‘aristocracy of everyone’ and it has failed because only our kin appear able to do so – and even then some men and many women resist it.

    The reason Jewish Christians are “Cucks’ and do not fight against the enemy is because their debt, loyalty, and fealty, is to the ancestral enemy of our people – and not to Family, Kith, Kin, Nature, Excellence and heroism, Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Jury and Law and Markets in Every Aspect of Life.

    The reason Aryan Christians are ‘not cucks’ is that we fight against the enemy because our debt, loyalty, reality is to our ancestors, Family, Kith, Kin, Nature, Excellence and heroism, Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Jury and Law and Markets in Every Aspect of Life.

    Choose Aryan Christianity of Kin and our persistence, or Semitic Christianity of the Enemy against our kin and your extermination.

    I am An Aryan, An Aristotelian, A Heathen, A Christian.

    Because that is all I can be, while maintaining the debt, loyalty, and fealty to my kin, my people, my ancestors, nature, the universe, and transcendence of man into the great gods our ancients imagined.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:48:00 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426193407615382

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426191435493947

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    CHOOSE ARYAN CHRISTIAN OF KIN OR SEMITIC CHRISTIAN AGAINST THEM I am, first, and foremost: 1) An Aryan(The primacy of man, heroism, excellence, reciprocity, truth before face, aristocratic egalitarianism), 2) Aristotelian(Naturalism, Truth regardless of cost), an;d 3) Heathen (Debt only to Nature and Ancestors, Ward of Nature). I cannot be those things, if I practice the supernatural over the natural, the irrational over the rational, and false debt over existential debt. I can however, be: 4) a scientific and rational christian, if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: i) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. ii) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. iii) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, iiii) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. These are truths. And no claim of truth nor good can require I: a) abandon the difference between man and animal by abandoning reason; b) claim belief in a falsehood; c) owe debt, loyalty, or fealty to other than my kith and kin. Yet it is Abrahamic Semitism that asks (a) abandon reason, (b) claim belief in falsehood, and (c) owe debt loyalty or fealty to other than my kith and kin. The Semitic technique of Abrahamic lying is: (a) False promise(lying), (b) Sophism(lying), (c) Straw Manning(lying), (d) Critique (lying), GSRRM(avoiding truth), (e) Denial(lying), (f) in exchange for ‘membership’ in a false family whose common interests is propagation of the lie, false promise, sophism, straw manning, critique, GSRRM, and denial. There is no difference between: (a) Judaism, (c) Christianity, (c) Islam and; (b) Marx-Freud-Frankfurt-Derrida et al: the marxists, socialists, psychologists, sociologists, feminists, postmodernists, denialists, and politically corrects (truth suppression) The First wave of Abrahamists created (a) Judaism to undermine, (b) Christianity to undermine further, and (c) Islam to conquer the undermined and weakened. … Against Aristocracy Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and Reason. The Second wave of Abrahamists replaced religion of the supernatural false promise, sophism, critique, and denial, with two attempts: (a) first Abrahamic pseudoscientific false promises sophism critique, and denial in marxism-socialism-freudianism-feminism. (b) then the Abrahamic sophistic false promises sophism critique, and denial with postmodernism, neo-liberalism, and political correctness. … Against Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and (Darwin!). (continued…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426191435493947

  • THE GAINS TO BE HAD FLUSHING AND CUTTING TIES WITH WEAKNESS AND TREACHERY —“Th

    THE GAINS TO BE HAD FLUSHING AND CUTTING TIES WITH WEAKNESS AND TREACHERY

    —“The harder you go against enemies; the more of your own, moved by sympathy or weakness, will defect to the other side. This too, can have positive returns, up to a point. But there is probably also a limit beyond which it is counter productive. The main risk is endangering the eventual achievement of any kind of victory. The secondary risk is of achieving one at too high a cost. But to the side of the optimum on which we presently find ourselves, there are still gains to be picked up in flushing out and cutting ties with weakness and treachery among our supposed ingroup.”—Ely Harman

    We don’t want ALL our own. This is an OPPORTUNITY to exit them not a challenge to be overcome.

    (eli as master of the game, writing in poetry)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:06:32 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425558507118949

  • Well, you know, a conquered desperate people looking for a savior are pretty eas

    Well, you know, a conquered desperate people looking for a savior are pretty easy prey….

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-09 15:42:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148618466624253952

    Reply addressees: @OrienPermu

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148426820984954880

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148426820984954880