THE ENEMY’S STRATEGY
1. The expansion of the technique invented by usury into a group strategy for the destruction of civilizations, and the reversal of human evolution, restoring man to… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496621610934734&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 11:52:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189872742260232192
THE ENEMY’S TECHNIQUE
Baiting in to Hazard (certain risk);
By use of False Promise (circumvention of reality);
Under cover of Sophism (pilpul);
Justified by Critique (lie, criticism, straw manning)
Under cover of Moral Pretense (lie);
Under cover of Plausible Deniability (lie);
For the purpose of profiting (by harm)
From consumption of accumulated assets (undermining):
… truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes,
Thereby;
…creating conflict, destroying trust, generating demand for authority,
Authority that recursively issues another iteration of false promise,
until all accumulated assets:
…genetic, cultural, normative, artistic, economic, institutional and political;
have been consumed;
by expansion of the underclasses;
whose reproduction or invasion, had been limited by;
… productivity, property, market, law, and natural aristocracy.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 08:02:00 UTC
THE ENEMY’S STRATEGY
1. The expansion of the technique invented by usury into a group strategy for the destruction of civilizations, and the reversal of human evolution, restoring man to condition of animal.
2. Baiting in to Hazard, by use of False Promise, Argued by Sophism, Under cover of Moral Pretense, Justified by Critique, for the purpose of profiting from undermining truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes, creating conflict, destroying trust, generating demand for authority, that recursively issues another iteration of false promise, until all accumulated genetic, cultural, normative, artistic, economic, institutional and political has been consumed by expansion of the underclasses whose reproduction had been limited by productivity, law, property, market, natural aristocracy.
3. The female group strategy of undermining organizations of males that are producing eugenic civilization (quality), by the direction of proceeds of production to the production of returns on commons, at the expense of female dysgenic reproduction (quantity), and her irresistible hyperconsumption.
List the false promises of the enemy?
It’s a long list.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 07:52:00 UTC
Demand for natural law exists, demand for natural rights exist, demand for rent seeking exists, demand for corruption exists, demand for predation exists, demand for lying exists. What will you use power to create?
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 23:08:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189680436148092931
Reply addressees: @thanos_pope
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189678832300761093
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189678832300761093
TRUTH IN HUMOR: THE HISTORY OF ENTREPRENEURIAL WARFARE
(or “We wuz pirates!”)
The Templars started out as ‘the poor knights’ as shown by two men on horseback. The Hospitaliers were not… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496032054327023&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 16:06:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189574276824928262
—“settlement is sub-optimal”—@JackHwite
Refusal of settlement on mutually beneficial terms only increases moral license to escalate. 😉
(I think stuff thru) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 14:12:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189545598225207296
—“Lying, fraud, libel, slander, misrepresentation, misleading, suggestion, loading, framing, obscuring, baiting into hazard, advocacy of, conspiracy of, involuntary transfer, is illegal. All speech is promissory, testimony, and is warrantied, and you’re liable for its consequences.”—Even simpler version
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 20:27:00 UTC
In other words, why let parasites of any kind exist?
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 15:18:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188837425403060225
Reply addressees: @Gyeff
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188837313364873216
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Gyeff Because the only reason it is preferable to let anyone live, be free of deportation, free of enserfment,free of slavery, free of imprisonment, is if you do not impose costs upon the interests of others. And if you cannot conform to a life free of parasitism then its self defense.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188837313364873216
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Gyeff Because the only reason it is preferable to let anyone live, be free of deportation, free of enserfment,free of slavery, free of imprisonment, is if you do not impose costs upon the interests of others. And if you cannot conform to a life free of parasitism then its self defense.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188837313364873216
I know you didn’t intend any language games, and I can infer morality and intellectual honesty in your questions and answers. But the truth is we all want to live parasitically off others if we can – and moralize (lie) to make excuses for it. So ending parasitism means ours too.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 14:50:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188830520752381955
Reply addressees: @thanos_pope @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188829977803931648
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188829977803931648
THE UTILITY AND DISUTILITY OF POLYGAMY
by Martin Štěpán
Polygamy works just fine when the group’s strategy is to conquer other groups and take their women but in a society that is a closed system, there is a finite number of women and letting them naturally distribute in Pareto distribution will leave disenfranchised men with the only option of conquering men from their own society to have a chance at a woman of their own.
The parallel zero-sum game to his I can think of is land. If all land in the nation’s territory was owned by the few leaving most men without realistic chance to own any by legal means, they will go to war.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 16:53:00 UTC