Theme: Predation

  • THERE ARE NO BETTER ANGELS OF OUR NATURE. Man is just a rational actor, and phys

    THERE ARE NO BETTER ANGELS OF OUR NATURE.

    Man is just a rational actor, and physical crime has become less rewarding because assets are largely intangible, consumption is absurdly cheap – especially foods, there are many more means of entertainment (yes crime is also a form of entertainment).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 11:00:00 UTC

  • PINKER HAS JOINED FREUD, BOAS, MARX, ADORNO, HARARI, HARRIS IN SELLING HALF TRUT

    PINKER HAS JOINED FREUD, BOAS, MARX, ADORNO, HARARI, HARRIS IN SELLING HALF TRUTHS

    NO, VIOLENCE (harm) is evolving (progressing) along the spectrum from physical, to financial, economic, to informational. There is more HARM than ever in human history and on far greater scales. It’s just distributed across time across the entirety of human capital. Measure it.

    —“Pinker addresses this in the FAQ on his site. Metaphorically extending the term ‘violence’ to practices you want to stigmatize(financial crime, inequality, etc) with rape, homicide and genocide confuse moralization with understanding. … Certainly, there are new financial, economic and informational practices that are bad and may even be increasing, but Pinker’s work is focused on violence, not “bad things”.”—

    I know law and philosophy are my specializations but I would think that was pretty hard for you to say that with an outside voice. Ergo: why is violence a ‘bad’? And why make the claim in the first place if not to claim harms are declining (they aren’t).

    In other words, (a) false promise to people by the sophism that harms are declining (they aren’t),(b) false promise of disambiguation of physical from net harms? So what if physical harm declines while net harm increases, for no other reason than physical harm is less profitable?

    All Steven is saying is what every other economist says: harms are NOT decreasing, it’s just that physical crimes are more costly and less profitable than at any previous time in history. So why not state Whole Truth? Another system of lies like Boas, Freud, Marx, Cantor? See?

    This is the problem with the left of center “Pseudo -Intellectual’ public intellectuals: They produce what sells but is only half true and that’s because they rely on correlations not as economists or physicists: OPERATIONALISMS.

    Tell the WHOLE truth not half-truth: lying.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 10:56:00 UTC

  • Because parasitism is a profitable enterprise

    Because parasitism is a profitable enterprise.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 04:30:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197371778751967232

    Reply addressees: @MeisterDutch @NickJFuentes @StefanMolyneux @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197371592491315201


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197371592491315201

  • Because they were taught undermining and vindictiveness with Abrahamic Religion

    Because they were taught undermining and vindictiveness with Abrahamic Religion 2.0: pseudoscience, sophism, deceit and denial justifying the oppression myth instead of the darwinian reality of our differences and power, pareto, and nash distributions necessary for survival. https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1194961494892527618

  • MORALITY DOESN’T SCALE. The reason we need a Sun Tzu a Machiavelli, and a Doolit

    MORALITY DOESN’T SCALE.

    The reason we need a Sun Tzu a Machiavelli, and a Doolittle, is because we are civilized and moral people and do not grasp the limit beyond which the immoral is… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=509576669639228&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-18 15:23:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1196448879404888064

  • —“The enemy does not care about being perceived as sane, cogent, rational, or re

    —“The enemy does not care about being perceived as sane, cogent, rational, or reasonable. In short they completely lack agency, and therefore must be domesticated by any means necessary.”—-Chris M. Silbaugh

    —“The enemy does not care about being perceived as sane, cogent, rational, or reasonable. In short they completely lack agency, and therefore must be domesticated by any means necessary.”—-Chris M. Silbaugh

    (Quote Reposts)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-18 14:23:00 UTC

  • Baiting into Hazard (irreciprocity). Fraud on a longer time scale. Same as check

    Baiting into Hazard (irreciprocity). Fraud on a longer time scale. Same as check cashing services. Same as Usurious Loans. Except we let the entertainment business, and the Patent Trolls get away with what we’ve outlawed in every other industry. Why? 20th Failure of Law.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-16 01:00:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1195506964563988480

    Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1195409403085819904


    IN REPLY TO:

    @StefanMolyneux

    Does she not understand that when she sold her music, she no longer owned it? https://t.co/YSSDoLEHX2

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1195409403085819904

  • THE ENEMY’S TECHNIQUE (algorithmic) Civilizational Destruction from Within; Inst

    THE ENEMY’S TECHNIQUE

    (algorithmic)

    Civilizational Destruction from Within;

    Instigating Construction of Internal Spirals of Capital Rivalry, Consumption, Destruction;

    Baiting into Hazard (certain risk);

    Those who are ignorant, or lack agency;

    By use of False Promise (circumvention of reality);

    Under the persuasion by Sophism (pilpul);

    Justified by Critique (lie, criticism, straw-manning)

    Under the cover of Moral Pretense (lie);

    Under the cover of Plausible Deniability (lie);

    For the purpose of profiting (by harm)

    From the consumption of accumulated capital (undermining):

    … truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes,

    By not specializing in,

    … The production of innovation in goods services information, both private and common

    … Warrantied

    By Specialization in fields permitting Export of Risk

    And Absent Warranty

    … Gossip for Undermining (Entertainment, Media, News, Opinion)

    … Informational Destruction (Academy)

    … Government (Facilitation of Conflict)

    … Legislation (Undermining by, Facilitation of Conflict, Facilitating Dissolution of norms, traditions, manners, ethics morals, Parasitism, Capital exhaustion)

    … Rent-Seeking (special interests)

    … Corruption (influence)

    … Undermining the law (specialization in undermining the constitution via the courts)

    … Law (specialization in coercion)

    … Finance (Parasitism and entrapment)

    … Tax and accounting (evasion)

    … Marketing and Advertising (scams and undermining)

    … Sales Scams

    … Commercial Trade in Scams physical, service, and informational

    … Black Market Goods, services, and Information.

    … Check Cashing

    … Loan Sharking

    … Gambling

    … Pornography

    … Prostitution

    … Drug Dealing

    Thereby;

    … creating conflict,

    … destroying trust,

    … generating demand for restitution

    … generating demand for authority,

    An authority that recursively issues another iteration of

    … false promise,

    … baiting into hazard

    Causing a Continuous Conflict Spiral

    And Tragedy of the Commons (Conflict for consumption)

    until all accumulated assets:

    … genetic,

    … cultural,

    … normative,

    … artistic,

    … economic,

    … institutional and

    … political;

    have been consumed;

    by the conflict between classes and interests

    and by the expansion of the underclasses;

    whose numbers, invasion, reproduction, consumption, agitation, had been previously limited by;

    … productivity, property, market, law, and natural aristocracy;

    … And the surplus proceeds from production devoted to the production of commons;

    … Providing the asymmetric returns on those commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-15 11:44:00 UTC

  • The Natural Law is compatible with Christianity – not identical. Meaning that Na

    The Natural Law is compatible with Christianity – not identical. Meaning that Natural Law presumes it is superior to conquer, rule, enserf, enslave, or exterminate others unless they are capable of equal reciprocity. Christianity, the opposite: it is superior to suffer conquest.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-13 16:42:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1194656781823365120

  • (lol, your concept of individualism clearly involves gossiping, shaming, ridicul

    (lol, your concept of individualism clearly involves gossiping, shaming, ridiculing, undermining, denial and lying to cover attempted irreciprocity (parasitism) rather than providing a solution to the problem at hand.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-10 17:24:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193580320492265474

    Reply addressees: @Europeu24

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193568619172630528


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193568619172630528