Theme: Predation

  • PULL THE VEIL FROM YOUR MIND —“Far away in Ukraine, he suggests to disaffected

    PULL THE VEIL FROM YOUR MIND

    —“Far away in Ukraine, he suggests to disaffected men in the West that _they_ should start a civil war, (he’s the “ideas guy” you see), but using that word requires courage. Instead, he hides behind romantic words like “revolution”, as if war is some beautiful poem. … He’s a snake. … I followed him for years, recommended him to others to follow, even learned a few things I still hold dear as concepts. But the veil dropped once or twice and it was revealed how he uses his intelligence in a corrupting way.”— Phil@Readomain.com @readomain

    Here, in the USA, taking care of an ailing parent rather than putting her in a home, he shows up to fight in virginia, educates others one how our civilization was undermined, writes a reformation of the constitution to restore and preserve it, works within the law – until then.

    I’m a revolutionary. In the tradition of the founders and their constitution, the british constitution, the common law, the european development of rule of law of common law, the germanic law, and the western indo european law of the ancients and their predecessors.

    I pull from your face, your rhetoric, and your mind, the veil of ignorance, error, bias, and wishful thinking – that there is any solution possible other than the same revolution each of our ancestors has used to restore freedom, liberty, and sovereignty – and their fruits.

    I never wore such a veil over my mind. You were just terrified when I pulled the veil from yours.

    So man up, show up, fight, and win.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-15 09:40:00 UTC

  • Yes. You need three bodies in any competition to maintain an equilibrium. This a

    Yes. You need three bodies in any competition to maintain an equilibrium. This allows defectors to shift alliances so that the equilibrium is maintained. Otherwise a monopoly would ensue and one would eliminate the other. So: two sexes are the optimum, three strategies are too.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-14 15:32:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250084431261556739

    Reply addressees: @jim_rutt @LLaddon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250083651288694786

  • THE JUDGEMENT OF THE LAW – ON THE LEFT 0. Reciprocity is the only reason for bot

    THE JUDGEMENT OF THE LAW – ON THE LEFT

    0. Reciprocity is the only reason for both sides to refrain from predation, parasitism, or boycott – cooperation or the option to cooperate is more valuable than non-cooperation, and the prevention of future cooperation.

    1. We create reciprocity via negativa by not imposing costs on others demonstrated interests

    2. The name we use for Demonstrated interests is property.

    3. In P-Law we use property in toto as the definition of property, meaning the empirical evidence of what demonstrated interests people defend.

    4. We are all dependent upon the informational commons for information.

    5. Some of us will defend the informational commons (or any commons) from other’s abuse of it. Some will not.

    6. When you make a truth claim to others, or others make a truth claim to you, the person making the claim can, if he errs, biases, justifies, or deceives, violates reciprocity with the audience (what we call unethical), causes you to harm the informational commons as a consequence (by externality), and if he makes that claim in public, harms the informational commons as well, and therefore violates reciprocity in the commons (what we call immorality).

    7. P-Law provides a definition of truth, and the means of falsifying (testing) statements for truthfulness by tests of testifiable, consistency, operational possibility, correspondence, rationality, reciprocity, completeness, full accounting, and possibility of warranty, and possibility of restitution upon error or deceit.

    8. Marxism, neo-marxism (cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism, and hbd-denialism, are all attempts at deception by:

    (a) claiming european self determination (sovereignty, reciprocity), tripartism (military, legal-commercial), and religious(family-faithful), mediated by law, and limiting us to markets, so that we preserve natural selection by demonstrated behavior, and devoting the proceeds to the production of commons, thereby maintaining the health,prosperity, and wealth of the people, and their competitive advantage is oppression, when all other peoples that did not do so were mired in poverty and suffering.

    (b) that the solution was communism, or socialism, that would end our natural selection, our prosperity, and our competitive advantage, and our ability to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, and victimization by nature – when all civilizations that have tried any form of equality have died.

    (c) that to bring about communism, socialism, and the reversal of evolutionary transcendence, it was necessary to undermine our civlization at every level.

    Monopoly statism to undermine our tripartism.

    Atheism to undermine our tripartism.

    Anti-militarism to undermine our tripartism.

    Anti-rule of law to undermine not only our tripartism but the means by which we resolved disputes between the classes.

    Marxism to undermine the markets and cooperation between the classes.

    Cultural Marxism to undermine our culture, values, myths, traditions, and arts.

    Feminism to undermine the family as the compromise between the genders given our different reproductive strategies and biological differences.

    Postmodernism to undermine our ability to use social pressure to force conformity into realism, naturalism, operationalism, reciprocity, truthful speech, and defense of the commons so that it was optimu for the production of high trust citizenry; and again,postmodernism to deny the existence of truth or truthful speech – when truthful speech is the primary reason for not only our high trust society but our ‘european means of sense-making’ that made empiricism our laws, democratic participation, our science, medicine, and technology, possible.

    Postmodernism to use language for any purpose by which to obtain political power – abandoning all need for consistency, correspondence, rationality and liability.

    Political correctness to undermine the truth of the substantial differences between our advanced, neotenic, genetically, informationally, normatively, culturally, traditionally, and institutional superior people, so that they can be conquered quietly and slowly.

    Using immigration to reverse our darwinian history.

    Using frailty in our law and democracy to capture our territory and institutions.

    Using the academy to indoctrinate two generations of marxist-postmodernist-feminist-HBD-denialist “Priests and Priestesses” to indoctrinate our children by manufacturing their ignorance, feminizing our males, and making obese both genders.

    That’s only part of what they’ve done. I’ve just run out of tolerance for listing their crimes.

    JUDGEMENT OF THE LAW

    If the informational, normative, traditional, and institutional commons is common property of a people, then the (((anti-western left))) is an organized crime syndicate invading and conquering from within, in violation of the Westphalian peace. And as such these people are prosecutable for war crimes, and we shall have our restitution.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-09 23:02:00 UTC

  • DENY THE OPPOSITION THE FIELD —“If we can’t convince the [xyz group], who the

    DENY THE OPPOSITION THE FIELD

    —“If we can’t convince the [xyz group], who the F can we convince?”—Matt Fahnestock

    You don’t convince. You erode. You continue relentlessly until you have denied the enemy their ground.

    Time. Repetition. Not efficiency. Not speed.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-08 14:49:00 UTC

  • RT @NoahRevoy: PACKs form to hunt prey and to fight outsiders. To take advantage

    RT @NoahRevoy: PACKs form to hunt prey and to fight outsiders. To take advantage of opportunity or to deal with a threat. Entry to the PACK…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-06 21:22:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1247273395840000001

  • <--(F) psychotic < solipsistic < sensitive < normal > analytic > aspie > autisti

    <–(F) psychotic < solipsistic < sensitive < normal > analytic > aspie > autistic (M) –>

    <–( F) social-individual superpredator <–> political-military superpredator (M) –>


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-02 01:02:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1245517008826970114

    Reply addressees: @zxq9_notits @SiliconEdge

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1245513110443589634

  • PREDATORS AND PARASITES We’re apex predators. The problem is they’re apex parasi

    PREDATORS AND PARASITES

    We’re apex predators.

    The problem is they’re apex parasites.

    Parasites are the most effective weapon against apex predators.

    That’s the narrative.

    How does one obtain restitution from the parasite?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 14:57:00 UTC

  • So ‘people expect too much’ of not being lead by the pied piper. UPB, KI, Rothba

    So ‘people expect too much’ of not being lead by the pied piper.
    UPB, KI, Rothbardian Libertarianism are just another false promise, baiting well meaning fools into hazard, advancing the strategy of the enemy using the enemy’s favorite technique: sewing conflict by false promise.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-29 18:52:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244336575569371136

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244335903662903297


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @LLaddon UPB like Rothbardianism is a case of baiting into hazard. Nothing meaningful is answered by UPB or The Kantian Imperative. Worse, it’s open to substitution. So UPB, like KI and Rothbardianism isn’t false. It’s worse. It’s evil.

    How is that for a repositioning?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1244335903662903297

  • Parasitic. We are apex predators, apex innovators, apex producers, and in partic

    Parasitic. We are apex predators, apex innovators, apex producers, and in particular, apex producers of commons. They are apex parasites on the commons. It’s an easily fixable problem by reforming the law to prohibit their means of parasitism – not just by them but by anyone.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-29 14:25:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244269411030138882

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244268764591542272

  • They have abandoned you to the undomesticated animals that they imported in vast

    They have abandoned you to the undomesticated animals that they imported in vast numbers to replace you. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-18 19:47:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1240364277967605760

    Reply addressees: @Filkster @odonnell_r @CamEdwards

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1240024854444867592