Theme: Operationalism

  • (a) hard to claim disambiguation and operationalism (science) is a complication

    (a) hard to claim disambiguation and operationalism (science) is a complication of conflation and supernaturalism(religion).
    (b) hard to compare the wisdom literatures of science (truth) versus religion (deceit).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-12 02:26:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1160739395592511488

    Reply addressees: @ProfKinch @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1160725733666430976


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1160725733666430976

  • WHAT DOES “SCIENCE” MEAN TO YOU? You see, when you hear the term “Science” you t

    WHAT DOES “SCIENCE” MEAN TO YOU?

    You see, when you hear the term “Science” you think about the via-positiva: the problem is, the method of doing science in each field differs. When I think of “Science” I think about the via-negativa: the due diligence necessary to warranty your speech against ignorance error bias wishful thinking, fictionalism and deceit – where the way of doing science in every field is the same. So in my understanding, one gives testimony using science, meaning evidence, reason meaning deduction from evidence, and reciprocity, meaning ethical and moral. So Science: existential, reason: logical, reciprocal: moral.

    Again: Science, Reason, Reciprocity.

    Science:
    … Externally Correspondent
    … Operationally Consistent

    Reason:
    … Categorically Consistent
    … Internally Consistent

    Reciprocity:
    … Rational Choice Consistent
    … Reciprocally Consistent

    And;

    Complete:
    … Parsimonious
    … Fully Accounted
    … Coherent

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:37:28 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576439183549845

  • His game is as dishonest as postmodern thought, congressional accounting, and th

    His game is as dishonest as postmodern thought, congressional accounting, and the woo woo of the Copenhagen Interpretation.Operationally stated there is a difference between the 180iq guy who has zero income and does math because he can, and the guy who has none because he can’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 20:03:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155931987191840769

    Reply addressees: @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155931345647886336


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @clairlemon This is why large data sets have had such a negative effect on postmodern pseudoscience and caused panic in the fields. Neurological data is observed. Economic data is demonstrated. Dating site data is demonstrated. Demonstrated data is different from reported (nonsense) data.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155931345647886336


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @clairlemon This is why large data sets have had such a negative effect on postmodern pseudoscience and caused panic in the fields. Neurological data is observed. Economic data is demonstrated. Dating site data is demonstrated. Demonstrated data is different from reported (nonsense) data.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155931345647886336

  • This is why large data sets have had such a negative effect on postmodern pseudo

    This is why large data sets have had such a negative effect on postmodern pseudoscience and caused panic in the fields. Neurological data is observed. Economic data is demonstrated. Dating site data is demonstrated. Demonstrated data is different from reported (nonsense) data.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 20:01:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155931345647886336

    Reply addressees: @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155930902569996288


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @clairlemon As for Psychology and Sociology and some Economics, it’s true that many shallow hypotheses (observations from meaningless data and meaningless correlations) are not repeatable. This however applies to small sample size, constructed tests, and reported data, not discovered data.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155930902569996288


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @clairlemon As for Psychology and Sociology and some Economics, it’s true that many shallow hypotheses (observations from meaningless data and meaningless correlations) are not repeatable. This however applies to small sample size, constructed tests, and reported data, not discovered data.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155930902569996288

  • then you don’t know what the F* you’re talking about. Secondly, if you can’t say

    …then you don’t know what the F* you’re talking about.
    Secondly, if you can’t say what you aren’t measuring (in his case, available opportunities under the population curve) then you don’t know what you’re talking about. He doesn’t do either. He doesn’t know what he’s saying.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 19:57:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155930469004804096

    Reply addressees: @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155930112115609600


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @clairlemon He tells people that they’re idiots or inummerate in reductive use of correlations. Conversely, if you can’t operationalize it you don’t understand it. In other words, if you can’t via-positiva construct a demonstrated behavior and via-negativa statistically define its limits …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155930112115609600


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @clairlemon He tells people that they’re idiots or inummerate in reductive use of correlations. Conversely, if you can’t operationalize it you don’t understand it. In other words, if you can’t via-positiva construct a demonstrated behavior and via-negativa statistically define its limits …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155930112115609600

  • He tells people that they’re idiots or inummerate in reductive use of correlatio

    He tells people that they’re idiots or inummerate in reductive use of correlations. Conversely, if you can’t operationalize it you don’t understand it. In other words, if you can’t via-positiva construct a demonstrated behavior and via-negativa statistically define its limits …


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 19:56:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155930112115609600

    Reply addressees: @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155929570891014144


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @clairlemon My followers tell me to come to Quillette and go after Taleb thoroughly and get his little game of deception out on the table. Because he’s just trying to play his own ethnic game with the data – just what he accuses others of. Cherry picking data.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155929570891014144


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @clairlemon My followers tell me to come to Quillette and go after Taleb thoroughly and get his little game of deception out on the table. Because he’s just trying to play his own ethnic game with the data – just what he accuses others of. Cherry picking data.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155929570891014144

  • @Euroslam You do not understand the meaning of idealism either. You are using it

    @Euroslam

    You do not understand the meaning of idealism either. You are using it as you did monarchy analogistically rather than operationally – this is a sophomoric means of attempting deception by conflation.

    You do not understand the use of competition. you do not know the evidence (history) of dictators vs kings. The value of the west in defeating the rest is continuous competition preventing the accumulation of power, and forcing men into markets, where merit determines outcome, by means of technological, economic, or political innovation.

    So stop wasting my time with your lies.

    Islam like judaism and christianity is just a way of dysgenic-ally destroying the gene pool, recivilization, and consuming all accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, knowledge and territorial capital.

    islam = cancer.

    You want intolerance. I’ll give you the most intolerant rule of law possible, and the most intolerant government possible.

    But I do it without sophism, supernaturalism, pseudoscience, denial, and lying.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-15 00:13:49 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102442574096666990

  • @BIGSCHMOOL That’s empirically false right? I mean, Math, Science, Operational l

    @BIGSCHMOOL That’s empirically false right? I mean, Math, Science, Operational language, Engineering, Demonstrated Preference, Reciprocity, and Legal Testimony are antidotes for lies.

    Idealism, Analogy, and Supernaturalism are just a comforting means of obscuring and justifying lying with artful sophism (abrahamic lying).

    If you can’t say it in the grammar and vocabulary of testimony (science) they you either don’t know what you’re talking about, are a purveyor of lies, or a maker of lies.

    But it’s just LYING.

    Its all just lies.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 18:32:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102429905737879126

  • (…) THE METHODOLOGY The methodology consists largely of using algorithmic (lik

    (…)

    THE METHODOLOGY

    The methodology consists largely of using algorithmic (like programming) operational language, the vocabulary and concepts of economics and law, to produce operationally formal arguments, that satisfy all dimensions of human perception (consistency, correspondence, operational (existential) possibility, rational choice, reciprocity, limits, full accounting, parsimony, coherence, and warrantied for due diligence against ignorance error bias and deceit for having done so. If you want to learn the methodology, it’s formal, and its relatively difficult, not because the principles are difficult, but because it exposes whether you know what you’re talking about or not, and forces you to speak and write in terms demonstrating that you have the knowledge to claim what you speak is true.

    This method, produces the long sought after ‘strictly constructed law’ closed to interpretation, on one end and the ability to limit political speech to that which is not false parasitic, predatory.

    So that’s the evidence I can and have summarized the work. It’s not philosophy or ideology so it’s not something you intuit, it’s like the calculus, formal logic, programming, economics, and law, which is something you study and learn by repeated application until it’s a skill.

    This is the most important work being produced in the field at present. nothing else compares. I know. And I know why, and I explain why, and it’s not a good thing that the enemy has been so successful at sophism pseudoscience propaganda and denial.

    Now, if that’s too much for your big boy pants, I’m sorry for you. But learning this if you have studied literary philosophy instead of science, logic, algorithms, economics, and law can be burdensome because you are the equivalent of a theologian in the empirical enlightenment, given that this formal logic of the social sciences deprecates literary philosophy forever to the realm of pseudosciences.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:52:34 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426211274373936

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426209481700160


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    (…) 3. A Methodology: i) Epistemology: “The Completion of the Scientific Method and its application to the full scope of human knowledge, resulting in a universal, formal, epistemological method sufficient for adjudication of differences in court.“ ii) Ethics, Law, Politics: “The strict, algorithmic, construction of the natural, common law, of reciprocity (tort);” 4. A Body of Law: ii) Law: “A body of law answering the cannon of questions – providing a common law of equally sovereign men, alternative to Roman, Napoleonic, and Continental law of unequally sovereign men” iii) Constitution: A Constitution of that law, completing the Aristotelian, Roman, British, and American Constitutional Project.” iiii) Policies: “A set of policies under that constitution, solving the otherwise unsolvable problems of the current age.” 5. A Reformation: i) Reformation: “A reformation and unification of all fields” – Language, Logic, and Mathematics – Psychology, Sociology, and Group Strategy – Money, Credit-Finance, and Economics – Ethics, Law, and Politics – Mindfulness-Religion, Education-Academy, and Government-Rule 6. A Solution i) A Solution: “A solution to the political problem of our age.” ii) A Declaration: “A Declaration demanding the implementation of this constitution, as reformations of, by amendments to, the existing American constitution, restoring the historical European, Germanic, English, British, and American rights of equally sovereign men, and a means of successful insurrection to force its adoption if force is required – which it will be.” THE LIST OF IDEAS Too long to list here but the overview lists all of the major themes in order by aristotelian category. From there you have to link to specific articles. ANd then there is the courseware. ANd finally I will ship the book when ready. (…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426209481700160

  • ARCHAIC PROSE IS FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT GRASP ITS CONTENTS, ONLY MIMIC ITS INTUITI

    ARCHAIC PROSE IS FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT GRASP ITS CONTENTS, ONLY MIMIC ITS INTUITIONS.

    If you have to argue in literary analogy it’s because you can’t argue in math, science, operations, incentives, actions and economics.

    The past is only as useful as the science we derive from it.

    Archaic prose is for those who do not grasp its contents, only mimic its intuitions.

    If you can’t disambiguate it, you don’t undrestand it.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:26:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424692763926613