Theme: Operationalism

  • LAW REPLACED PHILOSOPHY Nature consists of constant relations. We can describe t

    LAW REPLACED PHILOSOPHY

    Nature consists of constant relations. We can describe those constant relations. Math is the language of positional relations, logic of set relations, and operations of humanly possible subjectively testable actions. Law consists in the test of the MOST constant relations possible.

    So a) man creates descriptions of physical laws (applications of entropy), and b) man creates descriptions of natural laws (applications of reciprocity), c) judges discover those applications, and d) man issues command, legislation, and regulation, that are rarely if ever ‘law’.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 14:01:00 UTC

  • MISES: NEEDS REPEATING Mises was a raging clown claiming economics was construct

    https://propertarianism.com/2014/06/21/mises-praxeology-as-the-failure-to-develop-economic-operationalism-yes/ON MISES: NEEDS REPEATING

    Mises was a raging clown claiming economics was constructivist ALONE. A fellow autist for certain, he didn’t grasp his discovery for reasons I’ve illustrated at length elsewhere. Mises is important for his membership in the great failure of the 20th century, which was a Jewish construction – reversing Descartes rescue of western mathematics from Semitic superstition.

    Short versions

    PRAXEOLOGY AS A FAILURE TO DEVELOP OPERATIONALISM

    https://propertarianism.com/2014/06/21/mises-praxeology-as-the-failure-to-develop-economic-operationalism-yes/

    MISES POSITION IN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY

    https://propertarianism.com/2014/10/17/mises-position-in-intellectual-history/

    ROTHBARDIAN FALLACIES

    https://propertarianism.com/2014/06/20/rendering-rothbardian-fallacies-intellectually-embarrassing-and-argumentatively-impossible/

    HOPPE’S ERRORS

    https://propertarianism.com/2015/07/31/a-list-of-hans-hermann-hoppes-errors/

    If you can find an error in there it’d be a miracle.

    If it weren’t for rothbardians we might have been able to reform mises by rewriting human action in scientific prose. At this point there is no point.Updated Nov 28, 2019, 10:19 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-28 10:19:00 UTC

  • Hayek didn’t correct Keynes, Hilbert didn’t correct Einstein. Poincare didn’t co

    Hayek didn’t correct Keynes,
    Hilbert didn’t correct Einstein.
    Poincare didn’t correct Cantor.
    Brouwer failed to correct mathematics
    Bridgman did try to correct the sciences.
    Doolittle does… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=516765595587002&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-28 02:09:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1199872967481712640

  • Hayek didn’t correct Keynes, Hilbert didn’t correct Einstein. Poincare didn’t co

    Hayek didn’t correct Keynes,

    Hilbert didn’t correct Einstein.

    Poincare didn’t correct Cantor.

    Brouwer failed to correct mathematics

    Bridgman did try to correct the sciences.

    Doolittle does correct Mises.

    Same F—king Problem: Western Action and Realism vs Eastern Verbalism and Mysticism.

    Masculine vs Feminine cognition.

    Real is real vs Words are real.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-27 21:09:00 UTC

  • This doesn’t take much computational power, only expanding statements into promi

    This doesn’t take much computational power, only expanding statements into promissory, complete sentences, in operational vocabulary.

    The vast majority – with rare exceptions – of what people say is false and/or irreciprocal if it is outside of their direct experience.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 01:24:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198774370178666496

    Reply addressees: @balajis

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198773862898552832


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @balajis TEST:identity(disambiguation), internal consistency(logic), external correspondence(empirical), operational language (existential possibility), rational choice (bounded rationality), reciprocity (in choice), completeness (limits, full accounting), parsimony (competitive).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1198773862898552832


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @balajis TEST:identity(disambiguation), internal consistency(logic), external correspondence(empirical), operational language (existential possibility), rational choice (bounded rationality), reciprocity (in choice), completeness (limits, full accounting), parsimony (competitive).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1198773862898552832

  • TEST:identity(disambiguation), internal consistency(logic), external corresponde

    TEST:identity(disambiguation), internal consistency(logic), external correspondence(empirical), operational language (existential possibility), rational choice (bounded rationality), reciprocity (in choice), completeness (limits, full accounting), parsimony (competitive).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 01:22:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198773862898552832

    Reply addressees: @balajis

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198773143688687616


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @balajis So it’s not that one needs to determine whether something is true, its whether someone can demonstrate the knowledge to make a truth claim (satisfy market demand for infallibility in the given question, given the consequences.)

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1198773143688687616


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @balajis So it’s not that one needs to determine whether something is true, its whether someone can demonstrate the knowledge to make a truth claim (satisfy market demand for infallibility in the given question, given the consequences.)

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1198773143688687616

  • (pet peeve) The reason for pervasive pseudoscience in psych is the absence of op

    (pet peeve) The reason for pervasive pseudoscience in psych is the absence of operational logic yielding (a) falsification of hypotheses, and (b) cueing us to seek equilibrating influences. If you can’t do physics, economics, phil-of-science, you can’t do human science (well). https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1198147553948246016

  • Every time some conservative asserts something in confidence despite his relativ

    Every time some conservative asserts something in confidence despite his relative ignorance, he is no different from his consumptive (liberal) counterpart. The only ‘truthful’ empirical, and… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=509126443017584&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-18 00:55:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1196230345953349632

  • Testimony (Propertarianism) consists of … the use of procedural falsification;

    Testimony (Propertarianism) consists of

    … the use of procedural falsification;

    … in all dimensions of human perception;

    … resulting in the completion of the Scientific Method ;

    … its application to the totality of human knowledge;

    … resulting in a universally commensurable language of all thought;

    … its embodiment in the common law of tort;

    … its use in the construction of a template for constitutions;

    … and as a consequence creating a market for the prosecution of;

    … … superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit

    … and the eradication of:

    … … … superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit

    … from the commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational commons;

    … reversing the second Semitic attempt at the destruction of Western Civilization as it has destroyed every other by systematic undermining from within;

    … and restoring the quality of life we have expected from Western Civilization;

    … for those that live today, and those that will yet live in the future;”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-13 10:27:00 UTC

  • DEFINITION: PARSIMONY “Lowest cost across all dimensions testable by man” EXPANS

    DEFINITION: PARSIMONY

    “Lowest cost across all dimensions testable by man”

    EXPANSION

    – Given human faculties: sense, disambiguation (constant relations), perception(integration-prediction), auto-association-prediction, attention-prediction (will), recursion-prediction, and release of actions;

    – And dimensions of tests of constant relations: free associative, categorical, logical, empirical, operational, rational choice, reciprocal rational choice, completeness;

    Parsimony must refer to:

    “Lowest Cost”, expanded to:

    – the lowest cost (least information), description of a chain of causation

    – surviving tests of: entropy, realism, naturalism, operationalism,

    – and;

    – bounded rational self interest:

    – in the seizure of opportunity,

    – from the field of identified opportunities,

    – given the opportunity cost of the opportunity,

    – determined by competition for the greatest return in the shortest time for the least effort, with the greatest certainty at the lowest risk,

    – to the point of disequilibrium and subsequent re-equilibration,

    – eliminating the opportunity from the field of opportunities.

    – and

    – reciprocity (repeating the above) is the only productive rather than parasitic (costly) means of interaction.

    (- although parasitism and predation are profitable means of interaction, they are consumptive not productive.)

    The difference between:

    – Testimony (due diligence by self),

    – Coherence(consistency by audience),

    – Parsimony(competition by market),

    … is grammatical (point-of-view), and an application of and conformity to,

    – the law of epistemology (free association-idea-> hypothesis-surviving > theory-surviving > application-surviving)

    I can fuss with this a bit to make it as tight as reciprocity and testimony, or any of the other definitions, but ‘skeptical subjective testing against Occam’s Razor serves as the colloquial reduction.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-13 09:21:00 UTC