Theme: Operationalism

  • So if Jewish war on western-sensemaking, our realism, naturalism, operationalism

    So if Jewish war on western-sensemaking, our realism, naturalism, operationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity, testimony, commons, and eugenics, is a continuation of their ancient world rebellion against the masculine empires, and an involuntary rebellion against evolution-eugenics.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 11:59:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252567628062826496

    Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter @JonHaidt @berggruenInst

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252567055997468672


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TruthRespecter @JonHaidt @berggruenInst Female Social Construction to Manage behavioral growth of children, using her seduction > The Jewish group strategy (undermining host peoples, while riding on their commons) > The Anti Evolutionary (domestication) Canon: Freud, Boas, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida, Trotsky-Kristol.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1252567055997468672

  • WHAT DOES EMPIRICAL MEAN (core) Empirical: Reciprocally Observable, and therefor

    WHAT DOES EMPIRICAL MEAN

    (core)

    Empirical: Reciprocally Observable, and therefore agreeable, or disagreeable.

    1. Empirical means observable such that claims can be intersubjectively verifiable or falsifiable: meaning the observation can be “agreed or disagreed upon”;

    2. in addition it means a sufficient volume of observations that we falsify the fragility of episodic memories, our tendency to err, our tendency to find patterns that don’t exist, or to bias the results, and to use both to deceive ;

    3. in addition it means using physical instruments of measurement to compensate for the limits of our senses, perception, and the resulting limits to intuition, prediction, and memory;

    4. in addition it means using logical instruments of measurement (testing) of constant, contingent, inconstant, and non-relations to compensate for the limits of our intuition, imagination, prediction, and reason and as such to prevent claims made in ignorance, error, bias, and deceit.

    5. together consisting of tests of reciprocity of information, and the possibility of Agreement or disagreement by reciprocity of information using due diligence in the falsification of sense, perception, intuition, prediction, and claim by RECIPROCAL due diligence using quantity, quality, consistency, causality.

    See the value of operational language?

    If you have the words for it, most philosophical discourses is rendered nonsense.

    See how law (competition) differs from philosophy by reduction to reciprocity not the self (philosophical justification).

    Like I said, in almost all cases philosophical questions are sophisms due to idealism rather than realism – operational language.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-10 08:22:00 UTC

  • Serialize rather than idealize. Operationalize rather than analogize. Aristotle

    Serialize rather than idealize.

    Operationalize rather than analogize.

    Aristotle got it almost right.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-04 16:31:00 UTC

  • THE TEN CANONICAL PRINCIPLES IN THE NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGNS. 1. Commensurabili

    THE TEN CANONICAL PRINCIPLES IN THE NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGNS.

    1. Commensurability: Definitions by Disambiguation by Serialization and Operationalization

    2. Truth: Satisfaction of demand for infallibility.

    3. Testimony: Due diligence against perceivable dimensions.

    4. Reciprocity: Due diligence against incentive to retaliate.

    5. Property In Toto: Measurements of Demonstrated intersets

    6. Compatibilism: Gender and class division of perception, cognition, memory, advocacy, and cooperation.

    7. Trifunctionalism: Three possible means of coercion, produces three competing specializations of elites.

    8. Perfect Government: rule of law, monarchy as judge of last resort, houses for regions, classes, genders, with one family one vote – adapting to authority under threat, markets under peace, and redistribution during windfalls.

    9. Transcendence: Evolutionary necessity ‘to become the red queen’ – we may never stop nor never rest.

    10. Western Group Evolutionary strategy is “OODA” meaning technology, maneuver and initiative. This strategy is created by excellence and beauty, heroism and duty, truth and oath, sovereignty and reciprocity, rule of law and jury, and markets in everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war – while suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses, and devoting the surpluses to the production of commons, and the multiples for all that result.

    That’s the core of P.

    The rest is application.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 14:23:00 UTC

  • HOW DOES P-LAW DIFFER FROM PHILOSOPHY? (core) You could call P-Law Operational P

    HOW DOES P-LAW DIFFER FROM PHILOSOPHY?

    (core)

    You could call P-Law Operational Philosophy in the sequence of syllogistic reason > rationalism > set logic > operational logic > equilibrial logic (economic logic)

    0) uses series (supply demand) vs ideals.

    1) uses operational vs set logic

    2) users ternary logic not binary (undecidable, truthful, false)

    3) uses satisfaction of demand for infallibility not ideal truth

    4) tests for deceits not just errors

    5) tests for irreciprocity not just ‘good’

    6) tests for costs not just internal consistency

    7) tests for closure by reality instead of just non-contradiction

    8) tests for limits and full accounting.

    9) tests for warranty of due diligence, liability, restitutability.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 14:52:00 UTC

  • i do operational rather than platonism because it prevents contagion into woo wo

    i do operational rather than platonism because it prevents contagion into woo woo and pseudoscience. But this is a difficult topic for nonprofessionals.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-28 05:04:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243765888454705152

    Reply addressees: @dylan_anthony14 @We_knQw

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243742379129143296

  • P-Law is a Science. Sorry. I don’t do Philosophy. P-Law is a formal algorithmic

    P-Law is a Science. Sorry. I don’t do Philosophy. P-Law is a formal algorithmic

    P-Law is a Science. Sorry. I don’t do Philosophy. P-Law is a formal algorithmic (procedural) operational (consisting of human actions within human faculties), Paradigm, Vocabulary, Logic, Grammar and Syntax. A ‘formal science’. It just includes ALL OTHER SCIENCES within it. https://t.co/NnaZAziu2A


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-27 14:19:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243543131355832320

  • P-law is a formal, operational, and algorithmic logic using a universally commen

    P-law is a formal, operational, and algorithmic logic using a universally commensurable grammar (paradigm, vocabulary, logic grammar syntax), that tests (falsifies) every possible dimension of coherent (consistent, correspondent, existentially and operationally possible) thought.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-27 13:35:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243532024868200454

    Reply addressees: @KANTBOT20K

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243531453692076033


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @KANTBOT20K SCIENCES: 1. Formal(Logics: logic, mathematics, algorithmic, operational). 2. Physical (the laws of nature). 3. Psychological (cognitive science), and 4. Social (Social science: economics, law, politics, group strategy).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1243531453692076033

  • Vocabulary: Deflation and disambiguation by competition, operationalization, and

    Vocabulary: Deflation and disambiguation by competition, operationalization, and serialization, ex: Moral: Evil < Bad < Immoral < Unethical < Amoral > Ethical > Moral > Good > Righteous. or Truth: Tautological < Analytic < Idea < Testifiable < Honest < Untested.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-27 13:15:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243527029804486659

    Reply addressees: @KANTBOT20K @Doland58655726

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243525852706603008


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @KANTBOT20K @Doland58655726 Speech: Deflation (constraint upon) ordinary language grammar, limited to a single point of view, absent the verb to be, using complete promissory sentences, describing a series of operations (human actions), resulting in testable transactions (sentence),and sets of transactions.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1243525852706603008

  • Speech: Deflation (constraint upon) ordinary language grammar, limited to a sing

    Speech: Deflation (constraint upon) ordinary language grammar, limited to a single point of view, absent the verb to be, using complete promissory sentences, describing a series of operations (human actions), resulting in testable transactions (sentence),and sets of transactions.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-27 13:10:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243525852706603008

    Reply addressees: @KANTBOT20K @Doland58655726

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243524014288654337


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @KANTBOT20K @Doland58655726 Due Diligence: realism, naturalism, sensory, identity (categorical), internal (logical), operational (actions in time), external (empirical), rational (bounded rationality), reciprocal (moral – reciprocal rationality), limited, fully accounted, warranteed, restitutable.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1243524014288654337