Curt Doolittle

Theme: Operationalism

  • THIS IS WHAT TRUTH MEANS. AND P-LAW IS ITS MEASURE –“Why he needs eprime. Sophi

    THIS IS WHAT TRUTH MEANS. AND P-LAW IS ITS MEASURE

    –“Why he needs eprime. Sophistic presumption that man is the measure of all things.”— Andrew M Gilmour

    That’s Sophistry. I do science. Man’s sense, perception, actions are the only system of measurement man can testify to. If it isn’t testifiable, you can’t claim it’s TRUE.

    Because that’s what a truth claim means: Testimony that is consistent, composable (possible, operational), correspondent, complete (fully accounted), parsimonious (realism, naturalism), rational (choice, personal), and reciprocal (interpersonal), capitalizing, and eugenic.

    Testifiability (Empiricism), Material (Realism and Naturalism), Rational (capitalizing), Reciprocal (capitalizing) political (personally rational, interpersonally reciprocal, commons capitalizing and eugenic capitalizing)

    This is why P-Law is difficult. Most people cannot pass the test of intellectual honesty, because they cannot pay the cost to the self-image of intellectual honesty.

    All non-testimonial speech is theft.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-15 16:53:55 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105039844822360321

  • THIS IS WHAT ‘TRUE’ MEANS AND P-LAW IS ITS METHOD –“Why [Curt Doolittle] needs

    THIS IS WHAT ‘TRUE’ MEANS AND P-LAW IS ITS METHOD

    –“Why [Curt Doolittle] needs eprime [operational prose]. A Sophistic presumption that man is the measure of all things.”— Andrew M Gilmour

    That’s Sophistry. I do science. Man’s sense, perception, actions are the only system of measurement man can testify to. If it isn’t testifiable, you can’t claim it’s TRUE.

    Because that’s what a truth claim means: Testimony that is consistent, composable (possible, operational), correspondent, complete (fully accounted), parsimonious (realism, naturalism), rational (choice, personal), and reciprocal (interpersonal), capitalizing, and eugenic.

    Testifiability (Empiricism), Material (Realism and Naturalism), Rational (capitalizing), Reciprocal (capitalizing) political (personally rational, interpersonally reciprocal, commons capitalizing and eugenic capitalizing)

    This is why P-Law is difficult. Most people cannot pass the test of intellectual honesty, because they cannot pay the cost to the self-image of intellectual honesty.

    All non-testimonial speech is theft.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-15 16:51:04 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105039833611747723

  • Testifiability (Empiricism), Material (Realism and Naturalism), Rational (capita

    Testifiability (Empiricism), Material (Realism and Naturalism), Rational (capitalizing), Reciprocal (capitalizing) political (personally rational, interpersonally reciprocal, commons capitalizing and eugenic capitalizing)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-15 16:48:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316783087460790280

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316783086303145985

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Because that’s what a truth claim means: Testimony that is consistent, composable (possible, operational), correspondent, complete (fully accounted), parsimonious (realism, naturalism), rational (choice, personal), and reciprocal (interpersonal), capitalizing, and eugenic.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1316783086303145985

  • Because that’s what a truth claim means: Testimony that is consistent, composabl

    Because that’s what a truth claim means: Testimony that is consistent, composable (possible, operational), correspondent, complete (fully accounted), parsimonious (realism, naturalism), rational (choice, personal), and reciprocal (interpersonal), capitalizing, and eugenic.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-15 16:48:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316783086303145985

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316783084654784514

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    –“Why he needs eprime. Sophistic presumption that man is the measure of all things.”— Andrew M Gilmour

    That’s Sophistry. I do science. Man’s sense, perception, actions are the only system of measurement man can testify to. If it isn’t testifiable, you can’t claim it’s TRUE.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1316783084654784514

  • If I managed to convince the next generations that science consists of testimony

    If I managed to convince the next generations that science consists of testimony under ‘realism(existence), naturalism(cause), and operationalism (actions), and that european success is the product of institutionalizing testimony in norms, then that would be an accomplishment.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-14 21:27:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316490895810859010

  • “Q&A: What is the difference between a hero and an idol?”

    Note: this is an example of using the P-Method of Disambiguation by Enumeration, Serialization, and Operationalization. This method of disambiguation, is analogous to finding the common denominator in mathematics – creating a standard of commensurability: measurement. It works in any and every subject. It is the formal logic of speech.

     

    —“Q&A: What is the difference between a hero and an idol?”—

    THE CORRECT ANSWER

    CONFLATION: The mixing of properties of a term or the concept it relates to

    INFLATION: The mixing of properties of terms or concepts to increase appeal to authority.

    TRIFUNCTIONALISM: Europeans practice trifuctionalism – a market for elites, and a market for elite literature: (a)Science, Law, History, (b)Philosophy, Literature, (c) Mythology, Ritual (Natural Religion), Oath, Feast, and Festival. Europeans practice disambiguation and deconflation. This is why we developed empirical, history, law, and science and other civilizations didn’t.

    MONOFUNCTIONALISM: The Semites practice Monopoly: a monopoly that conflates mythology, Mythology, Ritual, Law into Theology. This is because they are heterogeneous tribal people that developed religion first, failed at developing both law and state.

    IDOL: an image or representation of a god used as an object of worship.
    … (a) Semitic: The primacy of Gods
    … (b) Submission
    … (c) Supernatural
    … (d) Theological
    … (e) Man > Prophet > God
    … (f) Idol

    HERO: a person who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.
    … (a) European: The Primacy of Man
    … (b) Aspirational
    … (c) Supernormal
    … (d) Mythological
    … (e) Hierarchy: Man > Hero > Demigod > God
    … (f) Statue

    COMMON HUMAN BEHAVIOR

    It’s common to CONFLATE and INFLATE terms like:

    … (a) IDOL and HERO,

    Just like it is common to CONFLATE and INFLATE

    … (b) Supernatural BELIEF and Natural TRUST.

    Or my favorite:

    … (c) Logical, Rational, and Reasonable

  • “Q&A: What is the difference between a hero and an idol?”

    Note: this is an example of using the P-Method of Disambiguation by Enumeration, Serialization, and Operationalization. This method of disambiguation, is analogous to finding the common denominator in mathematics – creating a standard of commensurability: measurement. It works in any and every subject. It is the formal logic of speech.

     

    —“Q&A: What is the difference between a hero and an idol?”—

    THE CORRECT ANSWER

    CONFLATION: The mixing of properties of a term or the concept it relates to

    INFLATION: The mixing of properties of terms or concepts to increase appeal to authority.

    TRIFUNCTIONALISM: Europeans practice trifuctionalism – a market for elites, and a market for elite literature: (a)Science, Law, History, (b)Philosophy, Literature, (c) Mythology, Ritual (Natural Religion), Oath, Feast, and Festival. Europeans practice disambiguation and deconflation. This is why we developed empirical, history, law, and science and other civilizations didn’t.

    MONOFUNCTIONALISM: The Semites practice Monopoly: a monopoly that conflates mythology, Mythology, Ritual, Law into Theology. This is because they are heterogeneous tribal people that developed religion first, failed at developing both law and state.

    IDOL: an image or representation of a god used as an object of worship.
    … (a) Semitic: The primacy of Gods
    … (b) Submission
    … (c) Supernatural
    … (d) Theological
    … (e) Man > Prophet > God
    … (f) Idol

    HERO: a person who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.
    … (a) European: The Primacy of Man
    … (b) Aspirational
    … (c) Supernormal
    … (d) Mythological
    … (e) Hierarchy: Man > Hero > Demigod > God
    … (f) Statue

    COMMON HUMAN BEHAVIOR

    It’s common to CONFLATE and INFLATE terms like:

    … (a) IDOL and HERO,

    Just like it is common to CONFLATE and INFLATE

    … (b) Supernatural BELIEF and Natural TRUST.

    Or my favorite:

    … (c) Logical, Rational, and Reasonable

  • I am sharing an opinion piece that fits the incentives. To date it is the most c

    I am sharing an opinion piece that fits the incentives. To date it is the most consistent, correspondent, operationally demonstrated, rationally incentivized, and coherent, theory and no other comes close – especially if you understand the left’s method of lying. (I teach it.)

    Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul

  • I am sharing an opinion piece that fits the incentives. To date it is the most c

    I am sharing an opinion piece that fits the incentives. To date it is the most consistent, correspondent, operationally demonstrated, rationally incentivized, and coherent, theory and no other comes close – especially if you understand the left’s method of lying. (I teach it.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-12 16:05:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315685040785850380

    Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315684126993854467

  • All knowledge that is non-tautological is theoretical. The question is only whet

    All knowledge that is non-tautological is theoretical. The question is only whether it is consistent, correspondent, and operationally possible. And if operationally possible whether it adheres to rational human incentives where Left=Theft + Dysgenic vs Right=Merit + Eugenic.

    Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul