Theme: Operationalism

  • We need a more expensive religion

    Well at present I seem to have ‘scienced’ religion into operational and functional demands – more so than anyone in the past. You can ‘science’ literature as well. Or consciousness. There is a difference however between the science, the experience, and especially the auto-associative experience, that results from a long history of practicing a religion. That said, the personal consequences versus the consequences for the polity due to any religious, literary, historical, traditional, normative set of behaviors is often in conflict with the religious claims. Heroin addiction feels good and accomplishes the same thing as religion. Its consequences for the individual and society are terrible. Anything that produces mindfulness (sedating the prey response by evoking the pack response) will create tradeoffs. So you care about religion as a USER (personal consequences) and I care about it as RULER (political consequences). Religion is one of the last domains to ‘science’ and there is no reason we should think doing so will be any less dehumanizing than every other falsification of our primitive fantasies. Yet the demand for mindfulness will remain. As such, what will provide the services of religion yet is not false and does not produce negative consequences like the Abrahamic religions? Stoicism-epicureanism and the Tragedy worked – but it’s expensive. So Abrahamic religion is cheap education and what we call formal ‘education’ is expensive. So it appears that we need a more expensive religion. And one that isn’t false.

  • We need a more expensive religion

    Well at present I seem to have ‘scienced’ religion into operational and functional demands – more so than anyone in the past. You can ‘science’ literature as well. Or consciousness. There is a difference however between the science, the experience, and especially the auto-associative experience, that results from a long history of practicing a religion. That said, the personal consequences versus the consequences for the polity due to any religious, literary, historical, traditional, normative set of behaviors is often in conflict with the religious claims. Heroin addiction feels good and accomplishes the same thing as religion. Its consequences for the individual and society are terrible. Anything that produces mindfulness (sedating the prey response by evoking the pack response) will create tradeoffs. So you care about religion as a USER (personal consequences) and I care about it as RULER (political consequences). Religion is one of the last domains to ‘science’ and there is no reason we should think doing so will be any less dehumanizing than every other falsification of our primitive fantasies. Yet the demand for mindfulness will remain. As such, what will provide the services of religion yet is not false and does not produce negative consequences like the Abrahamic religions? Stoicism-epicureanism and the Tragedy worked – but it’s expensive. So Abrahamic religion is cheap education and what we call formal ‘education’ is expensive. So it appears that we need a more expensive religion. And one that isn’t false.

  • What does language consist of? 1) Transfer of information via symbols (Referrers

    What does language consist of?
    1) Transfer of information via symbols (Referrers)
    2) By continuous recursive disambiguation
    3) Where symbols (Referrers) consist of measurements
    4) Measurements of relations between sense-perceptions
    5) Within a paradigm of constant relations.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-22 16:34:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363889840488669185

  • An Operational Explanation of Schizophrenia

    On Schizophrenia: The brain (neurons, minicolumns, columns, modules, regions, hemispheres) functions by the adversarial (competitive) composition for coherence (overlapping, matching), resulting in the seizure of attention (victory) by the Thalamus (control of attention by the persistence of feedback across the neocortex), which causes recursion( persistence of context). Any sufficiently widespread degeneration of that consolidation into coherence (severely in the hippocampal region, generally across the neocortex), will cause the failure of that recursion. The brain functions by continuous iterations of recursive disambiguation held by the thalamus(auto-associative attention) and anterior (front) cingulate cortext (recursive attention) the prefrontal cortex(goal intention). That’s why language (grammar) is organized as continuous recursive disambiguation: pathfinding. So schizophrenia and all its symptoms in all their forms and severities are easily explicable as general degenerative disorder – most critically of the thalamus -> cingulate cortex -> prefrontal cortex. And even that sequence may simply be the most severe of a spectrum of disorders. So just as Alzheimer’s begins in the hippocampal region preventing the formation of memories, and resulting in the degeneration of memories (sort of top-down failure of the brain), schizophrenia affects the other end of the spectrum (the bottom-up failure of the brain) by the degeneration of control competition for coherence and therefore attention, causing degeneration in the hierarchy of recursion of associations. This is why the initial association formed in the neocortex appears to function but the recursion upon that association fails. I have no idea other than the apparent causal, hierarchical, sequence of depression to schizophrenia hints at some relation to immunological disorders, viral disorders, and developmental disorders – even that is just a suspicion, but the current research certainly takes that position. ( This exposition is a reason why you want to understand my work on the operational explanation of the function of the brain. )

  • An Operational Explanation of Schizophrenia

    On Schizophrenia: The brain (neurons, minicolumns, columns, modules, regions, hemispheres) functions by the adversarial (competitive) composition for coherence (overlapping, matching), resulting in the seizure of attention (victory) by the Thalamus (control of attention by the persistence of feedback across the neocortex), which causes recursion( persistence of context). Any sufficiently widespread degeneration of that consolidation into coherence (severely in the hippocampal region, generally across the neocortex), will cause the failure of that recursion. The brain functions by continuous iterations of recursive disambiguation held by the thalamus(auto-associative attention) and anterior (front) cingulate cortext (recursive attention) the prefrontal cortex(goal intention). That’s why language (grammar) is organized as continuous recursive disambiguation: pathfinding. So schizophrenia and all its symptoms in all their forms and severities are easily explicable as general degenerative disorder – most critically of the thalamus -> cingulate cortex -> prefrontal cortex. And even that sequence may simply be the most severe of a spectrum of disorders. So just as Alzheimer’s begins in the hippocampal region preventing the formation of memories, and resulting in the degeneration of memories (sort of top-down failure of the brain), schizophrenia affects the other end of the spectrum (the bottom-up failure of the brain) by the degeneration of control competition for coherence and therefore attention, causing degeneration in the hierarchy of recursion of associations. This is why the initial association formed in the neocortex appears to function but the recursion upon that association fails. I have no idea other than the apparent causal, hierarchical, sequence of depression to schizophrenia hints at some relation to immunological disorders, viral disorders, and developmental disorders – even that is just a suspicion, but the current research certainly takes that position. ( This exposition is a reason why you want to understand my work on the operational explanation of the function of the brain. )

  • This helps too: People need words that transform from concepts to analogies to m

    This helps too: People need words that transform from concepts to analogies to m

    This helps too:
    People need words that transform from concepts to analogies to measurements.

    P-Logic and Law converts language to MEASUREMENTS. https://t.co/x0eB9OMiKz


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-18 23:48:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1362549690374516742

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1362542188081668097

  • The disambiguation and operationalization of Western Civilization’s “Individuali

    The disambiguation and operationalization of Western Civilization’s “Individualism”: “Self Determination maximizes the opportunity for adaptation at the cost of continuing natural selection”. It’s that last bit that the Left Can’t Stand For. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1362506452196278287

  • Google is your friend: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Adversarialism, GSRR

    Google is your friend: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Adversarialism, GSRR

    Google is your friend:
    Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Adversarialism, GSRRM, NAXALT, Face(Truth-before-face), Norms, Institutionalization, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Adaptation, The Sciences (formal, physical, behavioral, evolutionary), Rule of Law (Natural law), Neoteny. https://t.co/TL6nkXOLcX


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-18 18:21:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1362467414760427524

    Reply addressees: @factandrumor @viderino

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1362422074254458889

  • When you serve in the military what does the command “report” demand of the subo

    When you serve in the military what does the command “report” demand of the subordinate? When you testify in court what does it demand of the subordinate? When we use ‘truth-before-face’ to compare civilizational difference what does it demand of the speaker? What do they share?


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-18 14:56:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1362415637667188737

    Reply addressees: @factandrumor

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1362413411045359623

  • No other people solved, normalized, or institutionalized truth-before-face – let

    No other people solved, normalized, or institutionalized truth-before-face – let alone, realism, naturalism, operationalism, and adversarialism. Every other civilization sought not to discover and adapt to but to evade the formal, physical, behavioral, evolutionary laws.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-18 13:18:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1362390935045308421

    Reply addressees: @factandrumor

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1362376067198160900