Making use of a system of measurement when reasoning mythically (theologically) or rationally (philosophically) or empirically (scientifically) or operationally (testimonially) one CAN reach close to the same conclusions. The difference is in the error tolerated by each method.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-02 13:24:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1400080867255521282
RT @curtdoolittle: @earthevolution3 @Lord__Sousa @ThruTheHayes Science=Testimony. Testimony requires identity, consistency, operational con…
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-25 17:55:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1397250095410786308
Science=Testimony. Testimony requires identity, consistency, operational constructability from first principles, correspondence, rational choice, reciprocity, adversarial parsimony, limits, completeness, and warrantability. Since I know those things I can do that. That’s science.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-25 17:51:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1397248970980737029
Reply addressees: @earthevolution3 @Lord__Sousa @ThruTheHayes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1397248231084417025
The Method – Part I – Operational Sentences (Prose)
https://youtu.be/UwFKSX60CrA
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-02 12:29:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1388833037987762176
Recorded The Method Part 1 – Operational Sentences today. Rendering now. Have two versions. Tomorrow, I think, we’ll do the grammars.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-01 23:25:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1388635611599355907
So effectively we are not using notation for what it is we’re describing and measuring, and we have to compensate with ‘magic words’ to transform easily factorable math into counts, measures, and directions.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-25 13:48:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386316098749050883
Reply addressees: @milordog1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386315329169727490
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@milordog1 It ‘should’ be -1 for consistency. And the idea of ‘complex, rational, and irrational numbers’, are grammatical tricks that like the verb to-be in english obscures causality. Arithmetic(counting), math(ratios), geometry(space) are different grammars.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1386315329169727490
You can only warranty an observable.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-23 20:22:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385690557649989634
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago @ThruTheHayes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385687455714717703
Pick phrases that are very simple and demonstrable because that’s all we are trying to teach now. In order to make argumentative claims one requires first principles. We are not working with a regiments just sentences
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-23 20:20:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385689957650554882
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago @ThruTheHayes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385685171844882435
You can’t affirm something you yourself judge. As such you only observe a person at a location, and Ofer an opinion as to that individuals merits that provide advantage to the audience.What you are doing is getting stuck in god mode (speaking as an authority rather than observer)
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-23 19:35:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385678681020960778
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago @ThruTheHayes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385678127930744838
What does ‘in court’ mean. Operationaize that.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-23 19:32:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385678089049591817
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago @ThruTheHayes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385674421013258241