Untrue. I become NUMB to the influence of variations in the grammars (paradigms). I see them as just what they are. Constructs. They lose all means of influence. This is what we mean by ‘PLaw produces agency’ agency produces autonomy, autonomy responsibility, and then mindfulness
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-21 19:10:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1495838300908797964
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1495822845083111429
Operational statements are not simple, they are complete. This is why they are closed to interpretation, conflation, inflation, and deceit or denial by deduction or induction. There is no difference between my work and mathematics other than the complexity of transformations.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-21 18:34:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1495829358799425540
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1495828742006099968
@olddustyghost@Spacebunny@voxday@RolfNelson Um you dumb fuck, I’m a specialist in operationalization, and the falsification of cantorian sets and infinities as deviation from the cartesian restoration of mathematical realism. Now, given that you’ve just illustrated you’re a dumb fuck, let me explain for you and other dumb fucks, just what I said in one of the earilest posts to you dumb fucks on the topic: Infinities tell us only that we are missing sufficient information to identify the operational (existential limit) and that the question isn’t why evolution computes so quickly, but why evolution computes so well. So then JFG and I spent a bit of time explaining how evolution tries to limit the problem of infinities: in other words, what regulatory forces are extant in evolutionary reproduction that LOWER the rate of evolution to the maximum of selection pressure without collapse.
Now if you weren’t a dumb fuck you would understand that. But if you weren’t a dumb fuck you wouldn’t ahve ever believed Vox, or any other moron that evolutionary computation can’t achieve ratdical evolutionary change witin just a generation, two, or three.
In other words the rate of evoutionary adaptation is determined by the relatinoshiop between the productive content of the dna, the information content of the cell at any given state, the regulation of the dna production at any given state, the reproductive recombination of the dna during sexual reproduction, the mutation that occurs at division, recombination, regulation recombination, in-utero environment, and the very long list of selection pressures.
So, of those, selection pressure appears to be the most controlling variable given the … and in humans regulatory expression rather than DNA coding appears to be the most influential axis of evolution given that there is one single universal direction of human evolution: neoteny. And while some neotenic signals are genetic (eyes, skin color) and are very simple, Neoteny is not so much determined by SNP but by many polygenic interactions, but by regulatory expression. So just as your brain (to the extent you dumb fucks have one) performs trillions of parallel computations – yet we cannot examine or understand them given that complexity, the same is true of neotenic evolution that regulates the migration of growth stem cells away from the neutral tube. That regulation is largely responisble for slowing our development and maturity to provide the benefits of childhood non-aggression, for long enough periods of time that our neuology can develop intentional self regulation (executive function, agency). But this development that leads to our intelligence and ability to cooperate, is offset by the lost of persistent short term memory which is why chimps defeat us so thorougly.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-13 00:58:14 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107787969774865720
HOW DO WE DEVELOP A COMPETENCY IN THE SKILL OF DECIDABILITY?
— “So what’s a sound entry point to begin to develop this competency?” —
Practice “Continuous recursive disambiguation of concepts by serialization and operationalization into a spectrum of ordinal measurements closed to conflation, inflation and denial. Producing a single most parsimonious paradigm, vocabulary, grammar, logic of commensurability”
Why? Evolution constructs the entire persistent universe by the process of continuous, recursive, disambiguation of disorder(entropy) into order(energy) that we call mass in a process we call evolutionary computation.
If we reverse this organization by disambiguation into first principles using the same process we result in a set of irreducible first principles, vocabulary, grammar and logic of decidability across all human experience, completing unification of sciences and scientfic method.
So how can you learn that? You can do it yourself, or you can follow those of us who do it, producing that science of universal decidability, and our more than twenty-year project to complete it.
At least now it’s vaguely comprehensible.
But we are … an irreverent group. 😉 Our irrevernce provides the humor that lets us tolerate the daily scrifice of our psycholgical and emotional sacred cows. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-12 20:10:47 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107786839516096784
“Practice continuous recursive disambiguation of concepts by serialization and operationalization into a spectrum of ordinal measurements closed to conflation, inflation and denial. Producing a single most parsimonious paradigm, vocabulary, grammar, logic of commensurability”
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-12 20:02:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1492589914915024901
Reply addressees: @kyle_sheehan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1492588224048353281
RE: Triangles. ALL: Try to resist using terms from religion, philosophy, psychology, and try to express all referents and measurements in operational economic terms.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-12 19:17:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1492578652634103811
SUMMARY OF THE KOTH GAME FALSIFYING THE VOX DAY MORONS
@StevenV
The arguments I made were operational (scientific) of which empiricism is but one dimensions. The responses were without exception evidence of the female means of non-argument, defending the abrahamic method of deceit, combined with a failure to grasp basic concepts necessary to hold the claims your clowns asserted. In return I maintained the same strategy I have a long reputation for: reflect the insult and restate the central argument – or at least some component of it. Just as I have done in this paragraph. I even sent a set of links describing what I was doing and why. Yet all that occurred was evidence I was correction: common feminine justification of pretense of knowlege, use of GSSRM, pilpul, critique, as defense of the social construction of false promise (fraud) of freedom from formal, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws.
Really simply: no one has even understood basic criticisms of the variables that affect rates of evolution, nor a basic understanding of the limits of such mathematics, when results approach infinity. It’s like talking to kindergardeners about calculus. Adn I’ve baited every dimension that would allow anyone in the audience to demonstrate that knowledge, and thus demonstrate the capacity to hold with conviction the claims made.
It’s ok to have faith in a magic man if it makes you happy. But faith is not testifiable. That is why it requires faith. Therefore you may claim it is good, but may not claim it is true. Faith requires bearing insult for doing so for the same reason women must bear insult for their emotional and cognitive indiscipline. And when a people, and their faith are failing – largely becuase of their faith – then they have every incentive in the world for not bearing insult for faith, and like women, called out in public to ‘calm down’ double down with moral outrage of children.
The brain requires mindfulness to limit its costs. Some of us are more empathic and neurotic or of lower ability and value to others. As such those people are weaker than others. The need for faith is a weakness. This is why faith is ‘a good’ – for the weak.
The people who do not have and are not weak enough to require faith, demonstrate loyalty to the faithful when they are kith and kin just as men demonstrate loyalty to the empathic and neurotic fragility of women.
But to maintain that loyalty the women may never claim she is rational and possesed of agency, and the faithful may never claim they are testifying and that their words are true.
This falsehod breaks our coopeation by loyaty and makes the weak the enemy of the strong.
And the weak always double down on their weakness rather than adapt and in doing so mature into responsible agentful adulthood.
Thus endeth the lesson.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-10 00:32:25 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107770881326771097
@StevenV The arguments I made were operational (scientific) of which empiricism is but one dimensions. The responses were without exceptoin evidence of the female means of non-argument, defending the abrahamic method of deceit, combined with a failure to grasp basic concepts necessary to hold the claims your clowns asserted. In return I maintained the same strategy I have a long reputation for: reflect the insult and restate the central argument – or at least some component of it. Just as I have done in this paragraph. I even sent a set of links describing what I was doing and why. Yet all that occurred was evidence I was correction: common feminine justification of pretense of knowlege, use of GSSRM, pilpul, critique, as defense of the social construction of false promise (fraud) of freedom from formal, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws.
Really simple: no one has even understood basic criticisms of the variables that affect rates of evolution, nor a basic understanding of the limits of such mathematics, when results approach infinity. It’s like talking to kindergardeners about calculus. Adn I’ve baited every dimension that would allow anyone in the audience to demonstrate that knowledge, and thus demonstrate the capacity to hold with conviction the claims made.
It’s ok to have faith in a magic man if it makes you happy. But fait is not testifiable. That is why it requires faith. Therefore you may claim it is good, but may not claim it is true. Faith requires bearing insult for doing so. And when a people, and their faith are failing – largely becuase of their faith – then they have every incentive in the world for not bearing insult for faith.
The brain requires mindfulness to limit its costs. Some of us are more empathic and neurotic or of lower ability and value to others. As such they are weaker than others. The need for faith is a weakness.
The people who do not have and are not weak enough to require faith, demonstrate loyalty to the faithful when they are kith and kin just as men demonstrate loyalty to the empathic and neurotic fragility of women.
But to maintain that loyalty the women may never claim she is rational and possesed of agency, and the faithful may never claim they are testifying and that their words are true.
This breaks our coopeation by loyaty and makes the weak the enemy of the strong.
And the weak always double down on their weakness rather than adapt and in doing so mature into responsible agentful adulthood.
Thus endeth the lesson.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-10 00:29:08 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107770868401644066
@EvilSandmich Whenever someone makes a statement like that I ask them to operationalize it in order to demonstrate that they have the knowledge to make the claim.
What is the strategic value of creating a communication friction in the region – and causing the govt to react to it?
What can be done while they are reacting to it?
Don’t answer the question.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-07 04:58:04 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107754938970407735
JB: re: “Dissolution of narratives”
Rather: the dissolution of socially constructed narratives and replacement with socially falsified pragmatisms.
Outcome: Trades for goods and information are norm independent, but political commons are norm dependent.
Federations are Req’d.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-05 21:51:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490080691199127554
Reply addressees: @Plinz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1489841192976060416