Theme: Operationalism

  • I am starting to see your problem. It will take me a bit more to put my finger o

    I am starting to see your problem. It will take me a bit more to put my finger on it with clarity.

    So far you’re using ideal (mathematics being idealism) concepts for optimization, equilibrium. This may be useful in some fields, even if it’s not consistent across fields.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 00:05:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697400350188204230

    Reply addressees: @Ket_Math_Dad @EricMorganCoach @Viorp2 @WerrellBradley @AntonyArakkal1 @Sargon_of_Akkad

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697399252002222425

  • Sabine, all. Consiousness requires a system of measurement, and movement of the

    Sabine, all.
    Consiousness requires a system of measurement, and movement of the body through space and therefore human scale, is the source of the organization of information.
    I’ve done extensive work on the subject and as Sabine suggests, consciousness will emerge with enough memory in enough layers of recursive hierarchy from embodiment, episodic memory, and wayfinding – which is all that’s required. The next step is demand for recursion and that demand appears to be generated by the utility of social cooperation and the need for prediction of others behavior under the same constraints of embodiment. Truth: the brain turns it to be quite simple in function and complexity emergent simply by the sheer volume of grey matter.

    Reply addressees: @SocProf77 @skdh


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-31 17:43:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697304031348109312

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697094392169844976

  • That’s simply not true on the evidence. Instead people need a system of understa

    That’s simply not true on the evidence. Instead people need a system of understanding and measurement that provides mindfulness and confidence that they can act in their interests and the group interest without provoking others by not imposing costs upon others. Now given the IQ distribution in different classes and polities, given the knowledge difference between young and ignorant, adult and educated, and late age experiences, and given the empathizing to systematizing spectrum of feminine to masculine cognition, this means that dim, ignorant and feminine are better served by anthropomorphic rules and the mature, educated, and masculine better served by laws of the universe, then there is some claim that we require the spectrum of fairy tales and myths, to literature and rational rules, to scientific knowledge of cause and consequence, such that we may incrementally gain competence and gracefully fail to given our different genetic abilities. But there is no evidence god or gods are useful or necessary compared to heroes and natural laws.

    Reply addressees: @BobHatchett


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-29 19:18:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696603299326091264

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1696600358296936897

  • Example: Disambiguation By Enumeration, Operationalization and Serialization: |M

    Example: Disambiguation By Enumeration, Operationalization and Serialization:

    |Motiviation for Imitation|: Jealousy > Envy > Imitation > Admiration > Inspiration > Aspiration

    Jealousy:
    Definition: Jealousy involves the fear of losing something valuable to another person, such as a relationship or affection.
    Focus: The focus of jealousy is often on the relationship between three parties: the one who is jealous, the person they are jealous of, and the object of affection or attention.
    Emotion: Often associated with feelings of insecurity, fear, or possessiveness.
    Example: Feeling jealous when a significant other spends time with someone else.

    Envy:
    Definition: Envy is the desire for something that someone else possesses, such as a trait, status, ability, or possession.
    Focus: The focus of envy is typically on the object or quality desired, not necessarily on the relationship with the person who has it.
    Emotion: Often associated with feelings of inadequacy, longing, or resentment.
    Example: Feeling envious of a colleague’s success or a friend’s new car.

    Comparison:
    Commonality: Both envy and jealousy involve a comparison between oneself and others and can lead to negative emotions.
    Difference: Envy is about wanting something someone else has, while jealousy is about the fear of losing something to someone else.

    Conclusion:
    Envy and jealousy, though related, are distinct emotions. Envy focuses on desiring something someone else has, while jealousy centers on the fear of losing something to someone else.

    Positive Equivalents Without Negative Connotations:
    Positive equivalents without negative connotations might include admiration for qualities or achievements and contentment and security in relationships. These positive counterparts emphasize appreciation, respect, and trust rather than longing, resentment, or fear.

    A term that might come closer to a positive equivalent of envy, encompassing both admiration and a desire to emulate, could be “admiration”, or “inspiration” or “aspiration.”

    Admiration: This can be seen as a positive counterpart to envy. Admiration involves respect and approval for someone’s qualities or achievements without the negative longing or resentment associated with envy.Example: Admiring a friend’s talent without wishing to take it away from them.

    Inspiration:
    Definition: Feeling motivated and energized by someone else’s qualities, achievements, or successes, leading to a desire to pursue similar goals or develop similar skills.
    Example: Being inspired by an artist’s creativity and seeking to develop one’s artistic talents.

    Aspiration:
    Definition: Having strong desires or ambitions to achieve something, often influenced by the admiration of others who have achieved similar goals.
    Example: Aspiring to become a writer after reading the works of a favorite author.

    Both inspiration and aspiration can capture the positive aspects of admiration and the desire to emulate without the negative connotations of longing or resentment that are often associated with envy. They reflect a proactive and constructive response to recognizing qualities or achievements in others that one wishes to cultivate in oneself.

    Neutral Equivalents:

    Imitation (Of behavior):
    Definition: The act of copying or mimicking someone else’s actions, behaviors, style, or work.
    Characteristics: Replicative, often involves direct copying without necessarily adding originality or personal interpretation.
    Example: Imitating a behavior by reproducing it as it appears.

    Comparison:
    Imitation vs. Envy: Imitation involves copying someone else’s work or behavior, while envy involves desiring something someone else has. Imitation is an action, whereas envy is a feeling or desire.
    Imitation vs. Jealousy: Imitation is about replication, while jealousy is about the fear of losing something to someone else. Imitation doesn’t necessarily involve relationships or emotions like jealousy does.
    Commonality with Envy: Both imitation and envy can involve a focus on someone else’s qualities or possessions, but imitation is about copying, while envy is about desiring.
    Difference from Jealousy: Jealousy is more complex and involves relationships and emotions that are not directly related to imitation.
    Inspiration vs. Imitation: Inspiration often leads to original creations that are influenced by another’s work but not directly copied. Imitation, on the other hand, involves direct copying or replication.
    Aspiration vs. Imitation: Aspiration is about setting and pursuing personal goals, often influenced by others but not necessarily involving copying. Imitation is more about replicating specific behaviors or works.
    Commonality: All concepts involve a relationship to others’ qualities, achievements, or works, but they differ in how that relationship is expressed and what it leads to.

    Conclusion:
    While inspiration and aspiration involve positive motivations and desires influenced by others, leading to personal growth, goals, or original creations, imitation is more about direct copying or mimicking. Inspiration and aspiration often involve adding personal interpretation, creativity, or ambition, while imitation may not necessarily include those elements. The choice between these concepts depends on the context and what aspect of the relationship to others’ qualities or works is being emphasized.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-22 15:02:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694002193534443521

  • “Q: ARE YOU DOING PHILOSOPHY? NO. NOT REALLY.” Argh. Technically what I do is no

    “Q: ARE YOU DOING PHILOSOPHY? NO. NOT REALLY.”

    Argh. Technically what I do is not philosophy but formal science. Formal science is one of the four sciences: formal(logic), physical(before), behavioral(during), and evolutionary(after).

    I consider myself an anti-philosophy scientist. However, not only does no one understand the definition of science, but no one understands the distinction between science and philosophy. So for the sake of simplicity, I say I’m a philosopher and social scientist specializing in epistemology(knowledge), decidability(truth), law(conflict), and economics(cooperation).

    So, I work in the logic of decidability. The Formal logic of decidability. It’s a Formal operational logic. That means it’s different from formal set logic. Formal set logic uses symbols for categories. Operational logic uses names of operations instead of symbols. Both are formal in that they require unambiguous grammars of continuous recursive disambiguation. It’s the difference between abstract mathematics independent of context and scale and concrete and discrete computation dependent upon context and scale: a vast difference.

    The simple version is that I (we at NLI) write what looks like English, reads like programming, describes a supply-demand curve, and is just a different category of mathematics (ordinal or semantic, or ‘dictionary’) – terms that require explaining:
    cardinal(quantitative order) >
    … ordinal(qualitative order) >
    … … semantic (domain, dictionary, list order).

    I realize that I am, we are, trying to cause a rather grand leap in human thought, as large as the leap from theology to philosophy, or philosophy to science.

    So it’s quite an adaptation of ‘frame’ we’re asking of people – even if the benefits of doing so are as great as every other leap.

    The problem has been finding a means of simplifying it such that we can teach it effectively to larger numbers of people – which we think we’re able to do now.

    But like any formal discipline (STEM Knowledge) it’s more work than you’d expect. Partly because learning something you don’t know is easier than re-learning something you already think you know.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-10 18:24:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1689704275033706496

  • “Q: Curt: What’s your definition of Philosophy?”– I use, and we at NLI use, the

    –“Q: Curt: What’s your definition of Philosophy?”–

    I use, and we at NLI use, the methodology of “Disambiguation by enumeration, serialization, and operationalization into a system of measurement”.

    The series of wisdom literatures consists of:
    Mythology(Suggestion, myths, anthropomorphism, counting) >
    … Religion(Command, parables, rules, arithmetic) >
    … … Philosophy(Justification, literature, sets, reason, geometry) >
    … … … Empiricism (Falsification, history, rationalism algebra)>
    … … … … Science (Testimony, logic, instrumentation, calculus)>
    … … … … … Operational Logic (Demonstration, first principles, computation, adversarial simulation)

    Disambiguation by Limits
    Therefore, via disambiguation, a wisdom literature is defined by its limits, and its limits by what it is not.

    Sequence
    This disambiguation (evolutionary series) describes the arc of anthropomorphic and anthropocentric to the opposite, in which man is merely another product of evolutionary computation of continuous recursive disambiguation of disorder into by the simple laws of the universe.

    The Cause of the Sequence
    The evolution of wisdom literatures consists of the gradual replacement of ignorance, anthropocentrism and storytelling with knowledge, materialism(the irrelevance of man), and measurement.

    Philosophy’s Position In the Sequence
    Philosophy, or what is most often termed ‘fantasy moral literature’ in the imitators of Plato, is a bridge between religion and rationalism. And Epicurus and Aristotle the bridge between socratic philosophy and empiricism (natural philosophy).

    Religion and Philosophy also imply the search for the good. Empiricism, Science, and Operationalism imply the search for truth with which we may then consider the good.

    At the present time, as far as I know, we have completed the disambiguation of philosophy and science such that the domain of truth is produced by science and operationalism, but that the choice of good is determined by philosophy and history, and theology is but a test of the durability of a claim of the good over centuries.

    The Unambiguous Definition of Philosophy
    The unambiguous definition of philosophy is the production the reduction of ignorance, error, presumption, and bias, through a systematic method, consisting of critical skepticism (testing), disambiguation, and decomposition (analysis), necessary to study, (falsify), causes and consequences of the fundamental questions, concepts, and principles of everyday life and of nature, encouraging us to investigate what we are ignorant of or err upon, resulting in the pursuit of improving human individual and group understanding, valuation, and choice, and justifying that knowledge to others, so that it might spread for personal and collective advantage.

    Differences
    Philosophy differs from Religion in that it seeks to advance the human condition through increasing knowledge, agency, and ability, while theology seeks to produce consistent behavior regardless of knowledge, agency, and ability. This is why religious communities advance more slowly than philosophical, and philosophical more slowly than scientific.
    But it’s also why theology, then philosophy, then empiricism, then science, then operationalism place increasingly costly burdens on the individual’s ability to obtain and make use of increasingly complex knowledge, that is increasingly difficult to comprehend.
    Ergo we not only require theology, philosophy, science, and operationalism for increases in precision, but for teaching incrementally, and for graceful failure by those lacking ability to learn increasingly abstract complexities.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @univcompass


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-10 16:14:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1689671510946881536

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1689649092463669248

  • Q: CURT: “What Is P-Law?” It’s a shortcut for the scope of work we produce at th

    Q: CURT: “What Is P-Law?”

    It’s a shortcut for the scope of work we produce at the institute that consists of:

    The unification of the sciences into a formal operational (constructive, falsificationary) logic of the ternary logic of evolutionary computation; that in turn is the first principle upon which everything in the universe exists – with the resulting end product a science of cooperation(ethics), economics, law, and politics, and a reformation of the american constitution to plug the few holes in that attempt at a science of government.

    Which, if I write out like that, you quickly understand why we use the shortcut: P-Law. 😉

    Reply addressees: @AryanChadG


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-07 01:24:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688360526550548480

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688293737204678656

  • via Moritz Bierling and Martin Stepan “And to be clear, e-prime is only a traini

    via Moritz Bierling and Martin Stepan

    “And to be clear, e-prime is only a training tool to provide an onramp to operationalization, serialization, enumeration, etc. It doesn’t actually give you operationalization “right out the box”

    When you integrate it into subconscious like we have, if you can, you won’t say things that cannot be operationalized, even when you don’t use operational language directly.

    This is what Curt means when he says that how we speak looks like English but “is” actually math with words

    That only works because English was already pretty close.”


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-27 13:28:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1684556479611768832

  • I understand your point; it’s just not how we define pseudoscience today. A clai

    I understand your point; it’s just not how we define pseudoscience today. A claim of Science must meet a set of criteria satisfying testifiability. The most important of which is realism (absence of magic etc) and determinism (regularity of causality). I can enumerate each of the criteria of testifiability if needed. Pseudoscience is different from scientific fraud (which is pervasive today) because of the publication incentive.

    Reply addressees: @batchestgirl @Dek01907133


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-24 13:20:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1683467303998849024

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1683465940707713026

  • List synonyms and antonyms. Research etymologies. convert to operational definit

    List synonyms and antonyms. Research etymologies. convert to operational definitions. Determine consistent causal properties. Organize into a series. Add additional terms until limits achieved. Disambiguate definitions to produce identity in each.
    Simple Example:
    Evil < immoral…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-18 22:21:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1681429123590246401

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1681424788034846737