Curt Doolittle

Theme: Operationalism

  • Definitions Are Recipes

    by Bill Joslin The only definitions (identity) which rest in the commons are operational descriptions (recipes). Operational descriptions stand on their own as a set of arguments – thus definitions simply assign a name to a set of operational arguments. We then use names, for sake of brevity, to build new, higher order arguments. The relation of lower order and higher order definitions are two-fold – either a lower order argument has a causal relation to a higher order one (a primary or fundamental ) or the higher order argument provides superordinate to the lower order argument. By categorizing according to arguments versus object-properties we may open up new meta-relations which are not available with an object-property mentality.

  • by Curt Doolittle – Consistency in the categorical, internal, correspondent, ope

    by Curt Doolittle – Consistency in the categorical, internal, correspondent, operational, volitional, reciprocal, and fully accounted dimensions, create universally commensurable statements, just as certainly as constant dimensional relations in the first four dimensions are sufficient to describe any motion of and constant relations in time. by Bill Joslin: – Categorical = identity – Internal = is it logical – Correspondent = is it real – Operational = does it exist (how it exists , is real) – Volitional = is it doable – Reciprocity= is it successful (moral) – Fully accounting – necessary and sufficient for all of the above and all consequences accounted for.

  • “Yet the entire pantheon of liberal philosophy and economics admits itself to be

    —“Yet the entire pantheon of liberal philosophy and economics admits itself to be based on metaphysical unknowns, they state quite clearly that their forms aren’t empirical. So from the emergence of liberalism and capitalism what do we find? An overload of justification to why some supposed metaphysical unknowns justifies the existence of private property and the preservation of old, clearly predatory, capital.”—Gage Benson They are based upon actionability, voluntary reciprocity, non parasitism, contract : eugenics. in other words possible contract in testable terms as a means of defeating universal parasitism. They are based on the use of merit to concentrate capital. They mirror evolution. And the success of western and eastern civs is due to evolution: superior neoteny through continuous contraction of the lower margin. this process allows for an increase in the normative means. You presume equality by demand for certainty as a means of preserving opportunity or parasitism. they demand action in furtherance of capital concentration via reciprocity as the test of truth ( existential certainty). they accelerate to save, while you decelerate to consume. you demand consumptive opportunity, they demand retention of production from risk. they force evolution, and you force devolution.

  • “Yet the entire pantheon of liberal philosophy and economics admits itself to be

    —“Yet the entire pantheon of liberal philosophy and economics admits itself to be based on metaphysical unknowns, they state quite clearly that their forms aren’t empirical. So from the emergence of liberalism and capitalism what do we find? An overload of justification to why some supposed metaphysical unknowns justifies the existence of private property and the preservation of old, clearly predatory, capital.”—Gage Benson

    They are based upon actionability, voluntary reciprocity, non parasitism, contract : eugenics. in other words possible contract in testable terms as a means of defeating universal parasitism.

    They are based on the use of merit to concentrate capital.

    They mirror evolution.

    And the success of western and eastern civs is due to evolution: superior neoteny through continuous contraction of the lower margin. this process allows for an increase in the normative means.

    You presume equality by demand for certainty as a means of preserving opportunity or parasitism. they demand action in furtherance of capital concentration via reciprocity as the test of truth ( existential certainty). they accelerate to save, while you decelerate to consume. you demand consumptive opportunity, they demand retention of production from risk. they force evolution, and you force devolution.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-22 16:29:00 UTC

  • “Yet the entire pantheon of liberal philosophy and economics admits itself to be

    —“Yet the entire pantheon of liberal philosophy and economics admits itself to be based on metaphysical unknowns, they state quite clearly that their forms aren’t empirical. So from the emergence of liberalism and capitalism what do we find? An overload of justification to why some supposed metaphysical unknowns justifies the existence of private property and the preservation of old, clearly predatory, capital.”—Gage Benson They are based upon actionability, voluntary reciprocity, non parasitism, contract : eugenics. in other words possible contract in testable terms as a means of defeating universal parasitism. They are based on the use of merit to concentrate capital. They mirror evolution. And the success of western and eastern civs is due to evolution: superior neoteny through continuous contraction of the lower margin. this process allows for an increase in the normative means. You presume equality by demand for certainty as a means of preserving opportunity or parasitism. they demand action in furtherance of capital concentration via reciprocity as the test of truth ( existential certainty). they accelerate to save, while you decelerate to consume. you demand consumptive opportunity, they demand retention of production from risk. they force evolution, and you force devolution.

  • The Reciprocity Of Measurement (Infinities)

    Operationally defined, no infinite sets can exist, and the idea of infinite sets of different sizes is also impossible. However, what is possible, is that in the generation of positional names, some sets of names must be produced faster and some slower, so that at any given moment the size of the sets will differ. A number is the name of a position. A position can be applied to any dimension, and any number of dimensions. We can create mathematics using triangulation (the greek model) beginning with sizes, and using ratios of sizes, or we can create mathematics of positions and apply them to lengths in any dimension. This property defines the reciprocity of measurement. So we can start with the mathematics of triangulation, then apply it to scale (just as we apply money to prices as a standard unit), and then we can scale the unit reciprocally. If we taught mathematics operationally then all this fictionalism that makes math nonsense to so many people would disappear. So for example, we can measure art by triangulation but we cannot measure it by numbers. We can measure distances by either triangulation or numbers. There are phenomenon we cannot measure by numbers other than probability (causal density is too high).

  • THE RECIPROCITY OF MEASUREMENT (INFINITIES) Operationally defined, no infinite s

    THE RECIPROCITY OF MEASUREMENT (INFINITIES)

    Operationally defined, no infinite sets can exist, and the idea of infinite sets of different sizes is also impossible. However, what is possible, is that in the generation of positional names, some sets of names must be produced faster and some slower, so that at any given moment the size of the sets will differ. A number is the name of a position. A position can be applied to any dimension, and any number of dimensions. We can create mathematics using triangulation (the greek model) beginning with sizes, and using ratios of sizes, or we can create mathematics of positions and apply them to lengths in any dimension. This property defines the reciprocity of measurement. So we can start with the mathematics of triangulation, then apply it to scale (just as we apply money to prices as a standard unit), and then we can scale the unit reciprocally.

    If we taught mathematics operationally then all this fictionalism that makes math nonsense to so many people would disappear.

    So for example, we can measure art by triangulation but we cannot measure it by numbers. We can measure distances by either triangulation or numbers. There are phenomenon we cannot measure by numbers other than probability (causal density is too high).

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-21 11:42:00 UTC

  • The Reciprocity Of Measurement (Infinities)

    Operationally defined, no infinite sets can exist, and the idea of infinite sets of different sizes is also impossible. However, what is possible, is that in the generation of positional names, some sets of names must be produced faster and some slower, so that at any given moment the size of the sets will differ. A number is the name of a position. A position can be applied to any dimension, and any number of dimensions. We can create mathematics using triangulation (the greek model) beginning with sizes, and using ratios of sizes, or we can create mathematics of positions and apply them to lengths in any dimension. This property defines the reciprocity of measurement. So we can start with the mathematics of triangulation, then apply it to scale (just as we apply money to prices as a standard unit), and then we can scale the unit reciprocally. If we taught mathematics operationally then all this fictionalism that makes math nonsense to so many people would disappear. So for example, we can measure art by triangulation but we cannot measure it by numbers. We can measure distances by either triangulation or numbers. There are phenomenon we cannot measure by numbers other than probability (causal density is too high).

  • Operational Description Of Truthful Speech…

    One or more fully accounted, transactionally complete sentences, consisting of vocabulary limited to the semantics of commensurable, constant relations of human actions, in fully transparent grammar free of pretense of knowledge, demand for substitution, inflation and conflation, and limited to productive, warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of imposition of costs by externality. (Getting much closer now.)

  • OPERATIONAL DESCRIPTION OF TRUTHFUL SPEECH… One or more fully accounted, trans

    OPERATIONAL DESCRIPTION OF TRUTHFUL SPEECH…

    One or more fully accounted, transactionally complete sentences, consisting of vocabulary limited to the semantics of commensurable, constant relations of human actions, in fully transparent grammar free of pretense of knowledge, demand for substitution, inflation and conflation, and limited to productive, warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of imposition of costs by externality.

    (Getting much closer now.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 14:37:00 UTC