Theme: Operationalism

  • It is impenetrable because it uses 1) Continuous recursive disambiguation of ter

    It is impenetrable because it uses
    1) Continuous recursive disambiguation of terms by enumeration, operationalism, adversarialism, and serialization into a system of unambiguous measurement of any concept into one or more causal relations.
    2) Promissory, Operational, language, absent the verb to-be, as complete transactions, in complete sentences.
    3) Constructed from the ternary logic of evolutionary computation (the first cause), into the first principles (laws of nature) at each scale of emergent combinations (disciplines).
    There is more, but in general, math is just the most reductive deflationary language, and ordinary language is an efficient one, while storytelling ( loading, framing, obscuring), fictions, the fictionalisms, evasion, denial, projection, accusation, undermining, sedition, treason and warefare are inflationary, conflationary, deceptive, and evasive.
    I have employed the largest group of library science people I know of, worked with one of the largest organizations in the world on their analysis, and myself worked in early AI, as well as my own work in computational linguistics.
    What I learned most from, was anti-social behavior, lying, fraud, fictionalisms, and evasion – particularly sex differences in lying.
    There is more information there in the via-negativa than there was in all the efforts at rationalizing language.
    And the new LLMs are merely proving the point every single day now.
    Morality is just physics over time.

    Reply addressees: @privacyfocused @Y_I_K_ES @GaryMarcus


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 18:52:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776321950979063808

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776316562636677544

  • I don’t use number systems, either cardinal or ordinal for natural orders. I use

    I don’t use number systems, either cardinal or ordinal for natural orders. I use operational names. However if you have some suggestions I’d invest time in considering it?

    I should probably explain that numbers are useful for weights of relations (vectors), and we certainly could use numbers as arbitrary but unique names for both sums (points) and relations (vectors). But at that point, as arbitrary unique names, they are no longer ‘numbers’ per say, as both names, positional names, and values, but only names, without further positional or value content. (which is very Cantorian, really. 😉 )

    Reply addressees: @JohannNetram


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-30 21:53:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774193204264337408

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774142205571031257

  • Operationalism In Science: Mutual Insurance of Self Determination > Sovereignty

    Operationalism In Science:
    Mutual Insurance of Self Determination > Sovereignty > Reciprocity > Truth > Operationalism > Construction from First Principles.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-26 23:34:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772769207375052800

  • Operationalism In Science: Mutual Insurance of Self Determination > Sovereignty

    Operationalism In Science:
    Mutual Insurance of Self Determination > Sovereignty > Reciprocity > Truth > Operationalism > Construction from First Principles.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-26 23:34:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772769207425311173

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @NoahRevoy @JoshuaLisec Excellent. Basically: anglo germanic

    RT @curtdoolittle: @NoahRevoy @JoshuaLisec Excellent. Basically: anglo germanic root words approximate operational language and therefore a…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-26 14:53:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772638033893802026

  • Excellent. Basically: anglo germanic root words approximate operational language

    Excellent. Basically: anglo germanic root words approximate operational language and therefore are more likely to constitute truth speech.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-26 14:53:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772637972703187159

    Reply addressees: @NoahRevoy @JoshuaLisec

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772636056631775267

  • Yes to the first. The second is true but, not consistent with the first. Operati

    Yes to the first. The second is true but, not consistent with the first. Operationalize them both and then try to express the second (silver) as the first (golden)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-23 15:09:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1771554832182096187

    Reply addressees: @EP_Freely

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1771548158582985194

  • There are a number of videos on ‘the method’ on our youtube channel. If I try to

    There are a number of videos on ‘the method’ on our youtube channel.
    If I try to explain it to you it won’t make as much sense as trying to make use of it.
    That said:
    I use ‘continuous recursive disambiguation by adversarial competition by reduction of any dimension to a system of measurement. Again, by enumeration, operationalization, and organization into a spectrum by adversarial elimination.
    In other words, I build up a constructive logic (just as evolution did) from the polarity of the quantum background to human behavior.
    In practice there are about twenty-some-odd rules that explain nearly everything we care about.
    Learning how to apply them isn’t that different from learning how to apply geometry.
    The differences lies in the unlearning of your presumptions and biases.
    If it was easy someone would have done it before me.
    It’s not.
    I just happen to be born at the right time with enough other shoulders of other giants to stand on.

    Reply addressees: @RunicSigil


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-21 03:15:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770650426666352640

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770647152743915605

  • HELP: QUESTION FOR FELLOW SUPERNERDS: Here I’ve posted the same set of concepts

    HELP: QUESTION FOR FELLOW SUPERNERDS:
    Here I’ve posted the same set of concepts in three forms of prose:
    … 1) Publication Prose
    … 2) Academic Prose
    … 3) Academic Prose in Operational Language
    I recognize that I’m ‘asking a lot’ here, but please opine on which style would be preferable for the presentation of the summary of the work.

    Examples:

    1) Publication) Prose

    Title: The Emergence of Differences and Relations: A Constructive Logic of Existence

    From Homogeneity to Difference: In the beginning, there was homogeneity – a uniform, undifferentiated state of existence. However, as pressure or perturbations were introduced into this homogeneous system, differences began to emerge. These differences arose as localized fluctuations or variations in the properties or characteristics of the once-uniform existence.

    The Spectrum of Relations: As differences emerged, they gave rise to a spectrum of relations between the now-differentiated entities. These relations can range from “completely unrelated,” where the differences are merely coincidental and have no causal or dependent connection, to “necessary and persistent,” where the differences are intrinsically linked and interdependent.

    The Constructive Nature of Existence: Existence, then, can be understood as a constructive process, wherein differences and relations continuously emerge and evolve from an initially homogeneous state. This process of differentiation and relation-building gives rise to the complex tapestry of entities, phenomena, and interactions that constitute reality.

    Perception, Cognition, and Logic: The constructive nature of existence is mirrored in the functioning of the brain and the processes of perception, cognition, and logic. Neurons, the fundamental building blocks of the brain, operate by creating and manipulating differences and relations.

    Sensory inputs, which are essentially differences in stimuli, are processed by neurons to create perceptual representations. These representations are constructed through the identification and relation of differences in the input data.

    Cognition, in turn, involves the manipulation and integration of these perceptual representations to create higher-order concepts, ideas, and mental models. This process relies on the ability of neurons to establish and modify relations between different perceptual and conceptual entities.

    Logic, then, can be understood as the systematic testing and validation of the consistency and correspondence between the relations established in perception, cognition, and the external world. Logical reasoning involves assessing whether the relations between concepts, ideas, or propositions are consistent with each other and with the observed relations in reality.

    Artificial Neural Networks: The constructive logic of existence, based on the emergence of differences and relations, is also reflected in the design and functioning of artificial neural networks. These computational systems are modeled after the structure and operation of biological neurons, and they learn to perform tasks by identifying and manipulating differences and relations in input data.

    Just as neurons in the brain create perceptual and conceptual representations through the processing of differences and relations, artificial neural networks learn to recognize patterns, classify information, and make predictions by adjusting the strengths of the connections (relations) between their artificial neurons.

    Conclusion: The emergence of differences and relations from an initially homogeneous state is a fundamental process that underlies the constructive nature of existence. This process is mirrored in the functioning of the brain, the processes of perception, cognition, and logic, and even in the design and operation of artificial neural networks.

    2) Academic Prose
    Title: The Emergence of Differences and Relations: Towards a Constructive Logic of Existence

    Introduction: This section explores the fundamental process of how differences and relations emerge from an initially homogeneous state, and how this process explains the constructive nature of existence, perception, cognition, logic, and even artificial neural networks. By understanding these diverse phenomena as instances of a common constructive process, we aim to establish a foundation for a unified constructive logic of existence.

    The Emergence of Differences: We begin with the concept of homogeneity, a uniform and undifferentiated state of existence. However, this homogeneity is unstable, and as perturbations or pressures are introduced, differences begin to emerge. These differences manifest as localized variations in the properties or characteristics of the once-uniform existence. The emergence of differences is a crucial first step in the constructive process, as it sets the stage for the formation of relations.

    The Formation of Relations: As differences emerge, they give rise to a spectrum of relations between the differentiated entities. At one end of the spectrum, we have “completely unrelated” differences, where the variations are merely coincidental and have no causal or dependent connection. At the other end, we find “necessary and persistent” relations, where the differences are intrinsically linked and interdependent. Between these extremes lies a continuum of relations with varying degrees of causal and dependent connections.

    The Constructive Process of Existence: Existence can be understood as a constructive process, continuously building upon the emergence of differences and the formation of relations. This ongoing process of differentiation and relation-building gives rise to the complex network of entities, phenomena, and interactions that constitute reality. The constructive nature of existence is not limited to the physical world but extends to the realms of perception, cognition, and logic.

    Neuronal Basis of Perception and Cognition: The brain, particularly the neuron, is a prime example of how the constructive process of differences and relations underlies perception and cognition. Neurons operate by creating and manipulating differences and relations in sensory inputs and mental representations. Sensory information, which consists of differences in stimuli, is processed by neurons to create perceptual representations through the identification and relation of these differences. Cognition, in turn, involves the manipulation and integration of perceptual representations to create higher-order concepts, ideas, and mental models, relying on the ability of neurons to establish and modify relations between different perceptual and conceptual entities.

    Logic as the Testing of Relations: Logic can be understood as the systematic testing and validation of the consistency and correspondence between the relations established in perception, cognition, and the external world. Logical reasoning involves assessing the consistency of relations between concepts, ideas, or propositions and their correspondence with observed relations in reality. By testing these relations, logic serves as a tool for validating the constructive processes of perception and cognition and ensuring their alignment with the constructive nature of existence.

    Artificial Neural Networks and the Constructive Process: The constructive logic of existence, based on the emergence of differences and relations, is also reflected in the design and functioning of artificial neural networks. These computational systems, modeled after biological neurons, learn to perform tasks by identifying and manipulating differences and relations in input data. Just as neurons in the brain create representations through the processing of differences and relations, artificial neural networks adjust the strengths of connections between artificial neurons to recognize patterns, classify information, and make predictions.

    Conclusion: The emergence of differences and relations from homogeneity is a fundamental constructive process that underpins the nature of existence, perception, cognition, logic, and artificial neural networks. By recognizing these diverse phenomena as instances of a common constructive process, we can establish a foundation for a unified constructive logic of existence. This constructive logic provides a framework for understanding how consistency and correspondence arise across different levels of reality, from the basic structure of existence to the highest forms of abstract reasoning.

    3) Academic Prose in Operational Language
    Title: Constructing a Logic of Existence: The Emergence of Differences and Relations

    Abstract: This section proposes a constructive logic of existence based on the fundamental process of the emergence of differences and relations from an initially homogeneous state. It argues that this process explains the constructive nature of existence, perception, cognition, logic, and even artificial neural networks. By demonstrating the commonality of this constructive process across these diverse phenomena, the paper aims to establish a foundation for a unified constructive logic of existence.

    Introduction: The present investigation explores the fundamental constructive process that gives rise to the complex tapestry of entities, phenomena, and interactions constituting reality. It posits that this process involves the emergence of differences from an initially homogeneous state and the subsequent formation of relations between these differentiated entities. The paper argues that understanding this constructive process provides a basis for a unified constructive logic of existence, applicable across various domains, including perception, cognition, logic, and artificial neural networks.

    The Emergence of Differences: The constructive process begins with a homogeneous state, characterized by uniformity and lack of differentiation. However, the introduction of perturbations or pressures destabilizes this homogeneity, leading to the emergence of localized variations in properties or characteristics. These variations constitute the emergence of differences, a crucial first step in the constructive process, as they provide the foundation for the formation of relations.

    The Formation of Relations: The emergence of differences necessitates the formation of relations between the differentiated entities. These relations exist on a spectrum, ranging from “completely unrelated” differences, where the variations lack causal or dependent connections, to “necessary and persistent” relations, characterized by intrinsic links and interdependence. Between these extremes, there exists a continuum of relations with varying degrees of causal and dependent connections. The formation of relations completes the constructive process, giving rise to the complex network of entities and interactions that constitute existence.

    Perception and Cognition as Constructive Processes: The constructive process of differences and relations finds expression in the functioning of the brain, particularly in the operations of neurons. Neurons engage in the creation and manipulation of differences and relations in sensory inputs and mental representations. The processing of sensory information, consisting of differences in stimuli, results in the creation of perceptual representations through the identification and relation of these differences. Cognition builds upon these perceptual representations, manipulating and integrating them to create higher-order concepts, ideas, and mental models. This process relies on the neuron’s ability to establish and modify relations between different perceptual and conceptual entities.

    Logic as the Testing of Relations: Logic operates as a systematic testing and validation of the consistency and correspondence between the relations established in perception, cognition, and the external world. The process of logical reasoning involves assessing the consistency of relations between concepts, ideas, or propositions and their correspondence with observed relations in reality. By testing these relations, logic serves as a tool for validating the constructive processes of perception and cognition, ensuring their alignment with the constructive nature of existence.

    Artificial Neural Networks and the Constructive Process: Artificial neural networks, designed to mimic the functioning of biological neurons, demonstrate the applicability of the constructive logic of existence in computational systems. These networks learn to perform tasks by identifying and manipulating differences and relations in input data. The adjustment of connection strengths between artificial neurons enables the recognition of patterns, classification of information, and generation of predictions. This process parallels the constructive process of differences and relations in the brain, showcasing the universality of the constructive logic across biological and artificial systems.

    Conclusion: The constructive logic of existence, based on the emergence of differences and relations from homogeneity, provides a unifying framework for understanding the constructive nature of existence, perception, cognition, logic, and artificial neural networks. By recognizing the commonality of this constructive process across these diverse phenomena, the paper establishes a foundation for a unified constructive logic of existence. This logic elucidates the emergence of consistency and correspondence across different levels of reality, from the fundamental structure of existence to the highest forms of abstract reasoning.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-08 14:49:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1766114009206374400

  • OPERATIONAL PROSE ABSENT THE VERB TO-BE (repost) Operational prose that avoids t

    OPERATIONAL PROSE ABSENT THE VERB TO-BE
    (repost)
    Operational prose that avoids the verb “to be” in its various forms (is, are, was, were, etc.) and constructs complete sentences can significantly reduce the occurrence of vague, ambiguous, and evasive language. This style of writing emphasizes action, clarity, and directness, impacting the use of weasel words, passive voice, and other evasive strategies in several ways:

    Reduces Weasel Words and Vagueness: By focusing on concrete actions rather than abstract states of being, operational prose makes it harder to use weasel words that lack specificity. Statements must be tied to specific actions, actors, and outcomes, which naturally demands more precision and clarity.

    Eliminates Passive Voice: Without the verb “to be,” the passive construction becomes nearly impossible to use. This forces the writer to specify the subject performing an action, thereby increasing accountability and transparency in the prose.

    Limits Hedging and Ambiguity: Operational prose, by its nature, requires that statements be tied to clear and verifiable actions or outcomes. This makes it more difficult to hedge or be ambiguous, as each sentence must convey a specific action or result that can be measured or observed.

    Discourages Nominalizations: Operational prose encourages the use of active verbs, reducing the tendency to turn verbs into nouns (nominalizations), which often make sentences more abstract and less clear.

    Focuses on Specific Actions Over Generalizations: By emphasizing actions over states, operational prose avoids broad, untestable claims, focusing instead on specific, demonstrable activities or achievements.

    Minimizes Jargon and Bureaucratese: While not directly tied to the exclusion of the verb “to be,” operational prose’s emphasis on clarity and action can also help minimize the use of unnecessary jargon and bureaucratese, which often obscure meaning.

    Operational prose encourages a more direct, action-oriented style of writing that is inherently clearer and more specific. This style naturally mitigates the use of linguistic strategies designed to obscure, evade, or inflate, promoting instead a form of communication that is more straightforward and easier to verify or challenge.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-07 23:16:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765879292523667456