Curt Doolittle updated his status.
OK. LET ME HELP YOU.
Science: Operational Falsification.
Rationalism: Verbal Justification.
Religion: Supernatural Authoritarianism.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 04:45:16 UTC
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
OK. LET ME HELP YOU.
Science: Operational Falsification.
Rationalism: Verbal Justification.
Religion: Supernatural Authoritarianism.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 04:45:16 UTC
OK. LET ME HELP YOU.
Science: Operational Falsification.
Rationalism: Verbal Justification.
Religion: Supernatural Authoritarianism.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 00:45:00 UTC
I have a framework called testimony: internally consistent, externally correspondent, operationally describable, rational of choice, reciprocal of rational choice, limited, fully accounted, and parsimonious. As far as I know that is ever dimension of perception available to man.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 16:54:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017452150996299777
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017383367388561408
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017383367388561408
CLOSING
As such, before we get to metaphysics, we must answer the question of what we can testify to saying about metaphysics. For some reason this rather uncomfortable bit of necessity seems lost on the excuse-makers that brought us the dark ages.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 13:40:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017403275807723520
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017382157776510977
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017382157776510977
9) I *cannot* come to any other conclusion simply because I cannot testify to the untestifiable; cannot fictionalize to compensate; and have before me a rather simple answer that explains the universe, and all that results from it’s entropic transformation.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 13:31:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017400987110268928
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017382157776510977
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017382157776510977
8) Ergo, you are arguing as if we are discussing a theory when I am arguing that you are engaged in deception (fraud). In other words, you are creating a fictionalism in order to justify a personal psychological, political, or material want (or fear).
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 13:31:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017400942449381377
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017382157776510977
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017382157776510977
5) and an infinite number of monkeys on an infinite number of typewriters would do so in the time it it takes to type the number of characters that constitute the works of shakespeare. In other words, the time such a thing would take would be rather short.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 15:13:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1016339649395032064
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1016291695359676416
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1016291695359676416
4) that said, in the ideal model, some set of characters (~50), randomly generated (randomness is actually a hard problem in itself) will eventually produce the works of shakepeare…
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 15:12:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1016339330556743681
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1016291695359676416
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1016291695359676416
3) So conflating the ideal (math, monkeys on typewriters) with the real( operations existential in space-time), is a fallacy, and constructing arguments from that fallacy a straw man (deception or fraud.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 15:09:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1016338500508110850
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1016291695359676416
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1016291695359676416
2) However, mathematics and sets are ideals not reals, and monkeys on typewriters are ideals not reals, and in the same way we can model mathematical infinities (operations on constant relations) we can model any set of Ludic (fixed set of references) operations.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 15:07:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1016338100543475714
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1016291695359676416
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1016291695359676416