October 11th, 2018 10:42 AM THE EXISTENTIAL FRAME by Bill Joslin The existential frame (operations) remains constant (unmolested) across both linguistic (cognition) and experiential (sensory) domains. And any other frame, like rose color glasses, blinders or eye patches; twists, limits, or colors the experiential via the linguistic. (That’s what frames do). Subject – that which acts upon an object. Object – that which receives influence by a subject. Subjective truth – truth being the object upon which a frame has influenced. Objective truth – truth which remains untainted Operationalism and the tenets of Testimonialism work to prevent speakers from raping the truth.
Theme: Operationalism
-
The Existential Frame
October 11th, 2018 10:42 AM THE EXISTENTIAL FRAME by Bill Joslin The existential frame (operations) remains constant (unmolested) across both linguistic (cognition) and experiential (sensory) domains. And any other frame, like rose color glasses, blinders or eye patches; twists, limits, or colors the experiential via the linguistic. (That’s what frames do). Subject – that which acts upon an object. Object – that which receives influence by a subject. Subjective truth – truth being the object upon which a frame has influenced. Objective truth – truth which remains untainted Operationalism and the tenets of Testimonialism work to prevent speakers from raping the truth.
-
THE EXISTENTIAL FRAME by Bill Joslin The existential frame (operations) remains
THE EXISTENTIAL FRAME
by Bill Joslin
The existential frame (operations) remains constant (unmolested) across both linguistic (cognition) and experiential (sensory) domains. And any other frame, like rose color glasses, blinders or eye patches; twists, limits, or colors the experiential via the linguistic. (That’s what frames do).
Subject – that which acts upon an object.
Object – that which receives influence by a subject.
Subjective truth – truth being the object upon which a frame has influenced.
Objective truth – truth which remains untainted
Operationalism and the tenets of Testimonialism work to prevent speakers from raping the truth.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 10:42:00 UTC
-
ALL SPEECH IS MEASUREMENT, ALL STATEMENTS TRANSACTIONS. BUT MEASUREMENT OF WHAT?
ALL SPEECH IS MEASUREMENT, ALL STATEMENTS TRANSACTIONS. BUT MEASUREMENT OF WHAT?
You know, the material universe seemed complicated until we discovered the atomic structure and created the periodic table of the elements.
The same is true for the Grammars. Once you understand the grammars, all speech is as open to inspection and comprehension on its structure alone.
Once you understand that we can produce only one parsimonious consistent and correspondent frame: operations, that provides universal commensurability, you understand why all frames like all theories, like stories, are weak analogies, self delusions, or frauds.
There is only one ‘way of thinking’ (frame) that consists of truth, and an infinite number of frames that are weak, delusional or fraudulent.
Why? because we evolved to negotiate, not to speak the truth. We must learn to speak the truth as a means of calculation, just as we must learn to calculate using every OTHER method of calculation.
This is why postmodernism and every other disciplinary, cult, ideological, and private vocabulary is just fraud at some degree of scale.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 06:52:00 UTC
-
“Could we come up with a better term than “tribalism” please?”— Marginal Revol
—“Could we come up with a better term than “tribalism” please?”— Marginal Revolution
<Critical Rant=ON>
OMG…..
How about we use operational (scientific language) instead of postmodern (pseudoscientific language)? I mean, is economics a science or a pseudoscience?
The world doesn’t need more sophisms.
|PACK| Family > Kin > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Civilization > Race = Markets for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law, trade policy ameliorating differences in purchasing power), producing universal EUGENIC reproduction.
–versus–
|HERD| Individual > Corporation > Universalism = NO MARKETS for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law), instead involuntary transfers between groups producing UNIVERSAL DYSGENIC REPRODUCTION.
Economics if anything consists of the full accounting of costs. NOT THE CHERRY PICKING OF RETURNS INDEPENDENT OF COSTS.
I don’t make mistakes such as these. The reason is that I don’t engage in cherry-picking (Pseudoscience) Justificationism (sophism) and Postmodern (denial and deceit) “empty verbalism” for the purpose of producing frames that perpetuate the frauds of involuntary transfer, and the spread of dysgenia.
Simple facts: those groups that practiced eugenic reproduction under manorialism (east and west) succeeded precisely because of those eugenics, and those that did not, and still do not, are those that struggle.
And those that were sold the false promise of universalism whether in the ancient world (the Abrahamic Dark Age and the destruction of all great civilizations of the ancient world), and in the Modern world (marxist-libertarian-postmodern-feminist destruction of the modern world) but lacked the reserve capital (europe, east asia), were sufficiently distracted by the false promise of pseudoscientific sophism, that they have missed the window for using the industrial and technological revolution to organize their societies for eugenic middle class reproduction.
Reductive Explanation: The HERD (Universalist) doesn’t know it’s a HERD, but the PACK (Nationalist) knows it’s a pack, and the herd a herd.
Selective use of economics to justify an instinct is just pseudoscience. Either you engage in full accounting or you don’t.
<Critical Rant=Off/>
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 09:50:00 UTC
-
Um. No. Let me help you: Literature, even fictional literature, (artificial hist
Um. No. Let me help you: Literature, even fictional literature, (artificial history) is subjectively testable and operationally stated. Literature is not the problem. Using the fictionalisms of the the magical (pseudoscientific), Ideal (sophomoric, psuedorational), and occult (supernatural) is the problem. All such attempts are merely frauds to compensate for one’s incompetence or dishonesty.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-08 11:45:00 UTC
-
Literature, even fictional literature, is subjectively testable when operationally stated.
October 8th, 2018 11:45 AM
[U]m. No. Let me help you: Literature, even fictional literature, (artificial history) is subjectively testable when operationally stated. Literature is not the problem. Using the fictionalisms of the the magical (pseudoscientific), Ideal (sophomoric, pseudo-rational), and occult (supernatural) is the problem. All such attempts are merely frauds to compensate for one’s incompetence or dishonesty.
-
Literature, even fictional literature, is subjectively testable when operationally stated.
October 8th, 2018 11:45 AM
[U]m. No. Let me help you: Literature, even fictional literature, (artificial history) is subjectively testable when operationally stated. Literature is not the problem. Using the fictionalisms of the the magical (pseudoscientific), Ideal (sophomoric, pseudo-rational), and occult (supernatural) is the problem. All such attempts are merely frauds to compensate for one’s incompetence or dishonesty.
-
2) So an analysis of what he-said-she-said on the terms of their intentions, ver
2) So an analysis of what he-said-she-said on the terms of their intentions, versus what they say contrast to the parsimony of consistent, correspondent, operational, rational choice, reciprocity, and coherence with reality. I am more articulate but that is his point.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-06 09:58:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048512774668800001
Reply addressees: @wild_pomeg @SpitTheBluePill @SRCHicks @jordanbpeterson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1039867239170629633
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1039867239170629633
-
Working on operational reclassification of crimes today. (ack). Crimes are curre
Working on operational reclassification of crimes today. (ack). Crimes are currently organized by severity rather than function, which fails to educate the people in the (simple) constraints upon their behavior.
Was fairly easy to restore the right of men to fight and discipline one another for bad manners, and gossip, shaming, and rallying.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-23 12:06:00 UTC