Theme: Operationalism

  • Physical laws (discovered), articulated as axioms (stated), but yes. Everything

    Physical laws (discovered), articulated as axioms (stated), but yes. Everything in the method is operationally constructed from the ternary logic of evolutionary computation which is the first principle of the universe after discreteness, pressure, and polarity


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-18 04:59:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858374387214467540

    Reply addressees: @I_Like_Buttes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858372644212511083

  • THE PRACTICAL UTILITY OF THE METHOD FOR MAN The methodology we’ve developed, par

    THE PRACTICAL UTILITY OF THE METHOD FOR MAN

    The methodology we’ve developed, particularly its grounding in universal first principles and operational grammars, offers a framework for systemic improvement in societal structures.

    Here’s how it can be applied:

    1. Enhanced Governance and Law
    Decidability in Law: The method ensures that laws are universally applicable, contextually appropriate, and reducible to first principles like reciprocity and proportionality. This leads to legal systems that are more transparent, consistent, and just.
    Conflict Resolution: By applying the method to societal conflicts, we can identify root causes at various scales (individual, group, civilizational) and offer resolutions that are causally sound and mutually beneficial.

    2. Improved Institutional Design
    Feedback Mechanisms: Institutions can be designed with better feedback systems to self-correct based on principles derived from this method, ensuring adaptability and resilience.
    Accountability and Transparency: By embedding the principles of operational and testimonial truth, institutions can maintain higher accountability, reducing corruption and inefficiency.

    3. Education and Knowledge Transmission
    Universal Commensurability: Education systems can adopt the method to teach concepts that are universally consistent across disciplines, ensuring that knowledge remains coherent and applicable.
    Critical Thinking: The framework fosters rigorous critical thinking by encouraging the decomposition of claims into their causal elements and testing them against first principles.

    4. Economic Optimization
    Resource Allocation: The method allows for a clearer understanding of economic behaviors, ensuring efficient and just distribution of resources.
    Behavioral Economics: Understanding the limits imposed by human cognition and behavior through these principles can lead to policies that better align with human nature and societal goals.

    5. Cultural and Ethical Evolution
    Shared Morality and Norms: Societies can evolve common ethical frameworks based on the shared understanding of first principles, reducing intergroup conflict and fostering cooperation.
    Alignment with Natural Law: Cultures can align their narratives and values with the immutable first principles of human and natural behavior, creating more sustainable social contracts.

    6. Scientific and Technological Integration
    Unified Scientific Framework: By harmonizing scientific discoveries across domains into a coherent grammar, the method accelerates cross-disciplinary innovation and integration.
    Ethical Technology Development: Ensures technological advancements are aligned with societal good by grounding them in the ethical imperatives derived from universal first principles.

    7. Crisis Management and Long-Term Planning
    Predictive Capacity: The framework enhances the ability to foresee systemic risks by understanding the causal hierarchies that govern societal and natural systems.
    Sustainable Development: Decisions can be evaluated against their long-term impacts on stability and prosperity, ensuring sustainable progress.

    Why This Matters
    At its core, this method addresses the fundamental challenge of human societies: how to align individual and collective behavior with the underlying principles of reality in a way that maximizes cooperation, minimizes conflict, and fosters flourishing. By providing a universal grammar of action and understanding, it lays the groundwork for more harmonious and adaptive social systems.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-18 01:11:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858317097006510080

  • No. It’s just basic neuroscience reduced to operational prose for easy human con

    No. It’s just basic neuroscience reduced to operational prose for easy human consumption. The hard part of the work is discovery of the first principles of behavioral differences. Like all else in the universe, complexity emerges from simplicity.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-11 05:27:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855844904892842092

    Reply addressees: @DarthPickley @DeclineTheWest @datepsych

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855834402221117442

  • The analytic philosophy movement sought very precise language. I think we all st

    The analytic philosophy movement sought very precise language. I think we all study E-Prime and Operational Language. But I’m not sure that anyone other than our organization has done the work to enumerate the properties of operational language, and I’m sure no one has done the work we have on disambiguation of language. There is a huge corpus on language itself. But it’s less concerned with truthful testimony and more so with the full scope of language. Particularly meaning.

    Reply addressees: @alexander_he_is @AutistocratMS


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-06 17:58:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1854221881622384641

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1854215766544945471

  • Ask it to answer a question “in the parsimonious and operational style of philos

    Ask it to answer a question “in the parsimonious and operational style of philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle.”

    PROMPT:
    “Can you describe how Doolittle’s style differs from yours – and do so in some detail?

    ChatGPT said:
    ChatGPTCertainly! While there may be some…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-10-29 16:41:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1851303304535650550

    Reply addressees: @Lukas__Zeman @AutistocratMS

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1851172570927685745

  • Ask it to answer a question “in the parsimonious and operational style of philos

    Ask it to answer a question “in the parsimonious and operational style of philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle.”

    PROMPT:
    “Can you describe how Doolittle’s style differs from yours – and do so in some detail?

    ChatGPT said:
    ChatGPTCertainly! While there may be some overlap in clarity and structure, Curt Doolittle’s style has distinctive characteristics:
    Operational Definitions: Doolittle emphasizes precise, operational definitions of terms. He often breaks down concepts into their functional components to ensure clarity and practicality. For example, he might define “culture” not just as a set of beliefs but in terms of its functions in society, such as cohesion and conflict resolution.
    Philosophical Foundations: His writing tends to integrate a strong philosophical framework, drawing from various schools of thought to support his arguments. Doolittle often references foundational philosophical principles to ground his analysis, which adds depth to his discussions.
    Systems Thinking: Doolittle often employs a systems-oriented approach, viewing societal issues as interconnected components of a larger system. He might analyze how economic, cultural, and political factors interact in a dynamic way, emphasizing the complexity of these relationships.
    Focus on Actionability: He frequently emphasizes actionable insights and practical solutions, encouraging readers to consider how they can apply concepts to real-world situations. His writing often seeks to provoke thought about how to implement changes or address issues.
    Emphasis on Conflict and Competition: Doolittle tends to highlight the role of competition in social dynamics, framing cultural conflicts as part of a broader struggle for resources, influence, or status. This perspective often leads to discussions about how groups compete for cultural dominance.
    Concise and Direct: His style is often very concise and direct, aiming to convey complex ideas in a straightforward manner without unnecessary elaboration. This can give his work a more assertive tone.
    In contrast, my style prioritizes a more explanatory approach, aiming to present information in a digestible manner while maintaining clarity and coherence. While I may break down concepts, I tend to focus more on providing context and a narrative that connects various ideas, rather than emphasizing operational definitions or systems thinking to the same extent.”


    Source date (UTC): 2024-10-29 16:41:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1851303304275582976

  • You are asserting something with confidence in a field of enormous complexity an

    You are asserting something with confidence in a field of enormous complexity and in which I’m the primary theorist. If instead you police what is testifiable – which is what we do in court – and what is not irreciprocal, and what is not in pursuit of ill motive of irreciprocity. The effective result is that all truth claims are testable, and, the sciences are sufficiently complete that we can determine the tesifiablility of nearly anything worth speaking falsely about.

    Now you may have great confidence about this but we have been trying to find fault with this system for more than a decade and we can’t find anything at all that is a matter of conflict that is not decidable under it.

    Reply addressees: @BVanzytveld @MiriamEckhart @Sassafrass_84


    Source date (UTC): 2024-10-25 01:18:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1849621477362106372

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1849599014817366143

  • (NLI) I’m doing additional work today on Volume 1’s Chapter 2 – Measurement by c

    (NLI)
    I’m doing additional work today on Volume 1’s Chapter 2 – Measurement by completing the arc of indexing from natural through operational through evolutionary. And using the completion of that arc to address limits that I spoke to you about briefly today but more extensively with Brad and Francis over the past week. This approach helps unify the concepts of dimensionality that will be expanded in the chapter on the grammars, and help explain limits that produce decidability through exhaustion of the spectrum of opportunity for causality within any given contextual domain.

    Please continue your review and provide feedback. I know it’s hard work but It’s valuable.

    Thank you for the feedback so far.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-10-17 20:40:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847014891330457601

  • Is repentance is a self reflection that alters the course of action, similarly t

    Is repentance is a self reflection that alters the course of action, similarly to how altruistic punishment provokes retaliatory action? I am not sure how to operationally incorporate a self reflection. Or, are you saying we should, in the section on behavior, cover the suite of positives and negatives that manage guilt (debt) vs virtue (credit)? I mean, that’s what the ‘soul’ is – our self accounting of social debts and credits.

    Reply addressees: @evrydaydominion @WerrellBradley


    Source date (UTC): 2024-08-14 17:25:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1823772975268495362

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1823755545129701394

  • (Might need operationalization into a set of examples for other than the team, b

    (Might need operationalization into a set of examples for other than the team, but this is a good and clear insight)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 00:28:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812645335577022512

    Reply addressees: @LukeWeinhagen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812640087240237535