Theme: Measurement

  • THE SYNTHESIS OF LITERATURE AND TRUTH (read it and weep) THE MONOMYTH – Transcen

    THE SYNTHESIS OF LITERATURE AND TRUTH

    (read it and weep)

    THE MONOMYTH – Transcendence (Transformation)

    THE ARCHETYPES – Characters (Categories)

    THE VIRTUES – Comparison Operators (Values)

    THE ORDERS – Axioms (Relations: sets of conditions)

    THE NARRATIVES – Operations (Methods of change in state)

    THE DISCIPLINES – Mindfulness/Stoicism ( Noise Reduction)

    THE SCIENCES – Measurement (reduction of ignorance, error, bias, deception reduction)

    THE TRUTH – Parsimony (Most Parsimonious Operational Name of a Recipe of Transformation.)

    There exists only one objective – transcendence.

    There exists only one narrative – transcendence

    There exist only a few sub-narratives – methods of transcendence

    There exist only so many non-false virtues – variables of transcendence

    There exist only so many portfolios of virtues – transcendent characters.

    There exist only so many methods of non-false noise reduction – transcendent mind.

    There exist only so many methods of non-false elimination of falsehoods – transcendent reason.

    There exists only so many sets of primary operations – transcendent truths.

    Via-Positiva:

    A myth can employ anthropomorphism in an act of transcendence.

    A myth can employ hyperbole (super-normalism) in an act of transcendence.

    A myth can employ any technique to create an immoral condition against which one employs virtues to transcend.

    A myth can employ virtues in an act of transcendence.

    Via Negativa:

    A myth cannot contradict the virtue of transcendence.

    A myth cannot contradict of a virtue of transcendence in an act of transcendence.

    A myth cannot employ a falsehood in an act of transcendence

    A myth cannot employ luck or miracles in an act of transcendence.

    A myth cannot employ fictionalism (idealism, supernaturalism, pseudoscience/pseudo-rationalism) in an act of transcendence.

    If a myth can survive these tests then it is true, and good.

    If a myth cannot survives these tests then it is false, and evil.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 09:06:00 UTC

  • all languge consists of measurements

    all languge consists of measurements


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 07:13:00 UTC

  • Women buy of you what you have sold to men. It is other men’s treatment of you t

    Women buy of you what you have sold to men. It is other men’s treatment of you that determines your value to women. You don’t sell women. You sell men, and women buy using that measure.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 11:59:00 UTC

  • Because dreams might be the easiest means, but they also allow the most deceptio

    Because dreams might be the easiest means, but they also allow the most deception. While measurement the hardest means and least deception.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-01 14:04:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/870279998225121282

    Reply addressees: @ThePlatonicChad

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/870093182838636546


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/870093182838636546

  • We use science (measures), operations (recipes), meaning (analogies), and occult

    We use science (measures), operations (recipes), meaning (analogies), and occult (dreams) to communicate. What’s Least Bad? What’s Worst?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-01 14:04:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/870279819614932992

    Reply addressees: @ThePlatonicChad

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/870093182838636546


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/870093182838636546

  • Um. I watched it. He has confused science (Measurement) literature (Meaning) and

    Um. I watched it. He has confused science (Measurement) literature (Meaning) and Occult (Dreaming), and ignored externalities to the latter. https://twitter.com/ThePlatonicChad/status/870093182838636546

  • SMALLER IS BETTER (this is profoundly powerful) Or in technical terms, questions

    SMALLER IS BETTER

    (this is profoundly powerful)

    Or in technical terms, questions are decidable because costs and returns are calculable, because coincidences of want are marginal, and consequences are perceivable.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 18:17:00 UTC

  • What Would Happen To The Economy With Unlimited Money?

    Ironically, The same thing that would happen with no money. But instead of it not existing, it would be worthless. It’s called ‘inflation’.

    https://www.quora.com/What-would-happen-to-the-economy-with-unlimited-money

  • What Would Happen To The Economy With Unlimited Money?

    Ironically, The same thing that would happen with no money. But instead of it not existing, it would be worthless. It’s called ‘inflation’.

    https://www.quora.com/What-would-happen-to-the-economy-with-unlimited-money

  • YES, I AM CREATING DECIDABILITY USUALLY LIMITED TO QUANTITATIVE, FOR THAT WHICH

    YES, I AM CREATING DECIDABILITY USUALLY LIMITED TO QUANTITATIVE, FOR THAT WHICH WE CONSIDER QUALITATIVE.

    —“My impression of Curts work is that is precisely what he’s trying to do – develop a means of quantifying data that has been traditionally regarded as qualitative so that it can be evaluated more objectively and applied as absolute law.

    Am I incorrect?” — John Derbyshire

    Technically, I’m making it *decidable* by binary where necessary, qualitative where possible, and quantitative where possible. So the term you’re looking for is ‘decidable’. It’s just conventional that we use the word ‘quantifiable’ because so much of science has been dependent upon scale measurement.

    But yes, you are correct John.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-25 13:05:00 UTC