Theme: Measurement

  • by Bill Joslin Emotions are information about information – specifically how the

    by Bill Joslin Emotions are information about information – specifically how the datum measures against preference. One caveat about aesthetics – aesthetics takes hold in a population by the pervasive temperament of that population… A symptom or measure not a causal vector.
  • by Bill Joslin Emotions are information about information – specifically how the

    by Bill Joslin

    Emotions are information about information – specifically how the datum measures against preference.

    One caveat about aesthetics – aesthetics takes hold in a population by the pervasive temperament of that population… A symptom or measure not a causal vector.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-01 22:04:00 UTC

  • Why Did It Take Humanity So Long To Invent Science?

    Science uses measurement (a form of competition, believe it or not) to extend perception, and eliminate ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism and deceit. In other words, science is the means by which we seek to speak truthfully.

    Science evolved out of european common law of torts (resolution of disputes over property between equals), which led from the jury, to the ‘thang’ to the ‘senate’. This led to ‘scientific’ debate. This led to reason. Reason led to aristotelian pre-science. (He studied constitutions). Bacon was a lawyer. That law led to empiricism. Empiricism led to science.

    Law under competition (western law) led to science.

    Language evolved to negotiate, not to speak truthfully.

    Religion hindered law. (Religion is an attempt to state wisdom literature is true)

    Only the west invented it. You can see the chinese come close. No one else comes close. Even the persians were using what we call science for superstitious purposes.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-did-it-take-humanity-so-long-to-invent-science

  • If Mathematics Is An Exact Science, Why Are There Assumptions?

    As far as I know, mathematics consists not of science but of a logic. A logic meaning a grammar of decidability. And in the case of mathematics, the grammar of decidability consists of reduction of all references to positional names, and therefore all relations to positional relations. And we can do so with an unlimited number of dimensions,

    A science is necessary when we do not know the first principles (causal relations) of phenomenon and seek to identify them. Science therefore consists of theories and laws.

    A logic is necessary when we do know the first principles (causal relations). Ergo, logics consist of axioms.

    You can declare an axiom, but only identify a law.

    Once a law is known you may model it with axioms.

    That I know of there are only two assumptions in mathematics, and both are necessary for the simple reason that independent of context (applied mathematics) we have no means of decidability in matters of scale independence.

    The law of the excluded middle.
    The need for choice.

    Mathematics is actually quite simple. Its that because it is so simple, consisting only of positional relations, we can describe any set of constant relations with it.

    https://www.quora.com/If-mathematics-is-an-exact-science-why-are-there-assumptions

  • What Do Libertarians Think About The Modern Monetary Theory?

    MMT is an interesting thought experiment.
    The problem is we can’t test the theory very easily.
    And the underlying question is whether it would just generate runaway inflation.
    And as far as I can tell it would.

    HOWEVER
    I will put money on the fact that governments will, sometime in the next few decades, distribute liquidity directly to citizens via debit cards, rather than attempt to manage interest rates.

    I will further put money on the fact that governments will, shortly thereafter, provide zero interest loans for the purpose of increasing consumption.

    And that as a consequence the consumer lending sector will all but disappear.

    https://www.quora.com/What-do-Libertarians-think-about-the-Modern-Monetary-Theory

  • Why Did It Take Humanity So Long To Invent Science?

    Science uses measurement (a form of competition, believe it or not) to extend perception, and eliminate ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism and deceit. In other words, science is the means by which we seek to speak truthfully.

    Science evolved out of european common law of torts (resolution of disputes over property between equals), which led from the jury, to the ‘thang’ to the ‘senate’. This led to ‘scientific’ debate. This led to reason. Reason led to aristotelian pre-science. (He studied constitutions). Bacon was a lawyer. That law led to empiricism. Empiricism led to science.

    Law under competition (western law) led to science.

    Language evolved to negotiate, not to speak truthfully.

    Religion hindered law. (Religion is an attempt to state wisdom literature is true)

    Only the west invented it. You can see the chinese come close. No one else comes close. Even the persians were using what we call science for superstitious purposes.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-did-it-take-humanity-so-long-to-invent-science

  • If Mathematics Is An Exact Science, Why Are There Assumptions?

    As far as I know, mathematics consists not of science but of a logic. A logic meaning a grammar of decidability. And in the case of mathematics, the grammar of decidability consists of reduction of all references to positional names, and therefore all relations to positional relations. And we can do so with an unlimited number of dimensions,

    A science is necessary when we do not know the first principles (causal relations) of phenomenon and seek to identify them. Science therefore consists of theories and laws.

    A logic is necessary when we do know the first principles (causal relations). Ergo, logics consist of axioms.

    You can declare an axiom, but only identify a law.

    Once a law is known you may model it with axioms.

    That I know of there are only two assumptions in mathematics, and both are necessary for the simple reason that independent of context (applied mathematics) we have no means of decidability in matters of scale independence.

    The law of the excluded middle.
    The need for choice.

    Mathematics is actually quite simple. Its that because it is so simple, consisting only of positional relations, we can describe any set of constant relations with it.

    https://www.quora.com/If-mathematics-is-an-exact-science-why-are-there-assumptions

  • Do Governments Create Wealth And Jobs For Its Citizens?

    THE COMPLETE AND CORRECT ANSWER.

    —-”Do governments create wealth and jobs for citizens?”—-


    First, let’s understand some terms to make sure we know what we’re talking about.

    SERIES: Defense > Rule > Government > Bureaucracy (monopoly) > Institutions (anonymous cooperation at scale) > Markets (speculation, investment, production, distribution, trade) > Norms (friction reduction) > Truth Telling (friction reduction) > Trust (risk taking) > Economic Velocity > Social Order.

    DEFINITIONS:

    – Defense (producing a territorial monopoly on the organization of decidability over uses of assets (property)),
    – Rule (dispute resolution, or resolution of differences),
    – Government (the production and management of commons), and;
    – Bureaucracy (a monopoly that manages daily operations) are four different things.

    Defense secures territory from appropriation by other large organizations capable of physical appropriation. Defense produces possibility of choice of SOCIAL ORDER (portfolio of property, norms, traditions, laws, legislation, regulation, institutions)

    Rule resolves disputes between people given the property allocations (in china, none, in russia, some, in europe some more, in america most.) In most cases norms are produced by the consequences of rulings by kings, judges, priests, and ‘authorities’. This is why laws vary: they must reflect the needs of the current stage of development of the people in the polity. Adjudications of differences produce LAW.

    Government produces commons through charging and maximizing fees (taxes) of members, and directing those fees to the production of commons, that they assume will produce multipliers (greater returns than private sector will) for the simple reason that some commons are extremely expensive. Legislation(contract) or Command(Dictate) produces LAW SUBSTITUTES we call Law but are not. This ‘conflation’ is endemic in discourse.

    Bureaucracy does labor that a market cannot yet perform through competition. In theory, a bureaucracy functions as portfolio (financial) manager of a function that the market cannot yet produce, or produce in sufficient quantity, or produce at a sufficient price. But like all monopolies they pursue self interest and always become corrupt. In a perfect world, states would start multiple competing bureaucracies like startups, and the best one or two would survive.

    WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO

    Governments create the possibility to organize increasingly complex markets with increasingly complex divisions of labor, with increasingly complex concentrations of capital, with increasingly complex abilities to adapt to shifts, changes, and shocks.

    Governments do this by prohibiting rent seeking, corruption, parasitism, theft, murder at the local level, and capturing the gains as taxation, which they then use to pay for the production of commons, that in turn produce multipliers (returns), that in turn increase standards of living – or governments fail to do so, by not suppressing corruption and not producing commons, and not producing multipliers.

    So governments create the possibilty of increasingly productive and rewarding polities. But it is the entire network of people from the monarchy (Rulers) to the peasantry (laborers) that create jobs through constant increases in the velocity of prodcutiion.

    Why? Because our only wealth is time. We are not wealthier than cave men. We simply make everything cheaper by taking less time with more hands in greater coordination to produce everything we desire for less and less of our time.

    Rules make a game. Governments make rules so that we can play economic games – and moreover that we cannot play anti-economic gains.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    https://www.quora.com/Do-governments-create-wealth-and-jobs-for-its-citizens

  • Great series of posts. Hey. One thing. The difference between Keynesians and Neo

    Great series of posts. Hey. One thing. The difference between Keynesians and Neo-Kenesians and Conservatives is two fold: 1) rule by discretion vs rule of law, and 2) only measuring consumption vs equilibrium between consumption and genetic, institutional, and knowledge capital.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-26 03:13:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/945492786333278208

    Reply addressees: @conradhackett

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/942649779942764544


    IN REPLY TO:

    @conradhackett

    Ending this thread of popular tweets from 2017 with this popular thread of population density maps. Thanks for scrolling this far!
    https://t.co/KrFc1HrF7t

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/942649779942764544

  • Story>Myth >-Pseudo-history(Fictional History) >+History >Pseudo-law > +Tort Law

    Story>Myth >-Pseudo-history(Fictional History) >+History >Pseudo-law > +Tort Law > Scriptural Fictionalism and Hermeneutics >+Empiricism > Justificationary Rationalism (kant/rousseau,mendelsohn) > +Science > Pseudoscience (Marx,Freud,Boaz,Cantor,Mises) >Operational Science.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-24 13:27:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944922595073445889

    Reply addressees: @plevy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944783727414185984


    IN REPLY TO:

    @plevy

    Media and cultural evolution 📱 https://t.co/POideG59FR

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944783727414185984