Theme: Measurement

  • One of the measurable values of intelligence is the reduction of accumulated cel

    One of the measurable values of intelligence is the reduction of accumulated cellular damage. While males generally absorb cellular damage on behalf of women and children, the extent of that absorption is influenced by everything from accidents to risky to strenuous work.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-26 18:22:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978336361773232128

  • Natural Highs Good and Bad

    –“YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND [INSERT DRUG OF CHOICE HERE] – Religion Included”— My answer is more parsimonious (simple).

    • Anthropomorphism provides an intuitive means of measurement.
    • Intuition provides a discount on costly reason, and more costly calculation.
    • Intuition that is not false is not only cheaper but often more accurate than reason, as one’s ability to reason declines.
    • Anthropomorphism, intuition, avoidance or reason and solution, and suspension of disbelief during the process (what we call ‘daydreaming on one end and occult on the other’), evoke the feeling of surrendering our will (reason) to the pack, and the burden of reason (being human).

    This spectrum describes the beast(child), to the human(Adult) to the post-human(Wisened). So, while I understand fire gazing, day dreaming, pondering, listening to the oral story (myth), story, novel, fantasy novel, I no longer enjoy the conflation of the fantasy novel with the pretense that such things exist, or that the dependence upon such things has literally served as a drug to manufacture inaction, incomprehension, denial of reality, and worst, the destruction of the ancient civilizations by that drug, and the dark agrees of suffering that followed. So while we can produce highs from exercise, from socialization, from study, and from success, we can also produce highs from the disciplined training of our minds and bodies to produce altered states that no other creature can produce. And further we can do so by chemical means, and now advanced chemical means, and more recently, direct neural stimulation (video games). So, many things ‘feel good’ but the fact that they feel good physically, emotionally, or intellectually does not tell us whether or not that they are personally suicidal, interpersoanly, socially, politically, civilizationally or dysgenically. Every drug user of every kind justifies his addiction and attempts to do so only confirm that addiction. Some humans require those drugs because they cannot obtain them by the means evolution provided us, or they are too lazy to do so: working with others to achieve existential transcendence rather than the illusory or experiential, that in fact harm the individual, lose his potential, denigrate his lineage, his people, and mankind. It’s not that I don’t understand you see. It’s that I understand all too well, that we seek means of avoiding action by which we transform the universe into a garden for man. Some of us transcend ourselves, our people, our civilization, and man into gods. Most of us resist it kicking and screaming all the while, physically, emotionally, intellectually.

  • Natural Highs Good and Bad

    –“YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND [INSERT DRUG OF CHOICE HERE] – Religion Included”— My answer is more parsimonious (simple).

    • Anthropomorphism provides an intuitive means of measurement.
    • Intuition provides a discount on costly reason, and more costly calculation.
    • Intuition that is not false is not only cheaper but often more accurate than reason, as one’s ability to reason declines.
    • Anthropomorphism, intuition, avoidance or reason and solution, and suspension of disbelief during the process (what we call ‘daydreaming on one end and occult on the other’), evoke the feeling of surrendering our will (reason) to the pack, and the burden of reason (being human).

    This spectrum describes the beast(child), to the human(Adult) to the post-human(Wisened). So, while I understand fire gazing, day dreaming, pondering, listening to the oral story (myth), story, novel, fantasy novel, I no longer enjoy the conflation of the fantasy novel with the pretense that such things exist, or that the dependence upon such things has literally served as a drug to manufacture inaction, incomprehension, denial of reality, and worst, the destruction of the ancient civilizations by that drug, and the dark agrees of suffering that followed. So while we can produce highs from exercise, from socialization, from study, and from success, we can also produce highs from the disciplined training of our minds and bodies to produce altered states that no other creature can produce. And further we can do so by chemical means, and now advanced chemical means, and more recently, direct neural stimulation (video games). So, many things ‘feel good’ but the fact that they feel good physically, emotionally, or intellectually does not tell us whether or not that they are personally suicidal, interpersoanly, socially, politically, civilizationally or dysgenically. Every drug user of every kind justifies his addiction and attempts to do so only confirm that addiction. Some humans require those drugs because they cannot obtain them by the means evolution provided us, or they are too lazy to do so: working with others to achieve existential transcendence rather than the illusory or experiential, that in fact harm the individual, lose his potential, denigrate his lineage, his people, and mankind. It’s not that I don’t understand you see. It’s that I understand all too well, that we seek means of avoiding action by which we transform the universe into a garden for man. Some of us transcend ourselves, our people, our civilization, and man into gods. Most of us resist it kicking and screaming all the while, physically, emotionally, intellectually.

  • “YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND [INSERT DRUG OF CHOICE HERE]”— My answer is more parsimo

    –“YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND [INSERT DRUG OF CHOICE HERE]”—

    My answer is more parsimonious (simple).

    Anthropomorphism provides an intuitive means of measurement.

    Intuition provides a discount on costly reason, and more costly calculation.

    Intuition that is not false is not only cheaper but often more accurate than reason, as one’s ability to reason declines.

    Anthropomorphism, intuition, avoidance or reason and solution, and suspension of disbelief during the process (what we call ‘daydreaming on one end and occult on the other’, evoke the feeling of surrendering our will (reason) to the pack, and the burden of reason (being human).

    This spectrum describes the beast(child), to the human(Adult) to the post-human(Wisened).

    And access to the abiity to incurr such costs, is in itself a measure.

    So, while I understand fire gazing, day dreaming,pondering, listening to the oral story (myth), story, novel, fantasy novel, I no longer enjoy the conflation of the fantasy novel with the pretense that such things exist, or that the dependence upon such things has literally served as a drug to manufacture inaction, incomprehension, denial of reality, and worst, the desruction of the ancient civilizations by that drug, and the dark agees of suffering that followed.

    So while we can produce highs from excercise, from socialization, from study, and from success, we can also produce highs from the disciplined training of our minds and bodies to produce altered states that no other creature can produce. And further we can do so by chemical means, and now advanced chemical means, and more recently, direct neural stimulation (video games).

    So, many things ‘feel good’ but the fact that they feel good physically, emotionally, or intellectually does not tell us whether or not that they are personally suicidal, interpersoanly, socially, politically, civilizationally or dysgenically.

    Every drug user of every kind justifies his addiction and attempts to do so only confirm that addiction.

    SOme humans require those drugs because they cannot obtain them by the means evolution provided us, or they are too lazy to do so: working with others to achieve existential transcendence rather than the illusory or experiential, that in fact harm the individual, lose his potential, denigrate his lineage, his people, and mankind.

    It’s not that I don’t understand you see. It’s that I understand all too well, that we seek means of avoiding action by which we transform the universe into a garden for man.

    Some of us transcend ourselves, our people, our civilization, and man into gods. Most of us resist it kicking and screaming all the while, physically, emotionally, intellectually.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-25 20:41:00 UTC

  • 5 – Now, it turns out that just as we can measure things with mathematics, or sc

    5 – Now, it turns out that just as we can measure things with mathematics, or scales, or volumes, and we can measure the logical consistency of sentences, and we can write programs, we can also learn how to ‘measure’ what people say – such that we can tell if it’s false. …


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-23 00:25:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976978186901868544

    Reply addressees: @MaganeUsoNoUso

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976976828438073345


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 4 – We call this process of measurement and testing ‘science’. The problem with that system of measurement and testing is that there are things we can afford, and there are things we cannot afford to measure and test – including our patience, time, and energy.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976976828438073345


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 4 – We call this process of measurement and testing ‘science’. The problem with that system of measurement and testing is that there are things we can afford, and there are things we cannot afford to measure and test – including our patience, time, and energy.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976976828438073345

  • 5 – But others can and have been able to afford that measurement and testing. So

    5 – But others can and have been able to afford that measurement and testing. So the question is, how can we test the words, measurements, and tests of others who were able to afford the patience, time, energy, and cost?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-23 00:21:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976977130688000002

    Reply addressees: @MaganeUsoNoUso

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976976828438073345


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 4 – We call this process of measurement and testing ‘science’. The problem with that system of measurement and testing is that there are things we can afford, and there are things we cannot afford to measure and test – including our patience, time, and energy.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976976828438073345


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 4 – We call this process of measurement and testing ‘science’. The problem with that system of measurement and testing is that there are things we can afford, and there are things we cannot afford to measure and test – including our patience, time, and energy.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976976828438073345

  • 4 – We call this process of measurement and testing ‘science’. The problem with

    4 – We call this process of measurement and testing ‘science’. The problem with that system of measurement and testing is that there are things we can afford, and there are things we cannot afford to measure and test – including our patience, time, and energy.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-23 00:20:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976976828438073345

    Reply addressees: @MaganeUsoNoUso

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976976223967510531


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 3 – We compensate for those limits by reducing that which is beyond those precision to analogy to those precisions, and then working hard to insure that we do not imagine relationships (conclusions) that are not there, nor overlook those that are, no matter how counter intuitive.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976976223967510531


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 3 – We compensate for those limits by reducing that which is beyond those precision to analogy to those precisions, and then working hard to insure that we do not imagine relationships (conclusions) that are not there, nor overlook those that are, no matter how counter intuitive.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976976223967510531

  • 3 – We compensate for those limits by reducing that which is beyond those precis

    3 – We compensate for those limits by reducing that which is beyond those precision to analogy to those precisions, and then working hard to insure that we do not imagine relationships (conclusions) that are not there, nor overlook those that are, no matter how counter intuitive.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-23 00:17:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976976223967510531

    Reply addressees: @MaganeUsoNoUso

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976975823931674625


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 2-The answer is that you can only trust your senses at the level of precision of your senses. You can only trust your intuitions given the precision and biases of your intuitions. You can only trust your reason given the precision of your (all of our) reason.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976975823931674625


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 2-The answer is that you can only trust your senses at the level of precision of your senses. You can only trust your intuitions given the precision and biases of your intuitions. You can only trust your reason given the precision of your (all of our) reason.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976975823931674625

  • 2-The answer is that you can only trust your senses at the level of precision of

    2-The answer is that you can only trust your senses at the level of precision of your senses. You can only trust your intuitions given the precision and biases of your intuitions. You can only trust your reason given the precision of your (all of our) reason.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-23 00:16:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976975823931674625

    Reply addressees: @MaganeUsoNoUso

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976975378681090048


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 1-You know, you shouldn’t be hard on yourself for asking that question, because it’s probably the hardest question. I spent most of my adult life on that question and I gotta tell you it was very hard, and I only solved it by standing on the shoulders of relatively recent giants.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976975378681090048


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @MaganeUsoNoUso 1-You know, you shouldn’t be hard on yourself for asking that question, because it’s probably the hardest question. I spent most of my adult life on that question and I gotta tell you it was very hard, and I only solved it by standing on the shoulders of relatively recent giants.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/976975378681090048

  • 1-You know, you shouldn’t be hard on yourself for asking that question, because

    1-You know, you shouldn’t be hard on yourself for asking that question, because it’s probably the hardest question. I spent most of my adult life on that question and I gotta tell you it was very hard, and I only solved it by standing on the shoulders of relatively recent giants.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-23 00:14:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976975378681090048

    Reply addressees: @MaganeUsoNoUso

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976972803340607488


    IN REPLY TO:

    @MaganeUsoNoUso

    @curtdoolittle I’ve been stuck on this question and have been unable to find a way to answer it that seems complete: How can we trust our senses are trustworthy to falsify whether or not something is true? Is this simply just a question simply born out of Cartesian trickery?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976972803340607488