Theme: Measurement

  • NOTE HOW THESE CATEGORIES (DISCIPLINES) DIFFER FROM ARISTOTLE’S – TRADITIONAL PH

    NOTE HOW THESE CATEGORIES (DISCIPLINES) DIFFER FROM ARISTOTLE’S – TRADITIONAL PHILOSOPHY

    Note the order, and the pairings.

    1 – Psychology : Acquisitionism(restating psychology as acquisition)

    1 – Aesthetics : Aesthetics (a scientific restatement of aesthetics)

    2 – Metaphysics : Vitruvianism: Man as the Measure (actions determine categories)

    2 – Grammars: Grammars of Measurement (restating language as a set of grammars of continuous recursive measurements.)

    3 – Epistemology : Testimonialism (completing the scientific method and uniting all the sciences)

    3 – Truth : Testimonial Truth (an extension of performative truth)

    4 – Ethics : Propertarianism (an extension of the ethics of property)

    4 – Law : The Natural Law of Reciprocity of Sovereign Men.

    5 – Sociology : Division of Perception, Cognition, Knowledge, Labor, and Advocacy.

    5 – Politics : Markets in Everything, Market Government: Ending Monopoly Production of Commons

    6 -Group Evolutionary Strategies : Those that do and do not converge on Meritocracy, Eugenic Evolution, and Reciprocity.

    6 – War (Competition) : War by all possible means (including post-Westphalian war)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-04 12:00:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. I ONLY WORK WITH AND I ONLY CONSTRUCT PARADIG

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    I ONLY WORK WITH AND I ONLY CONSTRUCT PARADIGMS CONSISTING OF CONSTANT RELATIONS THE REMAIN CONTIGUOUS ACROSS DISCIPLINES

    In other words, Logic > Mathematics > Physics > Chemistry > Biochemistry > Biology > Sentience > Consciousness > Reason > Calculation > Computation.

    So when you ask me “Hey have you hear of X nonsense?” I hear “Hey have you heard of this set of fictional paradigms that are discontiguous with existential, observable, testifiable, reality?”

    No. Fairy stories. I like fairy stories. But only when they are in fact fairy stories, not fairy stories claiming to be something else.

    There is only one most parsimonious paradigm. And that most parsimonious paradigm is that which consists of constant relations contiguous across the disciplines.

    CONTIGUOUS
    1 : being in actual contact : touching along a boundary or at a point – the 48 contiguous states
    2 : touching or connected throughout in an unbroken sequence – contiguous row houses contiguous vineyards
    3 : next or near in time or sequence -The fires were contiguous with the earthquake.

    DISCONTIGUOUS
    1 : not contiguous – intermittent · sporadic · broken · fitful · interrupted · on and off · disrupted · erratic · disconnected

    CONSTANT RELATIONS
    1 : properties shared between two or more referents.
    2 : properties remaining constant between two or more states.

    INCONSTANT RELATIONS
    1 : properties not shared between two or more referents.
    2 : properties not constant between two or more states.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-02 23:20:57 UTC

  • Paradigms Consisting of Constant Relations

    I ONLY WORK WITH AND I ONLY CONSTRUCT PARADIGMS CONSISTING OF CONSTANT RELATIONS THAT REMAIN CONTIGUOUS ACROSS DISCIPLINES In other words, Logic > Mathematics > Physics > Chemistry > Biochemistry > Biology > Sentience > Consciousness > Reason > Calculation > Computation. So when you ask me “Hey have you hear of X nonsense?” I hear “Hey have you heard of this set of fictional paradigms that are discontiguous with existential, observable, testifiable, reality?” No. Fairy stories. I like fairy stories. But only when they are in fact fairy stories, not fairy stories claiming to be something else. There is only one most parsimonious paradigm. And that most parsimonious paradigm is that which consists of constant relations contiguous across the disciplines. CONTIGUOUS 1 : being in actual contact : touching along a boundary or at a point – the 48 contiguous states 2 : touching or connected throughout in an unbroken sequence – contiguous row houses contiguous vineyards 3 : next or near in time or sequence -The fires were contiguous with the earthquake. DISCONTIGUOUS 1 : not contiguous – intermittent · sporadic · broken · fitful · interrupted · on and off · disrupted · erratic · disconnected CONSTANT RELATIONS 1 : properties shared between two or more referents. 2 : properties remaining constant between two or more states. INCONSTANT RELATIONS 1 : properties not shared between two or more referents. 2 : properties not constant between two or more states.
    Jul 02, 2018 7:20pm
  • Paradigms Consisting of Constant Relations

    I ONLY WORK WITH AND I ONLY CONSTRUCT PARADIGMS CONSISTING OF CONSTANT RELATIONS THAT REMAIN CONTIGUOUS ACROSS DISCIPLINES In other words, Logic > Mathematics > Physics > Chemistry > Biochemistry > Biology > Sentience > Consciousness > Reason > Calculation > Computation. So when you ask me “Hey have you hear of X nonsense?” I hear “Hey have you heard of this set of fictional paradigms that are discontiguous with existential, observable, testifiable, reality?” No. Fairy stories. I like fairy stories. But only when they are in fact fairy stories, not fairy stories claiming to be something else. There is only one most parsimonious paradigm. And that most parsimonious paradigm is that which consists of constant relations contiguous across the disciplines. CONTIGUOUS 1 : being in actual contact : touching along a boundary or at a point – the 48 contiguous states 2 : touching or connected throughout in an unbroken sequence – contiguous row houses contiguous vineyards 3 : next or near in time or sequence -The fires were contiguous with the earthquake. DISCONTIGUOUS 1 : not contiguous – intermittent · sporadic · broken · fitful · interrupted · on and off · disrupted · erratic · disconnected CONSTANT RELATIONS 1 : properties shared between two or more referents. 2 : properties remaining constant between two or more states. INCONSTANT RELATIONS 1 : properties not shared between two or more referents. 2 : properties not constant between two or more states.
    Jul 02, 2018 7:20pm
  • I ONLY WORK WITH AND I ONLY CONSTRUCT PARADIGMS CONSISTING OF CONSTANT RELATIONS

    I ONLY WORK WITH AND I ONLY CONSTRUCT PARADIGMS CONSISTING OF CONSTANT RELATIONS THE REMAIN CONTIGUOUS ACROSS DISCIPLINES

    In other words, Logic > Mathematics > Physics > Chemistry > Biochemistry > Biology > Sentience > Consciousness > Reason > Calculation > Computation.

    So when you ask me “Hey have you hear of X nonsense?” I hear “Hey have you heard of this set of fictional paradigms that are discontiguous with existential, observable, testifiable, reality?”

    No. Fairy stories. I like fairy stories. But only when they are in fact fairy stories, not fairy stories claiming to be something else.

    There is only one most parsimonious paradigm. And that most parsimonious paradigm is that which consists of constant relations contiguous across the disciplines.

    CONTIGUOUS

    1 : being in actual contact : touching along a boundary or at a point – the 48 contiguous states

    2 : touching or connected throughout in an unbroken sequence – contiguous row houses contiguous vineyards

    3 : next or near in time or sequence -The fires were contiguous with the earthquake.

    DISCONTIGUOUS

    1 : not contiguous – intermittent · sporadic · broken · fitful · interrupted · on and off · disrupted · erratic · disconnected

    CONSTANT RELATIONS

    1 : properties shared between two or more referents.

    2 : properties remaining constant between two or more states.

    INCONSTANT RELATIONS

    1 : properties not shared between two or more referents.

    2 : properties not constant between two or more states.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-02 19:20:00 UTC

  • The reason: 1) as the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and a

    The reason: 1) as the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy increases, the information vastly increases, but the scope of that knowledge rapidly decreases, as do the cause and effect relationships between our thoughts actions and consequences.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-02 19:17:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1013864305144553474

    Reply addressees: @NothingTheGreat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1013817181753098240


    IN REPLY TO:

    @NothingTheGreat

    @curtdoolittle You’re generous with your time, thanks Curt. The ‘animal impulses’ -such as envy and fear- are just as much our evolved heritage as the drives that inform our ‘human goods’/self-authored virtues. So, I guess that you’re saying mindfulness is… (continued)

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1013817181753098240

  • Extending Eli’s Necessity of Commensurability and Decidability

    Long (Established Male), medium (ascendent male), short term (female consumption) division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy demand different degrees of calculation – computational stress. This is why trust, reciprocity, norms, traditions, myths, institutions and laws matter most to those of us with conservative and long term values (intuitions/genes) and not to those with progressive and short term values (intuitions/genes). Physical stress, lower emotional stress, higher intellectual stress and more accumulated cellular damage. (Male) -vs_ Physical stress, higher emotional stress, lower intellectual stress, and less accumulated cellular damage (Female) —“Without shared mythology, values, rituals, signals, institutions, language, culture, and kinship …. without some local commonality in these, there is no commensurability or decidability possible between individuals, and no coincidence of interests, and therefore no cooperation, only conflict.”— Eli Harman
  • Extending Eli’s Necessity of Commensurability and Decidability

    Long (Established Male), medium (ascendent male), short term (female consumption) division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy demand different degrees of calculation – computational stress. This is why trust, reciprocity, norms, traditions, myths, institutions and laws matter most to those of us with conservative and long term values (intuitions/genes) and not to those with progressive and short term values (intuitions/genes). Physical stress, lower emotional stress, higher intellectual stress and more accumulated cellular damage. (Male) -vs_ Physical stress, higher emotional stress, lower intellectual stress, and less accumulated cellular damage (Female) —“Without shared mythology, values, rituals, signals, institutions, language, culture, and kinship …. without some local commonality in these, there is no commensurability or decidability possible between individuals, and no coincidence of interests, and therefore no cooperation, only conflict.”— Eli Harman
  • What’s the Difference Between a Logic and A Grammar?

    (important)(core) There isn’t any.

    Logic...>...Grammar....>....Speech.........>...Story

    Is the same as:

    Law.....>...Theory........>....Hypothesis...>...Observation

    Grammar: Rules of continuous disambiguation producing a well formed statement functioning as a series of transactions in a contract for meaning. Any person who has spent enough time with complex databases has made the ironic assertion that everything in the universe can be Normalized down to ones and zeroes. Fewer of us recognize that this is very close to the structure of the human nervous system.

  • What’s the Difference Between a Logic and A Grammar?

    (important)(core) There isn’t any.

    Logic...>...Grammar....>....Speech.........>...Story

    Is the same as:

    Law.....>...Theory........>....Hypothesis...>...Observation

    Grammar: Rules of continuous disambiguation producing a well formed statement functioning as a series of transactions in a contract for meaning. Any person who has spent enough time with complex databases has made the ironic assertion that everything in the universe can be Normalized down to ones and zeroes. Fewer of us recognize that this is very close to the structure of the human nervous system.