Curt Doolittle

Theme: Measurement

  • Anglicans vs Jews

    The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is higher than the the jewish IQ: 112) The jewish distribution is WIDER (13.1 vs 11.1), with more at the bottom and more at the top. So they produce an extra 10% above 130, and it is 130 and 140’s that provide executive (130) and academic (140) competitive ability.

    The size of the world jewish population is about 6.5m. World anglican population is about 85m. Jews pursue a narrower set of careers than Anglicans/Episcopalians. Jews practice more nepotism. And Jewish excellence, which is verbal, is in demand in an era of mass communication. So, Anglicans are white equivalent of the jews (which we have known for 400 years, and is why we had the scientific revolution in britain, and both the English and Scottish enlightenments). If whites returned to practicing nepotism, and outlawed fictionalism in the commons by involuntary warranty of due diligence, and elminated financialization – all of which are easy – the numbers would stabilize. My observation which I cannot find research to confirm or deny is that jews have not only obtained female verbal ability, but the abilty of women to work on details for long periods of time. This ‘reverse dimorphism’ combined with culling of the underclasses, upward redistribution of reproduction to rabbis, extreme clannishness and nepotism, and specialization in extractive professions explains the statistical differences. So, anglicans choose a wider distribution of careers, are not nepotistic but universal, and produce about as many outliers. Jews are people of words, cunning, and mysticism, and europeans are people of metalsmithing, truth, and magic. We still specialize in our ancient traditional occupations.

  • Anglicans vs Jews

    The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is higher than the the jewish IQ: 112) The jewish distribution is WIDER (13.1 vs 11.1), with more at the bottom and more at the top. So they produce an extra 10% above 130, and it is 130 and 140’s that provide executive (130) and academic (140) competitive ability.

    The size of the world jewish population is about 6.5m. World anglican population is about 85m. Jews pursue a narrower set of careers than Anglicans/Episcopalians. Jews practice more nepotism. And Jewish excellence, which is verbal, is in demand in an era of mass communication. So, Anglicans are white equivalent of the jews (which we have known for 400 years, and is why we had the scientific revolution in britain, and both the English and Scottish enlightenments). If whites returned to practicing nepotism, and outlawed fictionalism in the commons by involuntary warranty of due diligence, and elminated financialization – all of which are easy – the numbers would stabilize. My observation which I cannot find research to confirm or deny is that jews have not only obtained female verbal ability, but the abilty of women to work on details for long periods of time. This ‘reverse dimorphism’ combined with culling of the underclasses, upward redistribution of reproduction to rabbis, extreme clannishness and nepotism, and specialization in extractive professions explains the statistical differences. So, anglicans choose a wider distribution of careers, are not nepotistic but universal, and produce about as many outliers. Jews are people of words, cunning, and mysticism, and europeans are people of metalsmithing, truth, and magic. We still specialize in our ancient traditional occupations.

  • You know, I’ve tended to follow the consensus that 15 points is a standard devia

    You know, I’ve tended to follow the consensus that 15 points is a standard deviation, in intelligence, but that doesn’t help so much because group standard deviations appear to range from 11… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=287267288536835&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 19:29:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033798712458440704

  • THE STANDARD DEVIATION IN IQ IS MISLEADING You know, I’ve tended to follow the c

    THE STANDARD DEVIATION IN IQ IS MISLEADING

    You know, I’ve tended to follow the consensus that 15 points is a standard deviation, in intelligence, but that doesn’t help so much because group standard deviations appear to range from 11 to 13, with 12.5 as the sort of median. Secondly, I’ve followed the convention of the center being 100.

    Both of these are kind of obscuring value.

    1 – the sort of middle between expensive to train and inexpensive to train is actually 106. (I sort of think of human potential beginning in that area.)

    via Lion:

    —“A verbal IQ of about 106 defines the cognitive lower bound of the smart fraction. And, each percentage point increase in the “smart percent” is worth about $600 (1998) to per capita GDP.”—

    2 – Every six points (about half a standard deviation) rather than seven, we see fairly rapid increases in ability.

    3 – They suggest average is sort of 95-105, and that’s true, but that’s the arbitrary average of the population given the population. Instead, I would say the average begins at 105 or 106 (105 for simplicity’s sake), and that we are one half standard deviation below the minimum for the upper half to compensate for the lower. And one standard deviation or 12 points below the low end of the optimum for modernity. And that this minimum will increase from 112 to 118 over the next century (or faster).

    4 – Roughly speaking 1/3 of the population, meaning the vast majority of the population under 95 has to disappear over the next few hundred years.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 15:29:00 UTC

  • J-Bias: The Difference is Distributions

    ( http://helmuthnyborg.dk//srv/htdocs/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Publ_2009_The-Intellligence-Religiosity-Nexus.pdf ) There is no superior race, just superior distributions that make use of superior ideas. Thee jews, despite being the most literate people in the dark and middle ages (a darkness they contributed to) achieved precisely NOTHING. Every Jewish achievement was made by their nearly forcible indoctrination into aristotelianism, in exchange for integration. They managed to produce the most murderous ideas in ancient history (judaism, christianity, islam), and the most murderous ideas in modern history (marxism), and the pseudosciences and deceits of the modern world (boasianism, fruedianism, cantorian supernaturalism in mathematics, the frankfurt school, and nearly single handedly destroyed both the academy and rule of law. And have nearly destroyed our civilization thrrough the 1965 immigration act, and their continuing efforts at making the world safe for judaism, which roughly transates to turning the world into the levant. The ONLY thinker they have is Einstein and he is overplayed because everything other than the Frame was the product of Europeans – even E=MC^2. He did manage to explain why. But he is their only non-pseudoscentific thinker. There are plenty of minor players, and a masterful effort for nepotism in the awards process. But data is data is data. Europeans did everything worth doing in history and did it faster for the simple reason that we tell the truth, —- and on one else does. So no, I don’t play superiority games, I just look the data. It’s notable that Babbage and Turing were Brits, and the Logicians were frequently Jewish, and so was Chomsky’s grammatical take on Turing. Turns out the logics were a total waste of time – there is no closure. Turns out mathematical set theory (logic) was harmful. Turns out the Grammars have far more to do with Turing than Chomsky. Everything is easily explained by jewish pilpul, pseudoscience, pseudo-mathematics, and psuedo-logic, versus anglo testimony, science, mathematics, and computation.

  • J-Bias: The Difference is Distributions

    ( http://helmuthnyborg.dk//srv/htdocs/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Publ_2009_The-Intellligence-Religiosity-Nexus.pdf ) There is no superior race, just superior distributions that make use of superior ideas. Thee jews, despite being the most literate people in the dark and middle ages (a darkness they contributed to) achieved precisely NOTHING. Every Jewish achievement was made by their nearly forcible indoctrination into aristotelianism, in exchange for integration. They managed to produce the most murderous ideas in ancient history (judaism, christianity, islam), and the most murderous ideas in modern history (marxism), and the pseudosciences and deceits of the modern world (boasianism, fruedianism, cantorian supernaturalism in mathematics, the frankfurt school, and nearly single handedly destroyed both the academy and rule of law. And have nearly destroyed our civilization thrrough the 1965 immigration act, and their continuing efforts at making the world safe for judaism, which roughly transates to turning the world into the levant. The ONLY thinker they have is Einstein and he is overplayed because everything other than the Frame was the product of Europeans – even E=MC^2. He did manage to explain why. But he is their only non-pseudoscentific thinker. There are plenty of minor players, and a masterful effort for nepotism in the awards process. But data is data is data. Europeans did everything worth doing in history and did it faster for the simple reason that we tell the truth, —- and on one else does. So no, I don’t play superiority games, I just look the data. It’s notable that Babbage and Turing were Brits, and the Logicians were frequently Jewish, and so was Chomsky’s grammatical take on Turing. Turns out the logics were a total waste of time – there is no closure. Turns out mathematical set theory (logic) was harmful. Turns out the Grammars have far more to do with Turing than Chomsky. Everything is easily explained by jewish pilpul, pseudoscience, pseudo-mathematics, and psuedo-logic, versus anglo testimony, science, mathematics, and computation.

  • J-Bias, Anglicans vs Jews

      The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is higher than the the jewish IQ: 112) The jewish distribution is WIDER (13.1 vs 11.1), with more at the bottom and more at the top. So they produce an extra 10% above 130, and it is 130 and 140’s that provide executive (130) and academic (140) competitive ability.

    The size of the world jewish population is about 6.5m. World anglican population is about 85m. Jews pursue a narrower set of careers than Anglicans/Episcopalians. Jews practice more nepotism. And Jewish excellence, which is verbal, is in demand in an era of mass communication. So, Anglicans are white equivalent of the jews (which we have known for 400 years, and is why we had the scientific revolution in britain, and both the English and Scottish enlightenments). If whites returned to practicing nepotism, and outlawed lying in the commons by involuntary warranty of due diligence, and elminated financialization – all of which are easy, the numbers would stabilize. My observation which I cannot find research to confirm or deny is that jews (“all jews are female”) have not only obtained female verbal ability, but the abilty of women to work on details for long periods of time. This ‘reverse dimorphism’ combined with culling of the underclasses, upward redistribution of reproduction to rabbis, extereme clannishness and nepotism, and specialization in extractive (immoral) professions explains the statistical differences. So, anglicans choose a wider distribution of careers, are not nepotistic but universal, and produce about as many outliers. Jews are people of words, deception, and mysticism, and europeans are people of metalsmithing, truth, and magic. We still specialize in our ancient traditional occupations.

  • J-Bias, Anglicans vs Jews

      The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is higher than the the jewish IQ: 112) The jewish distribution is WIDER (13.1 vs 11.1), with more at the bottom and more at the top. So they produce an extra 10% above 130, and it is 130 and 140’s that provide executive (130) and academic (140) competitive ability.

    The size of the world jewish population is about 6.5m. World anglican population is about 85m. Jews pursue a narrower set of careers than Anglicans/Episcopalians. Jews practice more nepotism. And Jewish excellence, which is verbal, is in demand in an era of mass communication. So, Anglicans are white equivalent of the jews (which we have known for 400 years, and is why we had the scientific revolution in britain, and both the English and Scottish enlightenments). If whites returned to practicing nepotism, and outlawed lying in the commons by involuntary warranty of due diligence, and elminated financialization – all of which are easy, the numbers would stabilize. My observation which I cannot find research to confirm or deny is that jews (“all jews are female”) have not only obtained female verbal ability, but the abilty of women to work on details for long periods of time. This ‘reverse dimorphism’ combined with culling of the underclasses, upward redistribution of reproduction to rabbis, extereme clannishness and nepotism, and specialization in extractive (immoral) professions explains the statistical differences. So, anglicans choose a wider distribution of careers, are not nepotistic but universal, and produce about as many outliers. Jews are people of words, deception, and mysticism, and europeans are people of metalsmithing, truth, and magic. We still specialize in our ancient traditional occupations.

  • “I believe I have been proven correct when I asserted innumeracy is a far greate

    —“I believe I have been proven correct when I asserted innumeracy is a far greater threat to the future than illiteracy.”— Sean Ring

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 10:26:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033661835021565952

  • “I believe I have been proven correct when I asserted innumeracy is a far greate

    —“I believe I have been proven correct when I asserted innumeracy is a far greater threat to the future than illiteracy.”— Sean Ring

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 06:25:00 UTC