October 17th, 2018 5:30 PM ECONOMIC PSEUDOSCIENCE = CHERRY PICKING [W]hat separates economic science from economic pseudoscience, is selective measurement of changes in capital. Labor mobility turns out to be one of the WORST POSSIBLE means of altering poverty. Bring capital and rule of law to people, not people to capital and rule of law: One either brings rule of law and capital to people (colonialism) or one brings people to rule of law and capital (reverse-colonialism). The only choice is whether you colonize and INCREASE world institutional capital, or are colonized and CONSUME world institutional capital – while claiming you’ve made an increase in productivity rather than consumption.
Theme: Measurement
-
ECONOMIC PSEUDOSCIENCE = CHERRY PICKING What separates economic science from eco
ECONOMIC PSEUDOSCIENCE = CHERRY PICKING
What separates economic science from economic pseudoscience, is selective measurement of changes in capital.
Labor mobility turns out to be one of the WORST POSSIBLE means of altering poverty.
Bring capital and rule of law to people, not people to capital and rule of law: One either brings rule of law and capital to people (colonialism) or one brings people to rule of law and capital (reverse-colonialism).
The only choice is whether you colonize and INCREASE world institutional capital, or are colonized and CONSUME world institutional capital – while claiming you’ve made an increase in productivity rather than consumption.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-17 17:30:00 UTC
-
WHAT ARE YOU MEASURING? FEELS (immediate experience) or REALS (consequences)? Se
WHAT ARE YOU MEASURING?
FEELS (immediate experience) or REALS (consequences)?
Self Delusion feels good to the Faithful. Drugs feel good to the drug user. Stealing feels good to the thief. Murder feels good to the murderer. Just about anything we evolve a moral disposition against feels good. That’s why we limit it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-17 11:47:00 UTC
-
Again: MBTI vs BIG5/6 vs Moral Foundations vs Gender
October 16th, 2018 10:43 AM AGAIN: MBTI vs BIG5/6 vs MORAL FOUNDATIONS vs GENDER (from elsewhere) In other words, the principle difference between MBTI and Big 5 are (a) the weight it gives to trait expression, and (b) the principle difference in value is that with 100 Questions we can test your IQ within a half a standard deviation, because all components scale evenly, but we cannot test the rest of your personality traits with so few questions because they do NOT scale evenly. Moreover, MBTI is a WORKPLACE and social weighting of traits, while BIG5 is a THERAPEUTIC weighting of traits. These are differences in value rather than differences in measurement. I was not the first person to make this distinction, but I have written extensively on the fact that while MBTI is imprecise, it is the maximum complexity of a model that individuals can work with in the workplace. We can measure all sorts of trait expression, and even the big 5 FACTORS must be broken down into TRAITS in order to accommodate the difference in factor expression between the GENDERS. STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10156661592707264&set=a.10156479504747264&type=3&size=850%2C370 In this sense MBTI is a better judge of the GENDER biases inherent in cognitive and emotional biases because its fairly obvious that the gender distributions are inverted. Whereas this transparency was only visible in BIG5 after division from Factors into Trait Expressions – and that occurred fairly recently (post 2000), as psychology attempted to reform from a pseudoscience to a science when confronted with imaging, genetic, and pharmaceutical science.
MORAL FOUNDATIONS BY PROPERTY RIGHT BIAS (POLITICAL BIAS)https://propertarianinstitute.com/2014/09/28/moral-foundations-as-property-rights/MORAL FOUNDATIONS BY GENDER BIAShttps://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/09/15/the-moral-foundations-by-gender-bias-m-vs-f/ -
Atheism Isn’t a Religion. at Best It’s an Ideology
October 16th, 2018 4:38 PM ATHEISM ISN’T A RELIGION. AT BEST IT’S AN IDEOLOGY [A]theism isn’t a religion (and casting it as such is a fraud), it’s a statement of Science (measurement) and used as an Ideology (political change), and arguably a Prosecution (law against fraud and harm). The only reason atheism is ridiculous is because we haven’t restored the oath, stoicism (mindfulness), ancestor, and nature worship (celebration). (native western religion) As such Criticism without Replacement is rather IDEOLOGICAL, for the simple reason that intuition(emotions) DO REQUIRE training, just as do our bodies, reason (reason, calculation, computation), and memories (knowledge, skills). Religion is just one of the layers of education. We can perform that education by various means. The whole ‘lies’ nonsense isn’t a necessary means. There is no evidence of it.
-
Atheism Isn’t a Religion. at Best It’s an Ideology
October 16th, 2018 4:38 PM ATHEISM ISN’T A RELIGION. AT BEST IT’S AN IDEOLOGY [A]theism isn’t a religion (and casting it as such is a fraud), it’s a statement of Science (measurement) and used as an Ideology (political change), and arguably a Prosecution (law against fraud and harm). The only reason atheism is ridiculous is because we haven’t restored the oath, stoicism (mindfulness), ancestor, and nature worship (celebration). (native western religion) As such Criticism without Replacement is rather IDEOLOGICAL, for the simple reason that intuition(emotions) DO REQUIRE training, just as do our bodies, reason (reason, calculation, computation), and memories (knowledge, skills). Religion is just one of the layers of education. We can perform that education by various means. The whole ‘lies’ nonsense isn’t a necessary means. There is no evidence of it.
-
“MARKETS OF THE VIA-NEGATIVA A.K.A.: “Incremental Suppression.”— Bill Joslin
—“MARKETS OF THE VIA-NEGATIVA
A.K.A.: “Incremental Suppression.”— Bill Joslin
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-16 17:09:00 UTC
-
ATHEISM ISN’T A RELIGION. AT BEST IT’S AN IDEOLOGY Atheism isn’t a religion (and
ATHEISM ISN’T A RELIGION. AT BEST IT’S AN IDEOLOGY
Atheism isn’t a religion (and casting it as such is a fraud), it’s a statement of Science (measurement) and used as an Ideology (political change), and arguably a Prosecution (law against fraud and harm).
The only reason atheism is ridiculous is because we haven’t restored the oath, stoicism (mindfulness), ancestor, and nature worship (celebration). (native western religion)
As such Criticism without Replacement is rather IDEOLOGICAL, for the simple reason that intuition(emotions) DO REQUIRE training, just as do our bodies, reason (reason, calculation, computation), and memories (knowledge, skills).
Religion is just one of the layers of education. We can perform that education by various means. The whole ‘lies’ nonsense isn’t a necessary means. There is no evidence of it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-16 16:38:00 UTC
-
THE HERD, (NPCs) RESIST ALL MEASUREMENTS (COMMENSURABILITIES) Resistance to pers
THE HERD, (NPCs) RESIST ALL MEASUREMENTS (COMMENSURABILITIES)
Resistance to personality, iq, class, race, and gender differences, is an NPC behavior (herd behavior) for obvious reasons- the pack requires a hierarchy to organize for the purpose of eugenic evolution (competition), but the herd rebels against it for the purpose of dysgenic (equalitarian) persistence.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-16 10:52:00 UTC
-
AGAIN: MBTI vs BIG5/6 vs MORAL FOUNDATIONS vs GENDER (from elsewhere) In other w
AGAIN: MBTI vs BIG5/6 vs MORAL FOUNDATIONS vs GENDER
(from elsewhere)
In other words, the principle difference between MBTI and Big 5 are (a) the weight it gives to trait expression, and (b) the principle difference in value is that with 100 Questions we can test your IQ within a half a standard deviation, because all components scale evenly, but we cannot test the rest of your personality traits with so few questions because they do NOT scale evenly.
Moreover, MBTI is a WORKPLACE and social weighting of traits, while BIG5 is a THERAPEUTIC weighting of traits. These are differences in value rather than differences in measurement.
I was not the first person to make this distinction, but I have written extensively on the fact that while MBTI is imprecise, it is the maximum complexity of a model that individuals can work with in the workplace.
We can measure all sorts of trait expression, and even the big 5 FACTORS must be broken down into TRAITS in order to accommodate the difference in factor expression between the GENDERS.
STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10156661592707264&set=a.10156479504747264&type=3&size=850%2C370
In this sense MBTI is a better judge of the GENDER biases inherent in cognitive and emotional biases because its fairly obvious that the gender distributions are inverted.
Whereas this transparency was only visible in BIG5 *after* division from Factors into Trait Expressions – and that occurred fairly recently (post 2000), as psychology attempted to reform from a pseudoscience to a science when confronted with imaging, genetic, and pharmaceutical science.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-16 10:43:00 UTC