index(name) > icon(representation) > symbol(abstraction)
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-14 13:00:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1117412373306933248
Theme: Measurement
-
6) Operational = Real (measurement). Ideal = Fictionalism (story). Supernatural
6) Operational = Real (measurement). Ideal = Fictionalism (story). Supernatural = Supernatural Fictionalism (magic). 😉 We can communicate by many means of narration. Externalities from mathematical fictionalism are substantive. -Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-10 15:27:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115999632495194115
Reply addressees: @KelseyAHE
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115646922243629057
IN REPLY TO:
@kelseyahe
Do you think mathematicians disagree about what’s true?
When? Where? Why?Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115646922243629057
-
5) Mathematics is just the most parsimonious grammar of speech we have, because
5) Mathematics is just the most parsimonious grammar of speech we have, because it consists of only one dimension: position. And as a grammar like all other grammars we make use of. The question is whether one is engaging in description, fiction, or supernaturalism.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-10 15:24:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115998916993007620
Reply addressees: @KelseyAHE
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115646922243629057
IN REPLY TO:
@kelseyahe
Do you think mathematicians disagree about what’s true?
When? Where? Why?Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115646922243629057
-
3) Or that such mathematicians tend claim that which is true (testifiable) refle
3) Or that such mathematicians tend claim that which is true (testifiable) reflects the number of those testable (knowable) dimensions that their work depends upon. Or that constructivist(measurements) < idealist[fiction](mathematical reality) < Supernaturalists (infinities) …
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-10 15:17:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115997286306320384
Reply addressees: @KelseyAHE
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115646922243629057
IN REPLY TO:
@kelseyahe
Do you think mathematicians disagree about what’s true?
When? Where? Why?Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115646922243629057
-
2) Mathematicians rarely know that categorical consistency (position), internal
2) Mathematicians rarely know that categorical consistency (position), internal consistency (logic), operational (existential) consistency (construction), external consistency (correspondence), and completeness (limits,full accounting), are the full set of dimensions we can test.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-10 15:13:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115996130154819584
Reply addressees: @KelseyAHE
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115646922243629057
IN REPLY TO:
@kelseyahe
Do you think mathematicians disagree about what’s true?
When? Where? Why?Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115646922243629057
-
1) True = A claim by the actor, of the internal consistency of the argument, use
1) True = A claim by the actor, of the internal consistency of the argument, used to construct a statement, in that grammar we call mathematics, that consists of operations upon, and deductions from, the single constant relation of positional names.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-10 15:09:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115995183043182593
Reply addressees: @KelseyAHE
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115646922243629057
IN REPLY TO:
@kelseyahe
Do you think mathematicians disagree about what’s true?
When? Where? Why?Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115646922243629057
-
A Short Course in the Grammars
There are a few fundamental innovations in Propertarianism 1 – The Dimensional warranty of due diligence (Testimonialism) 2 – The Periodic Table of speech (Grammars)3 – The Operational language and grammar in ePrime 4 – The Method of producing serialized Definitions (Disambiguation) 5 – Property in toto and the completion of the anarchic program in a reduction of social science to statements of changes in the state of ‘property’ (interests).
Grammar: “Rules of continuous disambiguation, limited to some set of dimensions, where those dimensions function as measurements, where those measurements consist of constant relations, between analogies to perception, experience, intuition, reason, or action; producing a well formed statement, functioning as a series of transactions, in a contract for meaning.”
“GETTING IT”
propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-1227/
“Let me try to identify things that would have made it faster: 1) Vocabulary. That would have been the biggest barrier to entry for me. What is fictionalism? What is operationalism? Largely graspable. Once this is clear I don’t see anything blocking the understand of the grammars. 2) I should have focused less on your facebook posts (until I got the grammars). I think I should have went straight to the website and find the Core of Propertarianism.”
THE GRAMMARS (POSTER)
—“Just saw you table of grammars, there is enough material for ten years of study just there.”— Singular Speech Yes. The Grammars, Operational language, Acquisitionism, Property in toto, Dimensional Warranties of Due Diligence,. Those sets of concepts produce a formal logic of social science, expressible not with set language, but with operational language. … Like I said. There is a wonderful parsimonious elegance underneath it all. It’s beautiful. Truth is enough – and it is now possible.
UNDERSTANDING THE GRAMMARS
Our Definition of ‘Grammar’ propertarianism.com/2018/10/30/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-1971/
All grammars limit the domains (property ranges) of semantic content. Semantic limits do not exist independent of grammars, but expand (inflate) fictionally or contract (deflate) operationally, empirically, and logically (meaning scientifically). In fact, the purpose of deflationary grammars is primarily to decrease deception, fiction, disambiguation, and dimensions, and therefore increase precision.
Inflationary and Deflationary Grammars propertarianism.com/2018/06/20/understanding-deflationary-grammar-and-dimensions/ Define Deflationary Grammar propertarianism.com/2018/03/16/11386/ Formal Grammar propertarianism.com/2017/10/02/grammars/ Understanding Deflationary Grammar (and Dimensions) propertarianism.com/2017/03/17/the-function-of-propertarian-grammar/ Grammars Instead of Logics propertarianism.com/2017/11/11/operationalism-grammars-instead-of-logics-its-like-chemistry-vs-biology-part-1/ Propertarianism: Datatypes, Operations, Grammar, Syntax propertarianism.com/2017/03/23/propertarianism-datatypes-operations-grammar-syntax/ EPRIME EPrime Lesson of the Day propertarianism.com/2016/09/23/e-prime-lesson-of-the-day/ Natural Law and the Grammar of Operational Language propertarianism.com/2017/02/20/natural-law-and-the-grammar-of-operational-language/ Law is the Top (Most Complete) Grammar propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-13/ The Grammar Tells You Everything About The Argument propertarianism.com/2018/10/30/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-1975/ Will Aliens Use the Same Grammars? propertarianism.com/2018/05/28/will-aliens-use-the-same-grammar/ The Route to Operational Grammar propertarianism.com/2017/11/01/the-route-to-operational-grammar/ What Is a Testimonial Argument? propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-730/ The Series of Grammars Psychology propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-53/ Aristotle was the only Prophet that wasn’t lying propertarianism.com/2018/06/02/grammars-always-tell-the-truth/ The Grammars of Truth and Deceit propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-1409/ Abrahamism Is a Grammar of Devolutionary Deceit propertarianism.com/2018/06/19/abrahamism-is-a-grammar-of-devolutionary-deceit/ The Grammar of Pseudoscience and Intellectual Fraud propertarianism.com/2018/05/21/the-grammar-of-pseudoscience/ The Grammar And Semantics Of Social Fraud: Soft Violence propertarianism.com/2018/01/19/the-grammar-and-semantics-of-social-fraud-soft-violence/ Teach people GRAMMARS so that they can DECODE (Weigh and Measure) speech propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-206/ We don’t have to speak in Operational Language – just know how to use it. propertarianism.com/2018/01/17/we-dont-all-have-to-speak-in-operational-language-any-more-than-we-need-to-speak-in-mathematics-or-legalese-but/
-
A Short Course in the Grammars
There are a few fundamental innovations in Propertarianism 1 – The Dimensional warranty of due diligence (Testimonialism) 2 – The Periodic Table of speech (Grammars)3 – The Operational language and grammar in ePrime 4 – The Method of producing serialized Definitions (Disambiguation) 5 – Property in toto and the completion of the anarchic program in a reduction of social science to statements of changes in the state of ‘property’ (interests).
Grammar: “Rules of continuous disambiguation, limited to some set of dimensions, where those dimensions function as measurements, where those measurements consist of constant relations, between analogies to perception, experience, intuition, reason, or action; producing a well formed statement, functioning as a series of transactions, in a contract for meaning.”
“GETTING IT”
propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-1227/
“Let me try to identify things that would have made it faster: 1) Vocabulary. That would have been the biggest barrier to entry for me. What is fictionalism? What is operationalism? Largely graspable. Once this is clear I don’t see anything blocking the understand of the grammars. 2) I should have focused less on your facebook posts (until I got the grammars). I think I should have went straight to the website and find the Core of Propertarianism.”
THE GRAMMARS (POSTER)
—“Just saw you table of grammars, there is enough material for ten years of study just there.”— Singular Speech Yes. The Grammars, Operational language, Acquisitionism, Property in toto, Dimensional Warranties of Due Diligence,. Those sets of concepts produce a formal logic of social science, expressible not with set language, but with operational language. … Like I said. There is a wonderful parsimonious elegance underneath it all. It’s beautiful. Truth is enough – and it is now possible.
UNDERSTANDING THE GRAMMARS
Our Definition of ‘Grammar’ propertarianism.com/2018/10/30/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-1971/
All grammars limit the domains (property ranges) of semantic content. Semantic limits do not exist independent of grammars, but expand (inflate) fictionally or contract (deflate) operationally, empirically, and logically (meaning scientifically). In fact, the purpose of deflationary grammars is primarily to decrease deception, fiction, disambiguation, and dimensions, and therefore increase precision.
Inflationary and Deflationary Grammars propertarianism.com/2018/06/20/understanding-deflationary-grammar-and-dimensions/ Define Deflationary Grammar propertarianism.com/2018/03/16/11386/ Formal Grammar propertarianism.com/2017/10/02/grammars/ Understanding Deflationary Grammar (and Dimensions) propertarianism.com/2017/03/17/the-function-of-propertarian-grammar/ Grammars Instead of Logics propertarianism.com/2017/11/11/operationalism-grammars-instead-of-logics-its-like-chemistry-vs-biology-part-1/ Propertarianism: Datatypes, Operations, Grammar, Syntax propertarianism.com/2017/03/23/propertarianism-datatypes-operations-grammar-syntax/ EPRIME EPrime Lesson of the Day propertarianism.com/2016/09/23/e-prime-lesson-of-the-day/ Natural Law and the Grammar of Operational Language propertarianism.com/2017/02/20/natural-law-and-the-grammar-of-operational-language/ Law is the Top (Most Complete) Grammar propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-13/ The Grammar Tells You Everything About The Argument propertarianism.com/2018/10/30/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-1975/ Will Aliens Use the Same Grammars? propertarianism.com/2018/05/28/will-aliens-use-the-same-grammar/ The Route to Operational Grammar propertarianism.com/2017/11/01/the-route-to-operational-grammar/ What Is a Testimonial Argument? propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-730/ The Series of Grammars Psychology propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-53/ Aristotle was the only Prophet that wasn’t lying propertarianism.com/2018/06/02/grammars-always-tell-the-truth/ The Grammars of Truth and Deceit propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-1409/ Abrahamism Is a Grammar of Devolutionary Deceit propertarianism.com/2018/06/19/abrahamism-is-a-grammar-of-devolutionary-deceit/ The Grammar of Pseudoscience and Intellectual Fraud propertarianism.com/2018/05/21/the-grammar-of-pseudoscience/ The Grammar And Semantics Of Social Fraud: Soft Violence propertarianism.com/2018/01/19/the-grammar-and-semantics-of-social-fraud-soft-violence/ Teach people GRAMMARS so that they can DECODE (Weigh and Measure) speech propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-206/ We don’t have to speak in Operational Language – just know how to use it. propertarianism.com/2018/01/17/we-dont-all-have-to-speak-in-operational-language-any-more-than-we-need-to-speak-in-mathematics-or-legalese-but/
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1541512910 Timestamp) THE INTELLECTUAL CATASTROPHE OF SPECIALIZATION (and the import of a universal language of testimony)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542218874 Timestamp) They Talk About Ideals, and We Talk About Reals – The Difference Is Costs – We Account for Costs.