Theme: Measurement

  • The problem with these studies is failure to measure genetic, institutional, nor

    The problem with these studies is failure to measure genetic, institutional, normative, and knowledge capital. As far as we can tell all prosperity is simply accumulated capital consumption made possible by fiat money debt. We aren’t wealthy we’re just spending down inheritances. https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1208318063982129152

  • Again:Stereotypes are the most accurate measure in social science.Women are hype

    Again:Stereotypes are the most accurate measure in social science.Women are hypergamous(income) men are hyper genetic (femininity). More women have to settle. i.e. Marriage will return to an upper class exclusivity without restoring incentives for household vs political exchange. https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1208284556593381376

  • Why the economic and legal rather than moral and normative language? Because of

    Why the economic and legal rather than moral and normative language? Because of 1-personal moral bias, 2-gender moral bias, 3-class moral bias, 4-normative moral bias, 5-cultural ethical bias, 6-civilizational moral bias, – but theft of property-in-toto is just theft – period.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-20 18:20:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1208089796914098176

  • Emotions are measures of changes in state of property. by Martin Štěpán ( Brando

    Emotions are measures of changes in state of property.

    by Martin Štěpán ( Brandon Hayes)

    Emotions are measures of changes in state of property. When they tell you hate or any other emotion is a crime, they’re trying to convince you your measurements are erroneous and to get you to stop measuring so that they can change the state of your property without obstacle.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-19 19:25:00 UTC

  • A SHORT TIMELINE OF PURCHASING POWER (from visual capitalist) 1900s After the Pa

    A SHORT TIMELINE OF PURCHASING POWER

    (from visual capitalist)

    1900s

    After the Panic of 1907, the National Monetary Commission is established to propose legislation to regulate banking.

    U.S. Money Supply: $7 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: A pair of patent leather shoes.

    1910s

    The Federal Reserve Act is signed in 1913 by President Woodrow Wilson.

    U.S. Money Supply: $13 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: A woman’s house dress.

    1920s

    U.S. dollar bills were reduced in size by 25%, and standardized in terms of design.

    The Fed starts using open market operations as a tool for monetary policy.

    U.S. Money Supply: $35 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: Five pounds of sugar.

    1930s

    To deal with deflation during the Great Depression, the United States suspends the gold standard. President Franklin D. Roosevelt signs Executive Order 6102, which criminalizes the possession of gold.

    By no longer allowing gold to be legally redeemed, this removes a major constraint on the Fed, which can now control the money supply.

    U.S. Money Supply: $46 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: 16 cans of Campbell’s Soup

    1940s

    The massive deficits of World War II are almost financed entirely by the creation of new money by the Federal Reserve.

    Interest rates are pegged low at the request of the Treasury.

    Under Bretton-Woods, the “gold-exchange standard” is adopted.

    U.S. Money Supply: $55 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: 20 bottles of Coca-Cola

    1950s

    The Korean War starts in 1950, and inflation is at an annualized rate of 21%.

    The Fed can no longer manage such low interest rates, and tells the Treasury that it can “no longer maintain the existing situation”.

    U.S. Money Supply: $151 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: One Mr. Potato Head

    1960s

    An agreement, called the Treasury-Federal Reserve Accord, is reached to establish the central bank’s independence.

    By this time, U.S. dollars in circulation around the world exceeded U.S. gold reserves. Unless the situation was rectified, the country would be vulnerable to the currency equivalent of a “bank run”.

    U.S. Money Supply: $211 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: Two movie tickets.

    1970s

    In 1971, President Richard Nixon ends direct convertibility of the United States dollar to gold.

    The period following the Nixon Shock is uncertain. The federal deficit doubles, stagflation hits, and the oil price skyrockets – all during the Vietnam War.

    Over the decade, the dollar loses 1/3 of its value.

    U.S. Money Supply: $401 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: Three Morton TV dinners.

    1980s

    The stock market crashes in 1987 on Black Monday.

    The Federal Reserve, under newly-appointed Alan Greenspan, issues the following statement:

    “The Federal Reserve, consistent with its responsibilities as the nation’s central bank, affirmed today its readiness to serve as a source of liquidity to support the economic and financial system.”

    The Dow would recover by 1989, with no prolonged recession occurring.

    U.S. Money Supply: $1,560 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: One bottle of Heinz Ketchup.

    1990s

    This decade is generally considered to be a time of declining inflation and the longest peacetime economic expansion in U.S. history.

    During this decade, many improvements are made to U.S. paper currency to prevent counterfeiting. Microprinting, security thread, and other features are used.

    U.S. Money Supply: $3,277 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: One gallon of milk.

    2000s

    After the Dotcom crash, the Fed drops interest rates to near all-time lows.

    In 2008, the Financial Crisis hits and the Fed begins “quantitative easing”. Later, this would be known as QE1.

    U.S. Money Supply: $4,917 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: One Wendy’s hamburger.

    2010-

    After QE1, the Fed holds $2.1 trillion of bank debt, mortgage-backed securities, and Treasury notes. Shortly after, QE2 starts.

    In 2012, it’s time for QE3.

    Purchases were halted in October 2014 after accumulating $4.5 trillion in assets.

    U.S. Money Supply: $13,291 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: One song from iTunes.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-19 16:56:00 UTC

  • FOLLOW THE MONEY: MOST PROFITABLE SECTORS Health the most profitable sector with

    FOLLOW THE MONEY: MOST PROFITABLE SECTORS

    Health the most profitable sector with a 21.6 percent net profit margin. Technology services 17.2 percent net margin were second, narrowly edging past finance 17.1 percent. Electronic technology and consumer nondurables round out the top five.

    Finance and insurance represent 7.4 percent (or $1.5 trillion) of U.S. gross domestic product or 266B.

    Health 3,823, (or 3.8T) 21.6% profit is 826B.

    Tech looks impressive but it doesn’t employ many people. Sort of like electricity., Small market HUGE impact.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-19 16:02:00 UTC

  • I never err. Because I don’t say anything I can’t warranty by due diligence in e

    I never err. Because I don’t say anything I can’t warranty by due diligence in every dimension testable by man. Its easy not to err. Just don’t say anything you haven’t exhausted due diligence upon. 😉

    And it takes a lot of knowledge to do that.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-17 20:11:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1207030529125691392

    Reply addressees: @drownded

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206978446271770624


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206978446271770624

  • That’s false. Statements are true or false regardless of who speaks them or why.

    That’s false. Statements are true or false regardless of who speaks them or why. To call you a liar I merely have to determine whether what you speak is testifiable, whether you originate, fail due diligence for, or carry lies, and what your incentives might be if it isn’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-17 01:52:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206753950231334912

    Reply addressees: @digitalErmit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206745191903899648


    IN REPLY TO:

    @digitalErmit

    @curtdoolittle You’d have to be a True Bearer of Truth – if that even exists – to call me a liar.
    You have particular interests so let me criticize you indeed, the way I like it will do for me.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206745191903899648

  • I try to define human claims by demonstrated behavior, not by what people claim.

    I try to define human claims by demonstrated behavior, not by what people claim.Demarcation is demonstrated:
    Theology, Philosophy, Rationalism, Logics, Mathematics, Physical Sciences, Economics and Law all operate by different inclusions, exclusions, and operational requirements.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-16 23:02:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206711210776956928

    Reply addressees: @james__jenko

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206707683518234629


    IN REPLY TO:

    @james__jenko

    @curtdoolittle “Socrates speaks of philosophy as the love of wisdom, implying thereby its pursuit rather than its attainment”. (Adler)

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206707683518234629

  • If the 20th c. attempt to define the sci. method failed, then how do you know th

    If the 20th c. attempt to define the sci. method failed, then how do you know that w/o a definition of science or its method? Like all other previous branches of left for science, truth departs into sci. of Testimony, & Ethics to reciprocity. Only choice remains in philosophy.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-16 11:50:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206542207009918981

    Reply addressees: @YvesBurri

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206366282662199297


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206366282662199297