Theme: Measurement

  • The Qualia of Geometry Is Uniform

    THE QUALIA OF GEOMETRY IS UNIFORM by Andrew M Gilmour (core) If Dennett built more on cog/sci and less on phenomenology. Dennett also made the mistake of using colour for uniformity of qualia as opposed to geometry (ancient Greeks). The qualia of geometry is uniform; the qualia of colour is not. *Uniform across human personal consciousness.


    CD: Well done. Will add that to our geometry presentation.

  • The Qualia of Geometry Is Uniform

    THE QUALIA OF GEOMETRY IS UNIFORM by Andrew M Gilmour (core) If Dennett built more on cog/sci and less on phenomenology. Dennett also made the mistake of using colour for uniformity of qualia as opposed to geometry (ancient Greeks). The qualia of geometry is uniform; the qualia of colour is not. *Uniform across human personal consciousness.


    CD: Well done. Will add that to our geometry presentation.

  • A God is a System of Measurement

    A God is a System of Measurement https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/a-god-is-a-system-of-measurement/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 19:25:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232386123923587072

  • A God is a System of Measurement

    [M]an is the measure of all things to man, because man is the only system of measurement available to man. God is a system of measurement in the group’s ideal of man to imitate (as in Jesus, or Achilles) a demigod to aspire to (Odin, Hercules), a god to negotiate with (zeus, thor, tyr), one to obey (jehova, allah), or one to simply understand (deism, the physical and natural laws). Any creature inventing a god would invent one in his image just as we have – and just as the hundreds of gods have been invented abandoned or lost before the present gods.

  • A God is a System of Measurement

    [M]an is the measure of all things to man, because man is the only system of measurement available to man. God is a system of measurement in the group’s ideal of man to imitate (as in Jesus, or Achilles) a demigod to aspire to (Odin, Hercules), a god to negotiate with (zeus, thor, tyr), one to obey (jehova, allah), or one to simply understand (deism, the physical and natural laws). Any creature inventing a god would invent one in his image just as we have – and just as the hundreds of gods have been invented abandoned or lost before the present gods.

  • Operationalism is Hard.

    —“P’s Operationalism is a lot harder than math. Math is so clear because it’s trivial. P requires much more.”— Adam

    Well you’re the first person to fully understand that. This is why I’m getting sort of awed lately – something is happening because people are progressive much faster now. Well as for your observation, math can construct a degree of precision outside of human scales of perception at the very large and very small. But as we have seen in testimony, law, and economics, in human action, the operations available and the grammar to create fully formed, grammatically complete, fully disambiguated statements in P is a lot harder than it is in math. So I see: first-order-logic (categorical logic) > math( positional logic)) > computable logic (programming) > operational logic( p-testimony), as the hierarchy of logics today. And in retrospect all the logics make so much more sense now.

  • Operationalism is Hard.

    —“P’s Operationalism is a lot harder than math. Math is so clear because it’s trivial. P requires much more.”— Adam

    Well you’re the first person to fully understand that. This is why I’m getting sort of awed lately – something is happening because people are progressive much faster now. Well as for your observation, math can construct a degree of precision outside of human scales of perception at the very large and very small. But as we have seen in testimony, law, and economics, in human action, the operations available and the grammar to create fully formed, grammatically complete, fully disambiguated statements in P is a lot harder than it is in math. So I see: first-order-logic (categorical logic) > math( positional logic)) > computable logic (programming) > operational logic( p-testimony), as the hierarchy of logics today. And in retrospect all the logics make so much more sense now.

  • Full-Accounting Fixes the “isms”

    Full-Accounting Fixes the “isms” https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/full-accounting-fixes-the-isms/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 16:27:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232341482318725120

  • Full-Accounting Fixes the “isms”

    by Luke Weinhagen . Communism, as it has been practiced, has functioned to keep full-accounting out of community interactions. Capitalism, as it has been practiced, has functioned to keep full-accounting out of capital interactions. Parasites use both to extract value from our common interests at the discount available due to their suppression of full-accounting. The solution… full-accounting.

  • Full-Accounting Fixes the “isms”

    by Luke Weinhagen . Communism, as it has been practiced, has functioned to keep full-accounting out of community interactions. Capitalism, as it has been practiced, has functioned to keep full-accounting out of capital interactions. Parasites use both to extract value from our common interests at the discount available due to their suppression of full-accounting. The solution… full-accounting.