It’s the most accurate measure of (g) we have. Trait-intelligence “g”, combined with trait-conscientiousness, and your trait-neuroticism we can largely predict everything about your life. Add the new antisocial personality tests measures just developed and it’s deterministic.
Reply addressees: @cayley_s @Simon_Whitten @rasmansa
Theme: Measurement
-
It’s the most accurate measure of (g) we have. Trait-intelligence “g”, combined
-
It’s the most accurate measure of (g) we have. Trait-intelligence “g”, combined
It’s the most accurate measure of (g) we have. Trait-intelligence “g”, combined with trait-conscientiousness, and your trait-neuroticism we can largely predict everything about your life. Add the new antisocial personality tests measures just developed and it’s deterministic.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 22:40:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267224525198032896
Reply addressees: @cayley_s @Simon_Whitten @rasmansa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267214317331644417
-
Tying the Universe Together in One Chart
TYING THE UNIVERSE TOGETHER IN ONE CHART (example of using the grammars)

I made this to illustrate that austrian economics is simply the lowest level of economic study, using operationalism (a sequence of rational incentives) in order to circumvent the problem of a full accounting. For this reason I equate austrian economics with rule of law as the foundations of social science. So, full accounting economics under rule of law,. The purpose of which is to improve our information and understanding without interfering. Chicago Economics sought to remain within the rule of law and provide solutions to insure us from exceptions. Most macro economics is concerned largely with monetary, banking, and financial system and it has very little to do with anything other than how broken this archaic treasury, financial, banking and credit system is. Most political economics (mainstream) is an exercise in the use of maximum disinformation for the purpose of maximizing commercial, financial, and political extraction from the productive classes using the false promise of employment as a measure.
-
The truth is social science is obvious because stereotypes are the most accurate
The truth is social science is obvious because stereotypes are the most accurate measure in social science, because they survive daily falsification by millions of us. That said, data matches the stereotypes. But It wasn’t until genetics we knew why: Neoteny & Class Distribution.
Reply addressees: @evrythingstays @Steve_Sailer -
The truth is social science is obvious because stereotypes are the most accurate
The truth is social science is obvious because stereotypes are the most accurate measure in social science, because they survive daily falsification by millions of us. That said, data matches the stereotypes. But It wasn’t until genetics we knew why: Neoteny & Class Distribution.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 19:34:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267177565048930304
Reply addressees: @evrythingstays @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266979089770065920
-
I look for five things
I look for five things: 1. Comprehension (do you understand P?) 2. Construction (how well constructed is your argument) 3. Precision (how parsimonious and balanced is it.) 4. Innovation (have you added an insight – hard but happens) 5. Poetics (is it aesthetically constructed)
-
I look for five things
I look for five things: 1. Comprehension (do you understand P?) 2. Construction (how well constructed is your argument) 3. Precision (how parsimonious and balanced is it.) 4. Innovation (have you added an insight – hard but happens) 5. Poetics (is it aesthetically constructed)
-
Aristotle Got as Close to It P as Archimedes Got to Calculus
–“I wonder what they called P before all the great libraries were destroyed.”—Andrew Gribble
—“I’m pretty confident that Aristotle got as close to it P as Archimedes got to calculus.”—Luan Raphael
Archimedes: 287 BC. Epicurus 341 BC Alexander 356 BC Aristotle 384 BC When Alexander Crosses the Hellespont 334 BC, he conquered the persian empire at the expense of infecting europe with oriental despotism. We should not look at alexander as a hero, but as a fool who brings greece to an end, as napoleon that brought europe to an end. It took us until: newton-liebniz to rediscover calculus descartes to restore us to geometry (reality) Davinci to restore roman engineering It takes until the royal society before we institutionalize it again and reach greek and roman levels of schools. (1660) We don’t restore ‘physical’ thought until the industrial revolution ~1700-1830, physical thought We don’t restore administration and military order until Napoleonic France. It takes until Darwin before we reach aristotelian ‘cleanliness’ of thought. The main innovations are technological, and the main innovation in logic returning to Archimedes with Babbage by accident and Turing by design. We are, I am, still trying to restore aristotle, our original frame of european thought. I mean, realistically, the worst thing that ever happened is letting the barbarians across the hellespont. but there is no natural barrier in anatolia like there are in the caucuses to build a wall upon. so Anatolia must be lost.
-
Aristotle Got as Close to It P as Archimedes Got to Calculus
–“I wonder what they called P before all the great libraries were destroyed.”—Andrew Gribble
—“I’m pretty confident that Aristotle got as close to it P as Archimedes got to calculus.”—Luan Raphael
Archimedes: 287 BC. Epicurus 341 BC Alexander 356 BC Aristotle 384 BC When Alexander Crosses the Hellespont 334 BC, he conquered the persian empire at the expense of infecting europe with oriental despotism. We should not look at alexander as a hero, but as a fool who brings greece to an end, as napoleon that brought europe to an end. It took us until: newton-liebniz to rediscover calculus descartes to restore us to geometry (reality) Davinci to restore roman engineering It takes until the royal society before we institutionalize it again and reach greek and roman levels of schools. (1660) We don’t restore ‘physical’ thought until the industrial revolution ~1700-1830, physical thought We don’t restore administration and military order until Napoleonic France. It takes until Darwin before we reach aristotelian ‘cleanliness’ of thought. The main innovations are technological, and the main innovation in logic returning to Archimedes with Babbage by accident and Turing by design. We are, I am, still trying to restore aristotle, our original frame of european thought. I mean, realistically, the worst thing that ever happened is letting the barbarians across the hellespont. but there is no natural barrier in anatolia like there are in the caucuses to build a wall upon. so Anatolia must be lost.
-
The ‘mystery’ of Math Rapidly Disappears
The ‘mystery’ of Math Rapidly Disappears https://t.co/l6gWhtzUXP