The Method – Part I – Operational Sentences (Prose)
https://youtu.be/UwFKSX60CrA
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-02 12:29:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1388833037987762176
The Method – Part I – Operational Sentences (Prose)
https://youtu.be/UwFKSX60CrA
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-02 12:29:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1388833037987762176

Screenshot from Episode of The Method: “The Grammars”, that explains the evolution of language from movement: wayfinding. So, yes, we’re bots. Get over it. ๐

Source date (UTC): 2021-05-02 11:58:27 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106165482755126667
The Method – Part 1 – Terms – Basic Concepts
https://youtu.be/1kubZs-l0TI
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-28 15:29:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387428725369749508
The Method Part I – An Overview of the Method
https://youtu.be/qBwfWcBPjAA
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-27 20:29:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387141874188754944
2. In most basic terms discoveries define increasing precision of constant relations – which math is the language that can best describe. The universe – all of it – consists of a hierarchy of COMPUTABLE relations with symmetries (states) – serving as memory.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-27 17:34:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387097942616682507
Reply addressees: @charlesmurray @chasrmartin @primalpoly
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387096990702612486
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@charlesmurray @chasrmartin @primalpoly Charles. 1. All such discoveries in history rely on the identical process, with those that succeed and fail demarcated by testifiable evidence ILLUSTRATING theories that falsify the alternatives by competition under realism, naturalism, operationalism for parsimony.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1387096990702612486
Gods function as a system of measure in the most primitive means of measurement available to, transmissible to, animal man: A headman, family, and tribe we can imitate, sympathize and empathize with, causing the group similar choices, reducing friction, promoting cooperation.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-26 14:55:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386695361578811397
I donโt do humanities. I just do the data. ๐ there is consistency between physics, neurology, demonstrated behavior, evolution, their measurement in economics and in law. The first principles are consistent across all formal, physical, behavioral, evolutionary sciences.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-26 00:19:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386474954749882368
Reply addressees: @MMMalign @BLUNDERBUSSTED
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386463452953300994
Formal logic of decidability in science, economics, law and testimony. Writing proofs of construction from first causes in and across behavioral sciences. And no you wouldnโt understand. ๐ It requires deep knowledge of multiple fields, not the least of which is cog sci. Cheers.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-25 23:28:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386462200450199558
Reply addressees: @MMMalign @BLUNDERBUSSTED
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386450731897602051
Look up the proof of it and you’ll see that it’s arbitrary.,
ab can equal -1 or 1 because the above choice is arbitrary for archaic reasons:
Counting on knuckles
Arithmetic on abacus
Math on balance scale <-culprit
Geometry on engineering measurement
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-25 15:34:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386342810434129922
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @milordog1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386341403702276102
T & T = T _ 1 + 1 = 2 _ 1 * 1 = 1
T & F = F _ 1 + -1 = 0 _ 1 * -1 = -1
F & F = F _ -1 + -1 = -2 _ -1 * -1 = (?) Why?
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-25 15:21:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386339493217701890
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @milordog1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386337681517465601