September 26th Chat Topics: Epistemic instrumentation
https://youtu.be/ilh480VIl44
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-26 19:58:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1442216983970279424
Theme: Measurement
-
September 26th Chat Topics: Epistemic instrumentation
-
So if you start from the HARD problem – and yes, these problems exist beyond the
So if you start from the HARD problem – and yes, these problems exist beyond the limits of mathematics – you start with knowing what’s wrong with mathematics, and how what’s wrong with mathematics affects physics and all that derives from it. (a lot). https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1441913763104362498
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-25 23:59:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1441915169945260044
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1441913763104362498
-
Because under P, we observe the grammars as a spectrum of graceful increase in p
Because under P, we observe the grammars as a spectrum of graceful increase in precision at the cost of meaning, or graceful decrease in precision to decrease the cost of meaning. All that matters is that the paradigm is consistent, correspondent, reciprocal, and possible. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1438557878785396741
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-16 17:39:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1438558244096651265
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1438557878785396741
-
Still not seeing what you see here.We’re either ignorant or we aren’t.Our ignora
Still not seeing what you see here.We’re either ignorant or we aren’t.Our ignorance can be decreased through narrative, example, and measurement. From intuitionistic and suggestive to rational and explicit. And from consistent correspondent and coherent to not so. I don’t get it.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-14 03:09:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1437614568872763394
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @oswaldspangled @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1437485768260395008
-
Religions provide a system of measurement creating a cognitive discount, status
Religions provide a system of measurement creating a cognitive discount, status signals, reducing conflict, and increasing cooperation. Our tendency is to produce a cult that satisfies our (small) niche. Such niche’s will always be sufficiently extreme that they cannot scale.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-13 16:11:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1437448865007931392
Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1437448058069913603
-
Then we are simply debating the content of the term ‘religion’ which is: (a) a g
Then we are simply debating the content of the term ‘religion’ which is: (a) a group strategy(values) (b) mythology advancing it(system of measurement) (c) ritual (intergenerational debt payment) (d) oath or promise stated or implied, and (e) festivals(equalization of classes).
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-12 23:38:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1437198999254142981
Reply addressees: @DavidMottershe8 @ConceptualJames
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1437198008140144650
-
Trying to find the most parsimonious way of explaining this but it’s not much mo
Trying to find the most parsimonious way of explaining this but it’s not much more complicated than ternaryism (ternary reasoning) forces full accounting – and I have no idea why simply stating that evaded me – the problem with ‘seeing patterns’ is you intuit obvious what isn’t. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1436697577165148161
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-11 14:28:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1436698147376533509
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1436697577165148161
-
ANTI-MATHINESS
ANTI-MATHINESS https://t.co/GScYw4bnpu
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-10 22:59:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1436464446470332422
-
No. Because you’re implying it’s a warning, rather than a weight and measure of
No. Because you’re implying it’s a warning, rather than a weight and measure of interest only to a tiny loud false virtue signaling minority.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-10 15:56:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1436357830127259657
Reply addressees: @KosChertified @_Akhaten
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1436356851956731907
-
Again. Define time. It is a continous property of the background field (absolute
Again. Define time. It is a continous property of the background field (absolute measurement) that determines the rate of change while we move through that field? Or is it our relative perception of the rate of change as we experience moving through that field?(relative)
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-06 19:23:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1434960398432800768
Reply addressees: @Mecanoide1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1434959682112737280