Theme: Measurement

  • Superority and Inferiority are measureable. And it isn’t even hard. Especially w

    Superority and Inferiority are measureable. And it isn’t even hard. Especially when we discover that it’s determined by trustworthiness. And primitive peoples don’t have it.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-19 15:17:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1495054985264082952

    Reply addressees: @StevenP79069048 @PaulNiland

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1495052517809528834

  • @fluke030 So in order to help you understand simple concepts, what is the purpos

    @fluke030 So in order to help you understand simple concepts, what is the purpose of a measurement, and what is the scope of possible measurements humans can use to reduce to analogy of experience such that they can perform one or more of the cardinal, ordinal, ternary, differential, identity tests, and the subsequent survivability of any claim from falsification?

    Now, I’ve made two simple posts so far, one defining the scientific method, and the other a question that defines the meaning of measurement in the scientific method.

    Most of the concepts necessary for testimony of truth claims is in these two posts. The other major concept is called ‘mindfulness’ which produces serotonin which suppresses negative thoughts, especially in those with trait neuroticism, or a female bias in brain organizaton placing empathizing over systematizing

    So if you eliminate all the falshoods from chrsitian teaching what behavior are those teachings attempting to produce and what mindfulness is produced, and why is it that about 1/3 of the pouplation requires mindfulness by social construction of a satisfying fiction (lies) in order to sedate their feelings of rejectio, self worth, status, inadequacy, alienation being left behind?

    There is no one living today (or in the past) that understands these matters better than I do, and everyone that understands them as well as I do is part of the institute organization.

    We are the culmination of the darwinian project to remove deceit from mankind.

    Cheers.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-19 14:53:15 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107825227071422104

  • @fluke030 “The purpose of the scientific method, just as is the purpose of adver

    @fluke030 “The purpose of the scientific method, just as is the purpose of adversarial prosecution in court before the jury from which science evolved, is to continuously recursively eliminate ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fiction, the fictionalisms, deceit, fraud, free riding, rent-seeking, corruption, denial, undermining, reputation destruction, social construction from any and all claims, leaving only that which is consistent with: unambiguity (identity), realism and naturalism (causality), internal consistency (logic), operational possibility (operationalism), external correspondence (observability), rational choice (incentives, motives), reciprocal rational choice (morality, ethics), and within stated limits, of full accounting within those limits, having demonstrated due diligence in all of the above, and within the limits of restitutabiity and liability. By this method, we discover human responsibility and human incentives, and we discover the first principles of the four sets of laws of the universe: formal logical, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws; and from this set of first principles, we can construct a formal logic of falsification, that universally tests all truth claims regardless of person or context. The end result of scientific investigation is a formal logic of falsification (error and lie detection).”

    This process of falsification, discovery of first principles (irreducible causality) constitutes the scientific method.

    This process applied to Christianity results in exactly the first principles that I stated. And as usual, I am correct.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-19 14:38:51 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107825170451748995

  • akulkis00 @akulkis00 —” I don’t know what you THINK your IQ is, but it’s defin

    akulkis00
    @akulkis00

    —” I don’t know what you THINK your IQ is, but it’s definitely below my 142~144, and Vox is at least 5 points higher than I am. ” —

    IQ consists of two measures. One of neural adaptivity, and one of accumulated knowledge because of that adaptivity. Increasingly we seek to test adaptivity because it’s visible even in neurological reaction times.

    But demonstrated intelligence consists of no less than:
    1) Neural velocity and adaptability
    2) Personality variation from systematizing (vs empathizing), openness and extroversion, conscientiousness (executive function), and low neuroticism.
    3) General Knowledge – general knowledge compensates for IQ, and the organization of general knowledge by minimum variation from unambiguity, internal consistency, external correspondence, in the form of general rules improves demonstrated intelligence
    4) Wants, Beliefs, Faiths, that are contradictory to unambiguity, internal consistency, external correspondence.
    5) Of course, trauma and disease.

    Manifested in:
    6) Lifetime Achievement.

    Now in estimating my IQ you’re off by a standard deviation. That doesn’t matter. I’ve had vastly more success in life than you have so I am less malinvested in self-image, status, and false beliefs to maintain them. And I have very low regard for the opinions of the peasantry. And I rather enjoy parenting gamma males who overstate the merit of their false beliefs, unwarranted opinions, and masculine pretense of competency.

    And regarding my lifetime achievement, well I’ve built a whole buncha tech companies and sold them. Burned through a couple of wives. Advised campaigns, participated in espionage and revolution. Survived two cancers and two other serious illnesses. Retired in my 40’s, and then solved the hardest remaining problem in intellectual history unifying the sciences as promised by EO Wilson. And I’ve done it with a total lack of respect for those like you, and without airs of pretense common in social, popular, academic, or political affairs. Which historically is a common personality expression for those with similar abilities and high functioning autistic neurology.

    Now, you know, evidence is. I did. You talk. It’s simple. 😉

    And none of your girl gossip will change the demonstrated evidence. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-16 00:44:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107804902102013958

  • @Rhodok I wouldn’t know how to measure that and I kind of doubt it. We know that

    @Rhodok I wouldn’t know how to measure that and I kind of doubt it. We know that races have different rates of metabolism. Different rates and depths of aging and maturity. And of course the primary difference is aggression, agency, and intelligence. And even there we see a variation in the sexual cognitive dimorphism. Regulating a body’s homeostasis shouldn’t vary other than rates of metabolism given ancestral differences in climatological range.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-15 16:11:35 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107802885861558266

  • @shelley11 curvalinear sculpture in marble, the ziggurat is obvious at close ins

    @shelley11 curvalinear sculpture in marble, the ziggurat is obvious at close inspection, and the close fitting stones of the wall are obvious when the other sides of each stone are observed. The technique for softening stones is universally known, and consists of eitehr using heat, heat and water, or acid runoff from metal mines.

    Again. You equate your ignorance with insight. But it is only ignorance.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-13 20:10:42 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107792501500768169

  • @shelley11 THE “TELL” of handmade arts is the imprecision at close inspection. T

    @shelley11 THE “TELL” of handmade arts is the imprecision at close inspection. This is, for example, how you determine which technique as used to produce antique furniture.

    Never assume your ignorance is a source of insight.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-13 19:46:52 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107792407761396654

  • @Spacebunny Are you claiming JFG didn’t show the math already? Years ago, and ju

    @Spacebunny Are you claiming JFG didn’t show the math already? Years ago, and just provide another link to it? You see, all along you keep making this claim as if JFG didn’t do the math already. Vox made the (lie) claim he did the math rather than copy it from Gelernter.

    Now, I can just copy paste JFG’s code.
    I can then add the additional dimensions.
    This will result in infinities
    So jfg’s code will go from explaining that vox is wrong (and lied)
    To that jfg was being conservative and kind.
    SO JFG’s code is sufficient to falsify You and Vox (and always has been).
    All I would do is show that jfg was being ‘kind’ and ‘conservative’.

    If you don’t want to watch us shit on you morons and vox for hours I undrestand. But then since all you have to do is how me where JFG’s code is wrong, then you can demonstrate you have the ability to hold an opinion rather than lie that you understand what you’re talking about.

    If you cant show me that, then you’re everything I accuse you of.

    Show me that JFG is wrong.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-12 21:34:36 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107787169040183202

  • @Spacebunny @voxday We just did THREE SHOWS on it – One by JFG, one with JFG and

    @Spacebunny@voxday We just did THREE SHOWS on it – One by JFG, one with JFG and I, and one by just me, in excruciating detail – you dumb fuck. The math ends in INFINITIES, not limits – and only moron would even imagine otherwise.

    Now I know you’re not smart enough to understand that. But that’s ok. Because I know you have a female mind, and that you’re practicing the female means of lying and denying in defense of your malinvestment in supernatural men in the sky. This is what the female mind does. It’s also why the female mind can’t reform – because feels don’t reform regardless of reals.

    So please, show me how the mat doesn’t end in infinities instead of limits? Show me that. Becasue JFG did the math without even including all the possible means of evolutionary computation (evolution). There are many more.

    If you can prove that the math doesn’t end in infinities then your stuck with proving that the math ends in limits. But you can’t just compare apples and oranges and claim an equality. It’s just lying.

    I do love shitting on you morons. I do. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-12 21:22:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107787121576681190

  • I”m sure I can answer the question but “m not sure I”m grasping it. The informat

    I”m sure I can answer the question but “m not sure I”m grasping it. The information density of mathematical expressions, of testimonial expressions, of narratives, of fictions, of poetry and arts, and the information density of deceits and frauds, is just b/c of combinatorics.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-12 20:32:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1492597407602851846

    Reply addressees: @kyle_sheehan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1492596536668311558