Theme: Institution

  • Yes. You and I enter the market for association to find friends; we enter the co

    Yes. You and I enter the market for association to find friends; we enter the commercial market to produce income and purchase goods services and information; we enter the parliamentary market for the production of commons; and we enter the court market for the resolution of…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-14 15:39:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679878409084710913

    Reply addressees: @tysonmaly

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679844171194986497

  • Yes. You and I enter the market for association to find friends; we enter the co

    Yes. You and I enter the market for association to find friends; we enter the commercial market to produce income and purchase goods services and information; we enter the parliamentary market for the production of commons; and we enter the court market for the resolution of disputes. And every one of those markets produce adversarial competition. In the court in particular, we compete before a jury instead of a customer.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-14 15:39:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679878408975667202

  • “Q: Curt, when you have time can you explain why the German and Japanese people

    –“Q: Curt, when you have time can you explain why the German and Japanese people are so similar when they’re so geographically distant.”–

    Great Question

    TLDR; territory, feudalism, militia, craftsmen, hostile richer neighbor created culture of hierarchy, piety, and duty. (and iq)

    Explanation:

    0) Geography: Both Japan and Germany are territorally challenging to govern, despite access to the sea in japan and rivers in germany. Until the age of rail governing the territory was far more difficult than say, france or england.

    1) Medieval Feudalism
    Feudalism in Medieval Germany:
    – Hierarchy: The feudal system in Germany was characterized by a hierarchy where the king was at the top, followed by powerful nobles (dukes and counts), knights, and then peasants or serfs.
    – Land Ownership: The king granted lands, known as fiefs, to his vassals (nobles) in exchange for their loyalty and military service. These vassals could further subdivide and grant the land to lower-ranking vassals or knights.
    – Military Service: The vassals were obligated to provide military service to the king. This often involved serving a certain number of days in the king’s army or providing a certain number of knights for the king’s service.
    – Serfdom: Peasants, or serfs, worked the land for the nobles. They were tied to the land and could not leave without the noble’s permission. In return for their labor, they received protection and the right to cultivate a portion of the land for their own use.

    Feudalism in Medieval Japan:
    – Hierarchy: The Japanese feudal system was also hierarchical, with the Emperor at the top in theory, but the Shogun (military leader) held the real power. Below the Shogun were the Daimyo (land-owning lords), followed by the Samurai (warrior class), and then the peasants.
    – Land Ownership: Similar to Germany, the Shogun granted land to the Daimyo in exchange for their loyalty and military service. The Daimyo, in turn, had Samurai who served them.
    – Military Service: The Samurai provided military service to their Daimyo. They were professional warriors who were trained in martial arts and followed the Bushido code, which emphasized honor, loyalty, and bravery.
    – Farmers and Artisans: At the bottom of the hierarchy were the farmers and artisans. They were not tied to the land like serfs in Germany, but they were subject to high taxes and had little political power.

    Note the duty/piety relationship with craftsmanship.
    Note the odd relationship between german philosophy and chinese philosophy rather than religiosity.
    Note that both these countries maximize duty and responsibility.

    2) Norms: Piety Duty and Social Harmony: Both Germany and Japan have historically placed importance on collectivism and social harmony. These cultural values encourage conformity, respect for authority, and a strong work ethic, contributing to the similarities observed between the two cultures.

    3) Parenting: the cultural value of respect for authority can be linked to authoritarian parenting styles prevalent in both countries, which in turn shaped individuals’ behavior and attitudes.

    4) Powerful Neighbors (china vs france)
    Both the Holy Roman Empire and Japan had a history of intermittent conflict and alliances with France and China, respectively. These interactions shaped their political institutions, diplomacy, and territorial ambitions. For instance, the Holy Roman Empire and France often competed for influence in Europe, while Japan and China had periods of conflict and alliance throughout history.

    5) Nation-Building and Territorial Consolidation: Despite their different geographic locations, both Germany and Japan have a strong history of territorial expansion and the formation of cohesive nation-states. This shared experience of nation-building and territorial consolidation has likely contributed to similarities in cultural identity and the development of a strong national pride in both countries.

    6) Industrialization and Modernization: As both Germany and Japan became industrial powerhouses in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, they underwent societal changes that emphasized the importance of precision and efficiency to maintain economic competitiveness.

    7) Post-World War II Reconstruction: Both countries underwent a process of rebuilding and modernization after World War II that focused on education, innovation, and economic development. This resulted in the emergence of similar values and cultural practices centered around efficiency and discipline.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @JaredAberach


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 19:29:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679573857173139459

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679567274724712448

  • Same issue, but much larger scale. At some point you’re pooling assets. We just

    Same issue, but much larger scale.
    At some point you’re pooling assets.
    We just don’t think of transactional customers as pooling assets, like ordinary cooperation, contractual, investment, or political relationships are pooling assets.
    They are.
    So the ‘law’ so to speak is just…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 15:00:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679506100297641984

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679504833546448898

  • Did conservative justicies leak or did liberal justices leak? As far as I know,

    Did conservative justicies leak or did liberal justices leak?
    As far as I know, we knew within twelve hours who leaked the abortion judgement, and who she was clerking for.
    We always pay for people to come to our gatherings and proceedings. Justices aren’t paid enough to travel otherwise. Nor are academics or intellectuals – even minor think tank folk like me. All of us have appearance and speaking fees. Most of us will speak for free if we have our expenses covered in advance. The question isn’t if one benefitted, but whether there is a relationship between the benefit and a judgement: a quid pro quo. None of the justices have as far as I know engaged in a quid pro quo. They are aligned as constitutionalists vs populists and they are invited constitutionalist vs populist venues. If that requires buying a book I think that’s probably inappropriate because it is a quid-pro-quo even if not for the purpose of altering a judgement. But it’s not substantive enough. For example Obama’s book deal was pretty substantive and at least appeared to be a quid pro quo.

    Now, should Sotomayor sit the bench? Of course not. She is an anti-constitutional activist happy to bypass the people and the legislature (‘violating the test of concurrency maintaining the sovereignty of the people over the state’), and it’s not clear she even holds to commonality in law (’empirical discovery of common judgements of irreciprocities by the lower courts’). I read her opinions as intellectually incompetent for the office she holds. At least with Justice Ginsberg she was just merely a populist and anti-constitutionalist activist, but she was intellectually capable -and all of us knew that.

    Reply addressees: @KaivanShroff


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 14:16:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679495130598760450

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678798468280713216

  • (Well, my goal of course is to train women to speak the truth regardless of cost

    (Well, my goal of course is to train women to speak the truth regardless of cost. Because the evidence is, that they CAN be taught. But doing so requires institutionalization of that habituation and legal penalty to enforce it. The problem we face is that it’s not clear what percentage of women are even capable of it. It’s not zero. It looks like it’s about twenty percent. And it looks like with indoctrination it’s more than half. But it’s possible it could be 80% with training – and that’s enough.)

    Reply addressees: @matteo_pilgrim


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-10 15:18:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678423402875441158

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678420278538280962

  • We do have an institute account. It’s just not updated frequently because most p

    We do have an institute account. It’s just not updated frequently because most people follow each of our Fellows. That said, it would be a part time job to consolidate all the ‘value’ posts from staff to the institute’s Twitter account and Twitter community.

    Fellows
    Curt: @curtdoolittle
    Brandon: @ThruTheHayes
    Martin: @TheAutistocrat
    Turbo: @Turbo_Flux
    Luke: @LukeWeinhagen
    (and many others found in our members list)

    The Institute Twitter Account
    https://t.co/3YgHPhwSQ3

    We also have a Twitter Community
    https://t.co/3hMV7qakTm

    And an NLI Friends List
    https://t.co/mvXOxxJ8bj

    And a Telegram Channel
    https://t.co/H2SoGkomAF

    And Private (staff only) Signal Groups
    (not shared)

    And a Youtube Channel
    https://t.co/27xEZxxtsw

    An Oddysee channel as back up of YT.

    And the Website
    https://t.co/sczfFL1Pns

    We’ve been canceled on Facebook.
    I don’t regularly post on Gab though there is content there.
    I don’t regularly post on Quora though there is content there.

    Reply addressees: @FarajRashi93307


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-09 20:15:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678135808929288192

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678131441803165697

  • FWIW: it’s a basilica (more of a public building than just a church or cathedral

    FWIW: it’s a basilica (more of a public building than just a church or cathedral) which is an evolution of the roman buildings dedicated to court and such.

    –“In Ancient Roman architecture, a basilica was a large public building with multiple functions, typically built alongside the town’s forum. The basilica was in the Latin West equivalent to a stoa in the Greek East. The building gave its name to the architectural form of the basilica.

    Originally, a basilica was an ancient Roman public building, where courts were held, as well as serving other official and public functions”–

    So this ‘church’ was an evolution of the court building on the roman city forums, and is an example of how the church gradually took over the functions of the state.

    The design of this basilica was an attempt to depart from medieval gothic designs that included buttresses (and which took up space). Instead, this was the largest dome every made of brick. And at the time it was a technological marvel.

    Now, is this odd convergence of styles aesthetically successful over time as were the gothic? No. But Indian saris, east asian kimono, greco roman togas, English cavalryman’s uniform as the template for all modern suits. Are they?

    Reply addressees: @monitoringbias @kevinrcantrell


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-09 02:13:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677863530224144387

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677834803637370885

  • NLI UPDATE: PROGRESS ON THE WORK We work seven days a week, as a group for two t

    NLI UPDATE: PROGRESS ON THE WORK

    We work seven days a week, as a group for two to four hours. And we work on three threads 1) staff meeting, strategy, and event planning 2) First principles (Rules of evolutionary computation), and 3) Strict Construction of Rights, Obligations, and Inalienations (ROIs) – which is the ‘hard part’ of the content.

    We are working on an event with speakers – them is the secession vs reform possibilities. The team prefers sooner rather than later, but I’ve done these things before and it’s hard in short time frames. But we’ll remain cautiously optimistic.

    We will finish that draft of ROIs in the next few week days. We work on first principles on the weekend. And we should complete those in two or three weeks. Though, we have one outstanding issue that I need to discuss with a mathematical physicist to be comfortable that I haven’t overlooked anything.

    After, we’ll work on enumerating ROIs (bill of rights so to speak). And then we’ll move our work from the ‘working area’ that we’re using now, and integrate it into the constitution – revising the existing constitution with much more detail. (That’s our workflow.) Then we can link the home page to the major reforms page, and the major reforms sections to the appropriate constitution articles.

    So to get to the heart of our proposals, the user experience should be home page(easily accessible) -> major reforms (accessible) -> Constitutional detail (less accessible legalese.)

    We have so much work to do. And if we think about it, it’s overwhelming (and sometimes depressing). But keep making progress and and I think the timing is going to work out just fine. 😉

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-08 01:00:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677482803825463297

  • This is our organization’s mission

    This is our organization’s mission.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-07 23:18:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677457078305136640

    Reply addressees: @FarajRashi93307 @midasnova

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677453584542191620