Theme: Institution

  • WILL THE ENGLISH, THE UK, CONTINUE TO DRAG MANKIND KICKING AND SCREAMING INTO TH

    WILL THE ENGLISH, THE UK, CONTINUE TO DRAG MANKIND KICKING AND SCREAMING INTO THE FUTURE?

    Nigel (all);

    We all, everyone, need broader knowledge of why the English invented the modern rule-of-law state, dependent upon (a)the natural law of cooperation, (b)the empirical process of discovery of the common law (“commonality”), (c) a constitution of processes and procedures under that rule of law (organization of cooperation), (d) a monarchy as judge of last resort given the perpetual regularity of the failure of republican political processes to fall to fashions and follies of the moment, (e) a cabinet of professional ministers serving at the pleasure the monarchy, houses of parliament reflecting the regions and classes (“concurrency”), and (f) the preservation of self determination by self determined means by reciprocal insurance of individual sovreighty in demonstrated interests (g) by the requirement for reciprocity in display word and deed, (h) limiting us all to adversarial markets for cooperation (markets), and resolution of conflict (courts).

    Mother England gave us revolutionary sequence of the rational, empirical, agrarian, commercial, financial, scientific, industrial, and technological revolutions in rapid sequence that dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and victimization by everything from tyrants to the vicissitudes of an nature uncaring nature that has nearly exterminated us with regularity, and the irradiated hostile wasteland of the galaxy and our universe itself.

    Mother England, our traditional law, our parliaments and our monarchy, ableit for the mistake of making parliament sovereign rather than the people uderr the. natura law, in a written constitution, is the optimum possible political order for human beings – and as close to a science of coperation for our varied and fragile human minds and characters as is humanly possible.

    In this perfect government, the role of government is to act far more as a venture capitalist measuring returns in the population than a priesthood that in suppression of inequality produces stagnation, decay, decline, and dysgenia as we have seen elsewhere the world over.

    The question is, can any body of people other than the anglosphere, or perhaps the broader germanosphere we are descendents of, accomplish this government of continuous development given the requirement of combining respect for the law, self determination, truth before face, duty to the commons before the self, the high trust that results, and the intergenerational institutions, traditions, norms, and habits required for its persistence? It’s only the british who can decide.

    Or will England, the UK, the Anglosphere, the Germanic Europeans, the mass of other Europeans, and broader mankind that we have arisen albiet inoptimally at times, suffer, even so horrific as another dark age, because the English lost their invention of moral modernity as readily as the Romans lost concrete, arts, and letters, and their very existence?

    Choose wisely please.
    Everything good in this world depends on that leadership.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @Nigel_Farage


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-08 19:11:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700225450885181442

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700219315230773255

  • I have had to revoke offers once and only for two or three people when the feds

    I have had to revoke offers once and only for two or three people when the feds seized our bank in 08 for exceeding their limits, and put us in an impossible condition. It’s possible over time to try to make it right by small compensation for their pains but not when you’re in crisis. I always think about all the employees and customers and vendors and when there are no conditions where no one gets hurt, then the principle of doing what does the least harm applies. Trolley problems do exist in real life. Unfortunately we don’t teach economics in school on purpose because teachers fear to experience parental retaliation for telling the truth. So average people assume companies have cash flexibility when they don’t. We hear about the money generated by few unicorn public companies, while most business tries to outperform the rate of inflation by enough points to keep exploring new customers and markets. I taught every hire twice a month a three hour lesson in the history of money business, followed by how our business operated and how as a growth company all our profits were out in receivables and we were largely constrained by cash flow. Once I showed them that I generally didn’t begin to profit from them until the third year and that’s why we work so hard at retention they were horrified. IMO every company should explain to all employees their financial model. It rapidly ends the mythology of excess profits.

    Reply addressees: @nickjamesthe1 @typesfast


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-08 16:20:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700182394911719424

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700109639113699522

  • Creating the social order of a family in the workplace is a benefit to all, but

    Creating the social order of a family in the workplace is a benefit to all, but company survival cannot always tolerate the economic order. There is a reason for the Hansel and Gretel parable: mothers frequently killed their children by exposure. In fact mothers have killed mor of their children for economic reasons tan men have killed one another in war. So operating as a business and terminating your employment is safer than historical parents who would murder you.

    Reply addressees: @nut_spac @Duderichy


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-08 16:00:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700177317362827264

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700133008387289489

  • extended traditional family (italians) tends to work the best

    extended traditional family (italians) tends to work the best.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-07 16:25:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699821272505499667

    Reply addressees: @FlashGorgone

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699820808208630114

  • I’m saying the marxists, neo-marxists, and feminists set out to destroy the inst

    I’m saying the marxists, neo-marxists, and feminists set out to destroy the institution of the family with purposeful intent, planned, and incrementally executed it using the easy manipulability of women due to their herd mentality and magical thinking.

    So that marriage as an…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-07 16:11:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699817801207234709

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699769155258401165

  • “We are in a post-marriage society; we just haven’t caught up with the trend”–

    –“We are in a post-marriage society; we just haven’t caught up with the trend”–

    That’s suicide because the family is the first institution upon which all other institutions evolve. And it’s impoverishing because the primary cost is the household, and multiple households are…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-07 01:03:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699589154244272461

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: WE’RE GONNA MAKE A SPECTACLE OF IT Y’all forgot court is theat

    RT @ThruTheHayes: WE’RE GONNA MAKE A SPECTACLE OF IT

    Y’all forgot court is theater; and there’s never been a time in history where actors…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-07 00:39:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699583239797563871

  • Singapore method of social services, in that the family is the institution that

    Singapore method of social services, in that the family is the institution that the government subsidizes not. the individual. ie: no kids, higher taxes, very poor in old age, because you aren’t contributing to generational production.
    End common property, no-fault divorce,…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 23:37:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699567625150312651

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699561242501972136

  • Avi, (all) There is a great biz model for the equivalent of a dorm with all thes

    Avi, (all)
    There is a great biz model for the equivalent of a dorm with all these features. Essentially that’s a monastery. or the pre-monastery – the epicurean dorms that the monastery evolved from.
    Why? Men simply don’t need a big nest, and if they do it’s better to hire a workshop where they can make all the noise (music, whatever) they want.
    I’ve done some rough estimates, because the soviets did some of this for miraculously cheap per-dwelling costs, and correspondingly limited cost of living.
    Problem appears to be limiting it to single hetero men in the current political environment while combining it with public financing (zero interest). Thus a bit of legislative activism is required. Effectively you have to create ‘societies’ to keep common interest and prevent degradation into slums. ie: owners only.

    Reply addressees: @AviSchiffmann


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 21:03:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699528883526045696

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699126463008759843

  • Correct answer. Conspiracy to undermine the institutions of cultural production,

    Correct answer.
    Conspiracy to undermine the institutions of cultural production, our constitution and our laws.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 19:03:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699498546511159549

    Reply addressees: @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699497919789859089