Theme: Institution

  • PROPERTARIANISM AND RULE OF LAW: CONTRACTUALISM Oliver Wendel Holms really screw

    PROPERTARIANISM AND RULE OF LAW: CONTRACTUALISM

    Oliver Wendel Holms really screwed American and anglo law.

    The more I study American history the more obvious it becomes that without the many nearby competitors we had faced as Europeans in Europe, that the new continent provided an excuse for the conquerors to take license given the unanimity of sentiment. A unanimity that was not present in Europe (and which is only present under empire.)

    LEGAL SCIENTISM (SCIENTIFIC)

    Law consists of a set of axioms which cannot be violated (true). As such, law is if not a science, at least a formal logic, that is both internally consistent, externally correspondent and universally decidable. Political preference cannot override these principles. (Rule of Law)

    LEGAL REALISM (RATIONAL) – THE FIRST AMERICAN VIOLATION OF RULE OF LAW

    Law is constructed from both political and logical origins.

    LEGAL POSITIVISM (ARATIONAL) – THE SECOND AMERICAN VIOLATION AND THE TOTAL ABANDONMENT OF RULE OF LAW

    Law is a social construction unbound by any constraint other than its origin.

    REFORMATION: LEGAL SCIENTIFIC CONTRACTUALISM (RATIO-SCIENTIFIC)

    Law consists of a set of axioms which cannot be violated, since such violation whether singular grand and visible, or invisibly accumulated from multitudinous and minor errors, would violate and destroy the incentive to cooperate within a government by rule of law. However, nearly any desirable contract can be constructed by voluntary agreement of parties, so long as the internal transfers are enumerated and the net result is productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange free of external imposition of costs upon others.

    PROPERTARIANISM = LEGAL CONTRACTUALISM

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine, (Tallinn, Estonia)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-01 04:59:00 UTC

  • Human History as Tribes not Governments

    [S] tatists and Priests love to teach the history of governments to give them legitimacy. But just as mathematics ought to be taught as a sequence of historical problems humans had to overcome, and we would understand it very easily, if we taught human history as the evolution of how our tribes evolved and expanded (now that we can teach it) we would find a very different world that was much easier to understand. And we would be a lot more concerned with peoples than corporate governments.

    Human history is not a very long period to cover. It’s a few thousand years. if you study land masses at geologic time, it’s easy to understand. If you study the solar system at galactic time, it’s easy to understand. If you study man at tribal time, it’s easy to understand. If you study technologies at technological time, it’s easy to understand. But if you teach these things all as a cacophony of unrelated events without a surrounding narrative it’s confusing as hell. Our myths make history seem long, mystical and confusing. But history of man’s evolution once we develop domestication is pretty simple. Before that it’s actually trivial, because it’s such a slow process. What humanists won’t like is that each wave of increasingly aggressive human wiped out the previous wave of less aggressive people.
  • Human History as Tribes not Governments

    [S] tatists and Priests love to teach the history of governments to give them legitimacy. But just as mathematics ought to be taught as a sequence of historical problems humans had to overcome, and we would understand it very easily, if we taught human history as the evolution of how our tribes evolved and expanded (now that we can teach it) we would find a very different world that was much easier to understand. And we would be a lot more concerned with peoples than corporate governments.

    Human history is not a very long period to cover. It’s a few thousand years. if you study land masses at geologic time, it’s easy to understand. If you study the solar system at galactic time, it’s easy to understand. If you study man at tribal time, it’s easy to understand. If you study technologies at technological time, it’s easy to understand. But if you teach these things all as a cacophony of unrelated events without a surrounding narrative it’s confusing as hell. Our myths make history seem long, mystical and confusing. But history of man’s evolution once we develop domestication is pretty simple. Before that it’s actually trivial, because it’s such a slow process. What humanists won’t like is that each wave of increasingly aggressive human wiped out the previous wave of less aggressive people.
  • If you say that you hate corporations because they’re evil. Why do you promote a

    If you say that you hate corporations because they’re evil. Why do you promote a corporeal government, instead of a familial and tribal one?

    Corporeal anything is evil.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-27 04:36:00 UTC

  • THE MEDIA AS DRUG DEALER It doesn’t make financial sense to operate a newspaper.

    THE MEDIA AS DRUG DEALER

    It doesn’t make financial sense to operate a newspaper. The FT generates 35M of profit per year on over 500M in revenues. That’s what, 7%? The reason to own a newspaper is influence: gossip.

    Now the financial times is, like the Journal, a financial rather than political newspaper. So by definition it’s an empirical and heroic medium rather than one of complaining, for the purpose of rallying shaming, and power accumulation.

    I went through five daily issues of Canada’s main newspaper a few years ago, circling correspondent articles (what I consider truthful) and you could find about three small articles a day. The rest were entertainment, created by appealing to the anglosphere’s erroneous sense of moral superiority.

    In other words, the newspaper business sells advertising to marketers, and then consumers buy signaling: a form of conspicuous consumption, that carries signals.

    And quite the opposite of what we expected: people are not able to insulate themselves from the most influential drug after sex: signals of moral fitness.

    If we look at the evolutionary reasons why this all works, it’s obvious: moral fitness makes us generous, and moral violation makes us punish.

    But we should look at the non-financial media as what they are: drug dealers.

    They’re causing suicide through addiction.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 05:07:00 UTC

  • WHAT DOES THE GOSSIP CLASS ACTUALLY DO? (seriously) What organizing function doe

    WHAT DOES THE GOSSIP CLASS ACTUALLY DO?

    (seriously)

    What organizing function does the gossip class perform? Is it advocacy of what? Resistance to what?

    CLASSES

    1) VIOLENCE: The Organization of Dispute Resolution (limits, norms, law, war): Aristocracy. The Martial Class.

    2) GOSSIP: The (Prioritization of Commons? Consumption?): Priests, Public Intellectuals, Academics: the Priestly class.

    3) REMUNERATION: The Organization of Production: Entrepreneurs: The economic class.

    4) LABOR: The production of knowledge, good and services, and reproduction: Scientists, Engineers, Labor


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-23 06:38:00 UTC

  • “New institutions, or the demise of old institutions, alter incentives and conse

    —“New institutions, or the demise of old institutions, alter incentives and consequently mechanically affect material behavior and reproductive behavior, and metaphysically affecting spiritual condition. The resulting changes in material and reproductive behavior can be immense and rapid – as the normative changes in family support and reproductive behavior over the last 50-75 years illustrate. The spiritual changes are less rapid, perhaps due in some part to cultural inertia and to genetic memory as 50 generations of megalomaniacs and charming psychopaths were caught out and punished by their peers in the nobility and church.”— Karl Brooks


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-23 04:38:00 UTC

  • #tcot #nrx The Church then chartered nobility with love and trust – and left the

    #tcot #nrx The Church then chartered nobility with love and trust – and left them to war and justice (production). They federated our tribes


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-22 10:10:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/623797175391252480

  • #tcot #nrx The Church manufactured idealism, and used Love to break kin and trib

    #tcot #nrx The Church manufactured idealism, and used Love to break kin and tribal biases, extending trust, and creating economic velocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-22 10:08:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/623796680245276672

  • Religions evolved for the poor. Philosophy for the middle. And Law for the Rulin

    Religions evolved for the poor. Philosophy for the middle. And Law for the Ruling classes. The three metodologies reflect perceived control.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-22 09:23:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/623785433286230016