Theme: Institution

  • The Pentatuch, Bible, and Constitution?

    [T]here is very little difference between the negotiated construction of the Pentateuch, or the Bible, and the American Constitution: they were the product of committees constructing the criteria for civil law. This is quite contradictory to the Indo European Tradition in which law EVOLVES. But these things are constructs of man for the purpose of governing man.

  • Evolution of Various Technologies of Cooperation

    [T]he Technologies of Cooperation 1) Tribal Hunter Gatherer -> Steppe/Desert -> Agrarian -> Urban -> (Slum?) 2) Headman -> Chieftain -> King -> President/Prime Minister -> (Judge?) 3) Memory -> Oral Tradition -> Written -> Printing -> Media -> (Digital Records?) 4) Norm -> Religion -> Law -> Credit -> (Digital Reputation?) 5) Spiritualism-> Mythos-> Religion-> Reason -> Pseudoscience -> Science -> Truth 6) Animism-> Polytheism-> Monotheism-> Reason-> PseudoScientism-> Trade. 7) Property -> Barter -> Money -> Interest and Credit -> Fiat Money -> (Baskets?) 8) Property -> Wealth -> Partnerships -> Banks -> Central Banks -> ( stocks?) 9) Pairing-Off -> Counting -> Recording -> Balanced Accounting -> Financialization -> (?) 10) Tribal -> Serial -> Poly -> Paternal -> Traditional -> Nuclear -> (Individual?)

  • Evolution of Various Technologies of Cooperation

    [T]he Technologies of Cooperation 1) Tribal Hunter Gatherer -> Steppe/Desert -> Agrarian -> Urban -> (Slum?) 2) Headman -> Chieftain -> King -> President/Prime Minister -> (Judge?) 3) Memory -> Oral Tradition -> Written -> Printing -> Media -> (Digital Records?) 4) Norm -> Religion -> Law -> Credit -> (Digital Reputation?) 5) Spiritualism-> Mythos-> Religion-> Reason -> Pseudoscience -> Science -> Truth 6) Animism-> Polytheism-> Monotheism-> Reason-> PseudoScientism-> Trade. 7) Property -> Barter -> Money -> Interest and Credit -> Fiat Money -> (Baskets?) 8) Property -> Wealth -> Partnerships -> Banks -> Central Banks -> ( stocks?) 9) Pairing-Off -> Counting -> Recording -> Balanced Accounting -> Financialization -> (?) 10) Tribal -> Serial -> Poly -> Paternal -> Traditional -> Nuclear -> (Individual?)

  • EVOLUTION OF OUR VARIOUS TECHNOLOGIES OF COOPERATION (Q: Can You Think of a Name

    EVOLUTION OF OUR VARIOUS TECHNOLOGIES OF COOPERATION

    (Q: Can You Think of a Name for Each Axis?)

    1) Tribal Hunter Gatherer -> Steppe/Desert -> Agrarian -> Urban -> (Slum?)

    2) Headman -> Chieftain -> King -> President/Prime Minister -> (Judge?)

    3) Memory -> Oral Tradition -> Written -> Printing -> Media -> (Digital Records?)

    4) Norm -> Religion -> Law -> Credit -> (Digital Reputation?)

    5) Spiritualism-> Mythos-> Religion-> Reason -> Pseudoscience -> Science -> Truth

    6) Animism-> Polytheism-> Monotheism-> Reason-> PseudoScientism-> Trade.

    7) Property -> Barter -> Money -> Interest and Credit -> Fiat Money -> (Baskets?)

    8) Property -> Wealth -> Partnerships -> Banks -> Central Banks -> ( stocks?)

    9) Pairing-Off -> Counting -> Recording -> Balanced Accounting -> Financialization -> (?)

    10) Tribal -> Serial -> Poly -> Paternal -> Traditional -> Nuclear -> (Individual?)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-23 03:29:00 UTC

  • There is very little difference between the negotiated construction of the Penta

    There is very little difference between the negotiated construction of the Pentateuch, or the Bible, and the American Constitution: they were the product of committees constructing the criteria for civil law. This is quite contradictory to the Indo European Tradition in which law EVOLVES.

    But these things are constructs of man for the purpose of governing man.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-23 03:23:00 UTC

  • Near Breeding, Selective Mating, Late Marriage, Suppression of Underclass Reprod

    Near Breeding, Selective Mating, Late Marriage, Suppression of Underclass Reproduction produces constantly improving norms, institutions, and commons.

    I am pretty sure that the evidence is in, that once you pollute a family with less desirable genes, that you can’t cleanse it – ever – unless you isolate and near-breed for centuries.

    In my own family I see Scandinavian (Ellen and I), german celt (me), mixed with Irish Celt, Dark Irish (my uncle John), Western Celt (Jean), Pole, Czech and Slav (John and Pat’s children), Slav and Dark Irish in their children. Most Doolittles carry R1b and look largely Celtic, although german rather than Scott’s Irish. The Oulette’s and Theriaults are poor french farmers from french and english celts. Although my mother’s father is undeniably a proper ‘Gaul’ – they’re big, and they have that Gallic nose. My daughters are different: one very much Celt, the other very much Czech with Celt. My son and my nephew are near clones with that white-blonde hair and round heads you see in Scandinavia and Finland. You can tell a lot from nose, teeth, eyes and skull shape. So we’re pretty typical northern europeans.

    Why do I mention this? Well, some groups have been successful at adopting genes wherever they go (Indo-Iran, Hittite, Greek, Semite, European), and some groups benefit from isolation (japanese, europeans). And some groups suffer from competition against the hordes (the middle east, central asia, africa). And some seem to form castes to overcome competition (india, south america).

    But the only way for genes to ‘correct’ (meaning exit bad genes) is with a small enough population to select for traits, but large enough to avoid near-breeding.

    If you’re White (Ethnically European), Certain west african tribes, Japanese, Korean, Han, there is nowhere to go but down by outbreeding, or incorporating new genes. If you’re not, then there is always a benefit to capturing better genes.

    And no that’s not an opinion, that’s demonstrated human behavior.

    More Symmetrical

    Younger – looking (less maturity)

    Taller (for men, not for women)

    Clearer, Fairer Skin

    Less Impulsive (although impulsivity is reproductively valuable in less desirables)

    More Intelligent (which is complicated)

    Age Better (less accumulated cellular damage)

    So it works like this: the worse genes you possess the more value is breeding up. The better are your genes the more value is in not breeding down. For everyone else – the vast middle – the best strategy is breeding up without breeding out.

    If we preserved the family we would preserve these traits. But we didn’t. So we don’t. Families protect, tribes protect, nations protect, but corporate states don’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-22 03:59:00 UTC

  • UK CONTRACT LAW VS US CONTRACT LAW You know the UK law is structured as terribly

    UK CONTRACT LAW VS US CONTRACT LAW

    You know the UK law is structured as terribly front-loaded placing huge burdens on ALL individuals and organizations. It’s like everyone is afraid of losing a dime, and spends a hundred bucks to save every dime. But you know, I know the source of it: (a) British desire to demonstrate signaling through moral high ground (b) continental hatred of entrepreneurship and capitalism.

    American law is back-loaded so that if problems arise they can be settled logically in court, placing burdens ONLY on individuals and organizations that have problems.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-21 08:07:00 UTC

  • DIVERSITY AND CORPORATISM ARE THE SAME THING. A government either improves condi

    DIVERSITY AND CORPORATISM ARE THE SAME THING.

    A government either improves conditions of the family (aristocracy) or it degrades the conditions of the family (corporatism). State corporatism is a war against small numbers of good genes by bad large numbers of bad genes. It’s not complicated.

    Reframe the debate: Government facilitates Corporatism, Dysgenia, And attack on families, versus Aristocracy,Eugenia, and expansion of families.

    Men build aristocracies to promote good genes and their genes, and women build peerages of lower classes to promote their genes.

    NOTHING IS COMPLICATED HERE, OR PHILOSOPHICAL. IT”S JUST NATURAL PROCESSES IN COMPETITION.

    That is why the Socialists undermined darwin.

    They have bad genes.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-21 05:29:00 UTC

  • THE THEORETICAL HIERARCHY OF ORGANIZATIONAL EVOLUTION (useful idea) 4 – LAW: Cus

    THE THEORETICAL HIERARCHY OF ORGANIZATIONAL EVOLUTION

    (useful idea)

    4 – LAW: Customers, Brand, Channels, and Income Stream, Predictability

    3 – THEORY: Innovation (business model), Investment, Possibility

    2 – HYPOTHESIS: Talent, Effort, Searching For A Business Model

    1 – FREE ASSOCIATION: Idea (Free Association)

    All human endeavors follow this principle just as most physical evolutionary organisms follow the “fibonacci, golden ratio, nautilus” sequence.

    The evolution of business is no different from the evolution of any other field of knowledge except that time is one’s enemy, competition is brutal, and testing is ever-present and inescapable.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-21 03:15:00 UTC

  • The Evolution Of Human Regulation

    [E]VOLUTION OF METHODS OF REGULATION 1) RELIGION – threat of ostracization. (culture) 2) LAW – threat of punishment, loss of property or liberty. (state) 3) CREDIT – threat of loss of consumption. (suppliers) 4) SOFTWARE – threat of loss of opportunity. (friends) Religion records your birth, promises, and deaths. Law produces a history of your infractions. Credit records a history of your impulsivity Software records a history of your non-conformity. You are always at the mercy of your neighbors. But every time population increases and with it anonymity, we develop a new means of constructing reputations in oder to ensure conformity. (Fuk. And, I’m working at bringing it about… I’m gonna join the Mr Robot Society. )