Theme: Institution

  • only humans act. states can act. A state is a collection of assets. A government

    only humans act. states can act. A state is a collection of assets. A government consists of people. People act.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-13 21:46:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797918598891261953

    Reply addressees: @ThisMachin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797916020270776320


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ThisMachin

    @curtdoolittle I am very familiar with Libertarian ideas about this . We can start conversation at a hight level. Or we can read Webster.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797916020270776320

  • As far as I know the first ‘states’ evolved in the alluvial river valleys when l

    As far as I know the first ‘states’ evolved in the alluvial river valleys when local tribal irrigation competed.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-13 21:44:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797918194002337796

    Reply addressees: @ThisMachin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797916020270776320


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ThisMachin

    @curtdoolittle I am very familiar with Libertarian ideas about this . We can start conversation at a hight level. Or we can read Webster.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797916020270776320

  • And a government can act only because individuals can act in concert according t

    And a government can act only because individuals can act in concert according to ‘rules’


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-13 21:43:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797917913730732033

    Reply addressees: @ThisMachin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797916020270776320


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ThisMachin

    @curtdoolittle I am very familiar with Libertarian ideas about this . We can start conversation at a hight level. Or we can read Webster.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797916020270776320

  • A government enforces terms within the state almost exclusively as the insurer o

    A government enforces terms within the state almost exclusively as the insurer of last resort. A government (people) != state (assets).


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-13 16:43:00 UTC

  • THE THREE ORDERS: KIN, CULT, STATE I would say that the Cathedral Complex (state

    THE THREE ORDERS: KIN, CULT, STATE

    I would say that the Cathedral Complex (state, academy, media) are all engaged in customer seeking – an incrementalist form of rent seeking. They profit from the building of customers and rents.

    The interesting question not discussed is that because we humans make use of law, religion, and market, but we choose a dominant bias with which to employ them in our social orders, yielding:

    (1)kin/law,

    (2)cult/religion, or

    (3)state/corporatism;

    depending upon homogeneity or heterogeneity of the population; to overcome resistance to the creation and preservation of commons – so that why is it that one bias in the order is always better off than the others?

    And why does not social-criticism and intellectual-decidability limit itself to the order desired by the population? of course, we know the answer is genetic in both desire for construct, and in the expression of that desire for construct as a will to power.

    I frequently ask the same question: why do economists vary in bias of decidability? for the same reason: austrian-social-science and rule of law preserving sovereignty, freshwater limits of rule of law as a commons against harm, and saltwater abandonment of rule of law in favor of preferential discretion in order to acquire customers for the state.

    If it isn’t clear to you, then the answer is this: anything other than kin/law is nothing more than an act of war by slower means.

    We have been at war. We are at war.

    Time to win the war.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-13 16:36:00 UTC

  • impossible, since markets predate the state

    impossible, since markets predate the state.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-13 08:13:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797713866025271296

    Reply addressees: @ThisMachin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797684698772180992


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ThisMachin

    @curtdoolittle markets are tools created by the state.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797684698772180992

  • NO. NUMERIC ACCOUNTS DO NOT CONTAIN MONEY (everything you need to know about mon

    NO. NUMERIC ACCOUNTS DO NOT CONTAIN MONEY

    (everything you need to know about money but were too ignorant to ask)

    All credit-money consists entirely of promises – not reserves not assets – just promises. Promises are made using presumptions about the future. If the future that those promises were envisioned in, disappears, then those promises CANNOT be fulfilled. People with ‘accounts’ never had ‘money’ – they had ‘promises of possible money’. All credit money consists of nothing but promises of possible money. period. end of story.

    So when some vast number of promise-money disappears, that means that the possible future disappeared. The money never existed. The money never had the opportunity to exist. The promises cannot be fulfilled.

    This is why the entire economic system is confusing to ordinary people. The only money you have is the money that you could use if the government disappeared tomorrow for good. Everything else is just a stock certificate for an investment in a company that is fully leveraged, and has only a little cash, but can issue new stock certificates at will, diluting the value of each previous stock certificate.

    The US government is a highly leveraged corporation and each dollar bill is a stock certificate, and each dollar of credit money is a promise of future stock certificates if you can fulfill you promises.

    THIS DESCRIBES THE TRUE (SCIENTIFIC) CONTENT OF WHAT YOU CONSIDER MONEY.

    1 – Money-Proper (commodity money).

    2 – Note-Money (notes issued against 100% reserve deposits)

    3 – Fractional-Reserve-Money (notes issued against x% reserve deposits) (promises)

    4 – Credit Money (stock certificates issued against promises of future money) (promises)

    5 – Fiat Money (Stock certificates in the tax returns on a state, as a monopoly, and enforced by law.) (more reliable promises)

    6 – Debt Instruments (too many to list – all sorts of debt) (less reliable promises)

    7 – Debt Default (insurance) Instruments (too many to list) (insurance against failed promises)

    8 – Shares of common stock with mandatory dividends (gambling on performance) (somewhat reliable promises)

    9 – Shares of Common Stock, in public companies (gambling on gullibility of other gamblers). (totally unreliable promises)

    Money is money. Everything else is just a promise. Promises are only as good as the people promising them’s ability to predict the future.

    And we know how good we are at predicting the future: foolishly optimistic.

    The western miracle is largely the result of conquering and selling off the American continent, the benefits of burning off stored petroleum products, and a three thousand five hundred years of evolving the technology we call accounting, empirical science, and the natural common law of contract.

    You are, we are, I am, heavily invested in a highly leveraged corporation under the assumption that we can continue to out-invent competing nations, in the next generation as successfully as we have out-invented them in the past 500 years, since we invented the technology of empiricism, and conquered the American continent.

    The entire ‘progressive’ program hinges on the assumption that we can continue to *invent* marginal differences in technology faster than competitors do – despite the fact that we no longer hold a monopoly on the technology that makes rapid invention possible: accounting, empiricism, and empirical contract law.

    So for example, just as Apple is making almost all its money on an iPhone, but if the iPhone era ends, the apple stock (and income) will crash; we Americans and Europeans, are heavily invested in stock certificates and promises of future stock certificates if we are able to continue to invent new technologies (in all their forms) faster than our competitors who now possess our same technologies.

    This is the basic argument conservatives have been unable to make over the past century. And you (we) were told that the source of our prosperity was democracy. This is false. Democracy is a useful means of distributing the windfall profits from 3500 years of western evolution of the technology of empiricism (truth telling) and the conquest and sale of a continent. We call that the cultural equivalent of winning the lottery. And the American system of government and our entire economy, are based on the likelihood that we will win another lottery. Despite the fact that we have only won three of them in 3500 years:

    1) the combination of wheel, horse, and bronze enabled us to conquer Eurasia, because of the technology of mobility and armor.

    2) the Greek invention of truth, reason, and proto-science combined with the discovery of local silver mines.

    3) the English invention of empiricism and science, combined with the discovery of a continent of primitives.

    That’s it. It’s not more complicated than that.

    Progressives are always wrong. Conservatives are always incompetent at communication. Together it’s been a catastrophe.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 18:17:00 UTC

  • Anglos had it right. We blew it.We blew it by destroying the fastest and most ad

    Anglos had it right. We blew it.We blew it by destroying the fastest and most adaptive institutional system of adaptation in hist.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 17:22:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797127274747326464

    Reply addressees: @guardian

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796752749782241280


    IN REPLY TO:

    @guardian

    This US election result is a terrific argument for monarchy | Giles Fraser | Loose canon https://t.co/aMPTWxRXZc

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796752749782241280

  • Why did the west outpace the rest?Rule of Natural Common, judge-discovered law,

    Why did the west outpace the rest?Rule of Natural Common, judge-discovered law, a market for commons(houses), a market for rulers.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 17:21:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797127130719076352

    Reply addressees: @guardian

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796752749782241280


    IN REPLY TO:

    @guardian

    This US election result is a terrific argument for monarchy | Giles Fraser | Loose canon https://t.co/aMPTWxRXZc

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796752749782241280

  • The local social market, and the local industrial market are the only tests of y

    The local social market, and the local industrial market are the only tests of your worth. Hence why people seek to avoid them. (state/acad)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 16:59:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797121511098318848