Theme: Institution

  • CHAPTER STRUCTURE OF 48 LAWS, USING ONE CHAPTER (I am a fan of this model, and w

    CHAPTER STRUCTURE OF 48 LAWS, USING ONE CHAPTER

    (I am a fan of this model, and would like to extend Propertarianism into this format, and add examples in multiple forms of literature. So that the unification of every system of thought is more obvious)

    #3 – CONCEAL YOUR INTENTIONS. (<<< LAW )

    (EXPLANATION >>> )

    Keep people off-balance and in the dark by never revealing the purpose behind your actions. If they have no clue what you are up to, they cannot prepare a defense. Guide them far enough down the wrong path, envelop them in enough smoke, and by the time they realize your intentions, it will be too late.

    TRANSGRESSION (<<<VIA NEGATIVA)

    The Marquis de Sevigne was young and inexperienced in the art of love. He confided in the infamous courtesan of seventeenth-century France, Ninon de Lenclos, to instruct him on how to seduce a difficult young countess. She made him follow a plan over a number of weeks, where the Marquis would be appearing in public always surrounded by beautiful women, in the very places the countess would be expected to see him. He was supposed to assume an air of nonchalance. This increased the jealousy of the young countess, who was not sure of his interest in her. One day the Marquis, unable to control his passion, broke from Ninon’s plan, and blurted out to the countess that he loved her. After this admission, the countess no longer found him interesting and avoided him.

    OBSERVANCE (<<< VIA POSITIVA)

    Otto von Bismarck was a deputy in the Prussian parliament at a time when many fellow deputies thought it was possible to go to war against Austria and defeat it.

    Bismarck knew the Prussian army was not prepared, so he devised a clever way to keep the war at bay. He publicly stated his praises for the Austrians and talked about the madness of war. Many deputies changed their votes. Had Bismarck announced his real intentions, arguing it was better to wait now and fight later, he would not have won. Most Prussians wanted to go to war at that moment and mistakenly believed their army to be superior to the Austrians. Had he gone to the king his sincerity would have been doubted. By giving misleading statements about wanting peace and concealing his true purpose, Bismarck’s speech catapulted him to the position of prime minister. He later led the country to war against the Austrians at the right time, when he felt the Prussian army was more capable.

    WISDOM (<<< ACTIONS)

    • Use decoyed objects of desire and red herrings to throw people off scent.

    • Use smoke screens (a poker face) to disguise your actions.

    • False sincerity is one powerful tool that will send your rivals on a wild goose chase.

    • Publicly declare your false intentions to give misleading signals.

    • A noble gesture can be a smoke screen to hide your true intentions.

    • Blend in and people will be less suspicious.

    REMEMBER

    It takes patience and humility to dull your brilliant colors, to put on the mask of the inconspicuous. Do not despair at having to wear such a bland mask-—it is often your unreadability that draws people to you and makes you appear a person of power.

    AUTHORITY

    Have you ever heard of a skillful general, who intends to

    surprise a citadel, announcing his plan to his enemy? Conceal your

    purpose and hide your progress; do not disclose the extent of your

    designs until they cannot be opposed, until the combat is over. Win

    the victory before you declare the war. In a word, imitate those war-

    like people whose designs are not known except by the ravaged country through which they have passed. (Ninon de Lenclos, 1623-1706)

    REVERSAL (<<< REVERSAL – JUST LIKE IT SAYS)

    No smoke screen, red herring, false sincerity, or any other diversionary device will succeed in concealing your intentions if you already have an established reputation for deception. And as you get older and achieve success, it often becomes increasingly difficult to disguise your cunning.

    Everyone knows you practice deception; persist in playing naive and you run the risk of seeming the rankest hypocrite, which will severely limit your room to maneuver. In such cases it is better to own up, to appear the honest rogue, or, better, the repentant rogue. Not only will you be admired for your frankness, but, most wonderful and strange of all, you will be able to continue your stratagems.

    As P. T. Barnum, the nineteenth-century king of humbuggery, grew

    older, he learned to embrace his reputation as a grand deceiver. At one point he organized a buffalo hunt in New jersey, complete with Indians and a few imported buffalo. He publicized the hunt as genuine, but it came off as so completely fake that the crowd, instead of getting angry and asking for their money back, was greatly amused. They knew Barnum pulled tricks all the time; that was the secret of his success, and they loved him for it. Learning a lesson from this affair, Barnum stopped concealing all of his

    devices, even revealing his deceptions in a tell-all autobiography. As

    Kierkegaard wrote, “The world wants to be deceived.”

    Finally, although it is wiser to divert attention from your purposes by

    presenting a bland, familiar exterior, there are times when the colorful, conspicuous gesture is the right diversionary tactic. The great charlatan mountebanks of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Europe used humor and entertainment to deceive their audiences. Dazzled by a great show, the public would not notice the charlatans’ real intentions. Thus the star charlatan himself would appear in town in a night-black coach drawn by black horses. Clowns, tightrope walkers, and star entertainers would accompany

    him, pulling people in to his demonstrations of elixirs and quack potions. The charlatan made entertainment seem like the business of the day; the business of the day was actually the sale of the elixirs and quack potions.

    Spectacle and entertainment, clearly, are excellent devices to conceal your intentions, but they cannot be used indefinitely. The public grows tired and suspicious, and eventually catches on to the trick. And indeed the charlatans had to move quickly from town to town, before word spread that the potions were useless and the entertainment a trick. Powerful people with bland exteriors, on the other hand—the Talleyrands, the Rothschilds, the Selassies—can practice their deceptions in the same place throughout their lifetimes. Their act never wears thin, and rarely causes suspicion. The colorful smoke screen should be used cautiously, then, and

    only when the occasion is right.

    (IMAGERY – IN POETIC VERSE >>> )

    Image: A Sheep’s Skin.

    A sheep never marauds,

    a sheep never deceives,

    a sheep is magnificently

    dumb and docile. With a

    sheepskin on his back,

    a fox can pass right

    into the chicken coop.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-01 12:56:00 UTC

  • That which is discretionary – command That which is historical record – common l

    That which is discretionary – command

    That which is historical record – common law record

    That which is descriptive of that record – general rules of common law

    That which is utopian or ideal in creating that record – legal philosophy


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-29 23:55:00 UTC

  • My Position On The Solution to Healthcare

    (regarding the republican failure to reform healthcare) Dick, Are you speaking truthfully, with bias, with wishful thinking, or propagandizing (fictionalizing)? 1 – they (mainstream republicans) thought they could replace it in name only. 2 – the right libertarians and conservatives that were elected to repeal it completely put together enough votes to block it. 3 – Now it will fail economically, and they will allow it to fail, and the right and the mainstream republicans will say ‘told you so’ – and they will solidify the movement of the middle class to the republican party permanently. 4 – The left will (as they intended originally) to propose full nationalization upon failure. 5 – The right will propose a tiered program (extending the two tiered system we have today: medicare and private.) 6 – the uninformed (unaligned) voter will provide marginal voting power to one party or another depending upon the timing. 7 – the outcome then is random, dependent upon the economic mood of the country. My opinion remains, and has been, to keep and expand the subsidy (medicare, medicaid) system for the poor, cover catastrophic health problems fully (for the lower middle and middl) and leave market plans available for the upper middle and upper classes. This three tiered system allows the governments (states) to negotiate price controls for the poor, the middle class to obtain insurance at reasonable prices by eliminating the high cost outliers, and the upper classes to fund research and development as they always have. This is, I am fairly certain, the optimum system that preserves the benefits of the market on one hand, the control of prices across that market on the other, and the ability to create demand for innovative (risky, expensive) services that respond to market demands. Cheers.

  • My Position On The Solution to Healthcare

    (regarding the republican failure to reform healthcare) Dick, Are you speaking truthfully, with bias, with wishful thinking, or propagandizing (fictionalizing)? 1 – they (mainstream republicans) thought they could replace it in name only. 2 – the right libertarians and conservatives that were elected to repeal it completely put together enough votes to block it. 3 – Now it will fail economically, and they will allow it to fail, and the right and the mainstream republicans will say ‘told you so’ – and they will solidify the movement of the middle class to the republican party permanently. 4 – The left will (as they intended originally) to propose full nationalization upon failure. 5 – The right will propose a tiered program (extending the two tiered system we have today: medicare and private.) 6 – the uninformed (unaligned) voter will provide marginal voting power to one party or another depending upon the timing. 7 – the outcome then is random, dependent upon the economic mood of the country. My opinion remains, and has been, to keep and expand the subsidy (medicare, medicaid) system for the poor, cover catastrophic health problems fully (for the lower middle and middl) and leave market plans available for the upper middle and upper classes. This three tiered system allows the governments (states) to negotiate price controls for the poor, the middle class to obtain insurance at reasonable prices by eliminating the high cost outliers, and the upper classes to fund research and development as they always have. This is, I am fairly certain, the optimum system that preserves the benefits of the market on one hand, the control of prices across that market on the other, and the ability to create demand for innovative (risky, expensive) services that respond to market demands. Cheers.

  • LET ME UNDER MINE YOUR HIGH MINDEDNESS IN POLITICAL ORDERS Social orders must ad

    LET ME UNDER MINE YOUR HIGH MINDEDNESS IN POLITICAL ORDERS

    Social orders must adapt to the conditions in which they function. All human beings seek predictability – a steady state – and it is normal for ascendent males to seek a steady state in which to prosper. But it is also rational for those who are uncompetitive to seek a steady state in which they do not need fight in the market for survival.

    Fascism = War

    Market Fascism = Peace

    Market Liberalism = Windfalls

    If you are seeking a steady state rather than to organize society according to its competitive needs, you are not in fact, seeking markets, but to circumvent the market – the market order. You are simply trying to do so at an inter-polity scale, rather than an intra-polity scale.

    Think about that before you claim the moral high ground and say we should organize society as such and such.

    We should organize society according to the market conditions in which it operates. And to do that requires training people to NOT require a steady state in order to function.

    So far, only the Singapore and Swiss models approach this strategy.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-25 13:01:00 UTC

  • MARKET VS ARMY Oliver: Family, tribe, market (speed), vs army and corporation (p

    MARKET VS ARMY

    Oliver:

    Family, tribe, market (speed), vs army and corporation (power).

    This question has been around forever.

    Welcome to the desert of the real. (so to speak)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-25 12:12:00 UTC

  • Absolute Nuclear Family only Survives Under Special Conditions

    The absolute nuclear family only survives under special conditions: when all men are in the militia, all families are culturally homogenous and near kin, and where there is little migration. In other words, it evolved under the middle class version of farming: manorialism, and the middle class version of farms: producing excess for market sale, and the middle class marketplace that results from the production of excess for market sale. The nuclear family and government pensions are a very, very, very destructive cancer.

  • Absolute Nuclear Family only Survives Under Special Conditions

    The absolute nuclear family only survives under special conditions: when all men are in the militia, all families are culturally homogenous and near kin, and where there is little migration. In other words, it evolved under the middle class version of farming: manorialism, and the middle class version of farms: producing excess for market sale, and the middle class marketplace that results from the production of excess for market sale. The nuclear family and government pensions are a very, very, very destructive cancer.

  • Europe and East Asia ‘have Done Better’ Because of Territorial Advantage Within Geographic Fortresses

    Fortress Europa obtained non-territorial advantage by: A COLLECTION of hypotheses that include: a) europeans have higher neuroticism (creativity) b) europeans have lower clannishness (dislike of outsiders) c) europeans have dramatically reduced the size of the underclass ( produced a higher distribution of Iq, and lower distribution of testosterone) d) there seems to be a longstanding IQ advantage in the north and an intellectual tradition into pre-history in the british isles (the ‘athens’ of pre-literate europe). e) the yamnaya brought aryanism (realism, sovereignty, martial rule, hierarchical organization, testimony, jury, common law ) to europe. And that this has been our most meaningful competitive advantage. f) that each wave of europeans out of Ukraine has been as much an ‘improvement’ over the prior as each wave out of Africa was an ‘improvement’ over the prior – for the same reason; africa and the steppe are brutal evolutionary furnaces. As far as I know all these hypotheses survive all possible scrutiny without requiring a particular genetic advantage other than perhaps reduced clannishness common among circumpolar peoples. This is why I adhere to this solution. Because it does not depend upon ‘magical’ genetics evolving by accidental mutation in the european genome, but merely adaptation to local conditions from a marginally indifferent set of homo sapiens in the past. As far as I know all human variation is in intensity of expression of possibilities extant already in the genome.

  • Via Negativa (Evolutionary Argument) in Historial Explanation

    by James Augustus My central argument is that Europe benefited by having an evolutionary environment that allowed for a high frequency of cultural, institutional and intellectual iterations, and that truth, sovereignty and natural law produce an existential advantage, so that what survived is what we call Western Civilization and its peoples. It is easy to look back at what survived and construct a rational narrative, but by doing so we are being fooled by randomness as Taleb is so succinct at pointing out. Evolutionary arguments are superior inasmuch as they point to what didn’t survive (via negativa) deterministically due to selection pressures.