Curt Doolittle

Theme: Institution

  • WHY DO WE OWN A RIFLE? 1 – To continue the evolutionary progress of my people by

    WHY DO WE OWN A RIFLE?

    1 – To continue the evolutionary progress of my people by preventing the usurpation of sovereignty of my kin by foreign invasion whether normative, cultural, religious, institutional, military, or demographic.

    2 – To overthrow governments that by accumulated impositions of convenience incrementally deprive us of our rights as englishmen (warriors of the militia), and to replace it with a new generation of government that restores those rights:

    a) reciprocity without exception,

    b) universal standing, and

    c) universal applicability.

    3 – To prevent the low from profiting by the criminal, unethical, and immoral.

    4 – To levy retribution upon and demand restitution of the wicked.

    5 – To prevent the indolent, lazy, and inferior from parasitism upon the private and common: my kin’s production of the intergenerational family and its assets. both personal, private, shareheld, common, and political.

    Western civilization began, evolved, and is maintained by nothing more than the militia. This is what differentiates the west from the rest. All that is unique and exceptional about western civilization from our law, our reason, our science, our institutions, our culture, and our mythology, begins with the distribution of capital and our intolerance for its centralization.

    Period.

    Ergo, the a personal rifle capable of war, revolution, prosecution, conviction, restitution and defense, is the minimum necessary arms by which a member of the militia persists the civlization of the militia: the west.

    And he who would demote the militia or disarm it by definition declares war on me, my kin, my people, my state, and civilization, and by proxy, all mankind – given our disproportionate contribution to dragging humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, infant morality, early death, disease, and tyranny.

    There is no greater crime against humanity than to deprive me of my weaponry.

    If you declare war on me and mine we will, without exception withdraw our consent, and damage, harm, kill any and al that you hold dear.

    I AM SOVEREIGN. ALL MILITIA ARE SOVEREIGN. WE ARE SOVEREIGNTY BY THE SINGLE LAW OF RECIPROCITY IN ALL THINGS

    INCLUDING THE RECIPROCAL INSURANCE OF ONE ANOTHER’S SOVEREIGNTY BY FORCE OF ARMS.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-08 20:38:00 UTC

  • Why Do We Own A Rifle?

    1 – To continue the evolutionary progress of my people by preventing the usurpation of sovereignty of my kin by foreign invasion whether normative, cultural, religious, institutional, military, or demographic. 2 – To overthrow governments that by accumulated impositions of convenience incrementally deprive us of our rights as englishmen (warriors of the militia), and to replace it with a new generation of government that restores those rights: a) reciprocity without exception, b) universal standing, and c) universal applicability. 3 – To prevent the low from profiting by the criminal, unethical, and immoral. 4 – To levy retribution upon and demand restitution of the wicked. 5 – To prevent the indolent, lazy, and inferior from parasitism upon the private and common: my kin’s production of the intergenerational family and its assets. both personal, private, shareheld, common, and political. Western civilization began, evolved, and is maintained by nothing more than the militia. This is what differentiates the west from the rest. All that is unique and exceptional about western civilization from our law, our reason, our science, our institutions, our culture, and our mythology, begins with the distribution of capital and our intolerance for its centralization. Period. Ergo, the a personal rifle capable of war, revolution, prosecution, conviction, restitution and defense, is the minimum necessary arms by which a member of the militia persists the civlization of the militia: the west. And he who would demote the militia or disarm it by definition declares war on me, my kin, my people, my state, and civilization, and by proxy, all mankind – given our disproportionate contribution to dragging humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, infant morality, early death, disease, and tyranny. There is no greater crime against humanity than to deprive me of my weaponry. If you declare war on me and mine we will, without exception withdraw our consent, and damage, harm, kill any and al that you hold dear. I AM SOVEREIGN. ALL MILITIA ARE SOVEREIGN. WE ARE SOVEREIGNTY BY THE SINGLE LAW OF RECIPROCITY IN ALL THINGS INCLUDING THE RECIPROCAL INSURANCE OF ONE ANOTHER’S SOVEREIGNTY BY FORCE OF ARMS.

  • Why Do We Own A Rifle?

    1 – To continue the evolutionary progress of my people by preventing the usurpation of sovereignty of my kin by foreign invasion whether normative, cultural, religious, institutional, military, or demographic. 2 – To overthrow governments that by accumulated impositions of convenience incrementally deprive us of our rights as englishmen (warriors of the militia), and to replace it with a new generation of government that restores those rights: a) reciprocity without exception, b) universal standing, and c) universal applicability. 3 – To prevent the low from profiting by the criminal, unethical, and immoral. 4 – To levy retribution upon and demand restitution of the wicked. 5 – To prevent the indolent, lazy, and inferior from parasitism upon the private and common: my kin’s production of the intergenerational family and its assets. both personal, private, shareheld, common, and political. Western civilization began, evolved, and is maintained by nothing more than the militia. This is what differentiates the west from the rest. All that is unique and exceptional about western civilization from our law, our reason, our science, our institutions, our culture, and our mythology, begins with the distribution of capital and our intolerance for its centralization. Period. Ergo, the a personal rifle capable of war, revolution, prosecution, conviction, restitution and defense, is the minimum necessary arms by which a member of the militia persists the civlization of the militia: the west. And he who would demote the militia or disarm it by definition declares war on me, my kin, my people, my state, and civilization, and by proxy, all mankind – given our disproportionate contribution to dragging humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, infant morality, early death, disease, and tyranny. There is no greater crime against humanity than to deprive me of my weaponry. If you declare war on me and mine we will, without exception withdraw our consent, and damage, harm, kill any and al that you hold dear. I AM SOVEREIGN. ALL MILITIA ARE SOVEREIGN. WE ARE SOVEREIGNTY BY THE SINGLE LAW OF RECIPROCITY IN ALL THINGS INCLUDING THE RECIPROCAL INSURANCE OF ONE ANOTHER’S SOVEREIGNTY BY FORCE OF ARMS.

  • YOU: NORM > RELIGION > LAW > CREDIT > SOCIAL Prepare for the worst.Updated Mar 6

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5730910/china-social-credit-rating-blacklists-citizens/TOLD YOU:

    NORM > RELIGION > LAW > CREDIT > SOCIAL

    Prepare for the worst.Updated Mar 6, 2018, 3:45 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-06 15:45:00 UTC

  • In Theory, How Do Innovative New Companies Get Created In A Textbook Socialist Economy?

    You know, I have been working on debunking the pseudoscience in economics – whether under the pretenses of socialist, social democratic, classical liberal, or libertarian dogmas for a couple of decades now. And I have a very hard time grasping how anyone can be literate enough in the subject to ask such a question, and still suggest that socialism is possible ever under any conditions whatsoever.

    I know why people intuit that such a thing is possible (it isn’t), at least it isn’t for more than a few decades, any more than uninsured (unregulated) markets are possible (they aren’t).

    The better the demographics the higher trust the polity the more effective are markets (rule of law) and the worse the demographics, the lower trust the polity, the more effective is command and control (rule by discretion).

    Socialist economies do not innovate because of incentives. In socialist economies people can enact change through access to command (rule by command), and they cannot innovate privately without fear of capture(theft) of the proceeds of their RISK. So, (and this is true through all of history) people maximize their effort in obtaining rents (parasitism).

    It’s better to think of Marx, Freud, Boaz, Frankfurt School, and Postmodern schools as a kind of pseudoscientific fiction that competes with science fiction and fantasy and the novel to inspire us such that we learn about ourselves by what we wish could be but cannot be.

    https://www.quora.com/In-theory-how-do-innovative-new-companies-get-created-in-a-textbook-socialist-economy

  • In Theory, How Do Innovative New Companies Get Created In A Textbook Socialist Economy?

    You know, I have been working on debunking the pseudoscience in economics – whether under the pretenses of socialist, social democratic, classical liberal, or libertarian dogmas for a couple of decades now. And I have a very hard time grasping how anyone can be literate enough in the subject to ask such a question, and still suggest that socialism is possible ever under any conditions whatsoever.

    I know why people intuit that such a thing is possible (it isn’t), at least it isn’t for more than a few decades, any more than uninsured (unregulated) markets are possible (they aren’t).

    The better the demographics the higher trust the polity the more effective are markets (rule of law) and the worse the demographics, the lower trust the polity, the more effective is command and control (rule by discretion).

    Socialist economies do not innovate because of incentives. In socialist economies people can enact change through access to command (rule by command), and they cannot innovate privately without fear of capture(theft) of the proceeds of their RISK. So, (and this is true through all of history) people maximize their effort in obtaining rents (parasitism).

    It’s better to think of Marx, Freud, Boaz, Frankfurt School, and Postmodern schools as a kind of pseudoscientific fiction that competes with science fiction and fantasy and the novel to inspire us such that we learn about ourselves by what we wish could be but cannot be.

    https://www.quora.com/In-theory-how-do-innovative-new-companies-get-created-in-a-textbook-socialist-economy

  • “Civilization is the institutional product of good enough human capital interact

    —“Civilization is the institutional product of good enough human capital interacting over time. Rule of law would be a common property, or “artifact” of that, especially when peer distribution of political agency is emphasized in a given polity.”— Simon Ström

    (absolute genius)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-05 13:02:00 UTC

  • “Civilization is the institutional product of good enough human capital interact

    —“Civilization is the institutional product of good enough human capital interacting over time. Rule of law would be a common property, or “artifact” of that, especially when peer distribution of political agency is emphasized in a given polity.”— Simon Ström (absolute genius)

  • “Civilization is the institutional product of good enough human capital interact

    —“Civilization is the institutional product of good enough human capital interacting over time. Rule of law would be a common property, or “artifact” of that, especially when peer distribution of political agency is emphasized in a given polity.”— Simon Ström (absolute genius)

  • (You’re no slouch. Strikes me as a strange question for you to ask. Look at the

    (You’re no slouch. Strikes me as a strange question for you to ask. Look at the affordability of signals, and signal-rotation from 1830 to 2000. And the economic shift from church to media and academy. And suppression of martial signals from ’63. Signal economy. Intuitions lag.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-04 14:52:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970311019942866945

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970285332791902210

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970285332791902210