Rituals that accompany oaths do not require belief in the ritual, only promise to adhere to the oath lest one be punished for violation of that which the community demands is inviolate (sacred) and therefore unforgivable. The Construction of Religion: Myth, Ritual, Oath, Feast (Festival). Political religion (for governing) in addition requires dogma and ‘law’. European pagan religion divided the law (real) from the mythic (ideal), from the cult (supernatural). It was the monotheists who sought a political religion by which to rule others that created a monopoly political dogma, from what had been a market of myths and rituals. ATHEISM The problem with atheism is that while there are dedicated atheists – often people of questionable character, some of us are atheists in that we practice Christanity as a wisdom literature, and many are agnostics in that they go along without knowing one way or the other, and the vast majority only deists who go along because they believe it’s a familial good, – all of us would still (and do) claim we are Christians. And it is why Evangelicals have used that term to distinguish themselves from the rest of us: they practice faith not reason. All that is required to claim one is a Christian is to have adopted the teachings of Christianity: 1. A Respect for private property and that no law may precede private property (the ten commandments) because private property creates harmony. 2. The eradication of hatred from the human heart. 3. The extension of kinship love to non-kin. 4. The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war, 5. The commitment to personal acts of charity for those who are in need. Now, ‘believers’ seem to think that the dogma has some basis in reality, but this is simply untrue (unscientific). The purpose of the dogma was to train illiterate unskilled slaves, peasants, and subsistence farmers in those four principles. The reason for the success of this dogma is that it creates an addiction response in believers for reasons we understand very clearly now. However, many of us do not need cerebral chemistry addiction to follow those five rules. And we understand the value of ritual (the combination of lesson, oath, feast of the church ritual) regardless of how greatly its demand for obedience differs from the five principles of Christianity. Western civilization has always been poly disciplinary and polytheistic. Those of us from germanic northern European families were just as familiar with the pagan myths and fairy tales, if not far more so than those of the ‘alien’ semitic religion. The Germanicization of Christianity was nearly immediate, and the origins in judaism, and non-european Byzantium was quickly and forcibly adapted to european (germanic and latin ) civilization, just as was the orthodox in the slavic lands. Today a person of minimal learning can undrestand quite easily that community rituals and oaths and feasts are necessary for the construction of civic trust. That aspirational myths are somewhat necessary for the intergenerational preservation of group evolutionary and competitive strategy through imitation. And that the mythos of western civilization is merely our history from the ancient greco-roman, germanic continental, and Atlantic periods. The reason we can worship our ancestors and use our history as mythos is because we have ancestors and history worth remembering. Those people who need falsehoods and fictions do so because they have either few or no ancestors or achievements worth remembering. A PAGAN I am a pagan if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and; 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and; 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends. AN ARYAN I am an Aryan if: 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people. A WARRIOR I am a warrior in that: 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations. THIS IS WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A SON OF ERUOPA Sovereign. A Man Transcendent. When you say we need a ‘complete religion’ we have one. This and the natural law of sovereignty. And the history of the european peoples.
Theme: Institution
-
The Final Word on Oaths, Christianity in Particular, and Religion in General
Rituals that accompany oaths do not require belief in the ritual, only promise to adhere to the oath lest one be punished for violation of that which the community demands is inviolate (sacred) and therefore unforgivable. The Construction of Religion: Myth, Ritual, Oath, Feast (Festival). Political religion (for governing) in addition requires dogma and ‘law’. European pagan religion divided the law (real) from the mythic (ideal), from the cult (supernatural). It was the monotheists who sought a political religion by which to rule others that created a monopoly political dogma, from what had been a market of myths and rituals. ATHEISM The problem with atheism is that while there are dedicated atheists – often people of questionable character, some of us are atheists in that we practice Christanity as a wisdom literature, and many are agnostics in that they go along without knowing one way or the other, and the vast majority only deists who go along because they believe it’s a familial good, – all of us would still (and do) claim we are Christians. And it is why Evangelicals have used that term to distinguish themselves from the rest of us: they practice faith not reason. All that is required to claim one is a Christian is to have adopted the teachings of Christianity: 1. A Respect for private property and that no law may precede private property (the ten commandments) because private property creates harmony. 2. The eradication of hatred from the human heart. 3. The extension of kinship love to non-kin. 4. The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war, 5. The commitment to personal acts of charity for those who are in need. Now, ‘believers’ seem to think that the dogma has some basis in reality, but this is simply untrue (unscientific). The purpose of the dogma was to train illiterate unskilled slaves, peasants, and subsistence farmers in those four principles. The reason for the success of this dogma is that it creates an addiction response in believers for reasons we understand very clearly now. However, many of us do not need cerebral chemistry addiction to follow those five rules. And we understand the value of ritual (the combination of lesson, oath, feast of the church ritual) regardless of how greatly its demand for obedience differs from the five principles of Christianity. Western civilization has always been poly disciplinary and polytheistic. Those of us from germanic northern European families were just as familiar with the pagan myths and fairy tales, if not far more so than those of the ‘alien’ semitic religion. The Germanicization of Christianity was nearly immediate, and the origins in judaism, and non-european Byzantium was quickly and forcibly adapted to european (germanic and latin ) civilization, just as was the orthodox in the slavic lands. Today a person of minimal learning can undrestand quite easily that community rituals and oaths and feasts are necessary for the construction of civic trust. That aspirational myths are somewhat necessary for the intergenerational preservation of group evolutionary and competitive strategy through imitation. And that the mythos of western civilization is merely our history from the ancient greco-roman, germanic continental, and Atlantic periods. The reason we can worship our ancestors and use our history as mythos is because we have ancestors and history worth remembering. Those people who need falsehoods and fictions do so because they have either few or no ancestors or achievements worth remembering. A PAGAN I am a pagan if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and; 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and; 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends. AN ARYAN I am an Aryan if: 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people. A WARRIOR I am a warrior in that: 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations. THIS IS WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A SON OF ERUOPA Sovereign. A Man Transcendent. When you say we need a ‘complete religion’ we have one. This and the natural law of sovereignty. And the history of the european peoples.
-
UPDATE: Curt posted a quote that stated the killing wasn’t unnatural, but that w
UPDATE: Curt posted a quote that stated the killing wasn’t unnatural, but that we needed institutions to suppress. This apparently violated community standards. We assume this was the result of an auto-filter of some sort, but it’s also possible that the usual stalkers sought to misrepresent it and report it.
The review takes about 24 hours. Either that or 30 days.
-The Propertarian Institute
– We view this as harassment since Curt works very hard NOT to violate Facebook policies, and hate speech is not something he engages in.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-04 19:14:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE FINAL WORD ON OATHS, CHRISTIANITY IN PART
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
THE FINAL WORD ON OATHS, CHRISTIANITY IN PARTICULAR, AND RELIGION IN GENERAL
Rituals that accompany oaths do not require belief in the ritual, only promise to adhere to the oath lest one be punished for violation of that which the community demands is inviolate (sacred) and therefore unforgivable.
The Construction of Religion: Myth, Ritual, Oath, Feast (Festival).
Political religion (for governing) in addition requires dogma and âlawâ.
European pagan religion divided the law (real) from the mythic (ideal), from the cult (supernatural). It was the monotheists who sought a political religion by which to rule others that created a monopoly political dogma, from what had been a market of myths and rituals.
ATHEISM
The problem with atheism is that while there are dedicated atheists – often people of questionable character, some of us are atheists in that we practice Christanity as a wisdom literature, and many are agnostics in that they go along without knowing one way or the other, and the vast majority only deists who go along because they believe itâs a familial good, – all of us would still (and do) claim we are Christians.
And it is why Evangelicals have used that term to distinguish themselves from the rest of us: they practice faith not reason.
All that is required to claim one is a Christian is to have adopted the teachings of Christianity:
1. A Respect for private property and that no law may precede private property (the ten commandments) because private property creates harmony.
2. The eradication of hatred from the human heart.
3. The extension of kinship love to non-kin.
4. The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war,
5. The commitment to personal acts of charity for those who are in need.
Now, âbelieversâ seem to think that the dogma has some basis in reality, but this is simply untrue (unscientific). The purpose of the dogma was to train illiterate unskilled slaves, peasants, and subsistence farmers in those four principles.
The reason for the success of this dogma is that it creates an addiction response in believers for reasons we understand very clearly now.
However, many of us do not need cerebral chemistry addiction to follow those five rules. And we understand the value of ritual (the combination of lesson, oath, feast of the church ritual) regardless of how greatly its demand for obedience differs from the five principles of Christianity.
Western civilization has always been poly disciplinary and polytheistic. Those of us from germanic northern European families were just as familiar with the pagan myths and fairy tales, if not far more so than those of the âalienâ semitic religion.
The Germanicization of Christianity was nearly immediate, and the origins in judaism, and non-european Byzantium was quickly and forcibly adapted to european (germanic and latin ) civilization, just as was the orthodox in the slavic lands.
Today a person of minimal learning can undrestand quite easily that community rituals and oaths and feasts are necessary for the construction of civic trust. That aspirational myths are somewhat necessary for the intergenerational preservation of group evolutionary and competitive strategy through imitation. And that the mythos of western civilization is merely our history from the ancient greco-roman, germanic continental, and Atlantic periods.
The reason we can worship our ancestors and use our history as mythos is because we have ancestors and history worth remembering. Those people who need falsehoods and fictions do so because they have either few or no ancestors or achievements worth remembering.
A PAGAN
I am a pagan if
1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and;
2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and;
3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and
4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And
5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends.
AN ARYAN
I am an Aryan if:
1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them;
2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken;
3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it;
4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it;
6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it;
7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise;
8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people.
A WARRIOR
I am a warrior in that:
1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us.
2) Once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And
3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations.
THIS IS WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A SON OF ERUOPA
Sovereign. A Man Transcendent.
When you say we need a ‘complete religion’ we have one.
This and the natural law of sovereignty.
And the history of the european peoples.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-04 18:11:49 UTC
-
Let me help you understand an unstated principle of economics at all scales: You
—-Let me help you understand an unstated principle of economics at all scales: Your company will be owned by those who give it access to markets.—
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-03 16:44:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. YOU ARE OWNED BY THOSE WHO CREATE ACESS TO MA
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
YOU ARE OWNED BY THOSE WHO CREATE ACESS TO MARKETS
Toyota Motor Company owns: Lexus, Scion, Daihatsu and Hino Motors, with a stake in Fuji Industries (Subaru’s parent company) and Isuzu.
…. Subaru: Owned by Fuji Heavy Industries with Toyota a minority partner.
…. Tesla: Toyota is a minority partner. Partnership with Daimler AG.
Volkswagen owns: Audi, Bentley, Bugatti, Lamborghini, Porsche, and overseas-brands SEAT and Skoda.
Fiat owns: Alfa Romeo, Chrysler, Dodge, Ferrari, Jeep, Lancia, Maserati, Ram and SRT.
BMW owns: Mini, Rolls Royce, and British Layland.
Daimler AG owns: Mercedes-Benz and Smart.
Renault owns: Mitsubishi, Dacia. Nissan. Nissan owns Infiniti.
Peugeot owns: Citroën, DS, Opel and Vauxhall brands:
General Motors owns: Cadillac, Buick, Chevrolet, and GMC.
*GM owns a controlling interest in Opel and Vauxhall in Europe and Holden in Australia.
Ford owns: Ford, Lincoln and a small stake in Mazda.
Mitsubishi is independently owned
Hyundai owns: Kia.
Tata(india) Owns Jaguar, Land Rover, Chery (china).
Volvo is owned by Chinese-automaker Zhejiang Geely
Saab is owned by National Electric Vehicle Sweden (NEVS).
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-03 16:15:52 UTC
-
YOU ARE OWNED BY THOSE WHO CREATE ACESS TO MARKETS Toyota Motor Company owns: Le
YOU ARE OWNED BY THOSE WHO CREATE ACESS TO MARKETS
Toyota Motor Company owns: Lexus, Scion, Daihatsu and Hino Motors, with a stake in Fuji Industries (Subaru’s parent company) and Isuzu.
…. Subaru: Owned by Fuji Heavy Industries with Toyota a minority partner.
…. Tesla: Toyota is a minority partner. Partnership with Daimler AG.
Volkswagen owns: Audi, Bentley, Bugatti, Lamborghini, Porsche, and overseas-brands SEAT and Skoda.
Fiat owns: Alfa Romeo, Chrysler, Dodge, Ferrari, Jeep, Lancia, Maserati, Ram and SRT.
BMW owns: Mini, Rolls Royce, and British Layland.
Daimler AG owns: Mercedes-Benz and Smart.
Renault owns: Mitsubishi, Dacia. Nissan. Nissan owns Infiniti.
Peugeot owns: Citroën, DS, Opel and Vauxhall brands:
General Motors owns: Cadillac, Buick, Chevrolet, and GMC.
*GM owns a controlling interest in Opel and Vauxhall in Europe and Holden in Australia.
Ford owns: Ford, Lincoln and a small stake in Mazda.
Mitsubishi is independently owned
Hyundai owns: Kia.
Tata(india) Owns Jaguar, Land Rover, Chery (china).
Volvo is owned by Chinese-automaker Zhejiang Geely
Saab is owned by National Electric Vehicle Sweden (NEVS).
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-03 12:15:00 UTC
-
Tradition, Norm and Fashion are different points on a spectrum of rates of chang
Tradition, Norm and Fashion are different points on a spectrum of rates of change of behavior.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 12:31:00 UTC
-
Thoughts on The German Postwar Theory: Ordoliberalism?
—“Is ordoliberalism an effective economic theory in your opinion? Why/why not?”— https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordoliberalism THE CORRECT ANSWER Ordoliberalism refers to the state-private alliance used by Germans after world war two. The premise is for the state to extend the market such that it provides desired goods and services rather than to take over the market for the production of goods and services. Ordoliberalism (geramn) differs from classical liberalism (anglo) just as continental law (german/french) differs from common law (anglo), in that the anglo seeks to suppress the state’s interference in the market (optimistic), and the german seeks to guard and manage the market (pragmatic to pessimistic). The anglo model is Imperial and expansionist (seizing all growth opportunities), and the german is domestic (maximizing known wants). The principle issue here is (a) demographic and (b) cultural. You can only conduct the german model with a martial (professional) bureaucracy and very honest people (farming). You can only conduct the anglo model when innovation is accessible (sail, piracy, conquest). So again, there is no ‘best’ model of government, there are only organizations that satisfy wants, needs, and exploit opportunities. The german postwar model was somewhat like the Chinese postwar model, and that is when you are ‘behind’ and want to ‘catch up’ it is a problem of organization. When you are ‘ahead’ and want to ‘stay ahead’ it’s a problem of innovation. The german model would be ‘bad’ for imperial purposes, and ‘good’ for postwar purposes. Germans are unique because of superior and homogeneous genetics, superior political culture due to lack of a central state, superior culture due to mastering craftsmanship for production of quality products, and the professionalization of the bureaucracy in imitation of Frederick the Great – and the subsequent investment in technical education that allowed Germany to produce the scientific (rather than British empirical) revolution – from which the postwar era has so soundly benefitted. In other words, the Germans and the Japanese both pursued superior export goods as a postwar strategy – and they COULD because of genetic(demographic) and cultural superiority. This is not a strategy all peoples can pursue – they lack the genetics, culture, and institutions to do so. As I’ve said repeatedly, and will continue to, the primary economic advantage any culture can seek is demographic. This will exacerbate over the next century such that smaller states with superior demographics will constantly outperform larger states with worse demographics. The people you live with have greater influence on your potential than do your abilities.
-
Thoughts on The German Postwar Theory: Ordoliberalism?
—“Is ordoliberalism an effective economic theory in your opinion? Why/why not?”— https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordoliberalism THE CORRECT ANSWER Ordoliberalism refers to the state-private alliance used by Germans after world war two. The premise is for the state to extend the market such that it provides desired goods and services rather than to take over the market for the production of goods and services. Ordoliberalism (geramn) differs from classical liberalism (anglo) just as continental law (german/french) differs from common law (anglo), in that the anglo seeks to suppress the state’s interference in the market (optimistic), and the german seeks to guard and manage the market (pragmatic to pessimistic). The anglo model is Imperial and expansionist (seizing all growth opportunities), and the german is domestic (maximizing known wants). The principle issue here is (a) demographic and (b) cultural. You can only conduct the german model with a martial (professional) bureaucracy and very honest people (farming). You can only conduct the anglo model when innovation is accessible (sail, piracy, conquest). So again, there is no ‘best’ model of government, there are only organizations that satisfy wants, needs, and exploit opportunities. The german postwar model was somewhat like the Chinese postwar model, and that is when you are ‘behind’ and want to ‘catch up’ it is a problem of organization. When you are ‘ahead’ and want to ‘stay ahead’ it’s a problem of innovation. The german model would be ‘bad’ for imperial purposes, and ‘good’ for postwar purposes. Germans are unique because of superior and homogeneous genetics, superior political culture due to lack of a central state, superior culture due to mastering craftsmanship for production of quality products, and the professionalization of the bureaucracy in imitation of Frederick the Great – and the subsequent investment in technical education that allowed Germany to produce the scientific (rather than British empirical) revolution – from which the postwar era has so soundly benefitted. In other words, the Germans and the Japanese both pursued superior export goods as a postwar strategy – and they COULD because of genetic(demographic) and cultural superiority. This is not a strategy all peoples can pursue – they lack the genetics, culture, and institutions to do so. As I’ve said repeatedly, and will continue to, the primary economic advantage any culture can seek is demographic. This will exacerbate over the next century such that smaller states with superior demographics will constantly outperform larger states with worse demographics. The people you live with have greater influence on your potential than do your abilities.