Curt Doolittle

Theme: Institution

  • Note that your standard terms of service mean that you are part of the problem a

    Note that your standard terms of service mean that you are part of the problem as a hosting provider not part of the solution. But commercial self interest is the origin of the ENTIRETY of the problem: Leftism = Hyperconsumption and therefore is commercially preferable.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-31 13:15:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057622134795784199

    Reply addressees: @TryGhost @realchrisolin @getongab

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057545081148727296

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Ghost

    @realchrisolin @getongab Ghost is fully open source and can be hosted anywhere – it’s not possible for us to censor or prevent anyone from using the product ✊🏼

    The (optional) use of Ghost(Pro) managed infrastructure is subject to our standard terms of service, here 👉🏼 https://t.co/H4glBxPvkO

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057545081148727296

  • This is the BEST thing to happen to Gab. Gab is now the de-facto free speech pla

    This is the BEST thing to happen to Gab. Gab is now the de-facto free speech platform. Only thing left is to promote it to the left so that it fills the ROLE of USA’s political platform “Out of life’s school of war, that which does not kill us, only serves to make us stronger.”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-31 12:52:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057616189919256576

    Reply addressees: @getongab

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057512234639912962

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057512234639912962

  • Halloween Celebration: Driven by (a) children per household, (b) relative wealth

    Halloween Celebration: Driven by (a) children per household, (b) relative wealth (c) the dominance of the workplace as means of trick-or-treating, because (d) the dissolution of the stable, territorial, intergenerational family, because of the growth of cities – and (e) as Haidt’s recent book suggests: the ‘infantilization’ of the generation, and it’s ‘paranoia’ due to the inverse relation between crime and criminal trends.

    Where I am in a rural area of the USA at the moment, its as insane as christmas decorations in suburbia.

    Don’t underestimate the impact of the current political stress over white-replacement on civic participation. It’s huge.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 19:22:00 UTC

  • Curt, What Do You Mean by Common Law and Tort Law

    October 30th, 2018 12:19 PM —“CURT, WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY COMMON LAW AND TORT LAW AND HOW ARE THEY RELATED.”— [O]K. Um I’m talking about the common law in the old sense as ‘the traditional law’ which consists of sovereignty and tort. In both UK and USA ‘common law’ often includes legislation that violates sovereignty and tort. In my work I make a clear distinction between the one law (reciprocity) common law (findings of the court), legislative law (improving or undermining the common law and the one law) and regulation (enforcement of legislative law whether it improves or undermines the common law and the one law) I refer to tort when I want to remind people that legislation and regulation do not necessarily (and often do not) preserve our natural, customary, traditional, rule of law by findings of law. The legislature’s original purpose was to choose whether the monarchy’s demand for the population to bear costs was acceptable to the regions,the warriors, the militia, and sometimes out of pragmatism) to the people. The ‘enlightenment’ took the power of commons choice out of the hands of the monarchy and put it into the republic (elected representatives, and the peerage (local governors)). The marxist and social democratic movement reversed our civilization by expanding the commons such that they violated our underlying natural law of reciprocity, in favor of the rest of humanity’s underclass demand for proportionality, and upon receiving proportionality, the political and underclass demand for equality of outcome. So, great question.

  • Curt, What Do You Mean by Common Law and Tort Law

    October 30th, 2018 12:19 PM —“CURT, WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY COMMON LAW AND TORT LAW AND HOW ARE THEY RELATED.”— [O]K. Um I’m talking about the common law in the old sense as ‘the traditional law’ which consists of sovereignty and tort. In both UK and USA ‘common law’ often includes legislation that violates sovereignty and tort. In my work I make a clear distinction between the one law (reciprocity) common law (findings of the court), legislative law (improving or undermining the common law and the one law) and regulation (enforcement of legislative law whether it improves or undermines the common law and the one law) I refer to tort when I want to remind people that legislation and regulation do not necessarily (and often do not) preserve our natural, customary, traditional, rule of law by findings of law. The legislature’s original purpose was to choose whether the monarchy’s demand for the population to bear costs was acceptable to the regions,the warriors, the militia, and sometimes out of pragmatism) to the people. The ‘enlightenment’ took the power of commons choice out of the hands of the monarchy and put it into the republic (elected representatives, and the peerage (local governors)). The marxist and social democratic movement reversed our civilization by expanding the commons such that they violated our underlying natural law of reciprocity, in favor of the rest of humanity’s underclass demand for proportionality, and upon receiving proportionality, the political and underclass demand for equality of outcome. So, great question.

  • COMBATTING THE PARASITE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. by Luke Weinhagen The Parasite Indus

    COMBATTING THE PARASITE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX.

    by Luke Weinhagen

    The Parasite Industrial Complex branches:

    – Military Industrial Complex (masculine parasitism, right establishment politics)

    – Narrative Industrial Complex (feminine parasitism, left establishment politics)

    Many models of thought and politic have been proposed to combat either the Military Industrial Complex or the Narrative Industrial Complex.

    Propertarianism recognizes and combats the Parasite Industrial Complex.

    (excellent)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 15:14:00 UTC

  • “CURT, WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY COMMON LAW AND TORT LAW AND HOW ARE THEY RELATED.”—

    —“CURT, WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY COMMON LAW AND TORT LAW AND HOW ARE THEY RELATED.”—

    OK. Um I’m talking about the common law in the old sense as ‘the traditional law’ which consists of sovereignty and tort. In both UK and USA ‘common law’ often includes legislation that violates sovereignty and tort. In my work I make a clear distinction between the one law (reciprocity) common law (findings of the court), legislative law (improving or undermining the common law and the one law) and regulation (enforcement of legislative law whether it improves or undermines the common law and the one law)

    I refer to tort when I want to remind people that legislation and regulation do not necessarily (and often do not) preserve our natural, customary, traditional, rule of law by findings of law.

    The legislature’s original purpose was to choose whether the monarchy’s demand for the population to bear costs was acceptable to the regions,the warriors, the militia, and sometimes out of pragmatism) to the people.

    The ‘enlightenment’ took the power of commons choice out of the hands of the monarchy and put it into the republic (elected representatives, and the peerage (local governors)).

    The marxist and social democratic movement reversed our civilization by expanding the commons such that they violated our underlying natural law of reciprocity, in favor of the rest of humanity’s underclass demand for proportionality, and upon receiving proportionality, the political and underclass demand for equality of outcome.

    So, great question.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 12:19:00 UTC

  • The Limit of Commercial Self Interest

    (FB Timestamp) THE LIMIT OF COMMERCIAL SELF INTEREST RE: Facebook, Twitter, Google, Quora, Stack Overflow, Medium, and all the rest of the ‘censors’…. [T]he secret to the Success of the West in both the Ancient and Modern worlds, is the speaking of uncomfortable truths, no matter the cost, and regardless of impact on the competence, self image, status, and dominance hierarchies.

    • Honor instead of Face.
    • Duty instead of Security.
    • Reciprocity instead of Proportionality
    • Order instead of Equality.
    • Truth, Beauty, and Goodness instead of Harmony.
    • Heroism vs Obedience
    • Aristocracy of Everyone vs Peasantry of Everyone.

    It is this ‘disregard’ for ‘face’ that produced all of western civilization’s excellences: truth, jury, rule of law, reason, empiricism, science, technology, medicine, markets, and the fastest adaptation of culture, economy, law, and polity to circumstance that is possible for mankind. By appealing to a world commercial market, where “Truth No Matter The Consequences” is not only unknown but anti social, and in many cases unethical, immoral, and highly offensive, we have let into our great civilization the antithesis of what made it great: Paying the price of offense to produce all that flows from telling the truth – from opinion, to testimony, to scientific fact. These companies, out of commercial self interest, are spending down the accumulated normative, cultural, traditional, intellectual, and institutional capital that we carefully accumulated over 3500 years of European evolution and development. The most intolerant wins. One can be tolerant of Truth and Opinion and create western civilization. Or one can be intolerant of Truth, and Opinion and reverse western civilization. What we are seeing is yet another invasion of intolerance, (first judaism and christianity), and now Judaism (Separatist Sophism), Postmodernism (Secular Christian Sophism), and Islam(Supernatural Conquest Sophism). Every single act of suppression of dissent against those who take offense is a THEFT of the capital of western civilization. In economic terms this is called: The Privatization of Public Capital – what we call ‘The Commons”. As I undrestand the situation, all of these companies are guilty of not only of (a) sedition, (b) conspiracy (c) massive privatization of the commons for commercial self interest, (d) use of proceeds and platform to coerce the state via the public to continue this privatization of the commons. This is theft. Period. Plan and simple. And sedition as well.

  • The Limit of Commercial Self Interest

    (FB Timestamp) THE LIMIT OF COMMERCIAL SELF INTEREST RE: Facebook, Twitter, Google, Quora, Stack Overflow, Medium, and all the rest of the ‘censors’…. [T]he secret to the Success of the West in both the Ancient and Modern worlds, is the speaking of uncomfortable truths, no matter the cost, and regardless of impact on the competence, self image, status, and dominance hierarchies.

    • Honor instead of Face.
    • Duty instead of Security.
    • Reciprocity instead of Proportionality
    • Order instead of Equality.
    • Truth, Beauty, and Goodness instead of Harmony.
    • Heroism vs Obedience
    • Aristocracy of Everyone vs Peasantry of Everyone.

    It is this ‘disregard’ for ‘face’ that produced all of western civilization’s excellences: truth, jury, rule of law, reason, empiricism, science, technology, medicine, markets, and the fastest adaptation of culture, economy, law, and polity to circumstance that is possible for mankind. By appealing to a world commercial market, where “Truth No Matter The Consequences” is not only unknown but anti social, and in many cases unethical, immoral, and highly offensive, we have let into our great civilization the antithesis of what made it great: Paying the price of offense to produce all that flows from telling the truth – from opinion, to testimony, to scientific fact. These companies, out of commercial self interest, are spending down the accumulated normative, cultural, traditional, intellectual, and institutional capital that we carefully accumulated over 3500 years of European evolution and development. The most intolerant wins. One can be tolerant of Truth and Opinion and create western civilization. Or one can be intolerant of Truth, and Opinion and reverse western civilization. What we are seeing is yet another invasion of intolerance, (first judaism and christianity), and now Judaism (Separatist Sophism), Postmodernism (Secular Christian Sophism), and Islam(Supernatural Conquest Sophism). Every single act of suppression of dissent against those who take offense is a THEFT of the capital of western civilization. In economic terms this is called: The Privatization of Public Capital – what we call ‘The Commons”. As I undrestand the situation, all of these companies are guilty of not only of (a) sedition, (b) conspiracy (c) massive privatization of the commons for commercial self interest, (d) use of proceeds and platform to coerce the state via the public to continue this privatization of the commons. This is theft. Period. Plan and simple. And sedition as well.

  • THE LIMIT OF COMMERCIAL SELF INTEREST RE: Facebook, Twitter, Google, Quora, Stac

    THE LIMIT OF COMMERCIAL SELF INTEREST

    RE: Facebook, Twitter, Google, Quora, Stack Overflow, Medium, and all the rest of the ‘censors’….

    The secret to the Success of the West in both the Ancient and Modern worlds, is the speaking of uncomfortable truths, no matter the cost, and regardless of impact on the competence, self image, status, and dominance hierarchies.

    – Honor instead of Face.

    – Duty instead of Security.

    – Reciprocity instead of Proportionality

    – Order instead of Equality.

    – Truth, Beauty, and Goodness instead of Harmony.

    – Heroism vs Obedience

    – Aristocracy of Everyone vs Peasantry of Everyone.

    It is this ‘disregard’ for ‘face’ that produced all of western civilization’s excellences: truth, jury, rule of law, reason, empiricism, science, technology, medicine, markets, and the fastest adaptation of culture, economy, law, and polity to circumstance that is possible for mankind.

    By appealing to a world commercial market, where “Truth No Matter The Consequences” is not only unknown but anti social, and in many cases unethical, immoral, and highly offensive, we have let into our great civilization the antithesis of what made it great:

    Paying the price of offense to produce all that flows from telling the truth – from opinion, to testimony, to scientific fact.

    These companies, out of commercial self interest, are spending down the accumulated normative, cultural, traditional, intellectual, and institutional capital that we carefully accumulated over 3500 years of European evolution and development.

    The most intolerant wins. One can be tolerant of Truth and Opinion and create western civilization. Or one can be intolerant of Truth, and Opinion and reverse western civilization.

    What we are seeing is yet another invasion of intolerance, (first judaism and christianity), and now Judaism (Separatist Sophism), Postmodernism (Secular Christian Sophism), and Islam(Supernatural Conquest Sophism).

    Every single act of suppression of dissent against those who take offense is a THEFT of the capital of western civilization. In economic terms this is called: The Privatization of Public Capital – what we call ‘The Commons”.

    As I undrestand the situation, all of these companies are guilty of not only of (a) sedition, (b) conspiracy (c) massive privatization of the commons for commercial self interest, (d) use of proceeds and platform to coerce the state via the public to continue this privatization of the commons.

    This is theft. Period. Plan and simple. And sedition as well.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 18:11:00 UTC