NO, hence special dispensation for Amish. Ergo, christianity, special dispensation. However, they live in separatist communities. And christians do not and possibly cannot. Ergo different special dispensation for christians. In other words, specific const. rights to christians.
@ArielFelidae @curtdoolittle @Jake38109894 Could the Amish maintain their settlements and positive population growth using a secularized version of their beliefs?
https://propertarianism.com/the-oath-of-transcendent-man/”NO”. THE 22 RULES OF WESTERN RELIGIOUS HIERARCHY
(important concept) (core)
—“One doesn’t have to look hard in history to see how Christianity can serve all of the above groups at the same time in the same community. “—Andrew Gribble
No, because christianity requires you believe and testify to belief in magic man nonsense and while some people can do this in exchange for community comforts, the rest of us understand it is just fairy stories for the weak, for women, and children, to help them sleep at night despite their universal powerlessness.
We can however understand the 5 rules of christianity, the 6 rules of heathenism, and the 8 rules of aryanism (our group’s strategy) as simply scientific, and we can thank our universe, our ancestors, and each other for creating and giving us all three, and train our children to likewise give thanks (carry the debt) of all three.
Religions create debts that transfer between generations, and in doing so train one another to carry the same debts (behaviors). In exchange we obtain neural economy (reduction of problems in calculation), and trust economy, and political economy, by reducing internal conflicts to those counter to the debt structure and related payments (behaviors).
This is the economics of religion.
The problem is that stupid ignorant people need fairy stories and adults who have education and training simply need the truth: Heathenism of the universe, Aryanism of our people, Christianity of our social interactions. and Warriors as insurance of all of the above.
—
The Heathen 6 rules
The Aryan 8 rules
The Christian 5 rules
The Warrior 3 rules
These are the 22 rules of western poly philosophical religion that I have been able to discover.
I can refine them a bit. I can add the law. But this is what makes the west the west: 22 rules.
—“Dear Curt, I have decided not to reduce your 9 year old $165 ticket for speeding because you have not responded during the period. Judge so and so.”—
Well, of course I didn’t respond. I didn’t live in the USA or get any mail, or anything else for nine years. ok? ok. Besides where the h— is [xyz] county?????
( I offered $100. Can’t blame a guy for tryin’. lolz )
You forget things when you have a fast car, pretty girl, sunshine, an open road, a long weekend to enjoy.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52146446_10156984161447264_5294366130914197504_o_10156984161442264.jpg THOSE WHO GOVERN
The Theologitariat claim you are should be governed by a moral religion.
The Politariat claim you should be governed by their judgement.
The Commentariat market that you should be governed by philosophy.
The Economitariat that you should be governed by consumption.
In practice you are governed by the Law, and all else is an attempt to subvert it.
In absolutes you are governed by men who fight and their tolerance of the current condition.
We are the men who Choose.
So Choose.Brandon Hayes*forbearance ;)Feb 13, 2019, 11:37 AMCurt DoolittleI need something of this nature on forbearance.
Do you have anything?Feb 13, 2019, 11:37 AMCurt DoolittleI need a definition and an example, and esp, an example in series if possible.Feb 13, 2019, 11:40 AMBrandon HayesLuke Weinhagen is the forbearance guru.
I make the distinction between tolerance and forbearance where ever I see it because I see it as a crucial point.
I don’t tolerate bad behavior; I forbear for some of it in my presence. Not because I have to but because I appreciate nuance and timing in my tactics.
“In absolutes you are governed by men who fight and their tolerance of the current condition.” < We don’t have to tolerate; Propertarianism gives license to persecute those cheating. For now we allow it as to create a more ideal transition [but it is not a must].Feb 13, 2019, 11:40 AMCurt DoolittleLuke Weinhagen ????? please?Feb 13, 2019, 11:41 AMCurt Doolittleah, so, convenience (cheating) > tolerance(discounting) > conviction(forbearance)Feb 13, 2019, 11:43 AMBrandon HayesI have some tags for you; one moment. :)Feb 13, 2019, 11:44 AMJWarren PrescottIn my heart, I just want to be left alone.Feb 13, 2019, 11:46 AMCurt Doolittlewe are never left alone. We must compete. Nature gave us luxuries. but none of us survive defeat by the red queen.Feb 13, 2019, 11:47 AMJWarren PrescottCurt Doolittle – and therein lies the dilemma… One of wanting to not be ruled by anyone and the other by wanting to be part of somethingFeb 13, 2019, 11:51 AMBill JohnsonFrom the Hymnal. Let’s all turn to page 27.Feb 13, 2019, 12:01 PMLuke WeinhagenCatching up…Feb 13, 2019, 1:03 PMLuke Weinhagentolerance – the capacity to endure continued subjection to something (my adds: externalizes costs, ignores limits, passive state, imposed externally, waives agency)
forbearance – patient self-control; restraint; the action of refraining from exercising a legal right, a response or enforcing the payment of a debt/cost. (my adds: carries costs, imposes limits, active state, self imposed, applies agency)
Above –
“tolerance of the current condition” is a great example of the ambiguity tolerance allows. Who is responsible for the current condition? Who imposed a cost and who is carrying that cost?
Alternative –
“In absolutes you are governed by men who fight and their forbearance of your shortcomings.”
Explicit in who is costing and who is covering costs.Feb 13, 2019, 1:31 PMLuke WeinhagenThe alternative also reminds the men who fight of their responsibility for what is and to reiterate their responsibility in asserting limits upon that forbearance.Feb 13, 2019, 1:44 PMTHOSE WHO GOVERN
The Theologitariat claim you are should be governed by a moral religion.
The Politariat claim you should be governed by their judgement.
The Commentariat market that you should be governed by philosophy.
The Economitariat that you should be governed by consumption.
In practice you are governed by the Law, and all else is an attempt to subvert it.
In absolutes you are governed by men who fight and their tolerance of the current condition.
