Curt Doolittle

Theme: Institution

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542289896 Timestamp) MOVING PROPERTARIAN INSTITUTE TO THE STATES The international organization is quite difficult so yesterday we began the process of moving the institute to the USA as a 5013c Non Profit Educational Institution. There are a host of reasons for doing this. They include making ourselves intentionally vulnerable in order to encourage attempts and gain the consequential publicity.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542555094 Timestamp) I SEE ARISTOCRACY (FAMILY) NOT PATRIARCHY (MALE) Where you see patriarchy(male) I see aristocracy (family), with female and offspring via-positiva generating demand (Problems) and testing limits, and male and peers via-negativa fulfilling demand (Solutions) and limits.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542555094 Timestamp) I SEE ARISTOCRACY (FAMILY) NOT PATRIARCHY (MALE) Where you see patriarchy(male) I see aristocracy (family), with female and offspring via-positiva generating demand (Problems) and testing limits, and male and peers via-negativa fulfilling demand (Solutions) and limits.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542640445 Timestamp) JOHN MARK’S JOURNEY TO LEADERSHIP By John Mark —“John Mark, You’ve made extraordinary progress coming seemingly out of nowhere and rapidly into thought leadership. For the sake of others, can you explain your journey, how long it took, and what advantages you had, and disadvantages you had to overcome? “—Curt Doolittle Thank you Curt. I’d be happy to share. First, I don’t know how to express how grateful I am to have come across you and this community of outstanding quality men (and some great women too). I started as a very motivated Christian. Grandparents and parents missionaries. High empathy gene. I just wanted to help people. Out of this grew a desire to understand truth. Somehow I realized this was the best way to help people in the long run. Started questioning certain commonly taught Christian doctrines (tithing), realized I’d been lied to. Then questioned hell (loving God + hell = does not compute). Spent a couple years researching it in the Bible. Wrote 500-pg book about it, got a niche audience online but couldn’t monetize it enough to be worth it. Also got very frustrated with church people. They punish questioning. I didn’t understand IQ, didn’t know that most of the people I was trying to talk to are practically a different species. Always had right wing economic instinct but almost no political knowledge. Started studying money, figured out banking scam. Got into conspiracy stuff. Then discovered “game”, redpilled on women. Then started trying to figure out the Left, because I truly could not understand them. I thought they could not possibly be sincere. (Now I know they are. At least the grassroots is. I did not fully realize this til I found Curt. Even many of the leaders – e.g. Obama probably is a true believer.) Abandoned the church. Realized the Bible does not inform about too many essential facts or equip how to solve political problems. Ended up stuck in a place where I couldn’t figure out how to stop the cycle of corruption/left advance. Somehow came across Curt, maybe 1.5 years ago (maybe 2?). Found the answer (Propertarianism) and took my understanding to a level I would not have thought possible. Have been feeding on Curt’s feed daily since I found him. I have also learned a lot from many others that contribute in his orbit. Everything I learned previously dovetailed in. From beginning to end, 10 years. Spending most of my “free time” studying/learning. I also learn by trying to teach, even if to myself. Writing, speaking, I teach out loud in the shower and in my bedroom. I record messages/content and listen back. Exposes my gaps. If I can’t explain it to a 12-yr-old, I don’t understand it well enough. And if I can’t predict accurately, I don’t understand. And if I can’t teach/speak decently on a subject off the cuff, I haven’t absorbed it well enough. (I do structure my content, but often stream of consciousness takes over due to familiarity with concepts, mulling them over for years. Often I get insights in the middle of speaking or writing. I’m sure Curt and many others have experienced this.) I did not try to come out with any political content until I was reasonably confident I had something to offer and that I would be more help than hindrance. I’m terrified of being wrong and leading people astray. (KEEP ME HONEST AND ACCURATE EVERYBODY!) I started by experimenting with short comments on Curt posts. Feedback was good so I kept going. I’ve always felt I had potential as a “teacher/explainer”/public speaker politically, but you never know until you test. Feedback was good enough from Curt and his group that I decided to start YouTube channel. Disadvantages:

    • Religious background, religious “experiences” I can’t explain. (Hinders scientific thought, wasted a lot of time seeking something unreliable.) A lot of muscle memory to undo.
    • Parents were loving (great in most ways) but did not prepare me for the real world. Struggled mightily in my 20s financially and with women (bluepilled) despite being tall, decent-looking, and naturally alpha in some ways. (This was an advantage in the end because it drove me to learn – “What am I doing wrong?”)
    • Extremely high creativity (musician), low conscientiousness naturally. Had to learn conscientiousness.
    • I don’t care about anything but my immediate family and understanding the world to help my people. This is an advantage but it’s like pulling teeth to get myself to work on my career. Make 6 figs now for big company doing mental/comms work but took me a while. Good socially but I’m not motivated to network with normies.
    • Zero support – nothing but rejection – from everyone I knew in meat world throughout my entire growth process. (I’m sure many others share this experience.)
    • No detailed historical knowledge, never studied philosophy or economics. Never got heavily into Libertarianism or Classical Liberalism. My time for studying was limited by workday and family, so I was laser-focused on “explain how the world works and why, or you’re wasting my time”. Every time I’d dip my toe into philosophy or econ I got frustrated. These things require sorting through huge volume of fluff/distraction and extracting nuggets and synthesizing, I simply didn’t have the time.

    Advantages:

    • Curt has been my shortcut on philosophy/econ/synthesis of everything – forever grateful. Curt also helped me realize that talking/preaching to people is not enough to get them to act productively, because it cannot overcome powerful instincts operating in millions of people. There must be rule of law (force) applied. (I kind of bypassed the libertarianism/classical liberal trap because Curt gave me a shortcut on so many subjects.)
    • 135-140ish IQ, skewed verbal. I can tell Curt and some/many men in Curt’s orbit are smarter than I am, but my range may be ideal for speaking to normies.
    • Extremely high openness (Big 5), learning is a compulsion, not a chore
    • Sitting in thousands of church services I learned the power of public speaking. Learned by observing. Contrasting the intolerable speakers from the great ones. T.D. Jakes (black preacher) + actual facts would be near perfection. I’m still improving but that volume of observation experience was helpful. Speak in simple language, be easy to follow (structure, or must be riveting if stream of consciousness), be genuine (don’t try to fake a persona) and passionate, explain why what you’re saying is important, surprise people somehow if you can, have a fresh angle of some sort that people haven’t heard before (even if it’s a new way of saying something that’s been said before). Listen to recordings of yourself – brutal but necessary to remove flaws/bad habits. What you hear on YouTube is somewhat edited for faster speed/pace (less captive audience than real life). Still trying to get better.
    • Got some decent experience public speaking in church settings. Enough to test and learn. A lot to youth. If you can keep 16-yr-olds interested for half an hour, you’re doing ok.
    • Am extremely comfortable in front of people due to playing music on stage (churches, other venues) hundreds/thousands of times.

    One big advantage: An amazing traditional, highly conscientious wife (Eastern European) who follows me everywhere intellectually and physically, is immune to leftist thought due to close knowledge of the effects of communism, and is a great cook! Hope this is helpful. Would be happy to answer any more specific questions. It is an amazing privilege to be a part of this. It’s bigger than any one of us and we all play our part. I hope to play mine with excellence to the best of my ability. Also a huge thank you to all of you who have encouraged me and given me your feedback and thoughts with the YouTube channel. Hugs

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542678201 Timestamp) WHERE DID ECONOMICS GO WRONG? As far as I know, economics ‘went wrong’ when “the republican income statement no longer propagated to the monarchical balance sheet.” In other words, when we failed to account for ALL capital changes, including territorial, genetic, cultural, normative, knowledge, and institutional, and therefore treated economics as a means of pseudo-scientific cherry-picking of measurements, under the pretense that such capital was being mobilized rather than consumed (or simply lost or destroyed). The postwar era, by the pseudoscientific taboo against the darwinian revolution and the necessity of continuing 3500 years of environmental eugenics, and 1600 years of manorial eugenics, and 800 years of juridical eugenics, converted the discipline into the means by which to conduct war against civilization: the incremental domestication of animal man into equilibrium with his productive technologies, and his means of calculating a survivable future with them: sovereignty, reciprocity, law (tort), markets in everything, property, money, prices. Economics is either a measure of cooperation, and therefore, reciprocity, and therefore political economy, and as such Law (tort – dispute resolution), Legislation (commons production and defense), and regulation (prior restraint by the insurer of last resort), and attendant standards of measurement, or it is merely an innumerate pseudoscience to justify the consumption of accumulated capital in pursuit of slow reversal of eugenic evolution, regression to the ancient mean, and the source of the justification for the consequente devolution of civilization and man. Efficiency is a rather ridiculous pursuit unbound by justification for less visible capital destruction , just as is legislation is a pursuit unbound by rules of contract. The Market Failure hypothesis is rather ridiculous since if the market produces proceeds sufficient to subsidize goods services and information, and distorting that market harmful to it. And a hundred other nonsense-schemes we use to obscure the reversal of eugenic evolution, or the returns on conquest and sale of continents, or the conversion of intergenerational lending to temporal redistribution and the price of that risk, or the transition from physical money to digital record of credit and debt, and the end of necessity or value of distribution of liquidity through the financial system, and the inability to reconstruct that capital without such chaos we dare not speak of it. Science is not kind. We have yet to have the necessary revolution in economics by its reunification with the law. As far as I know there is only one social science – the law (tort), legislation (contracts for the commons) and regulation (insurance) and the rest is measurement of its consequence. This was the difference between the austrian (rule of law), chicago (rule of law insured) and saltwater (return to arbitrary rule of man) schools of economics. Today, post 2008, it is very difficult to see much more than “I dunno what to do know” from the profession, except to permute as do the physicists on dark matter, because we lack the instrumentation necessary to obtain the information sufficient to correct our theories, and therefore limited to failure (collapse) and therefore desperate incentive to correct these errors, rather than falsify the 20th century social pseudosciences in economics as we are doing in psychology and sociology, with cognitive sciences and genetics. The Worm Turns, and as Hayek warned but could not himself answer: the 20th will be remembered as an era of the restoration of mysticism – which we more correctly state as platonism, idealism, sophism, innumeracy, and pseudoscience. Cheers

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543005217 Timestamp) Understanding Charlemagne: The christians were useful to conquerors the same way jesuits were to western expansion, and jews today are useful to statists both foreign and domestic, and greeks were to romans: literary specialists, bureaucrats, propagandists, and spies, hiding under cover of non-violence. In other words, using the female means of conspiracy as a group strategy. Charlemagne was able to conquer effectively by the use of siege technology and technique, cavalry making it possible to cover large distances ( high transport cost), and most importantly, a willing conspiratorial HOSTILE bureaucracy. Now, what I want people to learn is the importance of conquest by a HOSTILE BUREAUCRACY SPREADING A CULT. In the western case we are occupied by that same cult under an anti-darwinian, innumerate, illiterate, ahistorical, religion: marxism, postmodernism, feminism, WHY: We put too many men to work in the work force and not enough of them in the militia and military. THEY WIN BY CONSPIRATORS HIDING BEHIND WORDS. We win by conspirators acting at war.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543184222 Timestamp) RELIGIOUS (INTUITION) TRAINING Time, Institution, Ritual, and Tradition, depersonalize training (education) of the intuitions, such that the resistance we have to being taught by those who we may not know, not understand, disdain, dislike, fear, is circumvented. As such the teachers can be demanding, use false promise, intimidation, and fear to teach to those who are not kin. Repeating oaths does its work. Repeating parables does its work. Creating perception of debts does its work. Creating ostracization and inclusion with those oaths, parables, in continuous payment of those debts does its work. The question is this: What OATHS are True, and Good? What PARABLES teach the True and the Good? What DEBTS produce the True, and Good? What PROMISES of Inclusion, and THREATS of Ostracization produce the True and the Good? What FEASTS and FESTIVALS teach reward for all that do so? We can disassemble our religion into Oaths, Parables, Debts, Promises and Threats, Feast and Festivals, and in doing so construct a legal system – because that is what it consists of: a law of intuition – and then replace the false and bad with the true and good. We can replace submission with pacifism with domestication, submission with non-submission, lack of agency with agency, oath a lie, with oath to our people, transcendence into a lie, with transcendence into the gods we imagine, eternal life in a lie with eternal persistence and recurrence among our people, and Marxism, Postmodernism, Feminism, and the Hatred of White Men with Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Natural Law, Voluntary Markets, and Transcendence, with The Love of Our People both male and female. No More Lies. We Europeanized Christianity from a resistance movement to an excuse for aryanism. And by the twentieth century were shaking off the remains and restoring our aryanism. Underneath christian falsehood is merely this: EXCELLENCE (Virtue): I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; SOVEREIGNTY; I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; TRUTH: I swear to speak no insult and demand it; I speak the truth and demand it; I take nothing not paid for and demand it; Cause no harm without restitution for it; DUTY: I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; COURAGE: I shall not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and I shall seek to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people. LOVE: The eradication of hatred from the human heart;The extension of kinship love to non-kin. The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war; and the commitment to personal acts of charity for those who are in need. NATURE: I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and; I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and; I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and SUPREMACY OF MAN: I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. NO MORE LIES. WESTERN MAN: SOVEREIGNTY: THE CULT OF NON-SUBMISSION: THE RELIGION OF WHOSE WHO SHALL BE GODS.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543163260 Timestamp) We Had No Religion only Law, Oath, Festival and Myth (Repost) —“It is perhaps misleading even to say that there was such a religion as paganism at the beginning of [the Common Era] … It might be less confusing to say that the pagans, before their competition with Christianity, had no religion at all in the sense in which that word is normally used today. They had no tradition of discourse about ritual or religious matters (apart from philosophical debate or antiquarian treatise), no organized system of beliefs to which they were asked to commit themselves, no authority-structure peculiar to the religious area, above all no commitment to a particular group of people or set of ideas other than their family and political context. If this is the right view of pagan life, it follows that we should look on paganism quite simply as a religion invented in the course of the second to third centuries AD, in competition and interaction with Christians, Jews and others. — North 1992, 187—88, [34]

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543184222 Timestamp) RELIGIOUS (INTUITION) TRAINING Time, Institution, Ritual, and Tradition, depersonalize training (education) of the intuitions, such that the resistance we have to being taught by those who we may not know, not understand, disdain, dislike, fear, is circumvented. As such the teachers can be demanding, use false promise, intimidation, and fear to teach to those who are not kin. Repeating oaths does its work. Repeating parables does its work. Creating perception of debts does its work. Creating ostracization and inclusion with those oaths, parables, in continuous payment of those debts does its work. The question is this: What OATHS are True, and Good? What PARABLES teach the True and the Good? What DEBTS produce the True, and Good? What PROMISES of Inclusion, and THREATS of Ostracization produce the True and the Good? What FEASTS and FESTIVALS teach reward for all that do so? We can disassemble our religion into Oaths, Parables, Debts, Promises and Threats, Feast and Festivals, and in doing so construct a legal system – because that is what it consists of: a law of intuition – and then replace the false and bad with the true and good. We can replace submission with pacifism with domestication, submission with non-submission, lack of agency with agency, oath a lie, with oath to our people, transcendence into a lie, with transcendence into the gods we imagine, eternal life in a lie with eternal persistence and recurrence among our people, and Marxism, Postmodernism, Feminism, and the Hatred of White Men with Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Natural Law, Voluntary Markets, and Transcendence, with The Love of Our People both male and female. No More Lies. We Europeanized Christianity from a resistance movement to an excuse for aryanism. And by the twentieth century were shaking off the remains and restoring our aryanism. Underneath christian falsehood is merely this: EXCELLENCE (Virtue): I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; SOVEREIGNTY; I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; TRUTH: I swear to speak no insult and demand it; I speak the truth and demand it; I take nothing not paid for and demand it; Cause no harm without restitution for it; DUTY: I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; COURAGE: I shall not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and I shall seek to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people. LOVE: The eradication of hatred from the human heart;The extension of kinship love to non-kin. The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war; and the commitment to personal acts of charity for those who are in need. NATURE: I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and; I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and; I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and SUPREMACY OF MAN: I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. NO MORE LIES. WESTERN MAN: SOVEREIGNTY: THE CULT OF NON-SUBMISSION: THE RELIGION OF WHOSE WHO SHALL BE GODS.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543163260 Timestamp) We Had No Religion only Law, Oath, Festival and Myth (Repost) —“It is perhaps misleading even to say that there was such a religion as paganism at the beginning of [the Common Era] … It might be less confusing to say that the pagans, before their competition with Christianity, had no religion at all in the sense in which that word is normally used today. They had no tradition of discourse about ritual or religious matters (apart from philosophical debate or antiquarian treatise), no organized system of beliefs to which they were asked to commit themselves, no authority-structure peculiar to the religious area, above all no commitment to a particular group of people or set of ideas other than their family and political context. If this is the right view of pagan life, it follows that we should look on paganism quite simply as a religion invented in the course of the second to third centuries AD, in competition and interaction with Christians, Jews and others. — North 1992, 187—88, [34]