Theme: Institution

  • I’ve written about the French killing of the Templars to escape the crown’s debt

    I’ve written about the French killing of the Templars to escape the crown’s debt as the opening the door for the jews quite a bit over the years, but I haven’t written anything particularly detailed. Though in retrospect it’s rather obvious.
    I also describe the evolution of institutional record-keeping that allows increases in the granularity of control over populations. And credit is the precursor to what’s emerging as ‘social credit’ monitoring of the population on a scale that’s tyrannical at best.
    So this is why I’ve proposed vast reforms in the consumer credit system to cut the financial sector out of it – because under fiat currency it’s just parasitism and manipulation, and worst of all, baiting into hazard.

    Reply addressees: @artus9010


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-28 17:08:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784630854578311168

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784629712397963504

  • EUROPEAN INSTITUTIONAL HISTORY The aristocracy bought the church, and then once

    EUROPEAN INSTITUTIONAL HISTORY
    The aristocracy bought the church, and then once the church and aristocracy kill the templars the jews bought the aristocracy, and the aristocracy’s law and science killed the church.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-28 15:35:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784607320997019839

  • Q: CURT: “WHY CAN’T WE CENTRALIZE PRODUCTION?” There are some things the state c

    Q: CURT: “WHY CAN’T WE CENTRALIZE PRODUCTION?”

    There are some things the state can direct, which is largely defense, transportation and communication infrastructure, primary research and development in any competitive or comparative advantage, strategic trade policy, strategic industry, treasury, and law (courts). Of those, only ‘strategic industry’ is open to variations because the constitution of strategic industry varies constantly in time and over time.

    What is government good at:
    Capital formation and the organization of production and maintenance of those goods, services, and information that the private sector cannot achieve because of risk, time frame, and capacity to profit from it, while maintaining the production of a public good.

    Why is government bad at almost everything
    1. You’re apparently unaware of the “knowledge problem”: how government control creates poverty, corruption, and decline:
    (The knowledge problem, as articulated by economists, highlights the inherent limitations of governmental entities in acquiring the vast, dispersed information and the incentives necessary to produce goods, services, and information that the market can otherwise generate. This combination of ignorance and incentives leads to corruption within government as officials exploit their authority for personal gain in the absence of market disciplines and accountability.
    At the same time their failure and corruption degrade public trust and incentivize individuals to circumvent official channels, leading to the formation of black markets. These underground economies emerge not just as a symptom of regulatory and economic failure, but also as a pragmatic response by citizens seeking goods and services that are otherwise unattainable or exorbitantly priced due to government intervention. Thus, the knowledge problem underscores a fundamental challenge: without the nuanced understanding and incentives provided by market mechanisms, governmental interventions often result in widespread inefficiencies and societal corruption.)
    So 1. Failure of the pricing system to provide necessary complexity reduced to useful information 2. Necessary incompetence that results. 3. Lying and Corruption that results as a consequence. 4. The collapse of public trust, collapse of public incentives, public expansion of free riding, and the formation of black markets. 5. The resulting poverty as all these overhead costs more than exceed the costs and uncertainty of markets wherever markets CAN supply good services and information.

    What is the optimum role of government in the economy?
    1. Non Market Long Term Capital Production: Military, Infrastructure, Treasury, Insurance of Last Resort, – Possibly including medical infrastructure (buildings and equipment)
    2. Basic Research: not academic research but basic scientific and technological research that provides a competitive advantage.
    3. Venture Capitalist: Venture capitalist in strategic industry, formation of new industry, resulting public participation in profits of the industries governments have used public funds to invest in.
    If this means starting the production within the government, and when viable, turning it over to private sector management, or whether it means investing in private sector industries to maintain or expand comparative advantage, the utility of the government as an investor ‘and capitalist’ seeking returns for the public in lieu of taxes, is irrelevant. The government can accumulate capital in ventures that are necessary for the public good, useful for the public good, and that may take a long time to produce returns, while the private sector is better at making use of capital and producing returns on capital once a market exists.
    4. Subsidy of Primary Production: This is where our food supply requires vast regulation and reconstruction. And it is the only primary production that appears to be necessary,
    5. Insurer of Last Resort
    – Resolution of Conflicts (courts)
    – Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction
    – Defense
    And I’m reluctant to add these because they’re going to need vast reforms:
    – Catastrophic medical care
    – Catastrophic elder care
    – Catastrophic unemployment
    – Catastrophic genetic burden and resulting incompetence at survival.

    Everything else is better done by the private sector.

    Cheers.

    Reply addressees: @Gyeff0


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-27 20:09:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784313853313941504

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784287713564238087

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @OKFootball2 @bryanbrey @hendry_hugh Q: CURT: WILL THE PUBLIC

    RT @curtdoolittle: @OKFootball2 @bryanbrey @hendry_hugh Q: CURT: WILL THE PUBLIC STOCK MARKET STILL EXIST IN THE COMING DECADES?
    Yes for re…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-26 23:42:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784005102946095340

  • Q: CURT: WILL THE PUBLIC STOCK MARKET STILL EXIST IN THE COMING DECADES? Yes for

    Q: CURT: WILL THE PUBLIC STOCK MARKET STILL EXIST IN THE COMING DECADES?
    Yes for reasons too many to list. However it will change as it has continued to change throughout our history:
    1) We are exiting the period of boomer capital oversupply and entering a post-boomer period of capital undersupply.
    2) At the same time we are losing comparative advantage in IQ, Technology, Institutions, Economic Scale, Geostrategic influence, and political legitimacy.
    3) There is every reason to believe capital will continue to concentrate in a few sectors and the majority of sectors will continue to lag – in fact, I don’t know why the measurements don’t separate those markets already (for the purpose of the news).
    4) There is every reason to believe capital flight to the USA will continue and accelerate.
    5) There is every reason to believe however that technology will further reduce the population of speculators to those who can afford the compute.
    6) There is every reason to believe that – and get ready for this – the treasury will take over vast portions of the consumer credit, insurance, and investment markets even more so than does singapore, and put that investment into longer time frames and greater yields. The consequence is that institutional dollars derived from consumers will shrink in favor of foreign dollars. The scale of this is likely to be profound. This means that the market will be deprived easy capital, and vast portions of the banking, insurance, and consumer investment sector will be wiped out almost entirely. I cold write more on this but I am one of the authors of all of these policy changes and If I’m thinking of it then so are others.
    6) So basically imagine that capital is scarce, it comes with more strings attached, and from a broader capital base, and that there is MUCH more volatility and much lower growth. And the growth that’s available will be in markets that are riskier than today.

    I don’t really think this is pessimistic. If I were to take a pessimistic stance it would be that there is a non zero chance of a world war, a long running USA ‘troubles’ (civil war) or a catastrophic civil war, and it’s possible both the world war and the civil war occur at the same time, or that the civil war will encourage the world war.

    My job is to look at these fields of possibility. At. present I do not see possibility of continued growth by consumption. So I’ve worked on ‘what to do next’ under that assumption. And it means the equivalent of a restructuring and downsizing for a major industry, until prices and debts equilibrate back to levels possible to alter marriage, reproduction, and consumption rates. And to do so without further lowering national IQ through immigration. We are approaching 97 at present and if it dips below that we are probably headed toward a second world economy. Even today we are suffering from white population decline, such that Asian and Indian populations are supplying workers, and we are still importing talent from europe because europe is unsuited for entrepreneurial growth.

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @OKFootball2 @bryanbrey @hendry_hugh


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-26 23:41:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784005031210913793

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1783995822721368199

  • MORE VALID EINSTEIN CRITICISM –“Einstein remade a scientific world which was ri

    MORE VALID EINSTEIN CRITICISM
    –“Einstein remade a scientific world which was rich in aether + electron theorists into a taboo-filled scientific establishment that bet everything it had on the weakest force being the universe’s dominant force – an idea which by the 2020’s has firmly dead-ended w dark matter.”– @controscience

    Very well said.

    You could say Einstein transformed the study of materialist world of the aether(quantum background)and electron (mass, work), into the study of the anti-materials world of space-time and light (massless, work-less), just as other jewish intellectuals transformed European thought from classical mechanical and material to ‘magical’ verbal and imaginary.

    Combine this with Cantor-to-Bohr’s Ashkenazi ‘mathiness’ that did the same thing: transforming the material and operational to the imaginary and linguistic.

    Though the Einstein industry does not attribute this metaphysical regression into verbal mysticism to the entire suite of Ashkenazi theorists and so the public is unaware of the rebellion against ‘jewish physics, jewish economics, jewish politics, and jewish law’ that occurred at the same time.

    Thanks for your thoughts. 😉

    -CD

    Reply addressees: @controscience @haymanwazzup


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-23 14:44:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782782567621476352

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782780321458790550

  • Well, then we should get the three of us together and systematize it a bit so th

    Well, then we should get the three of us together and systematize it a bit so that we can give it a name and explain it on the triangle, because I suspect that’s a worthy objective.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-22 22:34:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782538483929653310

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782537705986941263

  • RT @StevePender: @AutistocratMS @curtdoolittle Markets in everything, even inves

    RT @StevePender: @AutistocratMS @curtdoolittle Markets in everything, even investigative reporting. As long as the law is fair, everyone co…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-22 22:30:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782537411261534620

  • I’m not so sure about intel, because I know how to reform it and it’s not diffic

    I’m not so sure about intel, because I know how to reform it and it’s not difficult. Justice needs a total refresh and I’m pretty sure state does to.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-22 22:16:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782533905242861778

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782533062632370234

  • RT @NoahRevoy: @Rupesh_Fagna @curtdoolittle You see, in my culture we have a dif

    RT @NoahRevoy: @Rupesh_Fagna @curtdoolittle You see, in my culture we have a different understanding of family obligations.

    For us, each g…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-22 13:55:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782407982619210145